Serhii Antonov's banner
Serhii Antonov's profile picture

Serhii Antonov

@13serhi7,130 subscribers

Ukrainian veteran from Luhansk. Ukrainian warrior since February 2022. Debunking propaganda. Stories from the frontline/Donbas. PayPal [email protected]

Shorts

Russian drone hits a civilian cafe. Second cafe in the same town attacked by Russia in recent weeks. This is a clear war crime — not liquidating Russian soldiers dressed in penguin camo.

Russian drone hits a civilian cafe. Second cafe in the same town attacked by Russia in recent weeks. This is a clear war crime — not liquidating Russian soldiers dressed in penguin camo.

22,153 просмотров

Videos

13serhi's profile picture

As a resident of Donbas, I was asked to tell about the beginning of war in Donbas in 2014. But this is a long story. So I'll do it in a few threads over the next few days. I realized that before I talk about the beginning of the war in Donbas, I need to talk a little about the period before the war. In particular, about Yanukovych's term (because during his term, Russia started taking over Ukraine) and about the Revolution of Dignity. After all, for those who do not know this period, the following story may be incomplete. In addition, Russian propaganda also pays attention to this topic. I have repeatedly seen how Russian propaganda, through its Western servants, distributed the map of the presidential elections in 2010, in which Ukraine is divided in half. At the same time, they claim that this is a map of the pro-Russian population and that these regions should be given to Russia. Yanukovych focused more on economic issues and his program was populist. He spoke "for everything good and against everything bad." And the majority in his program could find something of their own and interpret it in their own way. As for the Ukrainian language, his program stated that it remains the only state language. And the Russian language and other languages ​​have the right to exist in Ukraine. That is, he repeated what was stated in the constitution and how it worked before and after his tenure. Yanukovych's pre-election program was not pro-Russian, he spoke Ukrainian and never advocated joining Russia before the election Yanukovych positioned himself as a politician who is friendly to Russia but who will cooperate closely with Europe. That is, he showed some neutrality between East and West and his neutral path. Like once President Kuchma. And the majority of Ukrainians (until 2014) supported it. The majority of Ukrainians did not support the idea of ​​joining NATO. After all, when we gave up nuclear weapons, the USA, Britain, Russia and other countries guaranteed our sovereignty and territorial integrity. As history has shown, these hopes were in vain and Russia violated the agreements. But some Ukrainians remembered well the history of the extermination of Ukrainians by the Russians and were worried about Russia's attack on Georgia in 2008, which showed that Russia has not changed and will repeat its fascist-imperialist path. They turned out to be right. The share of these Ukrainians, in my subjective opinion, was 20%-30%, including me. It should be noted that these are people who did not want a war with Russia and did not plan it. But based on historical and modern realities, it was suspected that Russia would try to seize Ukraine or part of it in one way or another. And when Yanukovych finally canceled the European integration processes in November, people took to the streets both those who were against the cancellation of this process and those who feared that Russia, through Yanukovych, had started the process of absorbing Ukraine. There was another group of people who opposed the government because of great corruption and the transformation of the state into a totalitarian one. Or those that came out due to a combination of these factors. However, the final factor that pushed the protests into the Revolution of Dignity was the beating of protesters in the center of Kyiv. Then a peaceful and legal rally, which at the time consisted mainly of young people, was surrounded and then beaten by the police. The police beat people lying down. They even beat journalists. Then on December 1, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians came out in response to this brutality, the beginning of the establishment of a dictatorship and the suppression of people's rights. From that time, people did not leave the central square of Kyiv until Yanukovych fled to Russia. The first video shows the beating of protesters in the center of Kyiv. The second video is the start of the Revolution of Dignity in response to this.

Serhii Antonov

845,857 просмотров • 3 лет назад

13serhi's profile picture

12 years ago today, the Parliament of Ukraine removed Viktor Yanukovych from the office of President and scheduled presidential elections for May 25, 2014. For all these years, Russian propaganda has been pushing the narrative of an "undemocratic coup" and the "illegitimacy" of Ukrainian authorities. But this is very easy to debunk: 1. The Parliament voted with a constitutional majority - 328(!) votes out of 450 (over 72%). A constitutional majority (300+ votes) has the full right to amend the Constitution, call early elections, and remove the President from office. 2. Representatives of all 5 parliamentary parties (including the president’s own Party of Regions) and independents voted in favor. It was a complete consensus of the entire parliament. Opposition MPs said they were fulfilling the will of the Ukrainian people. MPs from the ruling coalition explained that the President had fled at the most critical moment - while Russia had already begun the annexation of Crimea. 3. Elections were held, and the next President was democratically elected by the majority of Ukrainians. This was the only correct decision in a situation where Russia had launched aggression and the President had betrayed the country and fled to the aggressor. Russian propaganda searches for controversial legal nuances. But the reality is simple: parliamentary consensus and democratic elections that clearly expressed the will of the people. Let me remind you: a coup is an unconstitutional change of power that lacks support from the majority of society. So how can a decision by the constitutional majority of Parliament to hold elections - which the majority of Ukrainians then won - be called a "coup"? Russians and their fans have called "illegitimate": Turchynov (acting President according to the Constitution of Ukraine), Poroshenko (democratically elected by the majority), and now Zelenskyy (who received a record number of votes). In the end, Russians would call ANY President of Ukraine illegitimate if he refuses to give Russia what it wants - or to turn Ukraine into a Kremlin puppet like Belarus. #RevolutionOfDignity #12YearsOfResistance #StandWithUkraine

Serhii Antonov

70,430 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки