Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

'𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙚𝙧 𝙁𝘼 𝙗𝙤𝙨𝙨 𝙆𝙚𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙎𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙨 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙋𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙢 𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙥𝙚𝙙 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙜𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙢𝙚𝙣'𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙤𝙩𝙗𝙖𝙡𝙡' 🗞️'A former Football Association (FA) boss has revealed the important role Prince William and Catherine played in a crucial moment for women's football' 'Speaking on women's football podcast That's So Offside earlier this month, Kelly Simmons... OBE recalled the astonishing moment the Prince of Wales helped change the nature of the game forever' 'Kelly, who began at the FA in 1991 before becoming Director Of The Women's Professional Game, had been hoping to secure some investment into the Women's Super League (WSL) from the 'all-male' board to move the game from semi-professional to professional' 'At the time, she explained, the FA was a 'very different organisation' and they 'couldn't really get anybody to believe in' the WSL' 'Speaking to hosts Cece Kane and Abby Dolbear, she said: "In that room, of those people, nobody believed that anybody would want to watch it and it couldn't possibly be commercially viable. And so we went in for money and I'd already been told that they were going to say no, even though it was a good business case." 'But just before she was about to leave, Prince William had something to say. He said: "Can I just say - I think this is absolutely fantastic. Catherine and I are massively supportive of the women's game and we think this is absolutely brilliant." 'Stunned, the chairman then decided to ask the room what they thought and, agreeing with the future King, everyone said it was "fantastic" 'Unable to believe her eyes, Kelly recalled: "And out we walked with the money! Which enabled the WSL to really go to that next stage. We would never have got it without Prince William. I'm convinced it wouldn't have happened otherwise"' 𝘞𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘶𝘭 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘺 𓆩Mrs.W𓆪 ☺️🫂show more

mrc 🦇

7,643 subscribers

26,776 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование Спорт

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

On 16 Nov 2010, the engagement of Prince William to Catherine Middleton was announced 💞 In the interview, Catherine said that she loved that William was very supportive of her “in good times and also through the bad times” and that was very special. And he has been there for her, every step of the way!

On 16 Nov 2010, the engagement of Prince William to Catherine Middleton was announced 💞 In the interview, Catherine said that she loved that William was very supportive of her “in good times and also through the bad times” and that was very special. And he has been there for her, every step of the way!

Helen Rosa

75,162 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Arteta: “We came here to win the game. I think the message was clear from three days before. We prepared to do that, to take the game to the areas that we believed we could win it. We certainly did that, even though we started the game with a goal down and psychologically we had to play with that. We've done it. “So we proved that we are there, but the reality is in the two boxes today was a difference and that's what decided the game. The styles have been different for the profile of players that we have available as well in certain areas, but the difference was 100 per cent, yes.”

Connor Humm

188,860 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

‘Rothschild’ is trending on X. It’s time to end the Federal Reserve SHOCKING history you were never told: Benjamin Franklin on the REAL cause of the War of Independence. It was the Rothschild banking takeover of their money in England “What was the real reason for the Revolutionary War? Very interesting. Not what you were taught in school. Real reason for the Revolutionary War. Here's a few quotes from William Manley German in a speech to the House of Commons December 1913. The Rothschild's Bank caused a bill to be introduced in the English Parliament, which provided that no colony of England could issue its own money. Thus, they had to use English money. The colonies were compelled to discard their money and mortgage themselves to the Rothschild's Bank of England to get money. Then, for the first time in the history of the United States, money began to be based on debt. Benjamin Franklin stated that in one year from that date, the streets of the colonies were filled with the unemployed. Franklin later claimed this was the real cause of the War of Independence. He said the colonies, you know, we heard it was the Tea Act, right? You know, things like tea tax and stuff. The colonies would gladly have, this is according to Benjamin Franklin, the colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England and the Rothschilds Bank took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment, dissatisfaction, and debt. And that is the real cause, folks, of the war. Next thing that I want to talk about real quick is something called the definitive trading. We heard this nasty rumor that we won the Revolutionary War. Ain't true! We did not win it. The last battle that was fought, Cornwallis, surrendered the battle, not the war. Proof? About one year ago, this document, — It's called the definitive treaty of peace between Great Britain and the United States signed at Paris 3 September 1783. It had never been in this country before that. This is what really, really, really happened. You think there was a war? Nah, read this. Listen to this. And again I've got this stuff available for anybody who wants to look at it later. Here's an introduction. It having pleased the divine providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent prince. This is somebody that lost the battle as the most potent prince. I don't think so. George III, by the grace of God, listen to this, here's his titles. King of Great Britain. France. Who did we borrow the money from that helped us win the war, we thought? France? Now we owe that money to the King of England? Interesting. Ireland, defender of the faith, youth of Brunswick and Lunenburg, archtreasurer and prince-elector of the Holy Roman Empire, treasurer of the Catholic Church, positions all over, etc. And it goes on and on and on and on and on. What happens is we start looking then at who are the parties to the treaty. We find out the parties to the treaty is this guy named John Adams, comma, Esquire. Does anybody know where you go get an Esquire title? England. I don't think we gave them out. Benjamin Franklin, Esquire. John Jay, Esquire. These were all people who were titled nobility in England, who were negotiating this treaty. And do you know what the treaty really said? The treaty really said, it's agreed that everything that England and the people of England and the King and whoever else owned and any obligations that existed before this treaty are still law. The King still owns it. The King still owed all the money. Nothing changed except we could govern ourselves theoretically as long as we paid the rent” There is ouch more information in this video and everyone should be aware of our real history.

‘Rothschild’ is trending on X. It’s time to end the Federal Reserve SHOCKING history you were never told: Benjamin Franklin on the REAL cause of the War of Independence. It was the Rothschild banking takeover of their money in England “What was the real reason for the Revolutionary War? Very interesting. Not what you were taught in school. Real reason for the Revolutionary War. Here's a few quotes from William Manley German in a speech to the House of Commons December 1913. The Rothschild's Bank caused a bill to be introduced in the English Parliament, which provided that no colony of England could issue its own money. Thus, they had to use English money. The colonies were compelled to discard their money and mortgage themselves to the Rothschild's Bank of England to get money. Then, for the first time in the history of the United States, money began to be based on debt. Benjamin Franklin stated that in one year from that date, the streets of the colonies were filled with the unemployed. Franklin later claimed this was the real cause of the War of Independence. He said the colonies, you know, we heard it was the Tea Act, right? You know, things like tea tax and stuff. The colonies would gladly have, this is according to Benjamin Franklin, the colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England and the Rothschilds Bank took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment, dissatisfaction, and debt. And that is the real cause, folks, of the war. Next thing that I want to talk about real quick is something called the definitive trading. We heard this nasty rumor that we won the Revolutionary War. Ain't true! We did not win it. The last battle that was fought, Cornwallis, surrendered the battle, not the war. Proof? About one year ago, this document, — It's called the definitive treaty of peace between Great Britain and the United States signed at Paris 3 September 1783. It had never been in this country before that. This is what really, really, really happened. You think there was a war? Nah, read this. Listen to this. And again I've got this stuff available for anybody who wants to look at it later. Here's an introduction. It having pleased the divine providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent prince. This is somebody that lost the battle as the most potent prince. I don't think so. George III, by the grace of God, listen to this, here's his titles. King of Great Britain. France. Who did we borrow the money from that helped us win the war, we thought? France? Now we owe that money to the King of England? Interesting. Ireland, defender of the faith, youth of Brunswick and Lunenburg, archtreasurer and prince-elector of the Holy Roman Empire, treasurer of the Catholic Church, positions all over, etc. And it goes on and on and on and on and on. What happens is we start looking then at who are the parties to the treaty. We find out the parties to the treaty is this guy named John Adams, comma, Esquire. Does anybody know where you go get an Esquire title? England. I don't think we gave them out. Benjamin Franklin, Esquire. John Jay, Esquire. These were all people who were titled nobility in England, who were negotiating this treaty. And do you know what the treaty really said? The treaty really said, it's agreed that everything that England and the people of England and the King and whoever else owned and any obligations that existed before this treaty are still law. The King still owns it. The King still owed all the money. Nothing changed except we could govern ourselves theoretically as long as we paid the rent” There is ouch more information in this video and everyone should be aware of our real history.

Wall Street Apes

259,631 просмотров • 1 год назад

Jack Hughes on supporting the U.S. women’s hockey team... “I wish — if there's a camera on me and Quinn when the women's team won, we’d look like the biggest superfans of all time. We were just jumping up and down. We couldn't believe it. And we locked in, said goodbye because we had a game the next night. It was late. And we sprinted out of there. But I remember I saw Megan in the café — I think it was the night we beat Slovakia, a night after they won the gold medal and we were just waiting for food and we were talking. I was just like, Megan, I'm so proud of you. I'm so happy for you. You know, couldn't have happened to a better person. And, obviously, you know, in my mind and I’m just like so many things, thoughts, and, you know, one of my thoughts was her. I'm like so proud to join her as a gold medalist and be able to win the men's and the women's team, go over to Italy, and win the gold medal, so special for the U.S.”

Jack Hughes on supporting the U.S. women’s hockey team... “I wish — if there's a camera on me and Quinn when the women's team won, we’d look like the biggest superfans of all time. We were just jumping up and down. We couldn't believe it. And we locked in, said goodbye because we had a game the next night. It was late. And we sprinted out of there. But I remember I saw Megan in the café — I think it was the night we beat Slovakia, a night after they won the gold medal and we were just waiting for food and we were talking. I was just like, Megan, I'm so proud of you. I'm so happy for you. You know, couldn't have happened to a better person. And, obviously, you know, in my mind and I’m just like so many things, thoughts, and, you know, one of my thoughts was her. I'm like so proud to join her as a gold medalist and be able to win the men's and the women's team, go over to Italy, and win the gold medal, so special for the U.S.”

Curtis Houck

1,359,031 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Arteta on the moment he found out Arsenal won the Premier League: “You don't realise it probably. One of the best feelings I ever had. “I was supposed to here at Colney watching game the boys the staff because that's what they wanted, I couldn't. I think 20 minutes later, before the game, I had to leave I couldn't bring the energy that I wanted think it their as to watch it to be and see what outcome would be… “I went home. I went outside to the garden. I started to build some fire. And I started to do some barbecue. I didn't watch any of it. I was just hearing some noises in the background, in the living room. And suddenly, the magic happened… “My oldest son opened the garden door. He started to run towards me, he started to cry, he gave me a hug and said, we are champions, Daddy. “And then my other two boys and my wife came over and it was beautiful. Just to see that joy on them as well, that they are always with me, it was magical.” 🥹❤️

Arteta on the moment he found out Arsenal won the Premier League: “You don't realise it probably. One of the best feelings I ever had. “I was supposed to here at Colney watching game the boys the staff because that's what they wanted, I couldn't. I think 20 minutes later, before the game, I had to leave I couldn't bring the energy that I wanted think it their as to watch it to be and see what outcome would be… “I went home. I went outside to the garden. I started to build some fire. And I started to do some barbecue. I didn't watch any of it. I was just hearing some noises in the background, in the living room. And suddenly, the magic happened… “My oldest son opened the garden door. He started to run towards me, he started to cry, he gave me a hug and said, we are champions, Daddy. “And then my other two boys and my wife came over and it was beautiful. Just to see that joy on them as well, that they are always with me, it was magical.” 🥹❤️

Connor Humm

50,147 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Kelly Oubre Jr. feels that the Sixers' quick turnaround following their series win over the Celtics played a factor in their Game 1 loss to the Knicks: "I would say so, yeah. It was a quick turnaround. We had to travel, didn't have a full practice before the game. In my time, I remember in the playoffs, you always had at least a practice before the game. If we were able to get some rest, get some recovery, and then get a good practice in...we would've been a little bit more prepared. But we don't make the schedule. We just have to go out there and play."

Kelly Oubre Jr. feels that the Sixers' quick turnaround following their series win over the Celtics played a factor in their Game 1 loss to the Knicks: "I would say so, yeah. It was a quick turnaround. We had to travel, didn't have a full practice before the game. In my time, I remember in the playoffs, you always had at least a practice before the game. If we were able to get some rest, get some recovery, and then get a good practice in...we would've been a little bit more prepared. But we don't make the schedule. We just have to go out there and play."

SNY Knicks

71,928 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Origins of Purple Rain, Purple Rain' was originally written as a country song, and was intended to be a collaboration with Fleetwood Mac singer Stevie Nicks. According to Nicks, she received a 10-minute instrumental version of the song from Prince, with a request to write the lyrics, but she felt overwhelmed by the task. She later said: "I listened to it and I just got scared. I called him back and said, 'I can't do it. I wish I could. It's too much for me.'" Prince then asked his backing band to try the song: "I want to try something before we go home. It's mellow." According to Lisa Coleman, Prince changed the song dramatically after Wendy Melvoin started playing the guitar to accompany the song: "He was excited to hear it voiced differently. It took it out of that country feeling. "Then we all started playing it a bit harder and taking it more seriously. We played it for six hours straight and by the end of that day we had it mostly written and arranged." Prince's explanation on the meaning of 'Purple Rain': "When there's blood in the sky – red and blue = purple... purple rain pertains to the end of the world and being with the one you love and letting your faith/god guide you through the purple rain." After recording the song, Prince phoned Journey member Jonathan Cain, to ask him to listen to it. Prince was concerned that it might be too similar to Journey's 'Faithfully', a song composed by Cain which had recently been in the US charts. However, Cain reassured Prince by saying that the songs only shared the same four chords. "I thought it was an amazing tune," Cain said. "I told him, 'Man, I'm just super-flattered that you even called. It shows you're that classy of a guy. Good luck with the song. I know it's gonna be a hit.'" Ladies and gentlemen, Prince performing a special and an absolute classic song, Purple Rain, live at Paisley Park, in 1999.

Origins of Purple Rain, Purple Rain' was originally written as a country song, and was intended to be a collaboration with Fleetwood Mac singer Stevie Nicks. According to Nicks, she received a 10-minute instrumental version of the song from Prince, with a request to write the lyrics, but she felt overwhelmed by the task. She later said: "I listened to it and I just got scared. I called him back and said, 'I can't do it. I wish I could. It's too much for me.'" Prince then asked his backing band to try the song: "I want to try something before we go home. It's mellow." According to Lisa Coleman, Prince changed the song dramatically after Wendy Melvoin started playing the guitar to accompany the song: "He was excited to hear it voiced differently. It took it out of that country feeling. "Then we all started playing it a bit harder and taking it more seriously. We played it for six hours straight and by the end of that day we had it mostly written and arranged." Prince's explanation on the meaning of 'Purple Rain': "When there's blood in the sky – red and blue = purple... purple rain pertains to the end of the world and being with the one you love and letting your faith/god guide you through the purple rain." After recording the song, Prince phoned Journey member Jonathan Cain, to ask him to listen to it. Prince was concerned that it might be too similar to Journey's 'Faithfully', a song composed by Cain which had recently been in the US charts. However, Cain reassured Prince by saying that the songs only shared the same four chords. "I thought it was an amazing tune," Cain said. "I told him, 'Man, I'm just super-flattered that you even called. It shows you're that classy of a guy. Good luck with the song. I know it's gonna be a hit.'" Ladies and gentlemen, Prince performing a special and an absolute classic song, Purple Rain, live at Paisley Park, in 1999.

Rock'n Roll of All

38,232 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "To me, it's [JFK's] most important speech. It's one of the most important speeches in American history; the thing that he did that was so unusual in that speech is he talked to the American people and asked them to put themselves in the shoes of the Russians..." "The zeitgeist of our era was that America had won the war and now we were going to rightfully dominate the peace. And he said something very, very different to Americans that challenged that patriotic assumption: He said, no, it was actually the Russians who won the war. They weakened Hitler and made it possible for us to march into Berlin." "And he talked about the suffering of the Russians during the war and to legitimize their security concerns, which nobody was doing... what he was saying to the Americans is, no, they have legitimate security concerns the same as we do, and we need to understand those things." "And he reminded Americans of the suffering that the Russians had endured, unimaginable suffering. One in seven Russians had been killed during World War II. He asked Americans to imagine that all of the land, all of the cities, all of the towns from the East Coast to Chicago had been leveled to rubble, that the forests and fields had been burned. And he said that's what happened to Russia during the war. That's what they sacrificed for us, and they have legitimate security concerns to make sure that never happens again..." "I'm speaking you today because the world is once again at a very similar crossroads. As in my uncle's time, nuclear tensions are at an extreme and dangerous level. As in his time, we have a unique opportunity not only to diffuse those tensions, but to take a radically different path, a path towards peace."

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "To me, it's [JFK's] most important speech. It's one of the most important speeches in American history; the thing that he did that was so unusual in that speech is he talked to the American people and asked them to put themselves in the shoes of the Russians..." "The zeitgeist of our era was that America had won the war and now we were going to rightfully dominate the peace. And he said something very, very different to Americans that challenged that patriotic assumption: He said, no, it was actually the Russians who won the war. They weakened Hitler and made it possible for us to march into Berlin." "And he talked about the suffering of the Russians during the war and to legitimize their security concerns, which nobody was doing... what he was saying to the Americans is, no, they have legitimate security concerns the same as we do, and we need to understand those things." "And he reminded Americans of the suffering that the Russians had endured, unimaginable suffering. One in seven Russians had been killed during World War II. He asked Americans to imagine that all of the land, all of the cities, all of the towns from the East Coast to Chicago had been leveled to rubble, that the forests and fields had been burned. And he said that's what happened to Russia during the war. That's what they sacrificed for us, and they have legitimate security concerns to make sure that never happens again..." "I'm speaking you today because the world is once again at a very similar crossroads. As in my uncle's time, nuclear tensions are at an extreme and dangerous level. As in his time, we have a unique opportunity not only to diffuse those tensions, but to take a radically different path, a path towards peace."

COMBATE |🇵🇷

287,322 просмотров • 3 лет назад

President Trump to WHCA president/CBS correspondent Weijia Jiang Jiang: “We'll do a couple, and then we go to the chief – Madam Chairman, I just want to say you did a fantastic job. What a beautiful evening. And we're going to reschedule. [APPLAUSE] And after that, it's very tough for her to ask a killer question. Right. But you have done a fantastic job. Please. Jiang: “Mr. President, I appreciate it. As you mentioned, it all happened so quickly and I wonder, especially because unfortunately you have experience with these sorts of threats in that moment when you realize there was a threat and Service agents were telling us to get down. Can you describe what was going through your mind, how you were feeling in that moment? Trump: “It's a very good question, actually. It was -- it's always shocking when something like this happens. It happened to me a little bit and that never changes. The fact we're sitting right next to each other, the First Lady on my right, and I heard a noise and sort of thought it was a tray. I thought it was a tray going down. I've heard that many times, and it was pretty loud noise, and it was from quite far away. He hadn't breached the area at all. They really got him, but – so it was quite far away. But it was a gun. And some people really understood that pretty quickly. Other people didn't. I was watching to see what was happening. Probably should have gone down even faster. Melania was very cognizant, I think, of what happened. I think she knew immediately what happened. She was saying, that's a bad noise. And, we were whisked away along with other people, but we were really whisked away. And again, the performance of the secret service and the police, all of the law enforcement, I thought was really good. So, it was very quick. There wasn't a lot of time to be thinking, because it was a matter of seconds before we were out the door and gone into an area we very much. And you wanted to too – you very much wanted to continue it because I don't like to let these sick people, these thugs, these horrible, horrible people change the fabric of our life, change the course of what we do. So, we held out. You were there. We held out right till the end. But they didn't want to take a chance. And I understand it was protocol, but we're going to be doing one hopefully within the next 30 days or sooner. And I am ready, willing and able. And I was all set to really rip it. And I said to my people, this would be the most inappropriate speech ever made if I said – so I'll have to save it. I don't know if I can ever be as rough as I was going to be tonight. I think I'm going to be probably very nice. I'll be very boring the next time, but we're going to have a great event. And you did a fantastic job. Thank you very much.”

President Trump to WHCA president/CBS correspondent Weijia Jiang Jiang: “We'll do a couple, and then we go to the chief – Madam Chairman, I just want to say you did a fantastic job. What a beautiful evening. And we're going to reschedule. [APPLAUSE] And after that, it's very tough for her to ask a killer question. Right. But you have done a fantastic job. Please. Jiang: “Mr. President, I appreciate it. As you mentioned, it all happened so quickly and I wonder, especially because unfortunately you have experience with these sorts of threats in that moment when you realize there was a threat and Service agents were telling us to get down. Can you describe what was going through your mind, how you were feeling in that moment? Trump: “It's a very good question, actually. It was -- it's always shocking when something like this happens. It happened to me a little bit and that never changes. The fact we're sitting right next to each other, the First Lady on my right, and I heard a noise and sort of thought it was a tray. I thought it was a tray going down. I've heard that many times, and it was pretty loud noise, and it was from quite far away. He hadn't breached the area at all. They really got him, but – so it was quite far away. But it was a gun. And some people really understood that pretty quickly. Other people didn't. I was watching to see what was happening. Probably should have gone down even faster. Melania was very cognizant, I think, of what happened. I think she knew immediately what happened. She was saying, that's a bad noise. And, we were whisked away along with other people, but we were really whisked away. And again, the performance of the secret service and the police, all of the law enforcement, I thought was really good. So, it was very quick. There wasn't a lot of time to be thinking, because it was a matter of seconds before we were out the door and gone into an area we very much. And you wanted to too – you very much wanted to continue it because I don't like to let these sick people, these thugs, these horrible, horrible people change the fabric of our life, change the course of what we do. So, we held out. You were there. We held out right till the end. But they didn't want to take a chance. And I understand it was protocol, but we're going to be doing one hopefully within the next 30 days or sooner. And I am ready, willing and able. And I was all set to really rip it. And I said to my people, this would be the most inappropriate speech ever made if I said – so I'll have to save it. I don't know if I can ever be as rough as I was going to be tonight. I think I'm going to be probably very nice. I'll be very boring the next time, but we're going to have a great event. And you did a fantastic job. Thank you very much.”

Curtis Houck

26,008 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking on retired Indian Army Major Vikrant Jaitly's case, Vikrant's wife Charul Jaitly's lawyer, Major Sudhanshu Pandey, says, "Vikrant was an ex-army officer... In 2016-17, due to family circumstances, he took premature retirement, and since then, he has set up his own work and has been settled in Dubai, where he is working... What we have been told is that there were some national security issues and cyber issues in respect of some different companies with whom Vikrant may have had some dealings... His wife was trying to find out what exactly had happened... She got in contact with the Ministry of External Affairs; everything was explained to them; Vikrant was given counsellor access; and thereafter, it was said that there are some investigations going on in respect of the case against different people, and during that investigation, it would be necessary for Vikrant to be there... Celina was the one whom she contacted first when she got to know about this, and she did not, at that point in time, come forward in any manner to help—at least, any visible help did not come from them. The case happened on the 6th of September 2023... She followed the protocol... and went about the case the way she was advised... She decided to wait for the case to get over... While Charul was never informed by Celina that she had decided to take any legal recourse in this matter, it would have been better if she had consulted Charul and discussed that this is what she was going to do about this. Charul would have come forward, and they could have taken steps that were in the best interest of Vikrant... The reason for filing the case is that if this was something that was motivated by her genuine concern for her brother, she should have consulted us... But to say that she is not being given information or that his wife is not giving her information, we actually strongly rebut because there are absolutely no such reasons. Charul was going to everybody whom she had a hope would be able to help Vikrant... We have been told that some investigation is in the process for which he is required, and when it is over, we will be able to have a better insight into the disposal of Vikrant." (06.12)

#WATCH | Delhi: Speaking on retired Indian Army Major Vikrant Jaitly's case, Vikrant's wife Charul Jaitly's lawyer, Major Sudhanshu Pandey, says, "Vikrant was an ex-army officer... In 2016-17, due to family circumstances, he took premature retirement, and since then, he has set up his own work and has been settled in Dubai, where he is working... What we have been told is that there were some national security issues and cyber issues in respect of some different companies with whom Vikrant may have had some dealings... His wife was trying to find out what exactly had happened... She got in contact with the Ministry of External Affairs; everything was explained to them; Vikrant was given counsellor access; and thereafter, it was said that there are some investigations going on in respect of the case against different people, and during that investigation, it would be necessary for Vikrant to be there... Celina was the one whom she contacted first when she got to know about this, and she did not, at that point in time, come forward in any manner to help—at least, any visible help did not come from them. The case happened on the 6th of September 2023... She followed the protocol... and went about the case the way she was advised... She decided to wait for the case to get over... While Charul was never informed by Celina that she had decided to take any legal recourse in this matter, it would have been better if she had consulted Charul and discussed that this is what she was going to do about this. Charul would have come forward, and they could have taken steps that were in the best interest of Vikrant... The reason for filing the case is that if this was something that was motivated by her genuine concern for her brother, she should have consulted us... But to say that she is not being given information or that his wife is not giving her information, we actually strongly rebut because there are absolutely no such reasons. Charul was going to everybody whom she had a hope would be able to help Vikrant... We have been told that some investigation is in the process for which he is required, and when it is over, we will be able to have a better insight into the disposal of Vikrant." (06.12)

ANI

41,692 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Arteta on the moment he believed it was going to happen: “It's been so many, probably I need a bit more time to reflect on that, and we have so many, so much footage that probably will explain the story of the season. “One of the main ones, it was a meeting that we had here next to the tree when I got all the players together and I told them, look at each other, look at the squad that we built over the summer. I think we are capable of everything and we can be very, very good. “That only depends on us and on our behaviours and everybody understanding the role that it's going to have daily or on the day. to give the best for the team. Once they realised that, I think we went to a different level, because you've seen the impact that everybody's had in different moments of games, through the season, and the capacity that we have shown to adapt to very, very tough circumstances throughout the season.”

Arteta on the moment he believed it was going to happen: “It's been so many, probably I need a bit more time to reflect on that, and we have so many, so much footage that probably will explain the story of the season. “One of the main ones, it was a meeting that we had here next to the tree when I got all the players together and I told them, look at each other, look at the squad that we built over the summer. I think we are capable of everything and we can be very, very good. “That only depends on us and on our behaviours and everybody understanding the role that it's going to have daily or on the day. to give the best for the team. Once they realised that, I think we went to a different level, because you've seen the impact that everybody's had in different moments of games, through the season, and the capacity that we have shown to adapt to very, very tough circumstances throughout the season.”

Connor Humm

246,101 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Lebron on what it takes to play for as long as he has at a high level that the average fan may not understand: "It starts way before you get on the floor. They see us once the game is going the popcorn's been popped and the lights are brighter. It takes so much more like sacrifice and discipline and things over the course if you want to be really great at this and if you want to do it for a long period of time. It's so many hours that you got to commit to it. There's so many things that you maybe want to do that you can't if you want to be great but everybody's journey is different. I'm just speaking from my journey but I do think that the game gives back to the ones who put the time in and commit to the game. That's just the game God's rewarding and we don't cheat the process"

Lebron on what it takes to play for as long as he has at a high level that the average fan may not understand: "It starts way before you get on the floor. They see us once the game is going the popcorn's been popped and the lights are brighter. It takes so much more like sacrifice and discipline and things over the course if you want to be really great at this and if you want to do it for a long period of time. It's so many hours that you got to commit to it. There's so many things that you maybe want to do that you can't if you want to be great but everybody's journey is different. I'm just speaking from my journey but I do think that the game gives back to the ones who put the time in and commit to the game. That's just the game God's rewarding and we don't cheat the process"

Oh No He Didn't

36,740 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" (2001), Angelina Jolie was initially reluctant to wear the famous shorts Lara Croft wears in the game. She eventually agreed to do it since she knew it would make the fans of the character happy & although the outfit was uncomfortable, it helped her connect with the character. Angelina Jolie talking about it: "We knew we had to have the shorts at one point, which was very, very difficult. And it was big discussions to the last minute about me….I think it was the first thing I said to Simon, probably. Was that I would do the movie, but would not get in the shorts. It did take a while, and then we thought, for the people that know her, you have to get in the shorts. It was very, very uncomfortable. You feel like her." "During the first film we had to really consider the game a lot and not stray too far from it, to try to make the game character a real person." (Angelina Jolie's interview to ScreenSlam, 2015, "A Conversation with Angelina Jolie", Steve Head, IGN, 2012 & IMDb) P.S: Happy 51st birthday, Angelina Jolie!

In "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider" (2001), Angelina Jolie was initially reluctant to wear the famous shorts Lara Croft wears in the game. She eventually agreed to do it since she knew it would make the fans of the character happy & although the outfit was uncomfortable, it helped her connect with the character. Angelina Jolie talking about it: "We knew we had to have the shorts at one point, which was very, very difficult. And it was big discussions to the last minute about me….I think it was the first thing I said to Simon, probably. Was that I would do the movie, but would not get in the shorts. It did take a while, and then we thought, for the people that know her, you have to get in the shorts. It was very, very uncomfortable. You feel like her." "During the first film we had to really consider the game a lot and not stray too far from it, to try to make the game character a real person." (Angelina Jolie's interview to ScreenSlam, 2015, "A Conversation with Angelina Jolie", Steve Head, IGN, 2012 & IMDb) P.S: Happy 51st birthday, Angelina Jolie!

DepressedBergman

23,815 просмотров • 21 дней назад

The tears from the Haters every time Catherine and William have an engagement…😏 “They went to a popular spot. Of course the crowd would be there”. Yes, William and Catherine went unbothered and with ease into a popular London market and proved a very important point: that the press and antimonarchists screaming online that “the Andrew crisis has ended the monarchy’s popularity with the public” are simply useless echo chambers online that do not reflect the reality🔥 With everything going on, Prince William and Catherine decided to go into a crowd, unannounced, unscripted and do a walkabout. They allowed the crowd to mob them, without any need for crowd control or extra bodyguards to shield them from the true sentiment of the public. And guess what happened? They got was pure, an adulterated Love from the Public who wanted them to get pictures, offer flowers and hug them🥰 Yes William and Catherine continue to be absolutely beloved in the UK and abroad. In spite of all the attacks against the monarchy and the slashing articles by the press around the world, W&C can STILL walk unannounced among the public with any easy confidence that no UK politician can afford to ever do in 2026🔥 This is the point that they have proven unequivocally: that there is a ‘singular Trust’ that exists between the British Public and the Wales; a singular trust that was built, not overnight, but with years of consistency, of genuine integrity of character and with compassion. Well and so, if you wonder why Prince William is the main target of the press and antimonarchists online you have the answer in this visit to the Borough: William and Catherine are very effective with the Public in general👌🏽 Prince William may be born a Prince but he is at home among ‘commoners’ giving respect, genuine care and affection; and that is why he tops every public opinion poll, comfortably☕️ #PrinceandPrincessofWales

The tears from the Haters every time Catherine and William have an engagement…😏 “They went to a popular spot. Of course the crowd would be there”. Yes, William and Catherine went unbothered and with ease into a popular London market and proved a very important point: that the press and antimonarchists screaming online that “the Andrew crisis has ended the monarchy’s popularity with the public” are simply useless echo chambers online that do not reflect the reality🔥 With everything going on, Prince William and Catherine decided to go into a crowd, unannounced, unscripted and do a walkabout. They allowed the crowd to mob them, without any need for crowd control or extra bodyguards to shield them from the true sentiment of the public. And guess what happened? They got was pure, an adulterated Love from the Public who wanted them to get pictures, offer flowers and hug them🥰 Yes William and Catherine continue to be absolutely beloved in the UK and abroad. In spite of all the attacks against the monarchy and the slashing articles by the press around the world, W&C can STILL walk unannounced among the public with any easy confidence that no UK politician can afford to ever do in 2026🔥 This is the point that they have proven unequivocally: that there is a ‘singular Trust’ that exists between the British Public and the Wales; a singular trust that was built, not overnight, but with years of consistency, of genuine integrity of character and with compassion. Well and so, if you wonder why Prince William is the main target of the press and antimonarchists online you have the answer in this visit to the Borough: William and Catherine are very effective with the Public in general👌🏽 Prince William may be born a Prince but he is at home among ‘commoners’ giving respect, genuine care and affection; and that is why he tops every public opinion poll, comfortably☕️ #PrinceandPrincessofWales

Canellecitadelle

80,798 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Natalya Murakhver, co-founder of Restore Childhood, tells me what happened when she met with Randi Weingarten, head of the American Federation of Teachers, back in 2022 and asked her to use her influence at the CDC to remove the masking mandates for school children: “I reached out to Randy Weingarten in the fall of 2022 because I saw that she was receptive to speaking with parents and engaging with parents, and I knew that she had a say in CDC reopening guidelines. At that point, the New York Post and Fox had broken the story that Randy and the teachers unions had crafted the school reopening guidelines, which up until then, parents certainly didn't know. So it was surprising. I had hoped that there was some good faith in those guidelines, and she was coming to it with an open heart. And so I reached out to her on X (Twitter at that point)…and said: ‘Could we meet at some point? I'd love to speak with you. My children are suffering in school with masks on, and I've done the research. There's no research supporting the safety and efficacy of masks. We need to get the kids back to normal.’ And she said yes, and we met on marathon Sunday in November 2022, on the Upper West Side for drinks. And it was very pleasant. We had a good conversation, and I asked her if she would talk to the CDC. It's kind of ludicrous to tell the story. I can't even believe that we had this conversation. I said: ‘I know that you have a say in what the CDC does. Can you talk to them about revising their guidelines and getting these kids back to normal? They need to be able to see each other's faces.’ And she said: ‘You know what, Natalya, if you present an outline for how to unmask the kids, I will present it to the CDC, and we'll see what we can do.’ Shocking. I, an Upper West Side mom without a medical degree… I mean, what am I going to present to her? I wanted her to remove the masks, but I guess now I need to go through the steps, because I've been given an opportunity to have a say in policy. So the first thing I did was I called Tracy Hogue, who was a researcher in the Bay area at the time, and friend, and I said: “Tracy, Randy Weingarten is willing to present our proposal to unmask the kids. I need research.” And Tracy is a dual citizen between the United States, and Denmark, speaks five languages, is really just a brilliant researcher, and she just laughed and said: ‘Of course, I'll work with you on this, but there's no proposal. If we give them an off ramp, we're going to have an on ramp. There's no research behind masking kids. Just take them off.’ So we worked together for a few months and figured out that there was a toolkit that another virologist had developed on the west coast for his own kids’ school about the benefits and harms of masking and the mental health issues that were developing in kids that he was seeing in his own children. And we ended up taking that toolkit and creating something called ‘Urgency of Normal’ which was released in January…and it was a toolkit for parents, not for the teachers unions. We realized there was nothing for us to present to Randy and the CDC. We needed to give the parents access to the data and to the stories so that they could advocate on their own local levels. And we wrote op-eds. We had multiple doctors, including Vinay Prasad, Monica Gandhi, Lucy McBride, big name doctors who signed on to it. We did a zoom call that had over 1000 parents from around the country, which is great considering we didn't have a budget…Parents would reach out to us from all over the world, not just the United States. I'd get emails from everywhere. And then eventually that led to me forming ‘Restore Childhood,’ a nonprofit that produced the film.” Natalya Murakhver

Natalya Murakhver, co-founder of Restore Childhood, tells me what happened when she met with Randi Weingarten, head of the American Federation of Teachers, back in 2022 and asked her to use her influence at the CDC to remove the masking mandates for school children: “I reached out to Randy Weingarten in the fall of 2022 because I saw that she was receptive to speaking with parents and engaging with parents, and I knew that she had a say in CDC reopening guidelines. At that point, the New York Post and Fox had broken the story that Randy and the teachers unions had crafted the school reopening guidelines, which up until then, parents certainly didn't know. So it was surprising. I had hoped that there was some good faith in those guidelines, and she was coming to it with an open heart. And so I reached out to her on X (Twitter at that point)…and said: ‘Could we meet at some point? I'd love to speak with you. My children are suffering in school with masks on, and I've done the research. There's no research supporting the safety and efficacy of masks. We need to get the kids back to normal.’ And she said yes, and we met on marathon Sunday in November 2022, on the Upper West Side for drinks. And it was very pleasant. We had a good conversation, and I asked her if she would talk to the CDC. It's kind of ludicrous to tell the story. I can't even believe that we had this conversation. I said: ‘I know that you have a say in what the CDC does. Can you talk to them about revising their guidelines and getting these kids back to normal? They need to be able to see each other's faces.’ And she said: ‘You know what, Natalya, if you present an outline for how to unmask the kids, I will present it to the CDC, and we'll see what we can do.’ Shocking. I, an Upper West Side mom without a medical degree… I mean, what am I going to present to her? I wanted her to remove the masks, but I guess now I need to go through the steps, because I've been given an opportunity to have a say in policy. So the first thing I did was I called Tracy Hogue, who was a researcher in the Bay area at the time, and friend, and I said: “Tracy, Randy Weingarten is willing to present our proposal to unmask the kids. I need research.” And Tracy is a dual citizen between the United States, and Denmark, speaks five languages, is really just a brilliant researcher, and she just laughed and said: ‘Of course, I'll work with you on this, but there's no proposal. If we give them an off ramp, we're going to have an on ramp. There's no research behind masking kids. Just take them off.’ So we worked together for a few months and figured out that there was a toolkit that another virologist had developed on the west coast for his own kids’ school about the benefits and harms of masking and the mental health issues that were developing in kids that he was seeing in his own children. And we ended up taking that toolkit and creating something called ‘Urgency of Normal’ which was released in January…and it was a toolkit for parents, not for the teachers unions. We realized there was nothing for us to present to Randy and the CDC. We needed to give the parents access to the data and to the stories so that they could advocate on their own local levels. And we wrote op-eds. We had multiple doctors, including Vinay Prasad, Monica Gandhi, Lucy McBride, big name doctors who signed on to it. We did a zoom call that had over 1000 parents from around the country, which is great considering we didn't have a budget…Parents would reach out to us from all over the world, not just the United States. I'd get emails from everywhere. And then eventually that led to me forming ‘Restore Childhood,’ a nonprofit that produced the film.” Natalya Murakhver

Jan Jekielek

12,766 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

President Trump, "Last fall, Melania and I had the pleasure of visiting their Majesties at Windsor Castle, a structure that's so beautiful and so long that it never seemed to end" "I, uh, looked down as a former real estate person, and it just went on forever" "And it was built by a gentleman named William the Conqueror in the year 1070" "And I asked the king, I said, was he a nice man, William the Conqueror?" "He said, I tend to doubt it. I don't think so" "When they call you William the Conqueror, generally speaking, you're not going to be too nice. But he must have been something, because it was nothing like I've ever seen Windsor Castle" "But, uh, tonight, in return, we are really doing something that's very special. Preparing to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our Declaration of Independence. A big time in our country. Very big time"

President Trump, "Last fall, Melania and I had the pleasure of visiting their Majesties at Windsor Castle, a structure that's so beautiful and so long that it never seemed to end" "I, uh, looked down as a former real estate person, and it just went on forever" "And it was built by a gentleman named William the Conqueror in the year 1070" "And I asked the king, I said, was he a nice man, William the Conqueror?" "He said, I tend to doubt it. I don't think so" "When they call you William the Conqueror, generally speaking, you're not going to be too nice. But he must have been something, because it was nothing like I've ever seen Windsor Castle" "But, uh, tonight, in return, we are really doing something that's very special. Preparing to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our Declaration of Independence. A big time in our country. Very big time"

Farrukh

703,847 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Watch the full extraordinary war of words between Fabian Hürzeler vs. Mikel Arteta after Arsenal beat Brighton 1-0. 🧂 Hürzeler: “There are different kinds of winning. So if they win the Premier League, no one will ask how they win the Premier League. I think you can really feel that. They do everything now to win this game and in the end it's about the rules. “So if the Premier League is the referee's decision, then it's difficult. They [Arsenal] make their own rules. At the moment, I have the feeling they are doing their own rules no matter how they are playing. So that's why I think it's difficult to judge that. “Overall, like I said, I will never be that kind of manager who tries to win in that way. I want to do well as players. I want my players to keep improving and keep playing football on the pitch. “In the end, of course, every team will manage and waste time but I think there has to be a limit and the limit has to be set by the Premier League. The limit has to be set by the referees. At the moment, they just can do what they want. “We will get the statistics for that. I made my point before the game and I stick to it and everyone else can judge it on his own. I'm not sure if I would ask now, everyone here in the room. Did he really enjoy this football game? “I'm sure maybe one raises his arm because he's a big Arsenal fan. But beside that, no chance. So that's why, again, it's just a repetition. We waste too much time about talking about Arsenal and their game.” Arteta responded: “What a surprise…” “Just go back for the previous games and you will find a lot of comments like this always. “I love my players, that's the highlight. I love my players, we love our players and I love the way we compete.“

Watch the full extraordinary war of words between Fabian Hürzeler vs. Mikel Arteta after Arsenal beat Brighton 1-0. 🧂 Hürzeler: “There are different kinds of winning. So if they win the Premier League, no one will ask how they win the Premier League. I think you can really feel that. They do everything now to win this game and in the end it's about the rules. “So if the Premier League is the referee's decision, then it's difficult. They [Arsenal] make their own rules. At the moment, I have the feeling they are doing their own rules no matter how they are playing. So that's why I think it's difficult to judge that. “Overall, like I said, I will never be that kind of manager who tries to win in that way. I want to do well as players. I want my players to keep improving and keep playing football on the pitch. “In the end, of course, every team will manage and waste time but I think there has to be a limit and the limit has to be set by the Premier League. The limit has to be set by the referees. At the moment, they just can do what they want. “We will get the statistics for that. I made my point before the game and I stick to it and everyone else can judge it on his own. I'm not sure if I would ask now, everyone here in the room. Did he really enjoy this football game? “I'm sure maybe one raises his arm because he's a big Arsenal fan. But beside that, no chance. So that's why, again, it's just a repetition. We waste too much time about talking about Arsenal and their game.” Arteta responded: “What a surprise…” “Just go back for the previous games and you will find a lot of comments like this always. “I love my players, that's the highlight. I love my players, we love our players and I love the way we compete.“

Connor Humm

313,981 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад