BoozeyBeauty's banner
BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

BoozeyBeauty

@BoozeyBeauty12,366 subscribers

someone told me that I should find Jesus... I'm still looking. 🏳️‍🌈🍷🍕💜

Shorts

Seeing Lieutenant John Fanning stare right at the signs in Karen Read's garage during the search warrant for her cell phones will never not be funny to me. 😭💀🤣

Seeing Lieutenant John Fanning stare right at the signs in Karen Read's garage during the search warrant for her cell phones will never not be funny to me. 😭💀🤣

2,409,899 Aufrufe

Karen Read's taillight was in tact at 5:42am on 1/29/22. New video from Pequitside Farm in Canton shows Karen's SUV being followed by Kerry Robert's vehicle. Jen McCabe is driving Karen's Lexus which is confirmed via John O'Keefe's surveillance footage mere minutes later. For time reference, they are driving from Jen's house back to John's. This was 20 minutes before pulling up to 34 Fairview Rd. The footage shows the very taillight that was later seen obliterated in photographs at the Canton Sallyport. The damage sustained would create a much different light pattern than what's shown in this video. A reminder: John's last steps occurred at 12:31am. If the Commonwealth's theory was correct, the taillight would've been damaged at that time.. and that is not what is seen via this footage 5 hours later.

Karen Read's taillight was in tact at 5:42am on 1/29/22. New video from Pequitside Farm in Canton shows Karen's SUV being followed by Kerry Robert's vehicle. Jen McCabe is driving Karen's Lexus which is confirmed via John O'Keefe's surveillance footage mere minutes later. For time reference, they are driving from Jen's house back to John's. This was 20 minutes before pulling up to 34 Fairview Rd. The footage shows the very taillight that was later seen obliterated in photographs at the Canton Sallyport. The damage sustained would create a much different light pattern than what's shown in this video. A reminder: John's last steps occurred at 12:31am. If the Commonwealth's theory was correct, the taillight would've been damaged at that time.. and that is not what is seen via this footage 5 hours later.

456,290 Aufrufe

It looks like we may have just figured out where Attorney Marc Diller got his original “Exhibit J”... And the answer is Jen McCabe’s best friend. 😱 Attorney Marc Diller’s first version of “Exhibit J” was the exhibit he filed in support of his motion for a Temporary Restraining Order to prevent Karen Read from getting her cell phones back from the Norfolk County DA’s Office. In multiple posts after the March 6th hearing, Kerry can be seen sharing the very exhibit that attorneys Diller, Rosenberg, and Seligson referenced in their filings over the past few weeks. In the video she posted, the tweet in question appears at the beginning, followed by screenshots that are described as coming from an alleged phone extraction. We can confirm this appears to be the original version of Exhibit J (before Diller later attempted to substitute a different version while still labeling it “Exhibit J”) because it matches exactly how Seligson described it in Read’s filing. In his response, Seligson states the exhibit is: 🔹 a partial screenshot of a tweet originally posted by Sean McDonough 🔹 includes a quote stating the recording was a “one-party consent call” 🔹 contains the audio of the call itself 🔹 matches the image of the exhibit included in the court filing All of those elements are in the version Kerry has been circulating online. This includes a comment on a Boston Fox 25 post. Ms. Drama Llama has publicly stated many times that she is close with Jen McCabe and communicates with witnesses as well as members of the O’Keefe family. She also appears regularly on a YouTube channel promoting “Justice for JJ” content and the Albert/McCabe/Higgins defense fund. As recently as Friday, she was seemingly publicly speaking about an opinion from the O'Keefe family in regards to a photo of John being posted (that she, herself, posted first). This could also explain why Attorney Diller may have considered the material reliable given that Kerry appears to be a trusted voice within the O’Keefe/McCabe circle. Now the question is, why is the best friend of a key witness seemingly inserting herself into active civil litigation by circulating exhibits connected to court filings? 🤔

It looks like we may have just figured out where Attorney Marc Diller got his original “Exhibit J”... And the answer is Jen McCabe’s best friend. 😱 Attorney Marc Diller’s first version of “Exhibit J” was the exhibit he filed in support of his motion for a Temporary Restraining Order to prevent Karen Read from getting her cell phones back from the Norfolk County DA’s Office. In multiple posts after the March 6th hearing, Kerry can be seen sharing the very exhibit that attorneys Diller, Rosenberg, and Seligson referenced in their filings over the past few weeks. In the video she posted, the tweet in question appears at the beginning, followed by screenshots that are described as coming from an alleged phone extraction. We can confirm this appears to be the original version of Exhibit J (before Diller later attempted to substitute a different version while still labeling it “Exhibit J”) because it matches exactly how Seligson described it in Read’s filing. In his response, Seligson states the exhibit is: 🔹 a partial screenshot of a tweet originally posted by Sean McDonough 🔹 includes a quote stating the recording was a “one-party consent call” 🔹 contains the audio of the call itself 🔹 matches the image of the exhibit included in the court filing All of those elements are in the version Kerry has been circulating online. This includes a comment on a Boston Fox 25 post. Ms. Drama Llama has publicly stated many times that she is close with Jen McCabe and communicates with witnesses as well as members of the O’Keefe family. She also appears regularly on a YouTube channel promoting “Justice for JJ” content and the Albert/McCabe/Higgins defense fund. As recently as Friday, she was seemingly publicly speaking about an opinion from the O'Keefe family in regards to a photo of John being posted (that she, herself, posted first). This could also explain why Attorney Diller may have considered the material reliable given that Kerry appears to be a trusted voice within the O’Keefe/McCabe circle. Now the question is, why is the best friend of a key witness seemingly inserting herself into active civil litigation by circulating exhibits connected to court filings? 🤔

24,098 Aufrufe

Brian Higgins seemingly couldn't do 2 things this evening: 🔹️get Karen Read's attention 🔹️keep his footing while simply standing still This man was ✨️shitfaced✨️.

Brian Higgins seemingly couldn't do 2 things this evening: 🔹️get Karen Read's attention 🔹️keep his footing while simply standing still This man was ✨️shitfaced✨️.

20,730 Aufrufe

The lie detector test determined.. that was a lie 🚨 On July 10th 2025, Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox stated that he had no idea "that person" (one of his employees, Kelly Dever) was associated with the Karen Read trial. Many of us thought that the top Boston cop wasn't being truthful but we had no evidence of such.. that is until now. Via FOIA requests by Marbury v. Mad and Laura Kornacka to the Boston Police Department, we now have evidence that Cox also suffers from "false memories". In an email dated February 22nd 2024, a Federal employee answers an email from Cox confirming the 3,074 pages were released to the Norfolk County DA's office the evening prior and that they had interviewed Dever. The next morning, on February 23rd 2024, Cox's calendar was updated to reflect a meeting with Dever. Kelly Dever testified on June 2nd 2025 to the exact sentiment that she had a private, one-on-one meeting with Cox before trial one and around the time the Federal documents were released. A call out to mainstream media: could we have an update on your original story? Perhaps get a statement from Commissioner Cox and Boston Police?

The lie detector test determined.. that was a lie 🚨 On July 10th 2025, Boston Police Commissioner Michael Cox stated that he had no idea "that person" (one of his employees, Kelly Dever) was associated with the Karen Read trial. Many of us thought that the top Boston cop wasn't being truthful but we had no evidence of such.. that is until now. Via FOIA requests by Marbury v. Mad and Laura Kornacka to the Boston Police Department, we now have evidence that Cox also suffers from "false memories". In an email dated February 22nd 2024, a Federal employee answers an email from Cox confirming the 3,074 pages were released to the Norfolk County DA's office the evening prior and that they had interviewed Dever. The next morning, on February 23rd 2024, Cox's calendar was updated to reflect a meeting with Dever. Kelly Dever testified on June 2nd 2025 to the exact sentiment that she had a private, one-on-one meeting with Cox before trial one and around the time the Federal documents were released. A call out to mainstream media: could we have an update on your original story? Perhaps get a statement from Commissioner Cox and Boston Police?

20,773 Aufrufe

I wanted to reach out to everyone who has been so kind to follow from TikTok to BlueSky, Twitter/X, and YouTube. As you know, TikTok went dark last night around 10:30pm, and with that went the community we had built together. I am deeply saddened by the loss, angered at the US government for the actions they have taken, and eager to rebuild on YouTube all at the same time. It's a mix of emotions that's hard to explain. That being said, I will be spending some time with an editing software to learn the in's and out's of how to create as good of content as I did easily on TikTok. I already have the setup, cameras, and lighting complete. It's the learning curve of a new platform for me that's taking some time. (If you know me, you know I can't half ass anything and refuse to put out shit content.) I built my platform on topics such as healing from domestic violence, rawness of dealing with CPTSD, surviving trauma, women's rights, grieving significant loss, being a Swiftie, humorous clap backs and the hypocrisy we see in our government (ex: Karen Read). This latest ban will only continue to fuel all of the above. For my entire life, I've been told I was too loud, annoying, and that I was prettier when I was silent... not anymore. ♀️💪 Love you, mean it xoxo

I wanted to reach out to everyone who has been so kind to follow from TikTok to BlueSky, Twitter/X, and YouTube. As you know, TikTok went dark last night around 10:30pm, and with that went the community we had built together. I am deeply saddened by the loss, angered at the US government for the actions they have taken, and eager to rebuild on YouTube all at the same time. It's a mix of emotions that's hard to explain. That being said, I will be spending some time with an editing software to learn the in's and out's of how to create as good of content as I did easily on TikTok. I already have the setup, cameras, and lighting complete. It's the learning curve of a new platform for me that's taking some time. (If you know me, you know I can't half ass anything and refuse to put out shit content.) I built my platform on topics such as healing from domestic violence, rawness of dealing with CPTSD, surviving trauma, women's rights, grieving significant loss, being a Swiftie, humorous clap backs and the hypocrisy we see in our government (ex: Karen Read). This latest ban will only continue to fuel all of the above. For my entire life, I've been told I was too loud, annoying, and that I was prettier when I was silent... not anymore. ♀️💪 Love you, mean it xoxo

27,999 Aufrufe

Videos

BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

The decertified and terminated Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor didn't just miss one video from John O'Keefe's Ring surveillance footage. He missed three. According to testimony, Proctor asked Trooper DiCiccio, whom he described as a "good friend," to review O'Keefe's Ring footage. DiCiccio took handwritten notes while examining the evidence. Three videos documented in those notes have never been accounted for: 🔹 12:41 AM: "Tail lights from driveway (I think she arrived home)" 🔹 5:47 AM: "Karen, Jen, Kerry @ house" 🔹 12:42 PM: "Lexus leaves" All three videos would have provided a view of Karen Read's taillight, the Commonwealth's alleged murder weapon. Yet Proctor denied that these videos ever existed, despite DiCiccio's notes indicating otherwise. 12:41 AM would likely show Karen Read arriving at John O'Keefe's home and pulling into the garage. 5:47 AM was referenced by investigators, but its counterpart video from 5:51 AM is missing. According to testimony, this was the timeframe when Karen Read, Jennifer McCabe, and Kerry Roberts were allegedly looking at the damaged taillight. Kerry testified that she observed a metal piece sticking out, and Karen allegedly removed a piece of taillight. Yet the video that should have captured those events is nowhere to be found. Somehow, conversations, blowing snow, vehicle doors opening and closing, and a vehicle leaving the property all failed to be recorded. 12:42 PM would have shown Karen Read's father driving her Lexus away from O'Keefe's residence. Initially, it was suggested that the missing footage may have been deleted by Karen Read when she returned to O'Keefe's house after leaving the hospital. John O'Keefe's mother, Peg O'Keefe, even alluded to that possibility during her testimony in the second trial. The problem with that theory is that O'Keefe's Ring account could only be accessed through his cell phone, and Karen Read did not have access to it. Even more significant, Ring's records reportedly showed that the only party to access the account was the Massachusetts State Police...

BoozeyBeauty

142,993 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

New footage of Jen and Matt McCabe at the O'Keefe's home the evening after the murder of John O'Keefe. On 1/30/22, Jen and Matt arrive at 8:29pm and then left with their daughter at 9:12pm. Jen looking interestingly exhausted as she first arrives and quite snappy with her daughter when they leave 45 minutes later. 🤔 Earlier that day, Jen and Kerry Roberts had spent 5 hours at the O'Keefe's. From there, they would 🔹️stop at Jen's for 7 minutes 🔹️stop at 34 Fairview Rd for 4 minutes and then proceed to Canton PD Detective Sergeant Mike Lank's home. This off-the-books meeting lasting roughly 45 minutes. Important to note, Lank has a long history with the Albert family. He, in fact, was the only officer trusted to enter 34 Fairview Rd multiple times during the early hours of 1/29/22. Jen McCabe had multiple police interviews on 1/29. At one point in the morning, she called Lank back to 34 Fairview to speak. He arrived and spoke to her in front of many Albert family members (Brian, Nicole, Chris, Julie, Kevin) and Brian Higgins. This is where Jen said, for the first time, Karen Read allegedly “admitted” to running over John. “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him”. On 2/1, she had another MSP interview at her home. Kerry Roberts had a police interview on 1/29 where she texted Jen that officers were about to interview her. Jen telling Kerry to call her after.. which is precisely what happened. On 2/1, Kerry had another police interview at Jen's where they were making a “timeline” together with Jen's sister Denise Galvin. Later that evening, Jen would be speaking to Michael Proctor on the phone and Kerry asked to speak with him as she suddenly “remembered” things. Karen Read was arrested on 2/1 at 7:40pm. After, Jen and Kerry Roberts would eagerly be texting one another about how their detective skills solved a murder. Jokingly, Kerry would claim Sandra Bullock to play her in the movie that was surely to be made. Jen adding that they were like an 80s detective sitcom show and Matt is like the character played by Tom Selleck. Due to the history of ever-changing timelines by Jen, one has to wonder.. was her spending 6 hours in total at the O'Keefe's home after the murder of John genuine (as a "caring friend") or was something more nefarious going on?

BoozeyBeauty

515,684 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

Canton PD Sgt Sean Goode was texting throughout the processing of the scene when John O'Keefe was found dead outside of Brian Albert's home at 34 Fairview Rd. Normally, this wouldn't be suspicious.. however, given the timeline of Goode being on his phone, it raises serious questions of who exactly he was speaking to and why. At 6:35:40 AM, Detective Sergeant Mike Lank gets a phone call that he says he does not remember who it was. This call lasts almost 3 mins. Immediately after he calls the Massachusetts State Police CPAC Unit for help. At 6:39:11 AM, the outdoor front light of 34FV is turned on and the door is opened. At 6:40:48 AM, Goode is seen texting after calling in a section 12 for Karen Read. We hear Goode tell Lank this while Lank is still on the phone with CPAC. Goode also asks if Lank wants to go inside because "the front door is actually open". While Lank and Goode head to the front door, Kerry Roberts and Karen Read return back. Within minutes, Karen is walked back to the ambulance and subsequently sent to the hospital for a section hold. They would draw her blood which then would be examined and given an estimate of her blood alcohol content of the time she supposedly ran into John O'Keefe. Goode and Lank would spend 18 minutes and 47 seconds inside 34 Fairview Rd with Brian Albert, Nicole Albert and Jen McCabe. While inside, Goode radios Kelly Dever in dispatch of the exact time of Jen's 911 call. Matt McCabe was also coming in and out (which was not testified to). In fact, Goode, Lank and Matt would leave the home together. At 7:02:04 AM, Goode is seen texting again. Karen Read would leave in the ambulance at 7:05:32 AM.

BoozeyBeauty

50,200 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

Here is this same piece of unidentified evidence being held up during trial 2 by Yuri Bukhenik. As we can see, it is thin and flimsy but still able to hold it's shape. There is a tab on the side that, per the crime lab, is about a 1/2 inch wide. This does not match what any takeout container or lid would look like.. even run over as some have suggested. There is no indentation of where a lid would attach to a bottom container and it is far too thin for it to be for food storage. It does, however, match the description for a protective covering over something round. Jeep enthusiasts often use a multitude of aftermarket parts for the vehicles, including protective shields over the head and fog lamps as well as any other auxiliary lights they may add on. These coverings can vary in material from polycarbonate, to acrylic, to tempered glass, to plastic, etc. It's important to note that Brian Higgins' Jeep not only had the plow with added head lamps on it but also a lift and specialized tires, amongst other upgrades he added to the vehicle. So his Jeep was not standard by any means. What I find interesting is that this item was found with other pieces of tail light on the lawn.. not the street. This was the same day John O'Keefe's hat and supposed drinking straw were found. We also still do not know where the apparent glass that was on Karen's bumper came from. This debris not matching her tail light, the drinking glass or any of the pieces Bukhenik found later at the scene. Oddly, it did match one singular piece found by Proctor on 2/11/22. My best guess is that the unidentified round item and the 3 matching pieces of apparent glass are correlated somehow.. perhaps one day we will get that answer.

BoozeyBeauty

39,659 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

112,930 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

Thank you, Katherine Loftus (NoteMyObjection), for confirming that your cousin Molly works as a victim witness advocate in the Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office. That’s relevant context for viewers as they evaluate your content and consider any potential bias. As for the rest, this is being framed as something it isn’t. When you position yourself as an “unapologetically honest” legal voice and platform witnesses, transparency is crucial. You don’t get to benefit from that credibility while dismissing reasonable questions about bias as “malicious.” And to be clear, my video does not meet any legal definition of malice. Criticism one may not like does not equate to maliciousness. As an attorney, you know this. You say you don’t use sources, but relationships, proximity, and access are relevant whether you choose to label them that way or not. That’s reality, especially when you’re speaking on cases tied to the same office your family is connected to. Again, that’s not an attack, it is however context your audience deserves. You also stated in your interview that having a strong opinion in this case leads people to attack looks instead of substance. Yet in your most recent video, you did exactly that. I don’t go there, because it’s not my style. I hold myself to a higher standard than reducing an argument to personal attacks, especially when the criticism is about substance, not appearance. So the claim that “this side” avoids substance doesn’t really hold up when you’re doing the opposite. As for the block, I explicitly stated in my video why I blocked you: mocking what I went through and continue to deal with. I believe in being transparent with my audience. What is hypocritical, though, is deciding some people are victims of harassment while others are experiencing the same things (home visits, employer calls, public confrontations, threats) are dismissed as “drama.” It’s also notable that in your interview with Kerry, none of that behavior was addressed. Perhaps next time do a little more research into the person you’re interviewing? Many of us are dying to know why your interviewee was calling herself and Jen McCabe “detectives,” and why a victim witness advocate out of the same DA’s office referred to them as “the best detectives around.”

BoozeyBeauty

42,758 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat