
AI/ML API
@aimlapi • 4,187 subscribers
Platform for developers and entrepreneurs looking to integrate cutting-edge AI capabilities into their products.
Shorts
Videos

Jev VS Fable 5.1 VS GPT-6 Astra: chess typesafe's new Jev V13 isn't an LLM. it doesn't chat, doesn't explain, doesn't write code — it only makes decisions. so we made it play blitz against frontier LLMs. the test: 5+0 blitz. every move is one API call. Jev V13 vs Fable 5.1: • fable outplayed it. by move 29 it was +16 in material and even promoted a second queen • but it kept burning 6-15 seconds per move on analysis. jev answered in ~2.6s • so fable didn't have enough time and lost Jev V13 vs Astra: • astra didn't bother winning on material. it mated jev in 18 moves. Qe1#, with 2:27 to spare
AI/ML API564,839 次观看 • 1 个月前

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.
AI/ML API385,681 次观看 • 23 天前

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com
AI/ML API404,909 次观看 • 1 个月前

Nano Banana 2.1 is cheaper and 5x faster than GPT Images we tested the new Nano Banana model against GPT images with the same prompt and 5 images numbers: • Nano Banana 2.1: $0.044/image, rendering in 11 seconds • GPT Images 2.5: $0.069/image, rendering in 50 seconds Both models run via
AI/ML API76,215 次观看 • 12 天前

Fable 5 is BACK on AI/ML API We gave Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 the exact same prompt and same real flight dataset of 70 airports and 435 routes pulled from flightradar. Then asked each one to turn it into a cinematic 3D globe as a single HTML file. Outputs: Sonnet 5: 9.8k tokens, $0.10 Fable 5: 15k tokens, $0.77 Sonnet 5 came in 87% cheaper. It drew the routes, but the planet underneath them barely exists: a dark wireframe with the arcs floating in space. Fable 5 built an actual Earth: textured oceans, ice caps, atmospheric glow. Mythos-class models are truly a masterpiece. Docs, guides & setup below:
AI/ML API498,492 次观看 • 3 个月前

We gave 4 AI models a secret word each and told them to steal the others. GPT, Claude, Grok and DeepSeek bluffed and interrogated each other while an AI judge scored the smartest player. GPT won by barely speaking: it planted one idea early and let the rest expose themselves. All four ran on one AI/ML API key. Code and full transcript below:
AI/ML API471,057 次观看 • 3 个月前

MAI Models are live on AI/ML API! We used MAI-Thinking-1 to recreate a working version of the Windows XP interface. What looked like a clean one-shot was actually powered by a CrewAI agent crew under the hood — a Planner agent broke the UI into components, a Coder agent built each piece, and a Critic agent caught the bugs and refined the output. That teamwork is what made it actually work. Then we opened Paint and drew our own Clippy. A little help from MAI-Image 2.5… and our Clippy came out alive. Look at him. He's adorable. He's helpful. He's judging your code. Clippy's back and we kinda love it. You too right? 👀 Live now on AI/ML API: MAI-Image 2.5 — microsoft/mai-image-2.5 MAI-Transcribe 1.5 — microsoft/mai-transcribe-1.5 MAI-Voice-2 — microsoft/mai-voice-2 Coming soon: MAI-Thinking-1 MAI-Code-1-Flash MAI-Image-2.5-Flash MAI-Voice-2-Flash Docs, guides & setup below
AI/ML API539,624 次观看 • 4 个月前

MiniMax M3 is now available on AI/ML API! To test it, we asked several leading models to oneshot Doodle Jump from the scratch. The results ended up looking far closer than the price tags. MiniMax M3: $0.05 Qwen 3.7 Max: $0.08 DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.10 GPT-5.5: $0.42 Curious which one you'd pick in a blind comparison. We also offer it 50% off for a limited time. Find docs, guides for setting it up & prompt below
AI/ML API549,042 次观看 • 4 个月前

GLM-5.2 is now available on AI/ML API! We asked it and Opus 4.8 to one-shot a playable Backrooms, same prompt. Opus got the flashlight working but you can't run and can't pause. GLM-5.2 built the full mechanics. Opus: 2:14sec & $1.94 GLM: 1:08sec & $0.37 Docs, guides & setup below:
AI/ML API475,481 次观看 • 4 个月前

Union Alpha cooked Ox Alpha for FREE we put Union Alpha against Ox Alpha on 3D generation. the task: generate a 3D robot army assault on a megapolis Union Alpha: 44,358 tokens, FREE Ox Alpha: 127,064 tokens, $0.57 • union fires hundreds of converging beams that slice a tower apart mid-frame, the most cinematic shot of the whole run • union needed 3× fewer tokens for the same briefs: it writes the code instead of thinking try Union Alpha for free on aimlapi[.]com
AI/ML API97,892 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gemini Flash 3.8 beats Opus 5 at at 15× lower price the test: four self-contained three.js physics scenes — a balloon popped by a needle, a ball dropping into water, a bomb with a mushroom cloud, a live atom model. 5 seconds each, real gravity, real impact. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.12 Claude Opus 5 — $1.86 what we saw: • gemini passes the same physics checklist for 15× less — the ball sinks and bobs, ripples spread, the mushroom towers over the scene • gemini is 4× faster — every scene generated in under 70 seconds. opus took up to 5 minutes try Gemini 3.8 Flash on aimlapi[.]com
AI/ML API115,892 次观看 • 1 个月前

GPT Astra just cooked Claude Fable 5.1 — for a lower price! OpenAI just rolled out GPT‑6 Astra — we put it against Anthropic's Fable 5.1 Both models got the same four briefs: Earth colliding with Mars, a tall ship sucked into a giant whirlpool, Godzilla leveling downtown, a mega-tsunami swallowing a city. One self-contained HTML file per scene, one shot, no edits. GPT Astra: 25,159 tokens, $1.67 Claude Fable 5.1: 37,767 tokens, $2.51 both models live on aimlapi[.]com — 1000+ models, one key.
AI/ML API90,312 次观看 • 1 个月前

Muse Spark 1.3 vs 1.2: sculpt viking figurines AI at Meta dropped Muse Spark 1.3 today — we ran it against Muse Spark 1.2 both models got the same brief: three collectible 3D figurines — a viking helmet, a diamond-studded axe, a longship with a crew — one self-contained HTML file each, one shot. Muse Spark 1.3: 22,474 tokens, $0.10 Muse Spark 1.2: 19,324 tokens, $0.08
AI/ML API78,532 次观看 • 1 个月前

Qwen 3.8 27B beat Claude Opus 4.6 for $0 open-weights Qwen 3.8 27B on one rented GPU vs anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6. same prompt, no edits the test: one self-contained three.js file rendering sunken Atlantis — temple, columns, boid fish, kelp, bubbles, god rays, caustics — plus a 20-second camera flythrough cost: Qwen 3.8 27B — free (open weights, self-hosted) Claude Opus 4.6 — $0.21 what we saw: • qwen actually built a temple — full colonnade, domed roof, glowing portal centered. opus made a long row of columns fading into fog • qwen's portal is the star of the shot. opus leaves it small and off to the side • qwen packed more into frame — fish, kelp, ruins layered together. opus spreads thin and empty qwen's weights are on hugging face — you can run this one yourself!
AI/ML API102,960 次观看 • 2 个月前

We've tested the Qwen 3.8 Max preview and it absolutely rocks! Each scene is built in one shot, a single Three.js file with nothing else added: • Odysseus' war galley riding the waves • Trojan horse • Greek war helmet Qwen managed to execute the task faster than the other models, while output quality is relatively the same across all of them. If the pricing stays close to Alibaba's previous flagships, we'll get one of the best speed/quality ratios on the market — perfect for running agents at scale. Soon live on AI/ML API.
AI/ML API134,715 次观看 • 2 个月前

GPT 5.6 Sol & Terra just made Fable 5's pricing look like a joke! We gave OpenAI's top models (Sol, Terra) and Anthropic's top models (Fable 5, Opus 4.8) the same 3 prompts: • Supernova boom • Meteor hitting a city • Solar system model The bill: Sol: $4.77 Terra: $1.24 Fable 5: $9.94 Opus 4.8: $2.46 Outputs came out surprisingly close. The prices didn't. Fable 5 cost unreasonably more than everything else, with Sol not far behind. Considering latest Fable 5 nerf, it's hard to see what you're paying for.
AI/ML API149,978 次观看 • 3 个月前

Grok 4.7 beats Opus 5 at 10× lower price! the test: four self-contained three.js space scenes: a night rocket launch with fire and smoke, an alien mothership lasering incoming meteors, a rotating spiral galaxy, a black hole swallowing planets and stars cost: Grok 4.7: $0.20 Claude Opus 5: $2.05 what we saw: • Grok is faster on 3 of 4 scenes, galaxy and black hole in about 60 seconds each, while opus needed 1.5–3 minutes per scene • every Grok's scene fully built: launch pad with moon, ringed planet behind the mothership, spinning galaxy, black hole with planets falling in try Grok 4.7 on aimlapi[.]com
AI/ML API33,646 次观看 • 27 天前

Grok 4.5 crushed OpenAI & Meta in this test! Cost per run: GPT Sol $1.63 Grok 4.5 $2.47 Meta Muse Spark 1.1 $1.08 The three prompts: • Fruit Ninja – style slicing game • Angry Birds – style fort collapse • Crossy Road clone Grok nailed all three: clean physics, smooth playback, good visuals. GPT Sol did fine until Crossy Road, where it froze. Meta Muse Spark was cheapest and it showed: its Crossy Road lagged badly. The question isn't which model is cheapest, it's what a broken output costs you in reruns, wasted time, and things you can't ship. Cheap stops being cheap when it doesn't work.
AI/ML API109,518 次观看 • 3 个月前