Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"๐™Š๐™ซ๐™ช๐™ก๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™Š๐™ซ๐™š๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™ช๐™ง๐™š - ๐˜ผ๐™ช๐™™๐™ž๐™ค ๐™๐™š๐™ข๐™–๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ง" Here's the remaster of the previous audio version Zorak did! I think it turned out well. Adagio VA: MOO๐ŸฉทCOW Kiwi VA: Squish SFX Pack: OpenNSFW + Squish Audio Mixer: Zorak The Evil ~ NSFW Sound Designer (LIMITED)

109,063 views โ€ข 1 year ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I wanted to show you guys how hard we've been working to get the Diddy Kong Racing decompilation to run this well on the Sega Dreamcast... So I took the liberty of splicing together some high-action moneyshots directly captured from the console for a look at how the game currently performs. Just a few days ago, it was dipping to below 20FPS with audio cutting in and out as the main thread couldn't keep up with the audio decoding while simultaneously handling rendering and game logic. I know, I know, how could a Dreamcast struggle with an N64 game? It's because these decompilations are written to essentially emulate the N64's unique hardware as accurately as possible. In this case, that means the Dreamcast's main SH4 CPU is emulating all audio decoding, mixing, and synthesis in software, including DSP effects. This was originally handled separately by the RSP coprocessor in the N64... Not wanting to have to rewrite the entire audio back-end to use the DC's AICA sound processor, I've vectorized the absolute living HELL out of the ADPCM decoder with my SH4ZAM library... Which gave us enough performance out of the SH4 to continue emulating all of the sound processing in software. You will notice in the footage that the only time the FPS isn't at solid 30 is when there is a lot of overlapping SFX from nearby racers chattering or items getting used. That's the SH4 having to work even harder to mix multiple audio channels together and possibly even apply DSP effects to them as well!

Falco Girgis

17,239 views โ€ข 1 month ago

๐Ÿšจ UVU STAGE FORENSIC BREAKDOWN: We're The Audio Mixer & Microphone Battery Pack Rigged for Charlie Kirk Explosionโ€” Proof of "Testing" Weeks Before! Here's a forensic visual breakdown of the professional 4K streaming setup at Thanks to @AlleyFiles investigator overlays, weโ€™ve now have every piece of gear on that stage notedโ€”and the results are disturbing. โšก๏ธ THE FORENSIC MANIFEST: Audio Command: The U300 Digital Mixer (Annotated for potential surge/grounding points). Power Source: High-capacity mobile battery-powered rigsโ€”standard for Kirkโ€™s tours to avoid local grid instability. Monitoring: Professional-grade multi-cam 4K digital monitoring. Charlieโ€™s Rode Mic Pack, worn on his belt under his shirt (left side), was directly aligned with the trajectory of the fatal entry wound on his neck. Witnesses reported a sound, but was it a gun? We believe the mic pack was rigged to explode, triggered by the very equipment on stage. Did the U300 play a pre-recorded gunshot over the PA system at the exact moment of the detonation to mask the sound of a small explosive charge? ๐Ÿ”Š๐Ÿ’ฅ Instagram stories from the Gear tech team show this exact setup was being prepped and tested for weeks. Was this "testing" actually a calibration for a remote trigger? If the FBI is calling this a "lone wolf" shooting, why does the physical evidence point to a digital execution? The gear was professional-grade, battery-isolated, and controlled. It didn't "malfunction"โ€”it was used. The timeline doesn't lie. The tech doesn't lie.๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Credit to Alley Files for these pics, FOLLOW Her!

Project Constitution

255,646 views โ€ข 5 months ago

So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didnโ€™t create it, He couldnโ€™t. Heโ€™s holy, holy, holy. But He didnโ€™t prevent it The Problem of Evil โ€” John MacArthur // March 17, 2007 You have to understand that this issue of the problem of evil is the big issue, the big one in even evangelical Christianity, as well as liberal Christianity โ€“ everybody trying to save God from this biblical definition. Letโ€™s assume for a minute that God doesnโ€™t have the power or willingly limited the power for a greater good, human freedom; or doesnโ€™t have the knowledge. In any case, guess what; evil exists and God exists, and God has no power over evil, and evil dominates the world, and it is beyond His control. The universe is out of control; itโ€™s out of control and the most crucial point. So just exactly how, may I ask you, is God all of a sudden going to get the knowledge of the future that He needs to bring this deal to an end, and how is He going to exercise the power to end it, and how is He going to overturn His immutable decision in the past to give the creature autonomy? How is God going to define the end of everything in the way the Bible says He defines it if Heโ€™s not even in control of it, because He will not or cannot exercise the power, or doesnโ€™t have the knowledge? Maybe global warming has more power than God. So I ask you this: Which god would you like? Would you rather have a god trying to get control of evil or a God completely in control of it? Itโ€™s obvious. Itโ€™s heresy to say the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God far beyond the willy-nilly human choices. So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didnโ€™t create it, He couldnโ€™t. Heโ€™s holy, holy, holy. But He didnโ€™t prevent it. It occurred in a rebellion against Him. But He willed and ordained that it occurred. In fact, if you study the Bible carefully, you can see many ways in which God designs to use evil things โ€“ natural evil, moral evil, supernatural evil โ€“ for His own purposes, even eternal evil, sometimes to bring fear and terror and conviction on the unregenerate, sometimes to bring chastisement and discipline on Godโ€™s people, sometimes to humble them. And in the case of Job, He turned Satan loose for horrendous evil in the life of Job. You remember that Jesus said to Peter one day, โ€œSatan desires to have you that he may sift you like wheatโ€? Remember that, Luke 22? And if Iโ€™d had been Peter Iโ€™d have said, โ€œWell, you told him no, right?โ€ Jesus said, โ€œActually, I told him yes, have at him.โ€ What? โ€œSo that when youโ€™re converted, you can strengthen the brethren.โ€ Thereโ€™s a remedial purpose in this. โ€œAs you come through that difficulty and come out the other side, youโ€™re going to be able to strengthen the brethren.โ€It was 2 Corinthians 12 where Paul says, โ€œThere was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan.โ€ A lot of discussion about what that is. Pretty clear. Messenger is aggelos. A satanic messenger is a what; a demon. I donโ€™t think Paul had a demon in his life, I think thatโ€™s the demon that was leading the false teachers who were ripping and shredding the Corinthian church, and Paul prayed three times that it might be removed, and the Lord didnโ€™t remove it. Why? He says twice in 2 Corinthians 12, โ€œto keep me from exalting myself, to keep me from exalting myself.โ€ If God so designs He will use a demon-led false teacher association to rip up a church to humble the pastor. Heโ€™s in control of all of that, of all of it.

Terri Green

16,839 views โ€ข 3 months ago

๐Ÿงต NEW EVIDENCE โ€” and this one's simple to understand. A professional broadcast camera (Canon XA55) was recording at UVU on September 10. Unlike every phone in the crowd, this camera records UNCOMPRESSED audio on 4 separate microphone channels at 48,000 samples per second. The Canon was roughly 46m away from the tent which provided a acoustic buffer between the onset of the events. This distance has provided clarity to the event that was missing with the other camera angles. Think of it this way: phone recordings are like looking through a foggy window. This camera is like a clean window with the lights on. Here's what that clean window shows: THE SOUND ARRIVED IN ORDER โ€” HIGH TO LOW When a supersonic bullet passes, the crack arrives before the boom. High-pitched sounds hit first, low-pitched sounds hit last. A bomb going off? Everything originates from the blast and arrives at the camera at the same time. The Canon proves the high frequencies arrived FIRST โ€” spread out over 100+ milliseconds. Followed by muzzle blast then a detonation which originates from the stage. THREE SEPARATE BOOMS โ€” NOT ONE This is the big one. Phone recordings near the stage smear everything together into one big noise. The Canon's professional audio separates THREE distinct low-frequency events: โ€ข +114ms โ€” Early energy (Mach cone) โ€ข +202ms โ€” Muzzle blast from ~120 meters away โ€ข +321ms โ€” DETONATION AT THE STAGE That third event โ€” the stage detonation โ€” is the LOUDEST of the three. It's not an echo. It's not a reflection. It is the strongest low-frequency peak in the entire recording, and it originates approximately 46 meters from the camera. Right at the tent. Right were Charlie was seated. Something EXPLODED there. The Canon captured it separately from the rifle blast for the first time. WHY THIS MATTERS If a rifle was fired from 120 meters away, and a separate detonation occurred at the stage approximately ~185ms later โ€” those are two different events at two different locations. A single shooter doesn't produce a detonation under a tent 120 meters from the rifle. A device detonation doesn't produce a muzzle blast from 120 meters away. The Canon separated what the phones couldn't: proof of events at MULTIPLE locations. 733 SUPERSONIC SIGNATURES A supersonic bullet creates tiny pressure waves called N-waves. The Canon's shotgun microphone captured 733 of them in under 200 microseconds each. The best phone recording? 123. That's 6x more. The phones weren't broken โ€” their compressed audio just can't preserve these. Uncompressed audio can. And it did. THE SHOTGUN MIC WAS POINTED AT IT The external microphone clipped 122,844 audio samples โ€” it was overwhelmed because the sound source was directly in its line of fire. Meanwhile the built-in mics captured clean audio with almost zero clipping. Zero correlation between the two signal paths. Same conclusion. MUZZLE BLAST CONFIRMS THE DISTANCE The +202ms blast puts the rifle at ~120 meters from the camera. The 10-camera analysis estimated 127 meters. That's within 6%. Two completely independent methods. Same answer. But the stage detonation at +321ms? That's only ~46 meters from the camera. That's the tent. A rifle 120 meters away. A detonation at the tent. Two locations. Captured separately for the first time on professional uncompressed audio. This is the 11th recording to independently confirm the same findings. Professional grade. No codec excuses. And now, for the first time, the stage detonation is isolated from the rifle blast. Full analysis + raw audio downloads at

Jon Bray

113,353 views โ€ข 4 months ago

My Thoughts on R2 after my time with it! Short review! First, Rivian completely nailed this thing. I love the positioning of the driver seats. That long front nose gives a nice commanding feel. They will sell each and every one of these! Driving impression/suspension: 9/10 I felt the vehicle has good build quality. It felt *tight* and secure. Power delivery was smooth and crisp in all-purpose. Sport mode fella unlocked and ready for all the fun things. Power is rapid and consistent with a full power moment around 35-40mph, all the power is there. There is a good amount of nose rise during a hard acceleration. But I do feel the suspension was working well to control this. Remember this isnโ€™t an air suspension. Itโ€™s a coil suspension. There is a difference between the suspension setting soft was SOFT. Firm was stiff but not overly stiff. It didnโ€™t have that bouncing effect that some vehicles can have when going into firm suspension. Moderate was a good balance. I wish it could be more adaptive in moderate but itโ€™s very very good. Turn in was good, and the turning radius was excellent. Switching from D to R for a 3-point turn was smooth and quick, no jerkiness. Very good control over entrance to parking lots. Stable. Lastly, it feels like the small delay some R1 have in throttle is gone with R2. Software: 8/10 This is where you guys know I am hard on them on. Because I want the best they can give. Rivian OS2.0 is a HUGE upgrade over R1. In all cases. Responsiveness, touch input, speed, app switching, keyboard responsiveness, etc., it is a huge difference. I love the new โ€œfish stickโ€ bar. And settings being available with one tap and being app-dependent first is fantastic. Well done Wassym Bensaid, the halo are great. The only thing about them is while driving, itโ€™s hard to get a direct click, especially when trying to use it to switch drive modes where you have to push towards you. The halo likes the spin/move, but I think I just need to get used to it. Living with it would for sure help with that. Iโ€™m really hoping they fully unlock customization for them. You can end up with 8 different characters you could adjust. I really like having the driver display. But driving with it, you can notice how much smaller it is compared to R1. Itโ€™s no deal breaker, but itโ€™s noticeable. Cameras felt snapper and of higher quality over Gen 2 R1. The turn signal sounds is new I like it as well as the forward and Evers noise it makes. Think Tesla sound when shifting. Audio: Now Iโ€™ve experienced R2 3x now. With 2 times with audio. The audio was significantly better than when I got to sit it in, in Miami for a block party. Itโ€™s about as good as R1 is now. There did feel like a sub was there. Thatโ€™s great. I used my Apple Music account so I could listen to the song I love. And it was great. Not perfect but good enough. Long as itโ€™s comparable to R1, itโ€™s okay. Cabin: It was very well appointed. I actually found it sufficiently quiet. ๐Ÿคซ I think for sure itโ€™s quieter than my R1T without question. The HVAC system design (air vent) I like better than R1. I feel like the HVAC system now can blow the air on better than trying to. I need more time to test preconditioning because thatโ€™s where Iโ€™ve seen most of the issues with my R1 vehicles. Tons of space, easy to drop the seats, itโ€™s flat, and nice under-floor space. The 1-touch drop for all windows was excellent. Overall: I think this is the Rivian everyone has been waiting for. This will be a fantastic one-car solution for so many families. There is storage for days, off-road abilities a Model Y canโ€™t even think of doing, but the UHF needs to improve quicker than it currently is because that is really becoming a buying decision for people. Tim and I canโ€™t wait to take delivery of our R2 Rivian; we are ready! Feel free to ask me anything about the R2! Iโ€™ll do my best to answer it or get you the answer. Itโ€™s a 10/10 for so many people.

Tyrone Holland๐Ÿš€๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿฝโ€๐Ÿ’ป

32,078 views โ€ข 2 months ago

Pragmata Review | No spoilers That is it for me. I played more than 30 hours of Pragmata and I am really happy that not only we finally got this game after so many delays and in a time where cancellations are common, but also that it turned out to be a very solid and enjoyable experience. Visually it is beautiful, and gameplay wise it works well for the length it has. It is not a long game, which I personally prefer, and I hope we see more titles like this instead of games trying to be longer just for the sake of it. I would not call it short like some people did, but I think it is exactly as long as it needs to be. Story wise, it is my favorite of the year so far. Seeing this kind of father and daughter dynamic again made me want to play more games with similar themes. I did almost everything in the game and I absolutely recommend it. If you are unsure about the length, maybe wait for a sale, but quality wise it deserves to be up there. I am not someone who rushes, so it took me longer because I admire the environments, take screenshots, record videos, and try to find collectibles without guides. For someone who just plays straight through, I think it would take around 12 to 15 hours, maybe a bit more or less. This is the kind of experience I want to see more often in the gaming space. I liked the combat and I think the enemy variety is fine for the length. If the game was longer without adding new enemy types, it would probably feel repetitive, but for what it is, it works. My biggest concern before playing was the combination of Hughโ€™s shooting and Dianaโ€™s hacking. If it was too complicated, it would be annoying, and if it was too simple, it would be boring. Thankfully, it ended up being exactly right. My only real complaint is that you need to return to the base to restock items, and when you die, the game sends you back there instead of placing you right before the area or at the last travel point you unlocked. It is not a huge issue, but it breaks the flow a bit. Diana is very cute and does her part extremely well, and Hugh is a character that is hard not to like. They both nail the dad simulator vibe. The voice acting is great, especially for Diana. Capcom delivered a unique and impressive new IP, which is always welcome in an industry where big publishers mostly rely on established franchises instead of taking risks. Whether we get more entries in the future is up to them, but it is also up to us to support games like this if we want more of them. On PC the game runs very well. The only thing that felt a bit underwhelming to me is the ray tracing when you use it on its own without path tracing. In some areas it does not add much, similar to what I noticed in Resident Evil Requiem. It makes me think it is either something with the RE Engine or simply that Capcom does not push ray tracing that far and focuses more on path tracing instead. Path tracing looks incredible, but of course it comes with a heavy performance cost. Something that impressed me throughout the entire playthrough is how consistent the game feels from start to finish. There is no point where it suddenly drops in quality or feels rushed. Every area has its own atmosphere, the pacing stays steady, and the game never tries to drag itself out longer than needed. It is rare to play something that stays this steady all the way through, and that alone made the whole experience even more enjoyable for me. I hope we get a DLC or a sequel one day, but even if this stays a one off, I am happy with what we got. Rating: 9/10

๐‘จ๐’”๐’‰๐’†๐’ ๐‘ถ๐’๐’†

32,822 views โ€ข 3 months ago

๐Ÿšจ Last night, an audio file was discovered in the Epstein Files that appears to be an FBI wiretap recording of what people are claiming is Erika Kirk procuring young girls for Epstein. Here is what I know and the questions I have: ๐Ÿ”ป The Phone Call The recording features a phone discussion involving a youthful-sounding femaleโ€”portrayed as cooperating with federal authorities (DOJ)โ€”speaking with someone who sounds like Erika Kirk. Background voices suggest law enforcement personnel guiding or debriefing the young woman before and after the conversation. ๐Ÿ”ป The Most Important Question โ€” Is It Really Her? Does it sound like her? Absolutelyโ€ฆ but audio can be tricky, and Iโ€™m leaning more toward no. Let me tell you why: First, this audio recording did not come with a dateโ€”of course. That detail is vitally important. All I know is that this audio comes from Dataset 9, page 661 of the Epstein Files. โ€” Document The FBI/DOJ should take the time to address this. Iโ€™m sure an official statement could clarify who these people areโ€ฆ the cooperating victim (if legally permissible), but more importantly, the recruiter. With that said, I did some digging in the documents on my own. This audio recording contains specific keywords that, if it was an FBI call, should have a paper trail, right? โ€”โ€” Key words I searched for: โ€œThe more you do, the more you makeโ€ or the shorter version, โ€œThe more you do.โ€ Sure enough, there are quite a few documents mentioning this. Here is one example: Within the Epstein files, a victim by the name of Haley Robson is identified as someone who was both a victim and later became a recruiter for Epstein. This court document is an excerpt from her deposition in a 2008โ€“2009 civil lawsuit (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, filed in Florida federal court). The documents refer to events from around 2002 in the Jeffrey Epstein case (specifically tied to his Palm Beach, Florida operations and documented in 2005 police/prosecution materials and the 2009 civil deposition). Robson, then a 16-year-old high school student in West Palm Beach, Florida, was approached at school and recruited. She has stated in interviews and deposition excerpts that she was told the phrase โ€œthe more you do, the more you makeโ€ in connection with the arrangement and payments. She eventually resisted further sexual acts but was then offered $200 per girl she recruited from her school. She ultimately brought at least eight others (young as 14), earning more based on the level of acts involved. The recruiter who initially approached her and told her the quote is consistently described in all public sources only as โ€œa classmate,โ€ โ€œa friend,โ€ or โ€œa girl in her classโ€ from Royal Palm Beach Community High School. Erika Kirk (Frantzve) did not attend Royal Palm Beach Community High School. She grew up in Scottsdale, Arizona, and graduated in 2007 from Notre Dame Preparatory High School, a private Catholic school in Scottsdale. Erika Kirk is 37 years old today and would have been 13 years old (if this audio recording is from 2002). Thereโ€™s no way thatโ€™s her if this is the case. Haley Robson is 40 years old and was reportedly 16 when she first met Jeffrey Epstein (around 2002). The timeline seems to match, assuming this is the correct year. Iโ€™ve listened and compared Haley Robsonโ€™s voice, and there are some similarities to the voice heard on this recording. Also consider that 24 years can change a voice significantly. Regardless, this is also something Haley Robson could easily dispel or confirm. If she has an X account, please tag her and ask directly if that is her in the audio. She appears frequently on television, so I donโ€™t think she would mind clarifying whether this recruiter in the audio is her or not. That should be straightforward So as of right now, based on the evidenceโ€”at least for meโ€”going with my gut, this is not Erika Kirk.

MJTruthUltra

147,775 views โ€ข 5 months ago