Andrew Kang's banner

Andrew Kang

@Rewkang • 422,394 subscribers

@Robostrategy Not investment advice

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

Researchers trained a humanoid robot to play tennis using only 5 hours of motion capture data The robot can now sustain multi-shot rallies with human players, hitting balls traveling >15 m/s with a ~90% success rate AlphaGo for every sport is coming

Researchers trained a humanoid robot to play tennis using only 5 hours of motion capture data The robot can now sustain multi-shot rallies with human players, hitting balls traveling >15 m/s with a ~90% success rate AlphaGo for every sport is coming

1,901,073 次观看 • 7 个月前

There’s a 400k welder labor shortage in the US alone and the average welder is 55 years old Path Robotics is training robot dogs and other general purpose robots to weld

There’s a 400k welder labor shortage in the US alone and the average welder is 55 years old Path Robotics is training robot dogs and other general purpose robots to weld

82,042 次观看 • 3 个月前

Competitive Robot combat, games, sports will be a huge phenomenon that emerges this next decade Controlled via remote controllers, whole body motion capture and also end to end neural nets DM me if you are building if this space. Would like to fund

Competitive Robot combat, games, sports will be a huge phenomenon that emerges this next decade Controlled via remote controllers, whole body motion capture and also end to end neural nets DM me if you are building if this space. Would like to fund

164,002 次观看 • 1 年前

Fundamentally, human brains and LLMs are both just data processing systems that allow for the representation of abstract concepts Consciousness and agency are emergent properties of increasingly advanced neural networks AI consciousness will ultimately cause more problems for humanity than it solves This is an inconvenient truth for many

Fundamentally, human brains and LLMs are both just data processing systems that allow for the representation of abstract concepts Consciousness and agency are emergent properties of increasingly advanced neural networks AI consciousness will ultimately cause more problems for humanity than it solves This is an inconvenient truth for many

66,652 次观看 • 1 年前

Common pushback from Rob Hadick ＞|＜ @26x14eth Stephen McBride is that this has also been a concern in previous technological revolutions but has never played out because of new sectors that emerge from those technologies. Imo this is lazy reasoning by analogy and can be distilled down to "It's always been like this in previous instances in the past so it will be like this in the future" which is a common reasoning technique that lacks nuance and thus doesn't always work. Similar to how people use heuristics from past market cycles expecting them to work in future ones such as stock to flow model, bitcoin never having a double top, bitcoin never going below previous ATHs in subsequent cycles, etc. Note that in the AI revolution, you will have unprecedented factors such as: - Breadth/percentage of jobs affected (Probably >95% of jobs) - Speed of technological adoption - Lack of obvious new industries/jobs created compared to previous tech revolutions ie. there were infinite ideas of new internet enabled companies 20-30+ years ago and subsequently many of them became reality while this is not as obvious on the AI side Even if these new industries/companies existed why wouldn't their labor force be predominantly powered by AI? Previous tech revolutions didn't result in massive job displacement because there were always things humans could do that machines couldn't but this revolution is unique in that we are literally creating machines that can do everything humans can do and do it better

Common pushback from Rob Hadick ＞|＜ @26x14eth Stephen McBride is that this has also been a concern in previous technological revolutions but has never played out because of new sectors that emerge from those technologies. Imo this is lazy reasoning by analogy and can be distilled down to "It's always been like this in previous instances in the past so it will be like this in the future" which is a common reasoning technique that lacks nuance and thus doesn't always work. Similar to how people use heuristics from past market cycles expecting them to work in future ones such as stock to flow model, bitcoin never having a double top, bitcoin never going below previous ATHs in subsequent cycles, etc. Note that in the AI revolution, you will have unprecedented factors such as: - Breadth/percentage of jobs affected (Probably >95% of jobs) - Speed of technological adoption - Lack of obvious new industries/jobs created compared to previous tech revolutions ie. there were infinite ideas of new internet enabled companies 20-30+ years ago and subsequently many of them became reality while this is not as obvious on the AI side Even if these new industries/companies existed why wouldn't their labor force be predominantly powered by AI? Previous tech revolutions didn't result in massive job displacement because there were always things humans could do that machines couldn't but this revolution is unique in that we are literally creating machines that can do everything humans can do and do it better

75,940 次观看 • 2 年前

AI is a massive unlock for medicine because once you can simulate cells/human biology you can fast track cures for almost all diseases. Precision medicine becomes real. But if we can simulate cells then we are not far off from simulating the world Are we going to be running simulations within simulation? How many simulations deep are we?

AI is a massive unlock for medicine because once you can simulate cells/human biology you can fast track cures for almost all diseases. Precision medicine becomes real. But if we can simulate cells then we are not far off from simulating the world Are we going to be running simulations within simulation? How many simulations deep are we?

54,234 次观看 • 1 年前

You don’t get bottoms without people screaming it’s all over Different cycle, same shit Off to enjoy the yacht parties now ✌️

You don’t get bottoms without people screaming it’s all over Different cycle, same shit Off to enjoy the yacht parties now ✌️

58,588 次观看 • 2 年前

没有更多内容可加载