正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

💖𝙉𝙀𝙒 𝙎𝙊𝙉𝙂💖 RiraN feat. AZK - Maboroshi 【DJMAX RESPECT V】 Full MV (BGA) : DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIBERTY 4 DLC PACK ⓒ 2025 Neowiz. DJMAX Entertainment All Rights Reserved.

RiraN

16,917 subscribers

46,565 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术音乐教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

✨新曲公開✨ 【DJMAX RESPECT V】 RiraN ft. 音琴兎愛 - Hikari Full M/V : OUT NOW on DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIBERTY 2 #DJMAX

✨新曲公開✨ 【DJMAX RESPECT V】 RiraN ft. 音琴兎愛 - Hikari Full M/V : OUT NOW on DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIBERTY 2 #DJMAX

RiraN

14,225 次观看 • 1 年前

DJMAX RESPECT V의 V LIBERTY 3 DLC PACK에 수록된 Teikyou - CHiNEM4TiC의 BGA 작업을 맡게 되었습니다. 많은 관심 부탁드립니다! Full : ✈️

DJMAX RESPECT V의 V LIBERTY 3 DLC PACK에 수록된 Teikyou - CHiNEM4TiC의 BGA 작업을 맡게 되었습니다. 많은 관심 부탁드립니다! Full : ✈️

cs

20,967 次观看 • 1 年前

DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIVERTY 5 Miiro 「Aria」 (feat. DIEIN) MV OUT NOW DJMAX (DJMAX Official) 신규 DLC의 타이틀곡 아리아의 MV가 선공개 되었습니다! 음악과 잘 어울리는 너무나도 멋진 영상입니다 작업에 참여해 주신 모든 분들께 감사드립니다! 게임 업데이트는 내일 (26) 음원 발매는 7/3, 7/7에 진행될 예정입니다! BGA: #DJMAX #디제이맥스 #Diein #Miiro

DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIVERTY 5 Miiro 「Aria」 (feat. DIEIN) MV OUT NOW DJMAX (DJMAX Official) 신규 DLC의 타이틀곡 아리아의 MV가 선공개 되었습니다! 음악과 잘 어울리는 너무나도 멋진 영상입니다 작업에 참여해 주신 모든 분들께 감사드립니다! 게임 업데이트는 내일 (26) 음원 발매는 7/3, 7/7에 진행될 예정입니다! BGA: #DJMAX #디제이맥스 #Diein #Miiro

Miiro

44,328 次观看 • 2 个月前

DJMAX RESPECT V書き下ろし楽曲とMVをYouTubeにアップしました EmoCosine - Luv Master 【from DJMAX RESPECT V】

DJMAX RESPECT V書き下ろし楽曲とMVをYouTubeにアップしました EmoCosine - Luv Master 【from DJMAX RESPECT V】

EmoCosine / エモコサイン

19,809 次观看 • 8 个月前

#PPPP in DJMAX RESPECT V V LIBERTY 5✨ 디맥에서도 뿅뿅뿅뿅🎮🎮🎮🎮

#PPPP in DJMAX RESPECT V V LIBERTY 5✨ 디맥에서도 뿅뿅뿅뿅🎮🎮🎮🎮

TAK

59,302 次观看 • 2 个月前

DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIVERTY 5 Miiro 「Aria」 feat. DIEIN 공개 예정 안녕하세요 미로입니다 26일 발매될 DJMAX (DJMAX Official) 신규 DLC의 타이틀 곡을 맡게 되었습니다! 신곡 Aria는 6/25일 DJMAX 채널에서 MV를 통해 선공개 될 예정입니다 많은 기대 부탁드립니다. 공개 일정 -6/25(THU) MV(BGA) OUT -6/26 (FRI) DLC RELEASE -7/3(FRI) ORIGINAL ALBUM RELEASE -7/7(TUE) DMRV 26SS RELEASE Trailer: Composer Lineup:

DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIVERTY 5 Miiro 「Aria」 feat. DIEIN 공개 예정 안녕하세요 미로입니다 26일 발매될 DJMAX (DJMAX Official) 신규 DLC의 타이틀 곡을 맡게 되었습니다! 신곡 Aria는 6/25일 DJMAX 채널에서 MV를 통해 선공개 될 예정입니다 많은 기대 부탁드립니다. 공개 일정 -6/25(THU) MV(BGA) OUT -6/26 (FRI) DLC RELEASE -7/3(FRI) ORIGINAL ALBUM RELEASE -7/7(TUE) DMRV 26SS RELEASE Trailer: Composer Lineup:

Miiro

29,448 次观看 • 2 个月前

DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIBERTY 3 DLC PACK 「Love, Epilogue (feat. mill)」 여배우를 짝사랑했던 코디네이터의 이야기를 썼습니다. 분량조절 실패해서 2:40 됐습니다. 도와주신분들 모아보니 드림팀이었습니다. 재밌게 플레이해주세요. Lyrics : u32 Vocal : mill Illust : nonnon Moive : LUMINA

DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIBERTY 3 DLC PACK 「Love, Epilogue (feat. mill)」 여배우를 짝사랑했던 코디네이터의 이야기를 썼습니다. 분량조절 실패해서 2:40 됐습니다. 도와주신분들 모아보니 드림팀이었습니다. 재밌게 플레이해주세요. Lyrics : u32 Vocal : mill Illust : nonnon Moive : LUMINA

seibin

46,134 次观看 • 1 年前

DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIBERTY 3 DLC The Universe - Nien 니엔님의 굉장한 갓곡에 업혀 네번째 BGA가 선공개되었습니다!! 항상 좋게 봐주셔서 감사합니다!! 🥹✨✨✨✨

DJMAX RESPECT V - V LIBERTY 3 DLC The Universe - Nien 니엔님의 굉장한 갓곡에 업혀 네번째 BGA가 선공개되었습니다!! 항상 좋게 봐주셔서 감사합니다!! 🥹✨✨✨✨

파테슘

32,148 次观看 • 1 年前

【🎉告知🎉】音楽ゲーム DJMAX RESPECT V の新DLC 「V LIBERTY 4」に ✨新曲「RiraN feat. AZK - Maboroshi」が収録されます！✨ アニソン X 音楽ゲームをイメージして作った楽曲です！🎶 リリースされたらぜひプレイしてみてください！🎮💫

【🎉告知🎉】音楽ゲーム DJMAX RESPECT V の新DLC 「V LIBERTY 4」に ✨新曲「RiraN feat. AZK - Maboroshi」が収録されます！✨ アニソン X 音楽ゲームをイメージして作った楽曲です！🎶 リリースされたらぜひプレイしてみてください！🎮💫

RiraN

19,144 次观看 • 8 个月前

[DJMAX RESPECT V] 1！2！3！4！ただいま配信CHU！(4BSC15) very fun

[DJMAX RESPECT V] 1！2！3！4！ただいま配信CHU！(4BSC15) very fun

dolce_iwate

54,892 次观看 • 1 年前

DJMAX ENT | V LIBERTY 4 DLC 이벤트 DLC PV RT 깜짝 이벤트! 지금 리트윗하고 스팀 코드 받아가세요! 📌참여 방법 DJMAX Official 팔로우 + 본 게시물 RT 📌이벤트 기간 ~12/18(목) 11:59 📌당첨자 발표 개별 DM 안내 (타래로 이벤트 내용이 이어집니다.)

DJMAX ENT | V LIBERTY 4 DLC 이벤트 DLC PV RT 깜짝 이벤트! 지금 리트윗하고 스팀 코드 받아가세요! 📌참여 방법 DJMAX Official 팔로우 + 본 게시물 RT 📌이벤트 기간 ~12/18(목) 11:59 📌당첨자 발표 개별 DM 안내 (타래로 이벤트 내용이 이어집니다.)

DJMAX Official

85,024 次观看 • 8 个月前

【新曲告知】 DJMAX Official DJMAX RESPECT Vの新しいDLC、V LIBERTY 2に私の新曲、「Hikari」が収録される予定です！音琴兎愛 (音琴兎愛/Negoto Bunnyla )さんと一緒に作ったKawaii Hyper Technoという意味不明な感じの楽曲です！！ MVもスーパーかわいいので、皆さんぜひ遊んでください！！！❤️‍🩹 #DJMAX

【新曲告知】 DJMAX Official DJMAX RESPECT Vの新しいDLC、V LIBERTY 2に私の新曲、「Hikari」が収録される予定です！音琴兎愛 (音琴兎愛/Negoto Bunnyla )さんと一緒に作ったKawaii Hyper Technoという意味不明な感じの楽曲です！！ MVもスーパーかわいいので、皆さんぜひ遊んでください！！！❤️‍🩹 #DJMAX

RiraN

31,308 次观看 • 1 年前

【告知】「DJMAX RESPECT V」NEW DLCに書き下ろし新曲『Luv Master』作らせていただきました！ 12/18から配信予定！よろしくお願いします🫶 #DJMAX

【告知】「DJMAX RESPECT V」NEW DLCに書き下ろし新曲『Luv Master』作らせていただきました！ 12/18から配信予定！よろしくお願いします🫶 #DJMAX

EmoCosine / エモコサイン

52,499 次观看 • 8 个月前

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Sall Grover

33,499 次观看 • 1 年前

LINK & INSTRUCTIONS HOW TO ATTEND OUR FEDERAL COURT HEARING VIA ZOOM NEXT MONDAY *Repost & share - We need to show the court that there is still very much public interest in this incredibly important landmark case. No government can be allowed to invoke such vile overreaching and tyrannical charter/human rights violations on Canadians ever again. Vaccine Travel Mandates lawsuit Hearing Date: November 3rd, 2025 - 1pm EST Case/file #: T-2536-23 - SHAUN RICKARD ET AL. v. HMK ET AL If you would like to attend the hearing virtually, please follow this link. Scroll down, go to page 2 and and click on the little green box with the pen (see attached screenshot). Then enter your information, click register and you will be sent an e-mail confirmation: *Please note, the hearing will now be held at the Federal Court in Toronto, not the Federal Court of Appeal as originally thought: 180 Queen St W Toronto ON M5V 1Z4 If you would like to attend in person, please contact the Clerk at the Federal Court and quote the file # above: T: 416-973-3356 E: audiences@fct-cf.ca Where we are at with the case: After nearly 4 years, the 15,000 pages of evidence – including some extremely damning/incriminating details – is getting closer to Court. Further to the Federal Court ruling that our landmark action can go to trial, the appeal to ensure the whole action can proceed will be heard on November 3rd, 2025 in the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Further to our earlier and full update below from January 9th of this year, we now now move a step closer to the opportunity to fully hold the Liberal government, and Justin Trudeau, to account in court. Their divisive, cruel and unscientific overreach in imposing a nearly 9 months ban on unvaccinated Canadians and Permanent Residents from travelling on planes, trains and ships caused hardship and damage to millions of people in Canada. The hard work of our talented young lawyer, Sam Presvelos, paid off in June 2022 when evidence emerging in discovery in those earlier stages of the case caused then Attorney General David Lametti to reconsider the government’s position and the ‘vaccine mandate for travel’ was suspended with the implicit threat being made that they would do it again if they wanted to do so. In a moment of respite those millions of people, denied their fundamental Section 6 rights for nearly 9 months, could once again travel to see their loved ones and family events; to work; and to take much needed vacation time. This appeal, which will be heard at the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto on November 3rd at 1pm Eastern Time, will consider whether Justice Kent Horne erred when he allowed the government’s motion to strike out two parts of our claim – those parts in relation to s.7 and s.12 of the Charter. Justice Horne allowed those parts in relation to s6 and s15 to go ahead to trial pending the outcome of this appeal and any further appeals that may follow. s.7 (life, liberty, security) deals with crucial rights that permit us all to decide for ourselves what happens to our body. We believe that the choice to accept a vaccine or not should be free of any sort of coercion or detrimental consequences imposed by any authority. They do not accept that the bar to their success in relation to s.7 is so high as to have no reasonable prospect of success and that their arguments should be allowed to proceed to trial. s.12 (cruel/unusual punishment) is normally heard in relation to the cruel and unusual punishment of people in the criminal justice system in relation to penal sanctions. We believe that then Prime Minister Trudeau developed the vaccine mandate as a deliberately cruel and unusual punishment for those Canadians who were exercising their s7 right to refuse the Covid-19 vaccines and, at the same time to use that punishment very publicly as a political campaign promise and ‘wedge issue’ in the 2021 General Election. The appeal will not be easy, but our case is in great hands with Sam Presvelos, the young litigator who achieved so much for millions of people in Canada who were, until June 2022, denied the right to even leave their country! If we succeed the government may then try to further appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. It is very apparent that they do not want this case to be heard and particularly, perhaps, the s.7 arguments. If we are unsuccessful at this stage, they may take their arguments to the Supreme Court. We want to have our arguments and evidence heard on all four Sections 6,7,12 and 15. If you would like to help support this incredibly important landmark lawsuit, you can do so via e-transfer: donations@freedomandjustice.ca or via the donations page on our website: More details can be found on our official website: Also more details/updates on the case and hearing here:

LINK & INSTRUCTIONS HOW TO ATTEND OUR FEDERAL COURT HEARING VIA ZOOM NEXT MONDAY Repost & share - We need to show the court that there is still very much public interest in this incredibly important landmark case. No government can be allowed to invoke such vile overreaching and tyrannical charter/human rights violations on Canadians ever again. Vaccine Travel Mandates lawsuit Hearing Date: November 3rd, 2025 - 1pm EST Case/file #: T-2536-23 - SHAUN RICKARD ET AL. v. HMK ET AL If you would like to attend the hearing virtually, please follow this link. Scroll down, go to page 2 and and click on the little green box with the pen (see attached screenshot). Then enter your information, click register and you will be sent an e-mail confirmation: Please note, the hearing will now be held at the Federal Court in Toronto, not the Federal Court of Appeal as originally thought: 180 Queen St W Toronto ON M5V 1Z4 If you would like to attend in person, please contact the Clerk at the Federal Court and quote the file # above: T: 416-973-3356 E: [email protected] Where we are at with the case: After nearly 4 years, the 15,000 pages of evidence – including some extremely damning/incriminating details – is getting closer to Court. Further to the Federal Court ruling that our landmark action can go to trial, the appeal to ensure the whole action can proceed will be heard on November 3rd, 2025 in the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Further to our earlier and full update below from January 9th of this year, we now now move a step closer to the opportunity to fully hold the Liberal government, and Justin Trudeau, to account in court. Their divisive, cruel and unscientific overreach in imposing a nearly 9 months ban on unvaccinated Canadians and Permanent Residents from travelling on planes, trains and ships caused hardship and damage to millions of people in Canada. The hard work of our talented young lawyer, Sam Presvelos, paid off in June 2022 when evidence emerging in discovery in those earlier stages of the case caused then Attorney General David Lametti to reconsider the government’s position and the ‘vaccine mandate for travel’ was suspended with the implicit threat being made that they would do it again if they wanted to do so. In a moment of respite those millions of people, denied their fundamental Section 6 rights for nearly 9 months, could once again travel to see their loved ones and family events; to work; and to take much needed vacation time. This appeal, which will be heard at the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto on November 3rd at 1pm Eastern Time, will consider whether Justice Kent Horne erred when he allowed the government’s motion to strike out two parts of our claim – those parts in relation to s.7 and s.12 of the Charter. Justice Horne allowed those parts in relation to s6 and s15 to go ahead to trial pending the outcome of this appeal and any further appeals that may follow. s.7 (life, liberty, security) deals with crucial rights that permit us all to decide for ourselves what happens to our body. We believe that the choice to accept a vaccine or not should be free of any sort of coercion or detrimental consequences imposed by any authority. They do not accept that the bar to their success in relation to s.7 is so high as to have no reasonable prospect of success and that their arguments should be allowed to proceed to trial. s.12 (cruel/unusual punishment) is normally heard in relation to the cruel and unusual punishment of people in the criminal justice system in relation to penal sanctions. We believe that then Prime Minister Trudeau developed the vaccine mandate as a deliberately cruel and unusual punishment for those Canadians who were exercising their s7 right to refuse the Covid-19 vaccines and, at the same time to use that punishment very publicly as a political campaign promise and ‘wedge issue’ in the 2021 General Election. The appeal will not be easy, but our case is in great hands with Sam Presvelos, the young litigator who achieved so much for millions of people in Canada who were, until June 2022, denied the right to even leave their country! If we succeed the government may then try to further appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. It is very apparent that they do not want this case to be heard and particularly, perhaps, the s.7 arguments. If we are unsuccessful at this stage, they may take their arguments to the Supreme Court. We want to have our arguments and evidence heard on all four Sections 6,7,12 and 15. If you would like to help support this incredibly important landmark lawsuit, you can do so via e-transfer: [email protected] or via the donations page on our website: More details can be found on our official website: Also more details/updates on the case and hearing here:

Shaun Rickard

34,834 次观看 • 10 个月前