James Lindsay, anti-Communist's banner
James Lindsay, anti-Communist's profile picture

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

@ConceptualJames • 568,196 subscribers

Chief Anti-totalitarianism Officer @NewDiscourses. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Shorts

OAN's Vish Burra, Matt Gaetz's scriptwriter and handler, has severely crossed the line now, calling Jews vermin, accusing them of "scheming," identifying them as cockroaches he's destroying in the name of "America First" and "America Only." He's deleting now because of the huge legal exposure this puts OAN and him into. Every Jewish employee at OAN now has standing in a Title VI and VII suit they could file, at least unless OAN handles it, perhaps more. I am also named by name, along with my friend Suzy. Vish has been targeting both of us with very specific harassment for long enough, clearly enough, that there can be no doubt to whom he's referring. This is also actionable, both criminally and civilly.

OAN's Vish Burra, Matt Gaetz's scriptwriter and handler, has severely crossed the line now, calling Jews vermin, accusing them of "scheming," identifying them as cockroaches he's destroying in the name of "America First" and "America Only." He's deleting now because of the huge legal exposure this puts OAN and him into. Every Jewish employee at OAN now has standing in a Title VI and VII suit they could file, at least unless OAN handles it, perhaps more. I am also named by name, along with my friend Suzy. Vish has been targeting both of us with very specific harassment for long enough, clearly enough, that there can be no doubt to whom he's referring. This is also actionable, both criminally and civilly.

711,292 görüntüleme

I guess he realized the only place to go from where he already got is further down. "Christians are fake and gay," he said. "Christianity is a feminized religion, he continued. Now "Conservatives ARE socialists," he bellows. Trainwreck. Oh, in case you haven't seen it...

I guess he realized the only place to go from where he already got is further down. "Christians are fake and gay," he said. "Christianity is a feminized religion, he continued. Now "Conservatives ARE socialists," he bellows. Trainwreck. Oh, in case you haven't seen it...

37,268 görüntüleme

Next up in the long line of right-wing media figures lifting up Woke Right retards who waste our time, Patrick Bet-David just had on the spectacular retard Curtis Yarvin who said this idiot nonsense: America has always been a Leftist experiment. No it hasn't, except barely from the perspective of European reaction and counter-revolutionary thinking, which is part of what constitutes the European, but not American, Right. (I AM ONCE AGAIN TELLING YOU ALL THAT "LEFT" AND "RIGHT" ARE NOT ADEQUATE TERMS FOR POLITICAL DISCUSSION FOR A LOT OF REASONS, MOSTLY THAT THEY DESCRIBE LOCATIONS IN A PARTICULAR ROOM AT A PARTICULAR TIME AND NOT COHERENT POLITICAL PROGRAMS.) America is actually founded on a tradition completely alien and separate to either the "Left" or the "Right" as it is conceived of in the European mind. It is overwhelmingly something completely different that dispensed wholesale with all the idiotic Continental philosophies the European "Left" and "Right" relied upon. America was not "Leftist" because "Leftist" referred to Jacobinism specifically at the time of the Founding, in line with the thinking of Rousseau's esoteric French Romanticism, whereas America was founded on SCOTTISH COMMON SENSE. America's founders specifically REJECTED Jacobinism and built their system to reject and safeguard against it, but Jacobinism is specifically the thing called "Leftism" in the original context. If you go back to the National Assembly in France, where were the Jacobins? To the left of the king. Hence, "Leftism" for their philosophy and political program. Where were the Scottish Common Sense people? IN SCOTLAND AND AMERICA, doing something completely different and totally awesome, not in the room at all. If you look at what these guys were thinking, it was that Common Sense precedes all these idiotic European philosophical theories, but that the brain-genius philosophers of Europe were so smart that they got the relationship backwards. The Euros thought philosophy precedes common sense, but the Americans knew philosophy must begin with common sense or it's merely idle (and dangerous) speculation. The "Right," if we consider it the side that "resists the Left" (what a poor definition, but that's its definition, isn't it?), in revolutionary France was a motley mix of monarchists, counter-revolutionists, and theocrats. Those would be exactly the people Americans threw out and told to go f- themselves. The "Right," if we must use the term, in America is the side that defends the American tradition, which is based on Common Sense. Most Americans until quite recently were more or less mostly common-sense people in their general orientation to life, hence the long-standing saying that America is "a center-right country." That's what it actually means, outside of these dumb directional terms posing as political orientations. So, this is stupid. Just stupid, but look how much time and energy it takes to deal with the illiterate stupidity of a twelve-second clip pumped to a million viewers who don't have time, interest, background, or inclination to take it apart (because most of them are too common-sense to want to read all this crap but still tribal enough to fall for Yarvin's). Truly, it takes an order of magnitude (or two) more work to take apart bullshit than it does to produce it. Woke, both Right and Left, is such a waste of valuable time and always has been.

Next up in the long line of right-wing media figures lifting up Woke Right retards who waste our time, Patrick Bet-David just had on the spectacular retard Curtis Yarvin who said this idiot nonsense: America has always been a Leftist experiment. No it hasn't, except barely from the perspective of European reaction and counter-revolutionary thinking, which is part of what constitutes the European, but not American, Right. (I AM ONCE AGAIN TELLING YOU ALL THAT "LEFT" AND "RIGHT" ARE NOT ADEQUATE TERMS FOR POLITICAL DISCUSSION FOR A LOT OF REASONS, MOSTLY THAT THEY DESCRIBE LOCATIONS IN A PARTICULAR ROOM AT A PARTICULAR TIME AND NOT COHERENT POLITICAL PROGRAMS.) America is actually founded on a tradition completely alien and separate to either the "Left" or the "Right" as it is conceived of in the European mind. It is overwhelmingly something completely different that dispensed wholesale with all the idiotic Continental philosophies the European "Left" and "Right" relied upon. America was not "Leftist" because "Leftist" referred to Jacobinism specifically at the time of the Founding, in line with the thinking of Rousseau's esoteric French Romanticism, whereas America was founded on SCOTTISH COMMON SENSE. America's founders specifically REJECTED Jacobinism and built their system to reject and safeguard against it, but Jacobinism is specifically the thing called "Leftism" in the original context. If you go back to the National Assembly in France, where were the Jacobins? To the left of the king. Hence, "Leftism" for their philosophy and political program. Where were the Scottish Common Sense people? IN SCOTLAND AND AMERICA, doing something completely different and totally awesome, not in the room at all. If you look at what these guys were thinking, it was that Common Sense precedes all these idiotic European philosophical theories, but that the brain-genius philosophers of Europe were so smart that they got the relationship backwards. The Euros thought philosophy precedes common sense, but the Americans knew philosophy must begin with common sense or it's merely idle (and dangerous) speculation. The "Right," if we consider it the side that "resists the Left" (what a poor definition, but that's its definition, isn't it?), in revolutionary France was a motley mix of monarchists, counter-revolutionists, and theocrats. Those would be exactly the people Americans threw out and told to go f- themselves. The "Right," if we must use the term, in America is the side that defends the American tradition, which is based on Common Sense. Most Americans until quite recently were more or less mostly common-sense people in their general orientation to life, hence the long-standing saying that America is "a center-right country." That's what it actually means, outside of these dumb directional terms posing as political orientations. So, this is stupid. Just stupid, but look how much time and energy it takes to deal with the illiterate stupidity of a twelve-second clip pumped to a million viewers who don't have time, interest, background, or inclination to take it apart (because most of them are too common-sense to want to read all this crap but still tribal enough to fall for Yarvin's). Truly, it takes an order of magnitude (or two) more work to take apart bullshit than it does to produce it. Woke, both Right and Left, is such a waste of valuable time and always has been.

72,006 görüntüleme

How it started... How it's going... This is standard G-per behavior, a standard recipe: 1) Unfairly take something directed at them as 100x worse than it really was; 2) Use it to justify mass attack as "defensive" retaliation; 3) Swarm with the mamximal misinterpretation of what they falsely allege happened to them first, x1000, making it personal and nasty and usually targeting children; 4) If anyone calls foul, they repeat the lie from (1) and accuse you of defending that behavior and add you to their hit list under their terms of war (e.g., people who defend "doxxers" should be doxxed). In this case, Piers Morgan-Springer asked Burrito Mussolini a question about a statement he had made about his dad and his upbringing publicly, paraphrasing closely: "I've conducted literally 1000s of interviews over 40 years of broadcasting and I believe very strongly that people are the result of their upbringing. On your show you said that your father (said his name which I forget) used to take you and your sister out for dinner but wouldn't visit certain restaurants because they were quote: "black fare." Do you think hearing that impacted how you view black people?" On the "great interview" that Burrito himself declared surprisingly fair, Burrito pushed back on this question as being in bad faith, but Piers got him to concede that Piers only knew the anecdote becuase Burrito himself had said it on his own publicly available show. Just two days later, he's on the attack, viciously, "greenlighting" a mass attack against Piers Morgan-Springer's family and children, which will be unbelievably beyond bounds, on a claim that Piers Morgan-Springer attacked his family first. I hope it's abundantly clear why we cannot unite with such people, who are identical to Transtifa but in Nazi clothing, digitally goose-stepping in perfect emulation of the SA in a certain infamous 1920s Hofbräuhaus while their Dear Leader runs his mouth unimpeded.

How it started... How it's going... This is standard G-per behavior, a standard recipe: 1) Unfairly take something directed at them as 100x worse than it really was; 2) Use it to justify mass attack as "defensive" retaliation; 3) Swarm with the mamximal misinterpretation of what they falsely allege happened to them first, x1000, making it personal and nasty and usually targeting children; 4) If anyone calls foul, they repeat the lie from (1) and accuse you of defending that behavior and add you to their hit list under their terms of war (e.g., people who defend "doxxers" should be doxxed). In this case, Piers Morgan-Springer asked Burrito Mussolini a question about a statement he had made about his dad and his upbringing publicly, paraphrasing closely: "I've conducted literally 1000s of interviews over 40 years of broadcasting and I believe very strongly that people are the result of their upbringing. On your show you said that your father (said his name which I forget) used to take you and your sister out for dinner but wouldn't visit certain restaurants because they were quote: "black fare." Do you think hearing that impacted how you view black people?" On the "great interview" that Burrito himself declared surprisingly fair, Burrito pushed back on this question as being in bad faith, but Piers got him to concede that Piers only knew the anecdote becuase Burrito himself had said it on his own publicly available show. Just two days later, he's on the attack, viciously, "greenlighting" a mass attack against Piers Morgan-Springer's family and children, which will be unbelievably beyond bounds, on a claim that Piers Morgan-Springer attacked his family first. I hope it's abundantly clear why we cannot unite with such people, who are identical to Transtifa but in Nazi clothing, digitally goose-stepping in perfect emulation of the SA in a certain infamous 1920s Hofbräuhaus while their Dear Leader runs his mouth unimpeded.

57,303 görüntüleme

Shabbat Shalom from Jerusalem. 🙏🇮🇱🙏

Shabbat Shalom from Jerusalem. 🙏🇮🇱🙏

17,873 görüntüleme

Videos

ConceptualJames's profile picture

Gamergate 2 is underway. Former game executive and develop at Blizzard Mark Kern Grummz: "The way games are funded you don't use your own money. Even EA, it's games are hugely expensive to make they're they're upwards of you know 250 sometimes 600 million dollars it's for certain live games it's incredibly how expensive they are and to do that uh your CFO is your best friend. "You're counting on your CFO to get you tax breaks to get you in to put studios in regions which are financially favorable and you will borrow the cheap money you will get a cheap money to do it. Even EA does this. I worked with EA; we were putting together a deal where they were taking bailout money from the banks in the last financial crisis that we had, and they were applying that cheap money towards games same thing with Covid money. They're applying that cheap money towards games, and what has been the cheapest money while interest rates were still low, you know a couple of years ago it was ESG financing, and so they're going to take this money." "Because the returns on investment have been so poor on Wall Street for ESG funds, that source of Revenue is drying it up. This Woke machine cannot continue in the way that it is now for AAA gaming, and I think unfortunately, it's so entrenched that you're not going to see—you're not going to see much of an ability to course correct because the studios are—they're just gonna shut down."

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

6,765,209 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

ConceptualJames's profile picture

The claim in this video is that I'm identical to Tucker Carlson in damaging the Republican Party, which I actually hear out in the world pretty often, and I guess that's a mythology about me now. It's not true, of course, and it's another of these Woke "different things are the same" games, in fact. Tucker is using destructive lies and awful views to attack the Republican Party, until recently from within and now quite explicitly. I am not. I told the truth about Tucker early and at high cost and didn't back down or stop when called names, resisted, and punished, including by NatCon, which has apparently realized Tucker has gone too far now (several years too late, after hosting him themselves and defending him and his friends, like Kevin Roberts and JD Vance, to this very day). What we do is not the same, not the same at all. He lies. I tell the truth. I want Republicans to win. He wants them to lose. He wants to take individual Republicans into evil. I want to pull them away from it. And this is only a beginning. This is a farce. More than that, it's a moral failure in slow retreat. NatCon got this wrong. I got it right. I was the bad guy, and now I'm even more of the bad guy. They're still failing on issue after issue, and that's their fault, not mine. I'm pointing at what they don't want pointed at, but the thing I'm pointing at involves them. I am not opposed to NatCons being in the Republican coalition at all, unlike with Tucker. I am opposed to them driving. I am opposed to them setting the agenda. They are the junior partners in this coalition, especially in these United States, and they need to get used to it. I'm not opposed to their stupid debates, although I think they're worse than a distraction right now. I don't even think they're real debates because to me the U.S. Constitution is the first and last word here. No new conservatism for some new nationalism needed. That doesn't make me a "libertarian." It makes me an American Patriot, thank you very much. It is my operating premise that to win elections, to be a worthy party, to be a big coalition, it must coalesce around widely popular, virtuous, and true things, not a fringe splinter, not resentment, not hate. I therefore think Tucker Carlson should be recognized as outside of the party, movement, etc. I also think NatCon's weird nationalist game is unacceptable. Big coalitions are not feasible around weird fringe ideas until after everything is broken, broken the way Tucker is trying to break them. This fever dream, to use the term, is madness, especially now. A lot of people, not just "Lindsayites" see it, hence the backlash. I resent these comments and all they aim to do, which is the same thing as the rest of what NatCon is actually trying to do: make themselves the new center of gravity for the Republican Party in the United States, which isn't just foolish but a losing idea. I said no. I still say no. I will keep saying no.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

22,049 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

ConceptualJames's profile picture

Who is James Lindsay?

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

528,201 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce