Paris 🗼's banner

Paris 🗼

@Paris_dnd • 1,872 subscribers

the feeds never end🗼

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

Bill Maher Tells Mike Tyson what he Doesn't like about Islam. Bill Maher: “You’re a Muslim. Is the whole family Muslim?” Mike Tyson: “It’s my wife and my kids. They have to choose what they want to be.” Bill Maher: “And you’re okay with that?” Mike Tyson: “Absolutely.” Bill Maher: “That is not a point of view that’s even allowed in many Muslim countries around the world. There is one religion, it is Islam, and they’re not big on, ‘Hey, you know what? Let’s agree to disagree.’” Mike Tyson: “But listen, I’m not Allah.” Bill Maher: “I know. I’m just saying that’s something you’re allowed to do here as an American Muslim.” Mike Tyson: “I learned from experience. I’m not going to stop that growth from something that my growth is extending with. I’ve grown with it, but that’s not their growth.” Bill Maher: “I’m just pointing out that this enlightened point of view is not found uniformly around the world.” Mike Tyson: “You’d be surprised how many Muslims want to come in that think the way we think.” Bill Maher: “I’m not surprised. And women who don’t want to wear the you know, whatever the thing that looks like a cover of a motorboat.” Mike Tyson: “Well, some people are more modest. I wish I had the dignity to be that modest.” Bill Maher: “Modest? Why do you say that?” Mike Tyson: “Because they believe in covering themselves, and I’m like, you said I gotta be I don’t have much money. I gotta be in this cheap-ass plane with all these people and talking to these people.” Bill Maher: “One thing is modesty. Completely covering a woman so you don’t see any of her is different. This isn’t modest. That’s pathological.” Mike Tyson: “Suppose she’s happy with that.” Bill Maher: “She’s not. Oh my God, she’s not happy with it. I mean, you can brainwash someone into liking anything.”

Bill Maher Tells Mike Tyson what he Doesn't like about Islam. Bill Maher: “You’re a Muslim. Is the whole family Muslim?” Mike Tyson: “It’s my wife and my kids. They have to choose what they want to be.” Bill Maher: “And you’re okay with that?” Mike Tyson: “Absolutely.” Bill Maher: “That is not a point of view that’s even allowed in many Muslim countries around the world. There is one religion, it is Islam, and they’re not big on, ‘Hey, you know what? Let’s agree to disagree.’” Mike Tyson: “But listen, I’m not Allah.” Bill Maher: “I know. I’m just saying that’s something you’re allowed to do here as an American Muslim.” Mike Tyson: “I learned from experience. I’m not going to stop that growth from something that my growth is extending with. I’ve grown with it, but that’s not their growth.” Bill Maher: “I’m just pointing out that this enlightened point of view is not found uniformly around the world.” Mike Tyson: “You’d be surprised how many Muslims want to come in that think the way we think.” Bill Maher: “I’m not surprised. And women who don’t want to wear the you know, whatever the thing that looks like a cover of a motorboat.” Mike Tyson: “Well, some people are more modest. I wish I had the dignity to be that modest.” Bill Maher: “Modest? Why do you say that?” Mike Tyson: “Because they believe in covering themselves, and I’m like, you said I gotta be I don’t have much money. I gotta be in this cheap-ass plane with all these people and talking to these people.” Bill Maher: “One thing is modesty. Completely covering a woman so you don’t see any of her is different. This isn’t modest. That’s pathological.” Mike Tyson: “Suppose she’s happy with that.” Bill Maher: “She’s not. Oh my God, she’s not happy with it. I mean, you can brainwash someone into liking anything.”

1,020,567 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

Bill Maher Says Muslims Are the Group He Won’t Joke About Host: “Who are the people you can’t make jokes about?” Bill Maher: “Muslims.” Host: “Muslims?” Bill Maher: “Yeah. Try that and see what your Twitter feed says.” Host: “But that’s not saying you can’t. That just means they’ll kill you.” Bill Maher: “Oh yes, I’ve said that.” Host: “Theoretically, you could.” Bill Maher: “You know, I’ve made jokes like, ‘It’s a religion of peace.’ There’s a PC over there, a PC over there and see, they’re right.” Bill Maher jokes about why Muslims are one group he believes comedians have to be especially careful with, arguing that fear of backlash or violence can make certain subjects feel off-limits.

Bill Maher Says Muslims Are the Group He Won’t Joke About Host: “Who are the people you can’t make jokes about?” Bill Maher: “Muslims.” Host: “Muslims?” Bill Maher: “Yeah. Try that and see what your Twitter feed says.” Host: “But that’s not saying you can’t. That just means they’ll kill you.” Bill Maher: “Oh yes, I’ve said that.” Host: “Theoretically, you could.” Bill Maher: “You know, I’ve made jokes like, ‘It’s a religion of peace.’ There’s a PC over there, a PC over there and see, they’re right.” Bill Maher jokes about why Muslims are one group he believes comedians have to be especially careful with, arguing that fear of backlash or violence can make certain subjects feel off-limits.

538,200 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Bill Maher and Mike Tyson Clash Over Muslims, Homosexuality and America. Mike Tyson: “Americans are the only phobic people in the world.” Bill Maher: “That’s ridiculous. There are many homophobic people.” “Every Muslim country in the world, you get thrown off of a roof.” Mike Tyson: “Well, that’s like some extreme stuff. As a Muslim myself, I know this. Everybody’s worthy of the mercy of God.” Bill Maher: “Intolerance toward homosexuality is very much alive in the world today. It’s probably more alive in Muslim countries.” Mike Tyson: “I’m talking about a country like this that fights for everybody’s rights and everybody’s equal.” Bill Maher: “America is a place with horrible sins in its past and its present, but if you look around the world, there is perspective to that too.” Bill Maher and Mike Tyson debate whether America is uniquely intolerant or whether the rest of the world, including Muslim countries, deserves more scrutiny.

Bill Maher and Mike Tyson Clash Over Muslims, Homosexuality and America. Mike Tyson: “Americans are the only phobic people in the world.” Bill Maher: “That’s ridiculous. There are many homophobic people.” “Every Muslim country in the world, you get thrown off of a roof.” Mike Tyson: “Well, that’s like some extreme stuff. As a Muslim myself, I know this. Everybody’s worthy of the mercy of God.” Bill Maher: “Intolerance toward homosexuality is very much alive in the world today. It’s probably more alive in Muslim countries.” Mike Tyson: “I’m talking about a country like this that fights for everybody’s rights and everybody’s equal.” Bill Maher: “America is a place with horrible sins in its past and its present, but if you look around the world, there is perspective to that too.” Bill Maher and Mike Tyson debate whether America is uniquely intolerant or whether the rest of the world, including Muslim countries, deserves more scrutiny.

447,637 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Why Tucker Carlson Turned Against Trump Stephen A. Smith: “You once supported President Trump. Why don’t you anymore?” Tucker Carlson: “I supported him, campaigned with him, defended him at Fox, and knew him for 20 years.” “That changed when he launched a regime-change war against Iran with Israel. I told him beforehand that it couldn’t be won and would only damage the United States.” “I think it’s the most disastrous decision any American president has made in my lifetime.” “It’s not that I hate Trump. I feel sorry for him. I believe he wasn’t able to make an independent decision.” “Tucker Carlson says Trump’s decision to go to war with Iran was the breaking point, calling it “the most disastrous decision any American president has made in my lifetime.”

Why Tucker Carlson Turned Against Trump Stephen A. Smith: “You once supported President Trump. Why don’t you anymore?” Tucker Carlson: “I supported him, campaigned with him, defended him at Fox, and knew him for 20 years.” “That changed when he launched a regime-change war against Iran with Israel. I told him beforehand that it couldn’t be won and would only damage the United States.” “I think it’s the most disastrous decision any American president has made in my lifetime.” “It’s not that I hate Trump. I feel sorry for him. I believe he wasn’t able to make an independent decision.” “Tucker Carlson says Trump’s decision to go to war with Iran was the breaking point, calling it “the most disastrous decision any American president has made in my lifetime.”

538,426 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

Bill Maher Asks Why Islam Gets a Different Standard Than Christianity. Bill Maher: “Keith Ellison, isn’t the treatment of Muslims in America the last frontier of racism? I’d say Muslims and atheists.” Keith Ellison: “From time to time, we just pick a new person to persecute and scapegoat.” Bill Maher: “But even Muslims are above atheists because they are people of faith.” Keith Ellison: “Muslims didn’t do it. Some homicidal maniacs did.” Bill Maher: “In the name of Islam.” Keith Ellison: “What does it matter that they invoked the religion? Anders Breivik slaughtered 70 people. I don’t hold Christians responsible for that.” Bill Maher: “That’s naive. The hate comes from the holy book.” Barney Frank: “When people misuse something you believe in and invoke it, you do have a responsibility to be critical of them. And that’s true of Islam, Judaism, Christianity and Hinduism.” Keith Ellison: “Fundamentalists who believe they can kill to make you believe them are the problem. People of faith, I don’t think, are.” Bill Maher: “Muslims, of course, are not terrorists. But I’ve found a lot of reasonable, moderate Muslims who, if you ask them whether someone who insults the Prophet has it coming if they get injured, will say yes.” Keith Ellison: “Well, I say no.” Bill Maher argues that religious extremism deserves to be confronted, while Keith Ellison and Barney Frank push back against blaming an entire faith for the actions of extremists. The argument ultimately comes down to whether the problem is religion itself or fundamentalists who use religion to justify violence.

Bill Maher Asks Why Islam Gets a Different Standard Than Christianity. Bill Maher: “Keith Ellison, isn’t the treatment of Muslims in America the last frontier of racism? I’d say Muslims and atheists.” Keith Ellison: “From time to time, we just pick a new person to persecute and scapegoat.” Bill Maher: “But even Muslims are above atheists because they are people of faith.” Keith Ellison: “Muslims didn’t do it. Some homicidal maniacs did.” Bill Maher: “In the name of Islam.” Keith Ellison: “What does it matter that they invoked the religion? Anders Breivik slaughtered 70 people. I don’t hold Christians responsible for that.” Bill Maher: “That’s naive. The hate comes from the holy book.” Barney Frank: “When people misuse something you believe in and invoke it, you do have a responsibility to be critical of them. And that’s true of Islam, Judaism, Christianity and Hinduism.” Keith Ellison: “Fundamentalists who believe they can kill to make you believe them are the problem. People of faith, I don’t think, are.” Bill Maher: “Muslims, of course, are not terrorists. But I’ve found a lot of reasonable, moderate Muslims who, if you ask them whether someone who insults the Prophet has it coming if they get injured, will say yes.” Keith Ellison: “Well, I say no.” Bill Maher argues that religious extremism deserves to be confronted, while Keith Ellison and Barney Frank push back against blaming an entire faith for the actions of extremists. The argument ultimately comes down to whether the problem is religion itself or fundamentalists who use religion to justify violence.

108,803 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

Bill Maher Reads Trump’s 2-Term Limit to Steve Bannon Then Bannon Still Says Trump Will Be President in 2029. Bill Maher: “Here it is, the Constitution. Amendment 22: ‘No person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice.’” Steve Bannon: “President Trump is going to run for a third term, and President Trump is going to be elected again on the afternoon of January 20th, 2029.” Bill Maher: “I’m sorry to be… ‘No person,’ you would agree he’s a person, ‘shall be elected.’ He was elected, ‘to the office,’ that’s the office of the president, ‘more than twice.’ Twice is once and then another time.” Steve Bannon: “We have a team of people that are working every day in federal courts.” Bill Maher: “A team? How can a team do something about that? I don’t care if the team is 12 trillion people. The words are still the words.” Steve Bannon: “The interpretation of this is open for interpretation.” Steve Bannon is confident Trump can somehow get around the two-term limit and return to the White House in 2029. Bill Maher, on the other hand, isn’t buying the argument that the Constitution is somehow unclear. He reads the amendment out loud and keeps coming back to the same point: Trump has already been elected twice, so what exactly is there to interpret? Bannon says his team is already working on it and points to the long odds the MAGA movement has overcome before. Whether there’s actually a legal path to a third term is another question entirely, but Bannon clearly believes they can pull it off.

Bill Maher Reads Trump’s 2-Term Limit to Steve Bannon Then Bannon Still Says Trump Will Be President in 2029. Bill Maher: “Here it is, the Constitution. Amendment 22: ‘No person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice.’” Steve Bannon: “President Trump is going to run for a third term, and President Trump is going to be elected again on the afternoon of January 20th, 2029.” Bill Maher: “I’m sorry to be… ‘No person,’ you would agree he’s a person, ‘shall be elected.’ He was elected, ‘to the office,’ that’s the office of the president, ‘more than twice.’ Twice is once and then another time.” Steve Bannon: “We have a team of people that are working every day in federal courts.” Bill Maher: “A team? How can a team do something about that? I don’t care if the team is 12 trillion people. The words are still the words.” Steve Bannon: “The interpretation of this is open for interpretation.” Steve Bannon is confident Trump can somehow get around the two-term limit and return to the White House in 2029. Bill Maher, on the other hand, isn’t buying the argument that the Constitution is somehow unclear. He reads the amendment out loud and keeps coming back to the same point: Trump has already been elected twice, so what exactly is there to interpret? Bannon says his team is already working on it and points to the long odds the MAGA movement has overcome before. Whether there’s actually a legal path to a third term is another question entirely, but Bannon clearly believes they can pull it off.

171,129 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Billionaire and co- founder of Palantir says says he’d gladly pay a 90% tax rate but only under one condition. palantir co-founder: “i’m f*cking rich, michael.” “i would pay a 90% tax rate if we could keep our society competent” “if we could stop having illegals swarm into our country… “if we could fire unaccountable bureaucrats… “if we could put systems in place to make our government competent… “if we could stop having regulators harass, destroy, and impede builders… “i will pay whatever taxes that takes. “i’ll pay 90% of my fortune. “we need our country to be functional for my kids, my grandkids, and everyone else.”

Billionaire and co- founder of Palantir says says he’d gladly pay a 90% tax rate but only under one condition. palantir co-founder: “i’m f*cking rich, michael.” “i would pay a 90% tax rate if we could keep our society competent” “if we could stop having illegals swarm into our country… “if we could fire unaccountable bureaucrats… “if we could put systems in place to make our government competent… “if we could stop having regulators harass, destroy, and impede builders… “i will pay whatever taxes that takes. “i’ll pay 90% of my fortune. “we need our country to be functional for my kids, my grandkids, and everyone else.”

1,092,280 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Bill Maher Says Islam and Gay Rights Clash: “We Just Don’t Do That Here” Bill Maher: “Melissa Chaudhry was asked why LGBT rights were missing from her progressive platform. She said, ‘Because a lot of Muslims do not feel that way, unfortunately.’” Bill Maher: “So is this the progressive policy now? Do we throw gay people under the bus anytime it clashes with what makes Muslims uncomfortable?” Bill Maher: “A gay cruise ship with 2,000 passengers had to change course because Muslim countries wouldn’t let it dock.” Bill Maher: “Egypt and Turkey have no problem saying, ‘Our culture, we just don’t do that here.’ We need a little of that attitude here.” Bill Maher: “How about, ‘Homophobia? We just don’t do that here.’” Bill Maher: “Linda Sarsour says, ‘Our number one priority is our community. It is not to assimilate.’” Bill Maher: “But that’s not really how immigration works. If I move to Japan, I don’t get to say, ‘Everybody, a couple of changes.’” Bill Maher: “Lots of people, not just Muslims, do lots of fucked-up shit. We don’t have to go along with it.” Bill Maher argues that progressive politics shouldn’t ignore conflicts between LGBT rights and conservative religious or cultural beliefs. He uses Muslim-majority countries and immigration as examples while insisting that the same standards should apply to everyone.

Bill Maher Says Islam and Gay Rights Clash: “We Just Don’t Do That Here” Bill Maher: “Melissa Chaudhry was asked why LGBT rights were missing from her progressive platform. She said, ‘Because a lot of Muslims do not feel that way, unfortunately.’” Bill Maher: “So is this the progressive policy now? Do we throw gay people under the bus anytime it clashes with what makes Muslims uncomfortable?” Bill Maher: “A gay cruise ship with 2,000 passengers had to change course because Muslim countries wouldn’t let it dock.” Bill Maher: “Egypt and Turkey have no problem saying, ‘Our culture, we just don’t do that here.’ We need a little of that attitude here.” Bill Maher: “How about, ‘Homophobia? We just don’t do that here.’” Bill Maher: “Linda Sarsour says, ‘Our number one priority is our community. It is not to assimilate.’” Bill Maher: “But that’s not really how immigration works. If I move to Japan, I don’t get to say, ‘Everybody, a couple of changes.’” Bill Maher: “Lots of people, not just Muslims, do lots of fucked-up shit. We don’t have to go along with it.” Bill Maher argues that progressive politics shouldn’t ignore conflicts between LGBT rights and conservative religious or cultural beliefs. He uses Muslim-majority countries and immigration as examples while insisting that the same standards should apply to everyone.

77,378 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

Glenn Greenwald Shredded Bill Maher Over U.S. Intervention in Muslim Countries Bill Maher: “It’s not our fault what came out. We didn’t go into Egypt. We ended up with the Muslim Brotherhood.” Glenn Greenwald: “We were supporting Mubarak for 30 years. It was our government that kept Mubarak in power, just like we’ve done across the entire Muslim world.” Glenn Greenwald: “How can you be a citizen of the United States, the country that has generated more violence and militarism in the world over the last five or six decades, and say, ‘Look at those people over there, they’re incredibly violent’?” Bill Maher: “I wasn’t talking about violence. I was talking about theocracy. That doesn’t happen here.” Glenn Greenwald: “Iran isn’t invading lots of other countries and occupying them for a decade the way the United States is. These things are interlinked because we are continuously interfering in that part of the world.” Bill Maher: “So it’s all our fault?” Glenn Greenwald: “It’s not all our fault. But when you send your military for six straight decades into other countries, bomb them, kill their children, women and innocent men, and prop up dictators, you take responsibility for your actions.” Bill Maher: “That religion goes back a thousand years before our Revolution. I don’t think we can take all the blame back.” Glenn Greenwald: “I don’t think we should. I think we should take a lot of it. Lots of religions, not just Islam, have produced violence.” Bill Maher: “Silly liberal view that all religions are alike because it makes you feel good.” Glenn Greenwald: “You get to ignore the responsibility that your own government has for the violence and instability in the world by saying, ‘Look, it’s that primitive religion over there that’s to blame.’” Glenn Greenwald pushes back hard on Bill Maher’s argument about Islam and the Middle East, pointing to decades of U.S. intervention, support for dictators and military action in the region. Maher argues that the problem is theocracy, while Greenwald says America also has to take responsibility for the instability it helped create.

Glenn Greenwald Shredded Bill Maher Over U.S. Intervention in Muslim Countries Bill Maher: “It’s not our fault what came out. We didn’t go into Egypt. We ended up with the Muslim Brotherhood.” Glenn Greenwald: “We were supporting Mubarak for 30 years. It was our government that kept Mubarak in power, just like we’ve done across the entire Muslim world.” Glenn Greenwald: “How can you be a citizen of the United States, the country that has generated more violence and militarism in the world over the last five or six decades, and say, ‘Look at those people over there, they’re incredibly violent’?” Bill Maher: “I wasn’t talking about violence. I was talking about theocracy. That doesn’t happen here.” Glenn Greenwald: “Iran isn’t invading lots of other countries and occupying them for a decade the way the United States is. These things are interlinked because we are continuously interfering in that part of the world.” Bill Maher: “So it’s all our fault?” Glenn Greenwald: “It’s not all our fault. But when you send your military for six straight decades into other countries, bomb them, kill their children, women and innocent men, and prop up dictators, you take responsibility for your actions.” Bill Maher: “That religion goes back a thousand years before our Revolution. I don’t think we can take all the blame back.” Glenn Greenwald: “I don’t think we should. I think we should take a lot of it. Lots of religions, not just Islam, have produced violence.” Bill Maher: “Silly liberal view that all religions are alike because it makes you feel good.” Glenn Greenwald: “You get to ignore the responsibility that your own government has for the violence and instability in the world by saying, ‘Look, it’s that primitive religion over there that’s to blame.’” Glenn Greenwald pushes back hard on Bill Maher’s argument about Islam and the Middle East, pointing to decades of U.S. intervention, support for dictators and military action in the region. Maher argues that the problem is theocracy, while Greenwald says America also has to take responsibility for the instability it helped create.

25,318 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

A 40-year-old woman got divorced and walked away with $1.1 million, a $715,000 401(k), and $115,000 every month for seven years. Caller: I recently finalized my divorce after being a stay-at-home mom for 14 years. I got what I consider a pretty good amount of money, but I honestly don’t know what to do with it because I let my ex-husband handle all of our finances. Co-Host: How much money are you getting? Caller: I got a check for $1.1 million, a $715,000 401(k), and $115,000 a month for the next seven years. Host: How old are you? Caller: I’m 40. Host: So you’ve got guaranteed income for the next seven years. That’s nice. Caller: I’m completely debt-free, but I don’t own a home because I just got divorced. I’m renting right now for $3,600 a month, which feels really expensive. Host: It is. Caller: I have about $95,000 in a high-yield savings account, and I recently started a Roth IRA. I know almost nothing about finance, so I’ve been trying to learn. My question is, can I live off part of this money, or do I need to get a significant job? Host: The good news is you have a monthly income for the next seven years, so you’ve got some time to reinvent yourself and figure out what you want to do with your life. You obviously don’t need $115,000 a month. Host: Figure out what you actually need. Maybe it’s $7,000 a month. Then take the rest and invest it every single month. You’ve been bought time to figure out a career path for yourself.

A 40-year-old woman got divorced and walked away with $1.1 million, a $715,000 401(k), and $115,000 every month for seven years. Caller: I recently finalized my divorce after being a stay-at-home mom for 14 years. I got what I consider a pretty good amount of money, but I honestly don’t know what to do with it because I let my ex-husband handle all of our finances. Co-Host: How much money are you getting? Caller: I got a check for $1.1 million, a $715,000 401(k), and $115,000 a month for the next seven years. Host: How old are you? Caller: I’m 40. Host: So you’ve got guaranteed income for the next seven years. That’s nice. Caller: I’m completely debt-free, but I don’t own a home because I just got divorced. I’m renting right now for $3,600 a month, which feels really expensive. Host: It is. Caller: I have about $95,000 in a high-yield savings account, and I recently started a Roth IRA. I know almost nothing about finance, so I’ve been trying to learn. My question is, can I live off part of this money, or do I need to get a significant job? Host: The good news is you have a monthly income for the next seven years, so you’ve got some time to reinvent yourself and figure out what you want to do with your life. You obviously don’t need $115,000 a month. Host: Figure out what you actually need. Maybe it’s $7,000 a month. Then take the rest and invest it every single month. You’ve been bought time to figure out a career path for yourself.

74,836 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A 61-year-old asks Dave Ramsey when he should start collecting Social Security. Dave’s answer is basically: it depends on how long you plan to live. Caller: I’m 61 years old and I keep getting these letters from Social Security asking me what I want to do. I’m still working, so I don’t really need the money right now. I’m trying to figure out when the best time is to take advantage of the program. Dave: Well, the trick to knowing when to take Social Security is knowing when you’re going to die. Once you’ve figured that out, then you can calculate it precisely. Obviously, the longer you live, the better it is mathematically to take it later because you’re going to get a bigger check for a longer period of time. Caller: I was actually intending to invest 100% of it. But then I found out I don’t get the full amount if I start early. Dave: Yeah, you don’t. The later you start whether it’s 62 all the way up to 70 the more you get each year. But you can run the numbers on the Social Security website. You can look at your situation and say, “Okay, if I take it at 66 or 67, I get this amount. If I take it at 62, I get this different amount.” Then compare the difference. If you take every dollar you receive from 62 to 66 and invest it in a good investment, the returns can potentially make up that difference over the rest of your life. So if you’re going to do what you said you’re going to do take the money early and invest it. it can make sense to start earlier. Now, taxes come into play because you’re still working. There are other factors you have to look at to figure out what you’re actually going to net. But the basic concept is that you may be able to earn a better return by taking the money earlier and investing it rather than waiting for the larger Social Security check. And there’s another thing. When you die, whatever is left in that investment account is part of your estate. When you die with Social Security, there’s nothing there to pass on. So personally i feel this is one of those situations where I think people automatically assume waiting is always the smarter move because the monthly Social Security check gets bigger. But if you’re 61, still working, don’t actually need the money and have the discipline to invest what you receive, I can understand why taking it earlier becomes an interesting option. The part I’d personally pay the most attention to is the difference between getting a bigger guaranteed check later versus having actual money invested in your own name that can potentially keep growing and can eventually be passed on. There’s no one answer that works for everybody though, because taxes, investment returns, your health, and how long you live can completely change the math.

A 61-year-old asks Dave Ramsey when he should start collecting Social Security. Dave’s answer is basically: it depends on how long you plan to live. Caller: I’m 61 years old and I keep getting these letters from Social Security asking me what I want to do. I’m still working, so I don’t really need the money right now. I’m trying to figure out when the best time is to take advantage of the program. Dave: Well, the trick to knowing when to take Social Security is knowing when you’re going to die. Once you’ve figured that out, then you can calculate it precisely. Obviously, the longer you live, the better it is mathematically to take it later because you’re going to get a bigger check for a longer period of time. Caller: I was actually intending to invest 100% of it. But then I found out I don’t get the full amount if I start early. Dave: Yeah, you don’t. The later you start whether it’s 62 all the way up to 70 the more you get each year. But you can run the numbers on the Social Security website. You can look at your situation and say, “Okay, if I take it at 66 or 67, I get this amount. If I take it at 62, I get this different amount.” Then compare the difference. If you take every dollar you receive from 62 to 66 and invest it in a good investment, the returns can potentially make up that difference over the rest of your life. So if you’re going to do what you said you’re going to do take the money early and invest it. it can make sense to start earlier. Now, taxes come into play because you’re still working. There are other factors you have to look at to figure out what you’re actually going to net. But the basic concept is that you may be able to earn a better return by taking the money earlier and investing it rather than waiting for the larger Social Security check. And there’s another thing. When you die, whatever is left in that investment account is part of your estate. When you die with Social Security, there’s nothing there to pass on. So personally i feel this is one of those situations where I think people automatically assume waiting is always the smarter move because the monthly Social Security check gets bigger. But if you’re 61, still working, don’t actually need the money and have the discipline to invest what you receive, I can understand why taking it earlier becomes an interesting option. The part I’d personally pay the most attention to is the difference between getting a bigger guaranteed check later versus having actual money invested in your own name that can potentially keep growing and can eventually be passed on. There’s no one answer that works for everybody though, because taxes, investment returns, your health, and how long you live can completely change the math.

38,840 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

A man worth $2 million refuses to get married without a prenup. His girlfriend says it makes her feel like he’s already planning for divorce. Now they’re questioning whether they should get married at all. Caller: My boyfriend and I have been dating for about a year, so we're speaking about marriage. And he had mentioned that he would never get married without a prenup. I've always been against the idea of a prenup. I do understand the logic behind them, and he's worth a lot more than I am financially. So, I just feel like if a man says that he won't get married without a prenup, it makes me feel like it's an unsafe marriage for me to enter into because he's planning for divorce basically or preparing for it if that makes sense. Host: Have you shared that with him? those exact words Caller: Yes Host: How did he respond? Caller: Well, he said that he feels like I'm being ungrateful because he would be willing to, you know, take on me and my two children and I shouldn't question him. Host: So, this is an act of charity for him and you shouldn’t ask for no more. He's already doing the most by letting you into his life. Caller: Well, i was pretty surprised when he said that and it was a little upsetting. I understand that money is important obviously but there are things that I value more than money. And there's no amount of money that would be worth a divorce to me or like dragging my children through a failed marriage and all of that. Host: Is this second marriage for both of you or one of you? Caller: It's a second marriage for me, And this is his first marriage. He's never been married. He has no children. Host: So how much more is he worth than you? Caller: I don't know exactly. The number that he gave me was two million. like between retirement and assets, savings, all of that. He says it wouldn't be fair if we were to get divorced. It wouldn't be fair for me to get half of everything he's worked for. And I understand the And I'm not saying I want half of everything. I'm saying i don't want to go into this marriage talking about divorce because I'm 36 years old and if I'm going to be getting divorced in 5 years, I'd rather not get married. Host: I think you guys are just missing each other communication wise and he has his reasons and you have your reasons and neither of you are getting to the root of it and understanding each other. Co-Host: it’s not necessarily wrong, for in his sake. I'm not going to say that he is wrong. But where I do think he's wrong and what what I get the ick about is the way he's responding to you in it and it makes you feel like he's valuing his money over you and that's how it feels.

A man worth $2 million refuses to get married without a prenup. His girlfriend says it makes her feel like he’s already planning for divorce. Now they’re questioning whether they should get married at all. Caller: My boyfriend and I have been dating for about a year, so we're speaking about marriage. And he had mentioned that he would never get married without a prenup. I've always been against the idea of a prenup. I do understand the logic behind them, and he's worth a lot more than I am financially. So, I just feel like if a man says that he won't get married without a prenup, it makes me feel like it's an unsafe marriage for me to enter into because he's planning for divorce basically or preparing for it if that makes sense. Host: Have you shared that with him? those exact words Caller: Yes Host: How did he respond? Caller: Well, he said that he feels like I'm being ungrateful because he would be willing to, you know, take on me and my two children and I shouldn't question him. Host: So, this is an act of charity for him and you shouldn’t ask for no more. He's already doing the most by letting you into his life. Caller: Well, i was pretty surprised when he said that and it was a little upsetting. I understand that money is important obviously but there are things that I value more than money. And there's no amount of money that would be worth a divorce to me or like dragging my children through a failed marriage and all of that. Host: Is this second marriage for both of you or one of you? Caller: It's a second marriage for me, And this is his first marriage. He's never been married. He has no children. Host: So how much more is he worth than you? Caller: I don't know exactly. The number that he gave me was two million. like between retirement and assets, savings, all of that. He says it wouldn't be fair if we were to get divorced. It wouldn't be fair for me to get half of everything he's worked for. And I understand the And I'm not saying I want half of everything. I'm saying i don't want to go into this marriage talking about divorce because I'm 36 years old and if I'm going to be getting divorced in 5 years, I'd rather not get married. Host: I think you guys are just missing each other communication wise and he has his reasons and you have your reasons and neither of you are getting to the root of it and understanding each other. Co-Host: it’s not necessarily wrong, for in his sake. I'm not going to say that he is wrong. But where I do think he's wrong and what what I get the ick about is the way he's responding to you in it and it makes you feel like he's valuing his money over you and that's how it feels.

13,151 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Daha fazla içerik yok.