Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

𝙃𝙤𝙠𝙞𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙙 🎞️: When defense becomes offense. DeAngelo Hall turns a mid-air strip into six to help the Hokies beat No. 2 Miami (2003) #LetsGoHokies | OG aka CAPTAIN 23

31,909 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

She wasn't dancing for anyone until the whole street joined in. One girl. One beat. And suddenly everyone's in. Made with GPT Image 2 and Seedance 2.0 on BudgetPixel AI Prompt: Video Prompt — 15 seconds, 16:9, Solo female street dancer Jessy (described above) dancing continuously and energetically from the very first frame to a viral trending upbeat pop/afrobeat-style track (130 BPM, catchy hook-driven viral sound), full choreography visible throughout — no static feet-only opening, no frozen ending. Sunlit outdoor market street, colorful stalls, soft crowd blur, photorealistic, 8K detail, consistent facial identity, cinematic natural daylight, fluid motion blur, perfect temporal consistency. 0:00–0:03 — Low-angle tracking shot rising into a full-body view; Jessy is already mid-move, doing a bouncy shuffle-step with sharp arm swings and a hip pop on the beat drop, ponytail whipping, face clearly visible and expressive. 0:03–0:06 — Whip-pan into a Dutch-angle mid-shot; Jessy spins into a body-roll combo, arms cutting sharply through the air, handheld camera pulsing with the beat. 0:06–0:09 — Crash-zoom to a high-angle crane shot; Jessy drops into a low groove-step with a floor-touch and pop back up, dust kicking softly at her sneakers, still mid-motion. 0:09–0:12 — Snap-cut to eye-level tracking shot circling her; nearby onlookers — two women and one man, each with distinct clearly-visible faces, different hairstyles, and different outfits from Jessy and each other — start mirroring her moves and join in, forming a loose group dance, all faces on camera (face cards visible, no obstruction). 0:12–0:15 — Wide dynamic shot pulling back as the whole group dances together in sync, Jessy in the center still moving with sharp bounce and a playful spin, camera continuing to move (slow pull-back with slight handheld shake) right up to the final frame — no freeze, motion carries through to the last moment, energetic smile toward camera.

Jessica Collins

31,799 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨🇺🇸 U.S. IN PANIC: Iran’s Shaheds are already breaking defenses — but China’s drones will be a nightmare Drones are getting cheaper, smarter, and harder to stop. Recent clashes in the Middle East showed how even relatively simple Iranian systems can slip through and damage high-value targets, exposing gaps in US/Israel air defense networks. That battlefield reality is now forcing a harder question, what happens when a more advanced industrial power applies the same logic at scale? China’s ASN-301 represents a different class of threat. Unlike Iran’s Shahed-136, which operates largely as a pre-programmed strike tool, the Chinese system is built to hunt air defenses. It can loiter for hours, detect radar emissions, switch to electro-optical tracking if signals disappear, and receive mid-flight updates via datalink. In effect, it turns the battlefield into a persistent seek-and-destroy environment for radars, the backbone of any modern defense system. Iran relies on volume: cheap, long-range drones launched in waves to exhaust interceptors. China combines that model with precision. Variants like the Feilong-300D push costs even lower while retaining flexibility in payload and targeting, making mass deployment economically viable on an entirely different scale. And this is where the real pressure point emerges. If US systems are already struggling to consistently intercept Iranian drones, the implications are stark. A conflict in the Western Pacific would hinge on production capacity. China’s ability to flood the battlespace with smarter, adaptable drones could force the US and its allies into a costly cycle: burning million-dollar interceptors to stop systems that cost a fraction to produce. The US is facing major difficulties in stopping Iranian drones—do they stand a chance against Chinese drones? NewRulesGeopolitics

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

106,077 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

“A lie unchecked becomes the truth.” Where have we heard that before? If Hank Brennan’s inflammatory claims about the defense & the ARCCA experts were true and accurate, why were NONE of those issues raised or even mentioned in his Motion to Exclude ARCCA Experts, or any court documents whatsoever? He stated that he received that information on February 13, 2025, nearly a week before Tuesday’s motions hearing, but you’re telling me that this guy wasn’t chomping at the bit to put ANY of this in a motion? Sure—and I’ve got a bridge to sell you. Why did Brennan file no affidavit of factual support, pursuant to Rule 13(a)(2) outlining any of these damning claims? Maybe because then he’d be bound under the pains & penalties of perjury which would make it much harder for him to hide behind “I misspoke” when his lies are confronted by the truth. Furthermore, if Brennan’s oh so damning claims of impropriety were true, then surely he would’ve included them in his Motion for Sanctions on the Defense, right? Especially given the fact that he filed his sanctions motion with the court (on 2/14/25) AFTER he’d already received said damning information (on 2/13/25), and from the defense themselves no less 😂. Certainly, if Brennan’s claims were true, and not him trying to distract & obfuscate from the mountain of Brady violations the prosecution is drowning in by playing to “the audience on the right,” there’s absolutely no chance he’d leave that information out of his Motion for Sanctions, but yet it is nowhere to be found. Why’s that? This was a blatant PR stunt by Hank Brennan & the DA’s Office to smear the integrity of the defense attorneys while planting the seed that ARCCA is not a neutral party. And guess what? They got what they wanted. Judge Beverly Cannone yet again revealed her bias and partiality—eating up every morsel of Hank Brennan’s unsubstantiated say-so, which is curiously outlined in NO court documents whatsoever by the Commonwealth. She piped up the theatrics without asking any questions or allowing the defense to respond or be heard. There are rules of criminal procedure for a reason and prosecutors have ethical obligations. Hank Brennan has repeatedly failed to abide by MA Rules of Criminal Procedure, specifically Rule 13(a)(2), obligating him to file an affidavit of factual support, which in part exists to keep attorneys honest & hold them accountable to the truth. This, of course, is why he rarely files them. On a side note: speaking of affidavits, you know who’s never submitted any affidavits, signed & sworn to under the pains and penalties of perjury? Jessica Hyde and Ian Whiffin. On the contrary, Richard Green has submitted at least 4 affidavits. The entire objective of Brennan’s PR stunt on Tuesday was to taint the jury pool by trying to make the defense attorneys look as sleazy as him so that any potential jurors will be less inclined to believe what the defense says, and attack the integrity of the ARCCA experts because he can’t meet them on the facts & they destroy his case. And much of the local + mainstream news media bought it hook, line & sinker. Nearly every headline is running with Brennan’s unverified word salad. It’s in the press & news media, and potential jurors have seen it. The damage is done, and because Judge Cannone was seemingly complicit in this charade of theatrics, she allowed Brennan’s lie to go unchecked. She’s seen no affidavit from him signed under the pains & penalties of perjury showing factual support of anything he said on Tuesday. So why is she so inclined to believe him? With a Judge so eager to indict Attorney Alan Jackson, Karen Read & her defense team for seemingly inexplicable personal reasons, based on nothing more than a hyperbolic emotional argument—which as it turns out was later revealed to be entirely false & inaccurate during that same hearing—and based on no real argument elaborated anywhere in any court documents by the Commonwealth, Judge Cannone confirmed once again that she lacks judicial temperament & is unfit to be presiding over this case. Judge Cannone is supposed to protect Karen Read’s right to a fair trial. Instead, she’s ensuring that Karen Read will never get a fair trial. Do you think any media outlets are going to issue retractions when Alan Jackson/defense counsel is absolved? Of course not! And by that point, the damage has already been done. Judge Cannone left the casual observer + news audience with a very prejudicial impression of the defense, seeking no follow up and affording no due process for the defense to be heard. A lie unchecked becomes the truth, and Judge Cannone knew that allowing Hank Brennan’s lie to go unchecked for a week would be extremely damaging to the defense in the lead up to trial. Why is she so apt to believe that defense counsel is somehow nefarious or dishonest when 3,000+ pages of Touhy evidence provided by the ongoing federal investigation—into THIS DA’s Office and THESE third party culprits—exposed an overwhelming number of the Commonwealth’s lies and verified that this is factually a malicious prosecution? Touhy evidence that only verified and corroborated the veracity of the defense and its case. ———— But, don’t take my word for it. Look at Hank Brennan’s own words in his Motion to Exclude ARCCA Experts and his Motion for Sanctions (attached below in comments). Let me know where, if anywhere, you find any of these damning claims (hint: you won’t). Look at the docket of all recent filings (attached) and let me know where, if anywhere, you see any affidavit of factual support for Brennan’s ARCCA expert exclusion argument that he made Tuesday (hint: you won’t). And it’s not due to lack of time, as he had nearly a week to file any of this information in a court document. Yet, he chose not to do that. What does that tell you? But let me get this straight, Judge Cannone has grave concern that could have profound effects on the defense and defense counsel? What a disgrace. #KarenReadTrial #KarenRead

Olivia

41,096 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What would you do if a monster charged at you in the middle of the street? Made with Nano Banana 2 + Seedance 2.0 4k on TapNow prompt Beat 1 - The Calm Opening The reference image character is a Western woman with long wavy blonde hair casually drinking a Coke in the middle of a chaotic urban street. Her outfit and cap match Image 1 exactly. Energy is calm, unfazed, and confident. Camera: grounded, cinematic, medium shot. Beat 2 - The Monster Charges A terrifying monster bull charges toward her at full speed. It smashes through debris and scatters people in panic. The street erupts into chaos around the character. Camera: dynamic tracking, wide angle to capture scale of monster and chaos. Beat 3 - The Transformation The young woman stays calm and completely unfazed. She lowers the Coke. She raises one hand. Her arm begins transforming into solid ice from the fingertips upward. Frost spreads across her skin, glowing with cold blue-white energy. Vapor rolls off the arm as the ice transformation builds. Camera: close-up on the arm transformation, slow and deliberate. Beat 4 - The Touch - Slow Motion As the monster lunges, she calmly reaches forward. She touches the monster with her frozen hand. DRAMATIC SLOW MOTION at the moment of contact. Ice rapidly spreads from the point of contact across the monster's body. The monster panics - thrashing and roaring as frost crawls over its claws, chest, face, and eyes. The monster's movement slows as the freezing effect takes over. Camera: extreme close-up on contact point, then pulls out to reveal the spreading ice. Beat 5 - Full Freeze The creature becomes completely encased in crystal-clear ice, frozen mid-attack. A tense pause holds on the frozen monster. Deep cracks spread through the frozen monster. Cracks split across its icy body with sharp crystalline sounds. Detailed cracking ice - realistic frost and crystal texture throughout. Camera: wide shot of the frozen monster, locked and still for the pause beat. Beat 6 - The Walk-Off The young woman casually takes another sip of Coke. She turns away without looking back. She walks off calmly as the frozen monster cracks behind her. Confident calm hero energy. No celebration. No reaction. Just casual. Camera: low angle tracking shot as she walks away, monster in background. Visual Effects Realistic ice transformation - frost spreading from fingertips upward. Frost vapor rolling off the arm during transformation. Cold blue-white glowing energy across frozen skin. Ice rapidly spreading across monster body from point of contact. Detailed cracking ice with sharp crystalline fracture lines. Crystal-clear ice encasing the entire monster mid-attack. Realistic freeze physics - movement slowing as ice covers the creature. Camera Style Dynamic cinematic camera movement throughout. High-action monster attack framing during the charge. Dramatic slow motion at the exact moment of hand contact. Close-up on ice transformation - fingertips to shoulder. Pull-back reveal as ice spreads across the monster's full body. Low angle walk-off shot to close the scene. One continuous take. No cuts. Camera never stops. Character appearance: a beautiful Western woman with long wavy blonde hair flowing naturally beneath the cap, maintaining the same calm, confident, and unfazed presence throughout the entire sequence.

Sharon Riley

58,578 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The faggots showed “routes of Ukrainian drones” to the Leningrad region — through the territory of Belarus and NATO countries (Picture #1). Now let’s look at reality, confirmed exclusively by their own official sources. Here’s how the air raid alerts developed in Russia on these days: Video for March 23 (Video #1) Video for March 25 (Video #2) Video for March 26 (Video #3) We’ve been working for a long time on our own website — an independent analog of the Ukrainian air alert site, but for the Russian swamps. It shows not only the alerts, but also the work of their air defense. We just managed to finish the recording and history function right before the strikes on the Leningrad region. Interesting detail: as soon as an air alert is declared in the Leningrad region itself, literally a few minutes later it is immediately announced in the Bryansk, Smolensk, Tver, and other regions that lie “on the way” to Leningrad. We do not rule out that the drones could have flown over the eastern districts of Belarus. That option is theoretically possible. However, there is zero confirmation: Belarusian chats in those areas were silent, locals wrote nothing, and no objective evidence (video or photos) has appeared. A simple logical question for all their “experts”: If our drones were not flying over Russian territory, but somehow cruising through NATO countries, then why the fuck did you declare air alerts across the entire country? What exactly were your air defense systems “shooting down” over your own regions? Why did the alerts trigger exactly in the regions that, according to your version, the drones never flew over? And the most interesting part — why does this alert pattern lead perfectly straight to the Leningrad region, where real strikes and fires occurred on exactly those dates? - Night of March 23 — massive attack on the Primorsk port (one of the key oil terminals on the Baltic). A fuel tank was damaged, and the fire burned for over a day. Governor Drozdenco claimed “over 50 drones shot down.” - Night of March 25 — strikes on the Ust-Luga port (Novatek terminal) and Vyborg (a ship was damaged, likely the icebreaker “Purga”, and the port itself). Fire in the port. They claimed “33 drones shot down.” - Night of March 26 — attack on the Kirishi Oil Refinery (KINEF) industrial zone. Fires confirmed by NASA FIRMS satellite imagery. They claimed “21+ drones shot down.” You faggots, when you lie about “routes through NATO”, at least try to coordinate your bullshit with your own official data. The picture is hilarious: alerts across the whole country, air defense working at full capacity, “hundreds shot down” — yet the drones supposedly “never flew over Russia.” Draw your own conclusions, friends. Logic has never been Russian propaganda’s strong suit.

DroneBomber

94,375 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

MR. IG🐻Prescription Play #2🏀 Ja Morant o11.5 Reb+Ast (+100) #GrindCity vs #LakeShow Film. Data. Narratives. What a great play. Show love if you want another play❤️ Lets start with the data because this man is averaging 16.8 Potential Assists across his last 9 games with 25+ minutes. We have also hammered the idea of the Lakers being a horrendous transition defense this season, and we know Ja Morant is at his most fun when he gets out in transition. Expect some easy assists on those plays here. Now as far as the Lakers, they don't hide their strategy of "you are either shooting or passing but you are not driving." While that last matchup was the one that started the drama with his comments about the coaches chewing him out mid-game, it did look like he was figuring out how to read it in the 2nd half. The Grizzlies would put Ja Morant on the wing in an ISO position, with everyone cleared out to the other side. The Lakers would have the big show EARLY help on the near side block. Ja Morant would then read the help of the big man and the weakside corner If the big and corner were helping early, he would drive and find the corner. If the big was helping and the corner wasn't, he would find the big on the opposite block. If the big AND the corner were waiting for him to drive before showing help, he would force the switch onto a lesser defender and put the Lakers into a position where they had to show help. And as far as the rebounding, Ja Morant's defensive role is simple: When there is a corner camper, matchup with the corner camper. With no Reaves, and not matching up on Luka/Lebron, we know this will be the case and should keep him in uncontested weakside rebounding position on any deep shot attempts. This is why he has had 11+ Rebound Chances in 3/4 against the Lakers.

Dr. Profit🩺

49,151 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Wait? Is this Seedance 2 Mini? The mystery Seedance 2 model IS HERE! No wait this time. About 55% of the cost of the 2.0 Fast is about 75% Quality wise they say to expect Fast level output and that seems fair? Thoughts? Left is Seedance 2 Mini Right is Seedance 2.0 Full Prompt Image To Video Use the uploaded images as identity, costume, and lighting reference. Same naturally confident charismatic age 25 woman throughout performing a sold-out arena concert. Real concert documentary feel, handheld camera energy, practical stage lighting only. gritty, real, fun, clean editing, english language high energy modern concert performance 0: 00–0:01 — Open tight on her face mid-performance, eyes bright, genuine laugh breaking through a lyric, hair catching stage light. Crowd noise swells under faint mic hum. 0: 01–0:06 — She steps forward to the edge of the stage, singing into the mic with playful energy, she frowns, sad "Wait! Is this Seedance 2 Mini?" and then smiles and laughs free hand reaching out toward the crowd, fingers brushing toward raised phones and hands. The crowd repeats the lyric back to her as she laughs. Warm stage lights and lens flares in the background, slight handheld camera sway following her movement. 0: 06–0:09 — Wide shot from a low angle near the crowd barrier — she's framed against haze and colored stage lights, band visible in soft focus behind her (guitarist stage left, keyboard player stage right). She throws her free arm out wide, laughing between lines, hair whipping slightly as she turns. 0: 10–0:12 — Cut to a closer three-quarter shot — she playfully points the mic toward the crowd for a sing-along moment, grinning, eyes scanning the audience with real warmth and connection. Visible sweat sheen, natural skin texture, slight camera shake as if shot from the pit. — Final beat: close-up, she looks directly into the lens with a bright, genuine smile Camera: handheld documentary-style movement throughout, natural focus pulls, no perfectly smooth gimbal shots, slight shake and imperfection consistent with a real concert film crew. Practical stage lighting only — no CGI glow, no artificial bloom, no glossy skin, visible natural texture and sweat under hot lights. Audio: live arena ambience — crowd roar, cheering, phone-camera flash pops, her voice carrying clearly over a full live band mix (electric guitar, keys, drums, bass). No studio polish — natural live-mix dynamics, slight room reverb. No on-screen text, no logos, no subtitles, no watermarks, no identity drift, no extra performers beyond the band already in frame, no slideshow stillness, no overly smooth or glossy rendering, no jarring cuts, no akward moments, no jerky moves, no duplicates, no clones

Brent Lynch

12,605 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Seednace 2 mini on OpenArt Prompt Seedance 2.0, 15 seconds, 16:9. Main subject from @ image1 — lock her completely. Face, skin tone, body, outfit, everything stays identical the whole way through. She's wearing a grey faded sleeveless crop top, loose high-waist light blue jeans, black canvas sneakers, black cord necklace, black wavy hair in a messy side-swept ponytail with bangs. Korean woman, early-2000s feel. The whole thing is shot in a quiet Korean residential neighborhood — narrow concrete alleys, low-rise houses with small terraces, a front yard with a clothesline, potted plants, parked bicycles and motorcycles, big trees, and overhead cables everywhere. No shops, no vendors, nothing commercial. Just a real neighborhood. Camera treatment is the whole point. This needs to look like someone's friend grabbed a DV camcorder and just started recording — no plan, no setup, no nothing. Heavy handheld shake, constant reframing, subject drifting toward the edges, autofocus hunting, lens breathing, exposure pumping. The image itself should look faded, low contrast, slightly washed out, with that digital noise and compression feel that early-2000s home video had. No stabilization. No modern grading. This aesthetic is non-negotiable. She starts sitting on a concrete sidewalk fixing her ponytail, arms raised, genuine smile, wind catching her hair — camera barely holding focus. Then the camera follows her into a narrow alley where she crouches down and feeds a stray cat that comes right up to her. After that she's in her front yard hanging laundry on the clothesline, morning breeze moving everything, camera swaying and hunting. Mid-section she's on the front terrace with a coffee cup, just sitting quietly, looking out at the street — loose drifting shot from the side. Then a right-side close shot where she raises her arm, waves warmly toward someone off-frame and says "Annyeong" — camera catches it a beat late. Final shot is a slow tracking walk down the street, coffee cup in hand, she notices the lens, turns slightly and gives a real quiet smile — then the recording just cuts to black mid-motion like the camcorder got switched off. Audio is strictly natural. Morning birds, light breeze, distant motorcycle sounds, faint neighborhood chatter, cat, coffee cup, footsteps on concrete, leaves. No music, no sound design, nothing added.

WasifAI

60,966 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This guy built an AI pipeline that generates hyperrealistic fashion models in 47 minutes and now dropshippers pay him $1,400 to clone the entire system. He got tired of watching e-com brands lose $8K per photoshoot when a single product angle changed so he built a 9-node workflow that generates 127 product videos from one Pinterest photo without hiring a single model. Here's the exact breakdown: → Claude writes a 34-parameter JSON brand DNA before any image is touched target psychographics, price anchor, vibe matrix, anti-inspiration blacklist → Pinterest becomes the model source library but you can't just download and animate → Kling 2.6 takes that static JPG and turns it into 5-second video but only after the prompt architecture is locked → Negative prompt node runs 41 exclusion terms: no plastic skin, no CGI glow, no symmetry artifacts, no doll face, no synthetic lighting → That one step kills the "AI look" that tanks engagement by 67% in the first 3 seconds → TikTok Studio uploads 19 videos in one batch with zero manual captioning because the brand voice was pre-programmed in step one → Atlas scrapes Amazon product links and auto-generates a Shopify store with hero images, pricing tiers, scarcity copy, and mobile-optimized checkout in 90 seconds → The store goes live before the first TikTok video finishes processing The key move 94% of people skip: you can't animate the photo before you inject the negative prompt. If you send a raw Pinterest image straight into image-to-video the face morphs into a wax figure. The fabric loses texture. The hands grow extra fingers. The whole thing screams "AI" and your CTR dies. His system runs the exclusion filter first so the model moves like she's shot on an iPhone 15 Pro in natural light. One brand hit 2.6M views on TikTok in 11 days with zero paid ads and converted at 3.7% because the videos looked like organic UGC not polished studio content. Brands now pay him $1,400 for the full pipeline setup + $340/month to keep the store synced with new product drops and seasonal video batches. The entire system runs on $23/month in API costs and one laptop. No photographer. No model agency. No product samples. Just a prompt template, a Pinterest account, and the discipline to filter out the AI artifacts before you render movement.

Shade

537,174 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

how to prompt undetectable ai shots while designing a running scene, first think about these 3 basic questions: how does the camera move? what is it looking at? where does it stop? a good motion prompt is really just a timeline it needs to follow real-world physics, and it needs to carry story at the same time 1. start with the narrative goal of the shot camera movement is not just movement it is the storytelling so before writing the prompt, define what the shot is trying to do for example, in a 15-second one take, the goal could be: follow the female lead laterally while she runs, to build speed and tension then briefly reveal the people chasing her then let the camera hesitate for a moment and find her again that small “lose and recapture” moment adds spatial depth and makes the chase feel more intense 2. build a clear space for the camera to work in if the space is vague, the shot gets messy very fast i like breaking the scene into layers so the model knows where everything belongs foreground: passing objects, environmental motion main subject layer: the woman running midground: cafe tables, pedestrians, the people chasing her background: the vanishing point of the street, and the entrance to the pedestrian area once the space is clear, the camera has a stage to move through 3. describe motion like a physical process a good moving shot has to respect inertia if the movement feels weightless or too perfect, it instantly feels fake so instead of using broad words, describe a chain of actions the camera can actually perform what accelerates what slows down when it adjusts when it slightly overshoots when it catches itself again that little bit of imperfection is usually what makes it feel real 4. use focus as part of the storytelling in a one take, focus is one of the best ways to guide attention you can design moments where focus shifts with intention for example: focus briefly drifts from the chasers’ faces, passes beyond them, lands on the woman in the distance, then quickly pulls back again it feels like a small mistake, but that’s exactly why it works it simulates a camera operator re-evaluating the subject in the middle of a fast-moving shot that kind of temporary focus loss and recovery adds a lot of immediacy and documentary feeling 5. build the sound space with the camera sound should move with the shot when the camera turns toward the chasers, the woman’s breathing should fall deeper into the sound field, while the chasers’ footsteps and breathing move to the center when the camera finds the woman again, her breath becomes the main sound again that shift in audio perspective helps the scene feel much more immersive it’s not just about what we see it’s also about where we feel the scene from 6. use negative constraints to stop common ai mistakes this part matters a lot i usually add clear “don’ts” at the end to stop the model from breaking the shot for example: no cuts no teleporting zooms no sliding characters no body fusion no floating props the travel bag must keep believable weight and inertia these negative constraints act like guardrails they help keep the result inside a believable physical world for me, the core of a strong motion prompt is simple: organize space, camera, focus, action, and sound into one executable timeline that’s really the difference instead of prompting a vague feeling, you’re designing a physical process and that’s usually what helps ai generate a moving shot that feels coherent, grounded, and full of tension

el.cine

14,433 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Every inch of this train becomes a weapon when survival is the only option. Made this video for @thankyouai_hq by using GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 prompt Part 1 (0–15 Seconds) A cinematic 15-second realistic action sequence inside an empty modern subway train car at night. Fluorescent ceiling lights cast harsh, cool white reflections across polished gray floors, brushed metal walls, silver handrails, and blue fabric seats. The train moves at high speed, creating subtle vibrations as overhead straps sway naturally. A fierce East Asian woman in her late 20s with dark hair secured in a tight high bun wears sleek black tactical gear consisting of a fitted long-sleeve compression top, cargo pants, combat boots, fingerless gloves, and tactical harness straps. She faces four heavily armed male assassins dressed in black tactical uniforms with balaclavas. The sequence opens with a low-angle tracking shot as the assassins rapidly surround her. She instantly drops into a low combat stance, slides across the polished floor beneath a sweeping attack, and uses the momentum to sweep an opponent's legs. She springs to her feet, delivering rapid elbow strikes and spinning back kicks while weaving between vertical poles and seat rows. One attacker charges from behind; she vaults over a subway seat, plants both feet on the seatback, and launches herself into a flying kick that knocks him backward into the train doors. Another assassin swings a baton, but she ducks, rolls beneath the strike, grabs an overhead handrail, and swings through the aisle to deliver a powerful mid-air double kick that sends two attackers crashing into opposite rows of seats. Fast handheld camera, dynamic tracking shots, Dutch angles, realistic impacts, gritty high-contrast desaturated color grading, movie-quality choreography inspired by Atomic Blonde and John Wick. No music, only heavy breathing, punches, impacts, footsteps, metallic rattles, and train ambience. Part 2 (15–30 Seconds) — Continuation Continuation of the exact same subway fight with identical character appearance, clothing, lighting, camera style, and environment. The East Asian woman maintains the same hairstyle, tactical outfit, and fluid fighting style as the battle intensifies inside the moving subway car. One assassin pulls a combat knife while another rushes with a metal pipe. She sidesteps at the last second, forcing them to collide before countering with rapid knee strikes and a spinning hook kick. She dives low between seat rows, crawls beneath grabbing hands, then explodes upward into a devastating uppercut that sends one attacker crashing into a glass partition. The tempered glass shatters realistically as fragments scatter across the floor. She grabs a dropped backpack and hurls it into another attacker's face before using a vertical pole to spin around with incredible momentum, delivering a flying roundhouse kick that throws the final assassin through a subway window. Glass bursts outward in slow, realistic fragments while cold night air rushes into the train. The final moments show the floor covered with shattered glass, abandoned weapons, backpacks, and defeated assassins. She stands breathing heavily in the center aisle, adjusting her fingerless glove before calmly walking toward the subway doors as sparks flicker from damaged lighting overhead. Dynamic low-angle tracking, close-up impact shots, handheld cinematography, realistic physics, gritty desaturated color grade, razor-sharp action, cinematic lighting, no music, only realistic fight sounds, shattering glass, metallic impacts, train rumble, and heavy breathing.

Sharon Riley

38,823 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

this is perfectly representation of what i been arguing for with Maxey-McCain lineups, specifically with Joel Embiid these are your best 3 offensive weapons, involving your 2 best shooters, but everyone is so dynamic it fundamentally makes offense broken Maxey shooting + penetration on left side, even reggie miller commentating points out how much space Maxey created off that drive, he then kicks it to Embiid Embiid as a hub here can act as a scorer or playmaker, from the very middle of the floor, he had the 3PT shot there, or coulda even forced it in the middle, does extra pass to McCain (note that Maxey n McCain are BOTH simultaneously one pass away, defense doesn't know who's getting it) pass to McCain, who no matter what he's shooting ALWAYS draws a hard closeout, that closeout was so hard due to his spacing gravity that he then unlocks the drive, and he's such a strong finisher he draws the defense with gravity LITERALLY just how Maxey did to start off the play kicks to Embiid, process is now backwards, who again has BOTH shot + drive into middy with a smaller defender, kicks it ONE MORE to Maxey, who hits the 3 either McCain or Maxey both penetration + kick + shooting threats PG in one corner for spacing Barlow in one corner for cutting beautiful play, coming from most likely our most potent offensive lineup. VJ can slot into the McCain/Maxey/PG/Barlow role as well, although his self creation is a little weaker than McCain/Maxey, i'd rather him act in the PG/Barlow role deff not a set play that Nurse runs too, he doesn't have this creativity. this shit was prolly lowry when they saw they was on the lineup together all in all, it perfectly showcases why McCain-Maxey is such an elite offensive duo, that we need more of. as i've been saying since LAST YEAR.

Y so serious

38,857 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

What if any preparations have you seen Iran make ahead of the war? Can you discuss It’s missile capabilities? Any intelligence capabilities? Any surprises it might happen in store? When the 12-day war ended, I estimated that Iran would need about six months to recover, including its nuclear program. Contrary to popular belief, Iran did not lose its entire long-range or medium-range air defense network; while some launchers were damaged, the primary targets of the Israeli strikes were the radar systems. Once the radars were neutralized, Iran successfully hid the bulk of its remaining batteries, leaving much of its arsenal intact. In contrast, short-range systems like the Tor-M1 and domestic variants were heavily engaged against cruise missiles, often being lost or damaged only after their ammunition was completely exhausted. Since then, Iran has worked to rebuild its destroyed radar network and, above all, to implement a genuine counterintelligence doctrine. The Mossad operations against Iranian radars and air defense systems have shaped new perimeter defense and counterintelligence doctrines not only in Iran but in other countries as well. If we look at the quantity of weapons and the organization of armed groups during Iran’s most recent protests, I would say the problem of foreign intelligence operations inside the country remains severe. This seriously threatens much of Iran’s capabilities, and I foresee a wave of sabotage operations as a new war draws closer. Iran has begun receiving collaboration from China across multiple areas,from satellites to internal counterintelligence, but it may still take some time for this to produce tangible results. During the last years, the Mossad relied heavily on cell phones, using SMS for recruitment and accessing device GPS for target location. Iran has since focused intensely on preventing any repetition of this, and on this specific issue, the Chinese appear to have provided support. Although foreign intelligence services have operated extensively inside Iran, the scale of any armed opposition groups is negligible compared to the Iranian armed forces, which could still draw on allied paramilitaries and militias in neighboring countries, including the Houthis. Iran has become a missile power with a stockpile far larger than Western estimates suggest. As early as 1998, Iran was already producing missiles with ranges exceeding 1,000 km, and it has continued doing so ever since, developing 12 to 15 different models in that range - meaning all are capable of reaching Israel. That is nearly 30 years of continuous missile production, resulting in a stockpile of several thousands. Another area where Iran has emerged as a global power is drones, including underwater ones. Iran’s UUVs have evolved rapidly into mass-produced models with integrated AI, and I believe they hold some major surprises in reserve. A key point today is that the AN/TPY-2 radars, which played a critical role in tracking Iranian missiles, would be among the first targets to be engaged. These high-powered X-band radars are the backbone of regional missile defense, providing essential data to THAAD and Patriot batteries. However, because they are large, stationary, and emit high-energy signals, they are highly vulnerable to a first-strike or saturation attack, which would effectively 'blind' the entire defensive network. Obviously, a defense budget of nearly one trillion dollars cannot be compared to Iran’s, but the real question is whether the cost and effort are worth the potential casualties. Even without Israel, the Americans maintain an immense advantage in aerial operations over Iran; however, as I have stated before, this superiority does not translate to the maritime theater.

Patricia Marins

21,142 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇮🇱🇮🇷 IRAN WAR STRATEGY EXPLAINED! It is important to understand that Iran is not fighting a symmetric war against the USA/Israel. They can’t and they don’t. 📋 Iran is doing two things at the same time: 1) WAR ON OIL AND GAS Iran is trying to choke off oil and gas trade from the Middle East through strikes on oil and gas platforms/refineries and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which handles about 25% of seaborne oil and gas trade. (Video 3) This hits US and Arab interests hard. The sheikhs are already calling Trump and urging quick action. They need peace to continue business. → This is achieved with minimal effort by Iran and is working. No ships pass the strait, oil/gas production is halted to some extent, prices skyrocket. This affects everyone worldwide. Trump is under heavy pressure as long as this continues. 2) MISSILE WAR The missile campaign is not aimed at quickly destroying USA or Israel. That’s pure internet hype. Iran fires enough drones and missiles to keep defenses busy and deplete interceptor stocks. They strike multiple locations simultaneously (Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, even Cyprus), forcing the US to spread air defenses thin. Concentrating heavy defenses in one place becomes impossible. As Rubio noted yesterday, only 6–7 interceptors are produced per month (Video 2), while Iran produces over 100 missiles per month. If Iran sustains the campaign, it will win the attrition war against air defenses. Time is on Iran’s side. The more air-defense missiles are expended per Iranian projectile, (just look how much they fire to intercept one missile - Video 4), the worse the situation becomes for the defenders—especially after Ukraine depleted much of the Western stockpile over the past four years. Key takeaway: As long as Iran maintains the missile campaign, time works in their favour. The longer the conflict lasts, the stronger Iran’s position becomes. If air defenses run out, Iran can strike freely anything and will win. 📋 Status quo: A) Iran fired fewer missiles on Monday, so they are losing? No! Analysis of the US CENTCOM video (Video 1): The US Air Force struck abandoned, already-used launchers and a broken-down truck. They clearly couldn’t locate active Iranian missile forces, so they hit whatever they found. The launchers were already expended; the crews had left after firing. When the US releases such footage, it suggests this is the best they have. They are not destroying Iran’s missile forces at a high rate. They destroy abandoned trucks. Iran doesn’t need to act quickly. Firing drones and missiles a few times a day is enough to keep oil/gas trade stopped and air defenses occupied. As long as they sustain this, time remains on their side. B) Is Iran winning? Also No. Iran struggles to keep its airspace clear. US surveillance drones continue to penetrate, preventing free movement of launchers. As long as those drones remain active, Iran cannot fire at will without risk. Failure to neutralise them would break their strategy. While American and Israeli drones fly in Irans sky, Irans missiles stay under ground and can’t surface, or they risk being struck quickly. Hence US/Israeli Surveillance drones, that direct strikes are the biggest problem Iran has now. They want to roll out missile infrastructure from below ground to the surface, and they can’t … at least not at scale. Watch this closely as a key indicator. How many drones are flying above Iran and how many are shot down. C) What is the US/Israeli strategy? They planned to remove Khamenei, trigger mass protests by Shah supporters, and install a new regime. This has clearly failed. Now they destroy military buildings (police headquarters, etc.), mostly for posture and intimidation. Essential personnel do not work in above-ground offices—doing so would be foolish. The remaining option is to make life unbearable and force surrender by bombing power plants and similar infrastructure. This will come soon at scale. More bombs!

Lord Bebo

1,612,322 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. Trump ordered U.S fighter jets and armed drones to launch a major assault on Houthi targets in Yemen. He issued a statement telling the Houthis: "Your time is up, and your attacks must stop." 2. A missile fired from Yemen struck Egypt's Sinai Peninsula near the resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh. The IDF is investigating whether Israel was the intended target but has not yet confirmed this. 3. SpaceX's Dragon capsule docked with the ISS, delivering 4 astronauts in a NASA crew swap. It will also bring back 2 stranded astronauts who have been on the ISS for 9 months since their Boeing Starliner was deemed too unsafe to return them. 4. Macron declared that Russia has no say in whether NATO troops enter Ukraine, stating that the decision lies solely with Kyiv. Britain and France are considering deploying thousands of peacekeepers as part of a ceasefire plan, while Russia outright rejects any NATO forces in Ukraine. 5. Todd Lyons, Acting ICE Director, said that Biden had cooked the books on ICE arrest data: "They were purposely misleading the American people by categorizing individuals processed and released into the interior of the United States as ICE arrests." 6. Over 300,000 Serbians took part in anti-government protests, calling for the resignation of President Aleksandar Vučić. It was Serbia's largest protest ever. 7. A fire at Club Pulse in Kocani, North Macedonia, killed at least 50 people and injured over 100. The blaze started during a concert by the band DNA when pyrotechnics were used, rapidly spreading through the crowded venue. 8. Kim Kardashian is reportedly taking legal action to remove Ye's new track from X after it featured their 11-year-old daughter, North. The song, 'Lonely Roads Still Go To Sunshine,' includes what appears to be Diddy's voice, despite his ongoing legal troubles, as well as a verse from North. 9. Trump signed an order to downsize the U.S Agency for Global Media, cutting wasteful spending at taxpayer-funded media outlets. It led to most Voice of America journalists being placed on administrative leave. 10. Israel's Defense Minister confirmed that the Iron Beam, a high-power laser air defense system, will be operational by the end of 2025. The Rafael-developed system is designed to intercept rockets, mortars, UAVs, and cruise missiles - at just $2-$3.50 per shot, compared to $40,000-$50,000 per Iron Dome interceptor.

Mario Nawfal

206,057 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr