ๆญฃๅœจๅŠ ่ฝฝ่ง†้ข‘...

่ง†้ข‘ๅŠ ่ฝฝๅคฑ่ดฅ

๐™ƒ๐™ค๐™ฌ ๐˜ฟ๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ๐™– ๐™‹๐™ง๐™š๐™ฅ๐™–๐™ง๐™š๐™™ ๐™ƒ๐™š๐™ง ๐˜พ๐™๐™ž๐™ก๐™™๐™ง๐™š๐™ฃ ๐™๐™ค๐™ง ๐™‡๐™ž๐™›๐™š ๐˜ผ๐™จ ๐˜ผ ๐™๐™ค๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ก | ๐˜ฟ๐™ž๐™–๐™ฃ๐™–โ€™๐™จ ๐™‡๐™š๐™œ๐™–๐™˜๐™ฎ - ๐™๐™š๐™–๐™ก ๐™๐™ค๐™ฎ๐™–๐™ก๐™ฉ๐™ฎ ๐™”๐™ค๐™ช๐™๐™ช๐™—๐™š Older doco, talking about Diana's relationship with her eldest son, William. 1/2. (a longer 20 min video of this in below post)

93,721 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 25 ๅคฉๅ‰ โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 ๆก่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๆš‚ๆ— ่ฏ„่ฎบ

ๅŽŸๅง‹ๅธ–ๅญ็š„่ฏ„่ฎบๅฐ†ๆ˜พ็คบๅœจ่ฟ™้‡Œ

็›ธๅ…ณ่ง†้ข‘

The media is finally paying attention to the obsession that Meg has with Prince William and his family. "Meghan Markle shares a rare video of daughter Lilibet playing with a Jellycat after William revealed the British toy is 'his children's currency'"๐Ÿ”ฅ The article reports how Meg "has shared a new video of herself gardening with her daughter, who was sporting a brand loved by the Wales children. [...]" "The popular British toy brand, which is famous for selling cuddly toys with smiling faces, is also a firm favourite among the Prince and Princess of Wales's children and Princess Charlotte posed with a toy from the brand in a 2015 portrait."๐Ÿ‘Œ Indeed, the first time the Wales introduce the brand jellycat in their family, it was in 2015 with the first ever baby portrait of Charlotte. However, Meg was not in the RF yet, and it is very clear she had no idea of its significance for the Wales๐Ÿ˜ It was last May 2025, during the BP garden party, that William and Catherine met with the late Liz Hatton's family. Her brother Matteo, gifted the Royal couple with Jellycat plushies: a 'Tarte au citron' for Catherine and William, a collector's item Pickled Onionโค๏ธ It was then that William revealed that he wasn't the only one who'd be delighted by the unique gifts. 'My children will love these, They are children's currency,' he said."๐Ÿ”ฅ This is when it became widely reported. So right on the dot, a month later today, William's stalker decided to release a video of herself and her "daughter" sporting the british toy brand with her daughter as the Wales did for Charlotte๐Ÿ˜ตโ€๐Ÿ’ซ Why would children raised in America by an american mother and a girl who has never been nor lived in the UK, play with British brand toys instead of American brand toys?๐Ÿคก EVERYTHING about Meg's "children" is always cosplayed from the Wales children๐Ÿค” It is very clear that Meghan suffers gravely from imposters syndrome and is obsessed with Prince William's life and his family because they are the Royal standard. She wants to FORCE a 'Royal British identity' in her american born and raised "children" that simply does not exist๐Ÿ”ฅ It is almost as if, somehow in her donkey head, she thinks that if she cosplays the Wales and their family successfully, Then the world will see Her and her family as "Real Royals" instead of the "Temu celebrity wannabe" they are seen as..๐Ÿคท๐Ÿฝโ€โ™€๏ธ To do so, Meg has cast herself as "Catherine", she has cast her daughter as "Princess Charlotte" Her son, cosplays either of "Princes George or Louis" and she has cast Harry as "William"๐Ÿคก And you can see it over and over again: Everything William and Catherine are reportedly doing as a couple, Meg announce she is doing it with Harry; If the Wales children are losing teeth, her children are also losing theirs that same week๐Ÿ˜‚ If they love gardening, baking and the outdoors, she announces her children do as well; William says he enjoys a movie, meg says she enjoys the same movie too; William plays mario go Kart, Meg reference Mario go Kart and paint herself as Princess peach๐Ÿ˜‚ Catherine cooks bolognese for William, Meg says she enjoys cooking it for Harry; William sports a bracelet made by Charlotte; Meg post a video wearing a similar bracelet made from lili; Charlotte plays with jellycat toys, Meg post a video of lili with jellycat toys..๐Ÿฅด More to the point, the only dates that matter to her are William's birthday, his mother Diana's birthday, Catherine's and their children's birthdays as well as their engagements dates; Meg plans all her releases around those dates obsessively๐Ÿคก This is Pure Psychotic mental illness on display๐Ÿ‘Œ Well and so, Harry will continue to be a very resentful and bitter manchild because he knows full well that even in his marriage, he is "William's spare"..โ˜•๏ธ

Canellecitadelle

142,599 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰

๐ŸšจALERT: Pastor Rob McCoy CAUGHT On Mic Admitting He Lied About His Son Being โ€œCovered in Charlie Kirkโ€™s Bloodโ€โ€ฆ Then Calls YOU Stupid for Noticing๐Ÿคช Shoutout to @patriotichousewife On YT for this awesome breakdown of a sermon Rob McCoy just gave last week at Redemption Church. Go SUBSCRIBE to her and watch her FULL video breakdown about it. The LINK will be in the comments below. Rabbi Rob McCoy ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ just took the pulpit AGAIN to: โœณ๏ธ Lie about his son being โ€œcovered in Charlieโ€™s bloodโ€ (admits 2 minutes later he only ASSUMED it) โœณ๏ธ Call questioning his story โ€œcarnal,โ€ โ€œgossip,โ€ and โ€œstupidโ€ โœณ๏ธ Hide behind Charlie Kirkโ€™s dead body while smearing Tucker & Candace โœณ๏ธ Whine about โ€œdeath threatsโ€ and โ€œclickbait Christiansโ€ while doing 20 minutes of clickbait himself โœณ๏ธ Lecture Gen Z about โ€œantisemitismโ€ and compare 2025 America to 1936 Nazi Germanyโ€ฆ from a church in Israel that Charlie allegedly sent him to start ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ This man has preached about Charlieโ€™s death in literally every sermon since July, but claims heโ€™s โ€œchosen to remain silent.โ€ The narcissism is clinical. The grift is grotesque. Asking questions isnโ€™t slander. Using a dead 28-year-old as your permanent human shield IS. How many more times does this guy get to exploit a tragedy before his own congregation wakes up? RT, Tag Candace Owens and drop your thoughts below โฌ‡๏ธ

Project Constitution

72,257 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 9 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

1/2. Matt Wilkinson, Sarah Hewson and JJ Anisiobi on Royal Exclusive, talking about 'what's needed for the celebrities to return'. Few thoughts... Seeing as William was correct in his initial assessment of Harry and Markle's relationship, and of US celebrity Markle's fame ambition and suitability for the British institution of monarchy, and seeing as nothing has changed - by all reports Harry still enables, protects and participates in Markle's poor behaviour, - Harry still has personal grievances and publicly shared issues with William and with his place in the hierarchy (and William's place will only increase in seniority), - and Markle is just as ruthlessly fame hungry as she was, and considering the fact that thanks to Harry and Markle's actions, things are now a lot worse than they were ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ผ, why would William, at this time in his and his wife and children's lives, expel time and energy into them returning? All things considered, why would he risk it, either for himself, his family, or the institution? With the precarious position the institution is in, and the instability and untrustworthiness of the US celebrities, who in their right mind would risk it? And also, on JJ's comments that all it would take is 'Catherine to publicly support Markle', I disagree. I wouldn't support their return, regardless of what William and Catherine said or did. full ep

mrc ๐Ÿฆ‡

12,505 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 5 ไธชๆœˆๅ‰

Here's my conversation with Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, the company that created Claude, one of the best AI systems in the world. We talk about scaling, AI safety, regulation, and a lot of super technical details about the present and future of AI and humanity. It's a 5+ hour conversation in total. Amanda Askell and Chris Olah (Chris Olah) join us for an hour each to talk about Claude's character and mechanistic interpretability, respectively. This was a fascinating, wide-ranging, super-technical, and fun conversation! First 4 hours are here on X (4 hours is current limit), and is up on everywhere else in full. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:14 - Scaling laws 12:20 - Limits of LLM scaling 20:45 - Competition with OpenAI, Google, xAI, Meta 26:08 - Claude 29:44 - Opus 3.5 34:30 - Sonnet 3.5 37:50 - Claude 4.0 42:02 - Criticism of Claude 54:49 - AI Safety Levels 1:05:37 - ASL-3 and ASL-4 1:09:40 - Computer use 1:19:35 - Government regulation of AI 1:38:24 - Hiring a great team 1:47:14 - Post-training 1:52:39 - Constitutional AI 1:58:05 - Machines of Loving Grace 2:17:11 - AGI timeline 2:29:46 - Programming 2:36:46 - Meaning of life 2:42:53 - Amanda Askell - Philosophy 2:45:21 - Programming advice for non-technical people 2:49:09 - Talking to Claude 3:05:41 - Prompt engineering 3:14:15 - Post-training 3:18:54 - Constitutional AI 3:23:48 - System prompts 3:29:54 - Is Claude getting dumber? 3:41:56 - Character training 3:42:56 - Nature of truth 3:47:32 - Optimal rate of failure 3:54:43 - AI consciousness 4:09:14 - AGI 4:17:52 - Chris Olah - Mechanistic Interpretability 4:22:44 - Features, Circuits, Universality 4:40:17 - Superposition 4:51:16 - Monosemanticity 4:58:08 - Scaling Monosemanticity 5:06:56 - Macroscopic behavior of neural networks 5:11:50 - Beauty of neural networks

Lex Fridman

1,375,977 ๆฌก่ง‚็œ‹ โ€ข 1 ๅนดๅ‰