Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

"It's kill an N-word in Canton day" - fired trooper Michael Proctor In a scathing plea to the court, attorney Rosemary Scappichio confirms one racist text message that is on Proctor's cell phone extraction that shows bias towards her client. "It's who this man is."

BoozeyBeauty's profile picture

BoozeyBeauty

14,663 subscribers

88,228 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Michael Proctor's new data extraction were confirmed to have racist and biased communications in them. Attorney Rosemary Scapicchio confirmed on 10/30/25: “If you’re already prejudiced to people because of the color of their skin, their ethnicity, if they’re a male or female, then you can’t have an open mind when you started this investigation.” Several other Norfolk County attorneys also were also able to receive this data extraction as Proctor investigated their clients cases. That being said, we also know the DA's office has them and most likely Massachusetts State Police. It's highly likely that Canton PD has parts of these communications considering Proctor was very friendly with several Canton officers. Proctor of course grew up and lives in town so his friendships with some of these individuals run decades long. I posted this video before the news of Canton PD Sgt Sean Goode had come out because I knew how entangled some of the Canton crew is in Proctor's dealings. And I can't stop wondering just who else went along with Proctor and engaged in these types of conversations. Are these officers still on the police force? Have they quietly retired? Are any of them still working details in Canton? Has any of them left Canton PD? Are any of them now passed away? But most importantly: will the public ever see these communications and know the truth of how their own officers, paid by their tax dollars, feel about them and their community members?
0:26

Michael Proctor's new data extraction were confirmed to have racist and biased communications in them. Attorney Rosemary Scapicchio confirmed on 10/30/25: “If you’re already prejudiced to people because of the color of their skin, their ethnicity, if they’re a male or female, then you can’t have an open mind when you started this investigation.” Several other Norfolk County attorneys also were also able to receive this data extraction as Proctor investigated their clients cases. That being said, we also know the DA's office has them and most likely Massachusetts State Police. It's highly likely that Canton PD has parts of these communications considering Proctor was very friendly with several Canton officers. Proctor of course grew up and lives in town so his friendships with some of these individuals run decades long. I posted this video before the news of Canton PD Sgt Sean Goode had come out because I knew how entangled some of the Canton crew is in Proctor's dealings. And I can't stop wondering just who else went along with Proctor and engaged in these types of conversations. Are these officers still on the police force? Have they quietly retired? Are any of them still working details in Canton? Has any of them left Canton PD? Are any of them now passed away? But most importantly: will the public ever see these communications and know the truth of how their own officers, paid by their tax dollars, feel about them and their community members?

BoozeyBeauty

24,166 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋
4:10

In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩‍🍳💋

BoozeyBeauty

114,191 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: Karen Read's lawyers have revealed, in open court, that former State Police Trooper Michael Proctor used anti-Semitic language in "secret" conversations on Proctor's cellphone (and that Proctor sent pictures of naked women, without their knowledge or consent, to his friends). Proctor, said Read's lawyers, also used racist, anti-female and homophobic language. Karen's lawyers have Proctor's entire phone, and are asking Judge Doolin for permission to use the messages in Karen's upcoming civil suit against the State Police and the Town of Canton.
6:24

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: Karen Read's lawyers have revealed, in open court, that former State Police Trooper Michael Proctor used anti-Semitic language in "secret" conversations on Proctor's cellphone (and that Proctor sent pictures of naked women, without their knowledge or consent, to his friends). Proctor, said Read's lawyers, also used racist, anti-female and homophobic language. Karen's lawyers have Proctor's entire phone, and are asking Judge Doolin for permission to use the messages in Karen's upcoming civil suit against the State Police and the Town of Canton.

Grant Smith Ellis

37,721 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -
9:43

NEW: The Proctorgate files continue to expand to SnapChat, and Michael Proctor's lawyer accused Karen Read's legal team of engaging in "defamation" by revealing Proctor and Sean Goode's horrifying text messages in a court filing last week, during a hearing before Judge Doolin Thursday on the Myles King docket in Norfolk Superior Court. Proctor's lawyer, during the hearing, argued that Proctor's Snapchat and text messages should not be made public. That resulted in this reporter saying, in real time; Wait, Michael Proctor had a Snapchat!?!?! Proctor's lawyer then referenced Karen's case filed last week in Bristol county (Proctorgate). Proctor's lawyer says he realizes the cat is out of the bad but implores Judge that we are talking about "Michael Proctor's privacy, who has spent years helping victims. He has never been indicted. He has never been arrested. He has never had his bail revoked. I would suggest Proctor has a legitimate privacy interest in these Snapchat messages." Proctor's lawyer wants the Norfolk D.A. to orally tell the defendants about Proctor's Snapchat messages. Proctor's lawyer then told Judge Doolin that Karen's lawsuit involving the Proctorgate files was intended to defame and embarrass Michael Proctor and, in turn, Proctor's lawyer asks Judge Doolin to keep Proctor's Snapchat messages public. Those were Proctor's own words (I said out loud). Rosemary Scapichhhio, the lawyer for Myles King, then said that Proctor has no standing in this case. Proctor is just an agent of the Commonwealth, says Scapichhhio, and it makes no sense to keep this material sealed when the Proctorgate messages are already starting to come out into the public. "I can't, for the life of me, understand how Proctor even has standing to come before the court," Scapichhhio said. Judge Doolin then said he will have a ruling "for ya' shortly." King, for his part, in currently in federal prison after he was charged by the DOJ last month for drug trafficking (a move that many suspect was designed to remove Proctor from King's cases). Read more about Proctorgate here -

Grant Smith Ellis

71,268 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING🚨🚨: Was the Free Karen Read movement at least partially correct? Trooper Michael Proctor's new phone messages have revealed a disturbing and shocking pattern of leaks regarding ongoing cases (including the name of an SA victim and "images of intimate body parts") over 12 years. This, in turn, leaves one to wonder; was Brian Tully's release of Lindsey Gaetani's unredacted 15-year phone extraction, with the involvement of Tully's PI Kate Peter, part of a larger pattern? Tully ran Proctor's Mass. State Police unit (detailed to the Norfolk DA) at the time Tully leaked Lindsey's phone extraction. One also wonders why Proctor's phone is being subject to a court fight for a protective order (that won't even allow defendants in cases Proctor investigated to have copies of the material), while Lindsey's phone was left without a protective order for months as a result of the inaction of the same Norfolk DA's office. My full overview on this breaking news story below.
18:19

BREAKING🚨🚨: Was the Free Karen Read movement at least partially correct? Trooper Michael Proctor's new phone messages have revealed a disturbing and shocking pattern of leaks regarding ongoing cases (including the name of an SA victim and "images of intimate body parts") over 12 years. This, in turn, leaves one to wonder; was Brian Tully's release of Lindsey Gaetani's unredacted 15-year phone extraction, with the involvement of Tully's PI Kate Peter, part of a larger pattern? Tully ran Proctor's Mass. State Police unit (detailed to the Norfolk DA) at the time Tully leaked Lindsey's phone extraction. One also wonders why Proctor's phone is being subject to a court fight for a protective order (that won't even allow defendants in cases Proctor investigated to have copies of the material), while Lindsey's phone was left without a protective order for months as a result of the inaction of the same Norfolk DA's office. My full overview on this breaking news story below.

Grant Smith Ellis

14,072 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

CONFIRMED: Demoted Detective Lieutenant Brian Tully called Karen Read a "cunt" in her home after looking at the cell phone of hers that Lieutenant John Fanning seized. In this video, I removed the background noise in three variables: one completely (voice only), one enhanced voice with slight background noise, and one with stronger background noise. ‼️In all three variations you hear, and see, Tully state, "what a cunt"‼️ This makes now two officers from the Massachusetts State Police who openly stated that a murder defendant was a cunt. "Whack job cunt" - fired and decertified Michael Proctor "What a cunt" - demoted Brian Tully
0:51

CONFIRMED: Demoted Detective Lieutenant Brian Tully called Karen Read a "cunt" in her home after looking at the cell phone of hers that Lieutenant John Fanning seized. In this video, I removed the background noise in three variables: one completely (voice only), one enhanced voice with slight background noise, and one with stronger background noise. ‼️In all three variations you hear, and see, Tully state, "what a cunt"‼️ This makes now two officers from the Massachusetts State Police who openly stated that a murder defendant was a cunt. "Whack job cunt" - fired and decertified Michael Proctor "What a cunt" - demoted Brian Tully

BoozeyBeauty

495,855 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Michael Proctor truly believed that his "gotcha" moment was when he destroyed his old cell phone, replaced that phone and set it to auto-delete after 30 days. Unbeknownst to him, his phone extraction, which was ordered in August of 2025, was successful back to the year of 2013. Trooper Proctor thought that he was safe. That his communications regarding topics like Karen Read, the John O'Keefe murder investigation, his job suspension and firing, and other important cases in the county were auto-deleted from his phone. He was so confident that he did several national interviews proclaiming his innocence. That calling Read vulgar names was a joke.. a figure of speech. He never thought that his phone extraction would pull over a decades worth of data which might show his communications regarding the John O'Keefe murder was not a one-off situation but rather a pattern. A pattern of behavior where he, and most likely his cops buddies, mock defendants and/or victims. Where it was normalized to share private details with those that shouldn't know critical and intimate parts of the cases he worked on. There has been a rumor swirling for some time that photographs were potentially being passed around by Norfolk County state police officers when data extractions were completed on the devices of female defendants/victims. It's been speculated that it was the norm to specifically look for images of women. That they made the rounds of the various group chats. Was this true and did it affect the cases of Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore, or Ana Walshe? But no.. no.. according to Proctor, the Read extractions were a lapse in judgement. A one time occurrence.
0:46

Michael Proctor truly believed that his "gotcha" moment was when he destroyed his old cell phone, replaced that phone and set it to auto-delete after 30 days. Unbeknownst to him, his phone extraction, which was ordered in August of 2025, was successful back to the year of 2013. Trooper Proctor thought that he was safe. That his communications regarding topics like Karen Read, the John O'Keefe murder investigation, his job suspension and firing, and other important cases in the county were auto-deleted from his phone. He was so confident that he did several national interviews proclaiming his innocence. That calling Read vulgar names was a joke.. a figure of speech. He never thought that his phone extraction would pull over a decades worth of data which might show his communications regarding the John O'Keefe murder was not a one-off situation but rather a pattern. A pattern of behavior where he, and most likely his cops buddies, mock defendants and/or victims. Where it was normalized to share private details with those that shouldn't know critical and intimate parts of the cases he worked on. There has been a rumor swirling for some time that photographs were potentially being passed around by Norfolk County state police officers when data extractions were completed on the devices of female defendants/victims. It's been speculated that it was the norm to specifically look for images of women. That they made the rounds of the various group chats. Was this true and did it affect the cases of Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore, or Ana Walshe? But no.. no.. according to Proctor, the Read extractions were a lapse in judgement. A one time occurrence.

BoozeyBeauty

67,936 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

THE MISSING CANTON LIBRARY FOOTAGE 🗣🚨 On February 7th, 2022, Louis Jutras from Canton’s IT Division emailed Trooper Dunne (Norfolk County MSP) surveillance footage from the Canton Public Library, per MSP’s request. Because of the town’s camera system setup, the footage was shared via a download link rather than direct files. Dunne then forwarded that same link to lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor. A follow up email, obtained by @Marbury_v_Mad through a FOIA request, shows that Proctor sought help from Norfolk County Forensic Video Technician Colleen Crawford. But why would Proctor need assistance if the footage could have been easily downloaded and preserved in its raw form, with original metadata? Data that was never provided to Karen Read’s defense team. Then there’s Brian Tully, the officer chosen to testify about this footage. A curious choice since Dunne received the original link and Proctor led the investigation, both would’ve been far more relevant witnesses. As Proctor’s supervisor, Tully would likely have known about the missing footage from the Canton Library. Did he also communicate with Crawford? The original file sent by Jutras was a full one-hour segment (12:00 a.m.–1:00 a.m.), yet the version later used in evidence has missing roughly two minutes from 12:37 a.m. to 12:39 a.m. And now, this newly uncovered correspondence shows Proctor personally thanked Crawford for her help with this very footage.
1:45

THE MISSING CANTON LIBRARY FOOTAGE 🗣🚨 On February 7th, 2022, Louis Jutras from Canton’s IT Division emailed Trooper Dunne (Norfolk County MSP) surveillance footage from the Canton Public Library, per MSP’s request. Because of the town’s camera system setup, the footage was shared via a download link rather than direct files. Dunne then forwarded that same link to lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor. A follow up email, obtained by @Marbury_v_Mad through a FOIA request, shows that Proctor sought help from Norfolk County Forensic Video Technician Colleen Crawford. But why would Proctor need assistance if the footage could have been easily downloaded and preserved in its raw form, with original metadata? Data that was never provided to Karen Read’s defense team. Then there’s Brian Tully, the officer chosen to testify about this footage. A curious choice since Dunne received the original link and Proctor led the investigation, both would’ve been far more relevant witnesses. As Proctor’s supervisor, Tully would likely have known about the missing footage from the Canton Library. Did he also communicate with Crawford? The original file sent by Jutras was a full one-hour segment (12:00 a.m.–1:00 a.m.), yet the version later used in evidence has missing roughly two minutes from 12:37 a.m. to 12:39 a.m. And now, this newly uncovered correspondence shows Proctor personally thanked Crawford for her help with this very footage.

BoozeyBeauty

92,443 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Dr. Matthews and Quanell X confronts p#nk @$$ racist Attorney Michael Phillips!!! This the one that used the N Word with the Hard R in open court in Brazoria County Texas!!! These racist are cowards and not real men 🤌🏾🔥🔥🔥🔥😎💯
1:51

Dr. Matthews and Quanell X confronts p#nk @$$ racist Attorney Michael Phillips!!! This the one that used the N Word with the Hard R in open court in Brazoria County Texas!!! These racist are cowards and not real men 🤌🏾🔥🔥🔥🔥😎💯

TheCompany™️©️

380,113 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Let’s put a permanent pin in the recycled claim that “Karen Read Googled for an attorney before police were even involved.” Take it back to Trial 1, Day 27, during Trooper Nick Guarino’s testimony about the phone extractions. Before David Yannetti even began cross, the court had to stop and hold a hearing outside the jury’s presence specifically about Read’s DUI-attorney Google search. This timeline had already been cleared up during a sidebar. But ADA Laura McLaughlin still pushed the narrative that Read searched for a lawyer before any police contact. She was trying to sell it as “consciousness of guilt,” undermine the Bowden defense, and magically erase the possibility of police misconduct all in one go. Except… reality got in the way. Yannetti quickly produced documentation showing Karen had already received a call from former Trooper Michael Proctor before that search ever happened. She didn’t Google an attorney until 8 minutes after speaking with him. This isn’t debatable. It’s not speculation. It’s in the transcripts, it’s in the data, and it played out on live television during the trial. And yet here we are STILL watching people (including some in direct contact with key witnesses) repeat the debunked talking point as if court records don’t exist. You don’t have to like Karen Read to acknowledge the timeline. But you do have to ignore documented facts to keep pushing that lie. And a bunch of fucking liars they are.
1:11

Let’s put a permanent pin in the recycled claim that “Karen Read Googled for an attorney before police were even involved.” Take it back to Trial 1, Day 27, during Trooper Nick Guarino’s testimony about the phone extractions. Before David Yannetti even began cross, the court had to stop and hold a hearing outside the jury’s presence specifically about Read’s DUI-attorney Google search. This timeline had already been cleared up during a sidebar. But ADA Laura McLaughlin still pushed the narrative that Read searched for a lawyer before any police contact. She was trying to sell it as “consciousness of guilt,” undermine the Bowden defense, and magically erase the possibility of police misconduct all in one go. Except… reality got in the way. Yannetti quickly produced documentation showing Karen had already received a call from former Trooper Michael Proctor before that search ever happened. She didn’t Google an attorney until 8 minutes after speaking with him. This isn’t debatable. It’s not speculation. It’s in the transcripts, it’s in the data, and it played out on live television during the trial. And yet here we are STILL watching people (including some in direct contact with key witnesses) repeat the debunked talking point as if court records don’t exist. You don’t have to like Karen Read to acknowledge the timeline. But you do have to ignore documented facts to keep pushing that lie. And a bunch of fucking liars they are.

BoozeyBeauty

25,582 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Idk about you but I can't WAIT to see the group texts Proctor was on with Chris Albert that Chris said he was weary of Massachusetts State Police investigators looking at because he "didn't wanna get anyone in trouble". That phone extraction will be telling us everything... 🙃
0:48

Idk about you but I can't WAIT to see the group texts Proctor was on with Chris Albert that Chris said he was weary of Massachusetts State Police investigators looking at because he "didn't wanna get anyone in trouble". That phone extraction will be telling us everything... 🙃

BoozeyBeauty

43,430 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

FaCt cHecK oF thE dAY! 🌟 Jumping to conclusions will always lead to a faulty landing. Claim: Kerry Roberts says she and Jennifer McCabe “willingly handed over their phones,” while Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything.” Rating: ❌ False What the trial testimony actually shows: On January 29, 2022, Massachusetts State Police Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik went to Karen Read’s parents’ home after Karen told police where she was when contacted. During Trial 1, Michael Proctor testified that: 🔹️They seized Karen Read’s cell phone 🔹️They seized her Lexus SUV 🔹️A search warrant had not yet been written and would be done after the seizure Also in Trial 1, Yuri Bukhenik testified that: 🔹️After Karen’s interview concluded, police told her they would be seizing her phone and her vehicle In Trial 2, Bukhenik reconfirmed: 🔹️The phone and vehicle were seized without a warrant 🔹️The warrant was written after the fact Kerry Roberts’ statement is false because Karen Read: ✅️ Voluntarily told police her location ✅️ Allowed police into her parents’ home ✅️ Turned over her cell phone ✅️ Turned over her Lexus SUV ❌ Police did not have a search warrant ❌ She did not resist or refuse She surrendered two of the most critical pieces of evidence before any warrant existed... something defendants are not legally required to do. Bottom line is that a warrantless seizure voluntarily complied with is still voluntary cooperation. Claiming Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything” is directly contradicted by sworn trial testimony (including testimony from the very officers who seized the evidence). The record shows voluntary cooperation without a warrant and stating otherwise is not a difference of perspective, it’s factually wrong. 🤯
1:16

FaCt cHecK oF thE dAY! 🌟 Jumping to conclusions will always lead to a faulty landing. Claim: Kerry Roberts says she and Jennifer McCabe “willingly handed over their phones,” while Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything.” Rating: ❌ False What the trial testimony actually shows: On January 29, 2022, Massachusetts State Police Michael Proctor and Yuri Bukhenik went to Karen Read’s parents’ home after Karen told police where she was when contacted. During Trial 1, Michael Proctor testified that: 🔹️They seized Karen Read’s cell phone 🔹️They seized her Lexus SUV 🔹️A search warrant had not yet been written and would be done after the seizure Also in Trial 1, Yuri Bukhenik testified that: 🔹️After Karen’s interview concluded, police told her they would be seizing her phone and her vehicle In Trial 2, Bukhenik reconfirmed: 🔹️The phone and vehicle were seized without a warrant 🔹️The warrant was written after the fact Kerry Roberts’ statement is false because Karen Read: ✅️ Voluntarily told police her location ✅️ Allowed police into her parents’ home ✅️ Turned over her cell phone ✅️ Turned over her Lexus SUV ❌ Police did not have a search warrant ❌ She did not resist or refuse She surrendered two of the most critical pieces of evidence before any warrant existed... something defendants are not legally required to do. Bottom line is that a warrantless seizure voluntarily complied with is still voluntary cooperation. Claiming Karen Read “did not willingly hand over anything” is directly contradicted by sworn trial testimony (including testimony from the very officers who seized the evidence). The record shows voluntary cooperation without a warrant and stating otherwise is not a difference of perspective, it’s factually wrong. 🤯

BoozeyBeauty

22,911 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The grocery store scene in Sicario: Day of Soldado is intense, but one part stands out to me. The mother runs to her daughter, checks on her, and then walks towards the suicide bomber. Her instincts are completely off. It's clear that she was hoping to get through the door and get away, but she placed her trust in the man who came there to kill her. As soon as she saw him standing there she should have grabbed her daughter, turned, and run the other direction. As infuriating as the scene is, it's important to note that it's not just an arbitrary depiction of a random character. It's a metaphor. The leftists in our nation always appeal to appeasement. They always tell us we're hateful or bigoted to point out that we have enemies, and that there actually are evil people in the world who hate us, and want to kill us. They fail to adequately assess the treat, and they put our entire nation in the hands of our enemies, who will obviously exploit this weakness aggressively.
2:13

The grocery store scene in Sicario: Day of Soldado is intense, but one part stands out to me. The mother runs to her daughter, checks on her, and then walks towards the suicide bomber. Her instincts are completely off. It's clear that she was hoping to get through the door and get away, but she placed her trust in the man who came there to kill her. As soon as she saw him standing there she should have grabbed her daughter, turned, and run the other direction. As infuriating as the scene is, it's important to note that it's not just an arbitrary depiction of a random character. It's a metaphor. The leftists in our nation always appeal to appeasement. They always tell us we're hateful or bigoted to point out that we have enemies, and that there actually are evil people in the world who hate us, and want to kill us. They fail to adequately assess the treat, and they put our entire nation in the hands of our enemies, who will obviously exploit this weakness aggressively.

Wasson Watch Co.

33,727 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In a recent interview, Colonel Nobel of the Massachusetts State Police stated that public trust was compromised by Michael Proctor on a "personal level" and not on a "operational level". Let me be so ever-living clear about this: those of us in the state (and especially in Norfolk County) overwhelmingly do not have trust in the state police. The conversations I've had with the women in my life who are afraid of being around state police. My non-white friends who are nervous when they see a state cruiser. One of my black friends said that he "always makes sure his hands are on 10 and 2 when around staties". That we can't trust the cops to not treat innocent individuals with dignity or transparency. This isn't personal. This is systemic. It wasn't just the Karen Read trial. It was the investigation of the murder of John O'Keefe. Of Sandra Birchmore. Of Ana Walshe. When the system quietly disciplines officers like Buhkenik, Tully and DiCiccio. When the system promotes an officer like Kotkowski. When the system protects an officer like Fanning. When the system fights for the rights of Proctor.. this is why we don't trust you operationally. It's not over some taillight or texts, it's the community seeing the behavioral patterns as a whole. It should not take criminal activity by one officer, and a failed public relations campaign, for a colonel to recognize (and change) this.
0:58

In a recent interview, Colonel Nobel of the Massachusetts State Police stated that public trust was compromised by Michael Proctor on a "personal level" and not on a "operational level". Let me be so ever-living clear about this: those of us in the state (and especially in Norfolk County) overwhelmingly do not have trust in the state police. The conversations I've had with the women in my life who are afraid of being around state police. My non-white friends who are nervous when they see a state cruiser. One of my black friends said that he "always makes sure his hands are on 10 and 2 when around staties". That we can't trust the cops to not treat innocent individuals with dignity or transparency. This isn't personal. This is systemic. It wasn't just the Karen Read trial. It was the investigation of the murder of John O'Keefe. Of Sandra Birchmore. Of Ana Walshe. When the system quietly disciplines officers like Buhkenik, Tully and DiCiccio. When the system promotes an officer like Kotkowski. When the system protects an officer like Fanning. When the system fights for the rights of Proctor.. this is why we don't trust you operationally. It's not over some taillight or texts, it's the community seeing the behavioral patterns as a whole. It should not take criminal activity by one officer, and a failed public relations campaign, for a colonel to recognize (and change) this.

BoozeyBeauty

20,301 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.
1:49

there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.

Dixie Normus

32,262 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

From the beginning of the John O'Keefe murder investigation, several individuals appeared to distance themselves from knowing John or even knowing of him. One of those individuals was Canton Police Sergeant Sean Goode. We hear an example of this firsthand during Kerry Roberts' non-emergency call on January 29, 2022. During that call, Kerry provided specific identifying details that should have made it immediately clear who she was referring to: a Boston police officer who lived on Meadows off Pleasant Street and had adopted his niece and nephew. However, recent public records requests suggest a very different story. Less than a year earlier, Detective Kevin Albert and Goode were discussing an issue involving O'Keefe. During that conversation, Albert shared personal details about John, including that he was a Boston police officer who had adopted his niece and nephew - a tragic story that many in Canton were familiar with. These are the exact same identifying details Kerry provided to Goode during the January 29 call. It's also important to remember that Canton is a relatively small town, and the law enforcement community within it is even smaller. Officers who live in town but work for different agencies or jurisdictions often knew of one another, if not through work itself, then through local gatherings, events, or social circles. This included Greg Long and Brian Albert of BPD, Michael Proctor of MSP, and Brian Higgins of ATF. Not only had Albert and Goode discussed O'Keefe, but Goode had also been assigned to assist with O'Keefe's March 21, 2021 issue. In fact, that was not the only incident involving O'Keefe that Goode would assist with. Which raises an important question: was Goode minimizing or downplaying his familiarity with John during Kerry's call? In a previous post, I pointed out that Goode was actively texting while the scene where O'Keefe was found was being processed. He was also one of only three officers permitted inside Brian Albert's home at 34 Fairview Road. I've mentioned before just how involved Goode was in this investigation, and it's possible that whatever is uncovered through his internal affairs investigation could reveal more about what occurred during the earliest hours of John O'Keefe's murder investigation.
0:25

From the beginning of the John O'Keefe murder investigation, several individuals appeared to distance themselves from knowing John or even knowing of him. One of those individuals was Canton Police Sergeant Sean Goode. We hear an example of this firsthand during Kerry Roberts' non-emergency call on January 29, 2022. During that call, Kerry provided specific identifying details that should have made it immediately clear who she was referring to: a Boston police officer who lived on Meadows off Pleasant Street and had adopted his niece and nephew. However, recent public records requests suggest a very different story. Less than a year earlier, Detective Kevin Albert and Goode were discussing an issue involving O'Keefe. During that conversation, Albert shared personal details about John, including that he was a Boston police officer who had adopted his niece and nephew - a tragic story that many in Canton were familiar with. These are the exact same identifying details Kerry provided to Goode during the January 29 call. It's also important to remember that Canton is a relatively small town, and the law enforcement community within it is even smaller. Officers who live in town but work for different agencies or jurisdictions often knew of one another, if not through work itself, then through local gatherings, events, or social circles. This included Greg Long and Brian Albert of BPD, Michael Proctor of MSP, and Brian Higgins of ATF. Not only had Albert and Goode discussed O'Keefe, but Goode had also been assigned to assist with O'Keefe's March 21, 2021 issue. In fact, that was not the only incident involving O'Keefe that Goode would assist with. Which raises an important question: was Goode minimizing or downplaying his familiarity with John during Kerry's call? In a previous post, I pointed out that Goode was actively texting while the scene where O'Keefe was found was being processed. He was also one of only three officers permitted inside Brian Albert's home at 34 Fairview Road. I've mentioned before just how involved Goode was in this investigation, and it's possible that whatever is uncovered through his internal affairs investigation could reveal more about what occurred during the earliest hours of John O'Keefe's murder investigation.

BoozeyBeauty

20,777 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“I also want to acknowledge to this Court and Ms. Read that I was mistaken when I interpreted her words to say ‘I’m dead. I’m fucking dead.’” - Attorney Marc Diller, 3/6/26 Well… that’s one way to end a week. After filing it, italicizing it in a motion so it would stand out to the Court, defending it in multiple pleadings and trying to explain it away once the audio started circulating publicly… Marc Diller walked into court today and admitted he got it wrong. The hearing itself started with a sidebar, where the attorneys spent quite a bit of time in a private conference with the judge. The attorneys then went into a room by themselves where they conferred with one another. When everyone came back on the record, Diller announced that the plaintiffs were withdrawing their TRO motion entirely. Instead, the parties agreed to work expeditiously and in good faith on a stipulation regarding the handling of Karen Read’s phones before they are returned to her custody. If they can’t come to an agreement on that protocol, the issue will go right back in front of the court. Importantly, the existing preservation order and prior agreements remain in place. Nothing about that changed. Another key point that came out of the hearing: anything related to the phones will now go through Read’s legal team first. Her attorneys will handle the review and extraction process, and while the plaintiffs can make suggestions about what they believe is relevant, the ultimate decisions remain with Read’s team. Which brings us back to the quote. Because let’s not forget how this whole thing started. The phrase “I’m dead. I’m fucking dead.” wasn’t buried somewhere in a filing. It was front and center, highlighted and emphasized as part of the argument for why the court should step in and block Karen Read from getting her property back. It was presented as if it were a direct, incriminating statement. And today, in open court, the attorney who put that quote into the record acknowledged that he misinterpreted it. 🗣 The motion built around that argument was fully withdrawn with Diller tucking his tail admitting that he was wrong. Sometimes the loudest accusations end with the quietest admissions.
3:25

“I also want to acknowledge to this Court and Ms. Read that I was mistaken when I interpreted her words to say ‘I’m dead. I’m fucking dead.’” - Attorney Marc Diller, 3/6/26 Well… that’s one way to end a week. After filing it, italicizing it in a motion so it would stand out to the Court, defending it in multiple pleadings and trying to explain it away once the audio started circulating publicly… Marc Diller walked into court today and admitted he got it wrong. The hearing itself started with a sidebar, where the attorneys spent quite a bit of time in a private conference with the judge. The attorneys then went into a room by themselves where they conferred with one another. When everyone came back on the record, Diller announced that the plaintiffs were withdrawing their TRO motion entirely. Instead, the parties agreed to work expeditiously and in good faith on a stipulation regarding the handling of Karen Read’s phones before they are returned to her custody. If they can’t come to an agreement on that protocol, the issue will go right back in front of the court. Importantly, the existing preservation order and prior agreements remain in place. Nothing about that changed. Another key point that came out of the hearing: anything related to the phones will now go through Read’s legal team first. Her attorneys will handle the review and extraction process, and while the plaintiffs can make suggestions about what they believe is relevant, the ultimate decisions remain with Read’s team. Which brings us back to the quote. Because let’s not forget how this whole thing started. The phrase “I’m dead. I’m fucking dead.” wasn’t buried somewhere in a filing. It was front and center, highlighted and emphasized as part of the argument for why the court should step in and block Karen Read from getting her property back. It was presented as if it were a direct, incriminating statement. And today, in open court, the attorney who put that quote into the record acknowledged that he misinterpreted it. 🗣 The motion built around that argument was fully withdrawn with Diller tucking his tail admitting that he was wrong. Sometimes the loudest accusations end with the quietest admissions.

BoozeyBeauty

36,112 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Bohacek: It's not a word that we use. And it's hurtful and it's inappropriate. And if you think about this, how are we going to tell a 12 or 13 year old kid to not use that kind of language when the most powerful man in the world, who is a role model to many, is
1:22

Bohacek: It's not a word that we use. And it's hurtful and it's inappropriate. And if you think about this, how are we going to tell a 12 or 13 year old kid to not use that kind of language when the most powerful man in the world, who is a role model to many, is

Acyn

18,944 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten