Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Grok 4.7 beats Opus 5 at 10× lower price! the test: four self-contained three.js space scenes: a night rocket launch with fire and smoke, an alien mothership lasering incoming meteors, a rotating spiral galaxy, a black hole swallowing planets and stars cost: Grok 4.7: $0.20 Claude Opus 5: $2.05... show more

AI/ML API

4,081 subscribers

33,356 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

23 Comments

Hugo Plat6 days ago

10x difference?!?!? OMG

AI/ML API6 days ago

yeah, it's crazy!

Lookoff6 days ago

Grok is cooking 🔥

AI/ML API6 days ago

yes! and it's live on AI/ML API

AshutoshShrivastava6 days ago

10X is huge

AI/ML API6 days ago

yes! and you can try it on AI/ML API

AI/ML API6 days ago

try Grok 4.7

Volodymyr Bandura6 days ago

You really don’t feel this efficiency in subscription, they are better on Claude max compared to cursor ultra

AI/ML API6 days ago

They’re also great when you try them with AI/ML API 😉

Lexi6 days ago

The combination of animation, effects, and geometry raises the bar.

AI/ML API6 days ago

Exactly

Vishal Singh 🥑6 days ago

not much difference is outputs, but 10x difference in price...crazy grok wins this one big time 💪

AI/ML API6 days ago

10x is no joke

Enzo6 days ago

yep thats it, rocket science

AI/ML API6 days ago

Literally it

Shinra6 days ago

grok 4.7 at 10x cheaper AND faster on 3d generation is the kind of concrete comparison that matters. one test doesn't prove everything but if this scales to production workflows, that's a real displacement event. opus still wins on pure reasoning complexity but for creative/visual work where you need speed and iteration, grok just became the obvious pick. that's how markets consolidate around price/performance winners

Chansoo Byeon6 days ago

Grok Groks Buy American 🇺🇲 Buy Winner 🏆 Buy Tesla! Best products & services like Tesla & Starlink simply WIN 🌎 Way too many people don't know buying a Tesla is cheaper than buying a Corolla! & Don't forget to use a Tesla referral code when ordering your Tesla! Tesla expanded its referral program to & certain parts of Europe & Asia! USA & Canada: 3 months of FSD Germany: €250 France: €500 Netherlands: €500 Norway: 11,500kr UK: £500 Australia 🦘: $350AUD New Zealand: $400 Italia: €500 Switzerland: 250 CHF Sweden: 11400 SEK South Korea 🇰🇷: 165,000 Won Japan: 60,000 yen Singapore: S$300 Malaysia: RM 4200 Thailand: B8,500 Hong Kong: HK$1,900 Macau: MOP$1,958 Philippines: ₱13,000 Taiwan: NT$8,000 India: ₹22,000 Here is mine if you need one: DMs are open for questions. FSD is mind-blowing!!

AI/ML API6 days ago

Grok is great. We’ve added it to our API - try it

Jarret6 days ago

only problem the Opus 5 output's are better in everyday..... you get what you pay for

AI/ML API6 days ago

That’s why we put both and many others into our API - try it

ShadowAguy6 days ago

Did you verify the generated 3.js scenes actually run without errors, or just that they look correct in a screenshot?

AI/ML API6 days ago

Ran perfectly from the 1st shot

ShadowAguy6 days ago

Ran perfectly from the first shot, that is the detail that matters. What did you run, was it a coding task or something else entirely

Related Videos

Gemini Flash 3.8 beats Opus 5 at at 15× lower price the test: four self-contained three.js physics scenes — a balloon popped by a needle, a ball dropping into water, a bomb with a mushroom cloud, a live atom model. 5 seconds each, real gravity, real impact. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.12 Claude Opus 5 — $1.86 what we saw: • gemini passes the same physics checklist for 15× less — the ball sinks and bobs, ripples spread, the mushroom towers over the scene • gemini is 4× faster — every scene generated in under 70 seconds. opus took up to 5 minutes try Gemini 3.8 Flash on aimlapi[.]com

Gemini Flash 3.8 beats Opus 5 at at 15× lower price the test: four self-contained three.js physics scenes — a balloon popped by a needle, a ball dropping into water, a bomb with a mushroom cloud, a live atom model. 5 seconds each, real gravity, real impact. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.12 Claude Opus 5 — $1.86 what we saw: • gemini passes the same physics checklist for 15× less — the ball sinks and bobs, ripples spread, the mushroom towers over the scene • gemini is 4× faster — every scene generated in under 70 seconds. opus took up to 5 minutes try Gemini 3.8 Flash on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

115,892 views • 25 days ago

Grok 4.6 drops around August 7 with a 1.5 trillion parameter model and improved fine-tuning, per Elon Musk. Grok 4.7 follows a few weeks later at 2.1T, better in every benchmark but slightly slower to serve. xAI is stacking releases while Grok 4.5 already beats Opus 5 on price-performance in cybersecurity benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 drops around August 7 with a 1.5 trillion parameter model and improved fine-tuning, per Elon Musk. Grok 4.7 follows a few weeks later at 2.1T, better in every benchmark but slightly slower to serve. xAI is stacking releases while Grok 4.5 already beats Opus 5 on price-performance in cybersecurity benchmarks.

Digg

35,731 views • 2 months ago

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. in our community: we stimulate our traders to automate. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap.

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. in our community: we stimulate our traders to automate. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap.

AlphaCartel

41,471 views • 5 months ago

Claude Opus 5 just smoked Grok on prediction markets. $1,000 to $3,700 in a single day. A guy made $16,000 on Grok in ten weeks with four prompts. I ran his exact prompts through the new Opus 5 instead. It did in a day what took Grok two months. Grok still wins on breaking news. It reads live X the second a story drops, nothing beats it there. But on mispriced markets, Opus 5 saw money Grok walked right past. Same prompts. Same questions. Higher hit rate on almost every one. There's a reason, and it's a little unfair. I'm not spelling it out here, because the day everyone knows it the edge is dead. Almost nobody is running these prompts through Opus 5 yet. That window is the whole opportunity. The four prompts are in the article below, copy-paste ready. Bookmark & read this now, while you're still early enough for it to matter.

Claude Opus 5 just smoked Grok on prediction markets. $1,000 to $3,700 in a single day. A guy made $16,000 on Grok in ten weeks with four prompts. I ran his exact prompts through the new Opus 5 instead. It did in a day what took Grok two months. Grok still wins on breaking news. It reads live X the second a story drops, nothing beats it there. But on mispriced markets, Opus 5 saw money Grok walked right past. Same prompts. Same questions. Higher hit rate on almost every one. There's a reason, and it's a little unfair. I'm not spelling it out here, because the day everyone knows it the edge is dead. Almost nobody is running these prompts through Opus 5 yet. That window is the whole opportunity. The four prompts are in the article below, copy-paste ready. Bookmark & read this now, while you're still early enough for it to matter.

cvxv666

29,598 views • 2 months ago

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Grok 4.7 beats GPT-6 Astra on real-world tasks, and it's 5x cheaper. • Same price as 4.6, $2 input and $6 output per million tokens, well under Sol, Fable, and Astra • A new larger base model, which Elon has put at 2.1 trillion parameters, up from 1.5 trillion, with extra training on SpaceX data • Trained to natively understand the Grok Bot harness, the same move Anthropic made with Claude Code • Leads on electrical engineering and Harvey's legal benchmark, beats Astra Max on GDPval, trails on software engineering • Elon Musk: "Grok 4.7 places SpaceXAI as third after Anthropic and OpenAI for agentic coding. When factoring in that Grok is significantly faster and lower cost, it's a great choice for your everyday workhorse" Theo Jaffee: "SpaceX has a huge amount of data on real world hardware problems, real world engineering. So I bet Grok models are going to be better at rocketry engineering than any of the other models out there."

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Grok 4.7 beats GPT-6 Astra on real-world tasks, and it's 5x cheaper. • Same price as 4.6, $2 input and $6 output per million tokens, well under Sol, Fable, and Astra • A new larger base model, which Elon has put at 2.1 trillion parameters, up from 1.5 trillion, with extra training on SpaceX data • Trained to natively understand the Grok Bot harness, the same move Anthropic made with Claude Code • Leads on electrical engineering and Harvey's legal benchmark, beats Astra Max on GDPval, trails on software engineering • Elon Musk: "Grok 4.7 places SpaceXAI as third after Anthropic and OpenAI for agentic coding. When factoring in that Grok is significantly faster and lower cost, it's a great choice for your everyday workhorse" Theo Jaffee: "SpaceX has a huge amount of data on real world hardware problems, real world engineering. So I bet Grok models are going to be better at rocketry engineering than any of the other models out there."

MTS

18,190 views • 6 days ago

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

CLAUDE OPUS 4.7 TRANSFORMED MY TRADING. i didn't write a single line of code here's exactly what happened: → day 1: opus 4.7 dropped. i killed all my 4.6 bots. → day 2: asked claude to rebuild them. v2 shipped in 18 min. → day 3: went live with on perps. the 3 things that changed in 4.7: → reads chart + orderflow + news in ONE call it's much faster & more capable. and the models will only get better from here. the bot is not the edge. the speed of iteration is the edge. 4.6 shipped a strategy in 4 days. 4.7 ships in 18 minutes. because we know, traders who ignore AI will be left behind. bookmark this, start building with OPUS 4.7 asap. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

Marry Evan

20,151 views • 5 months ago

I'm proud to present this video created with Grok. Here are the main steps in the making of this video: 1. I wrote a draft script by hand. 2. I reworked the script with Grok to eliminate inconsistencies and add technical details (what I have them say about the Apollo missions and the stones is accurate). 3. Grok broke it down into scenes. 4. I switched to Grok Imagine's Agent mode: transforming each scene into a prompt. 5. I animated each scene in Agent mode using video, as well as cropping and image selection. 6. I edited it. Here's the result; it's hard to call it AI. I look forward to reading your comments. Grok Imagine Elon Musk

I'm proud to present this video created with Grok. Here are the main steps in the making of this video: 1. I wrote a draft script by hand. 2. I reworked the script with Grok to eliminate inconsistencies and add technical details (what I have them say about the Apollo missions and the stones is accurate). 3. Grok broke it down into scenes. 4. I switched to Grok Imagine's Agent mode: transforming each scene into a prompt. 5. I animated each scene in Agent mode using video, as well as cropping and image selection. 6. I edited it. Here's the result; it's hard to call it AI. I look forward to reading your comments. Grok Imagine Elon Musk

Déborah

69,706 views • 3 months ago

New Fable 5 beats Opus 4.8 on real world physics simulations We gave both models the same three prompts and asked them to build self contained HTML5 sims with real physics and no libraries: 1. Chaotic double pendulum 2. Galton board 3. Water in a spinning drum (WCSPH) Generation cost Fable 5: $3.35 on 68.7k tokens, time 14m 47s Opus 4.8: $0.93 on 38.9k tokens, time 8m 10s Fable clearly did better on the water simulation, producing a much more solid and continuous body of water. Opus left larger gaps near the walls, scattered particles around the scene, and struggled to keep the fluid stable.

New Fable 5 beats Opus 4.8 on real world physics simulations We gave both models the same three prompts and asked them to build self contained HTML5 sims with real physics and no libraries: 1. Chaotic double pendulum 2. Galton board 3. Water in a spinning drum (WCSPH) Generation cost Fable 5: $3.35 on 68.7k tokens, time 14m 47s Opus 4.8: $0.93 on 38.9k tokens, time 8m 10s Fable clearly did better on the water simulation, producing a much more solid and continuous body of water. Opus left larger gaps near the walls, scattered particles around the scene, and struggled to keep the fluid stable.

atomic.chat

1,588,172 views • 3 months ago

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash at 3D geometry test: six self-contained three.js stereometry scenes — a (3,8) torus knot, a Klein bottle, a great stellated dodecahedron, a hyperboloid ruled by 120 straight rods, a level-3 Menger sponge, a thick Möbius strip. one shot each, no libraries beyond three.js, every surface painted with a live iridescent rainbow that has to crawl across the geometry. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — $0.27 • gemini delivers all six figures for 2.4× less — 21k output tokens against deepseek's 168k • gemini is 5× faster — every scene under 25 seconds, deepseek took up to 3 minutes on the Möbius strip • deepseek wins the torus knot: its rope is vivid and glossy, while gemini rendered the same knot nearly black • neither model can build a real Klein bottle. both hand back a twisted tube and call it done try both on aimlapi[.]com

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash at 3D geometry test: six self-contained three.js stereometry scenes — a (3,8) torus knot, a Klein bottle, a great stellated dodecahedron, a hyperboloid ruled by 120 straight rods, a level-3 Menger sponge, a thick Möbius strip. one shot each, no libraries beyond three.js, every surface painted with a live iridescent rainbow that has to crawl across the geometry. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.11 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — $0.27 • gemini delivers all six figures for 2.4× less — 21k output tokens against deepseek's 168k • gemini is 5× faster — every scene under 25 seconds, deepseek took up to 3 minutes on the Möbius strip • deepseek wins the torus knot: its rope is vivid and glossy, while gemini rendered the same knot nearly black • neither model can build a real Klein bottle. both hand back a twisted tube and call it done try both on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

39,901 views • 17 days ago

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!

thehype.

62,603 views • 17 days ago

Opus 5 DID NOT 1 shot this paper sketch style multiplayer FPS game, with highly satisfying shooting mechanics. Been seeing all these "look at Opus 1 shotted" demos, tried the public prompts on Ultracode, and what it produces is a stuff of nightmares, worthy only of a selective screen recording for X. These are cool capability tests, but not games. I've been building this black/white themed high action and performance FPS that feels good to play for the last week or so . This was done as a series of ~100 prompts using Fable 5, Sol, Grok 4.5 and now Opus 5, over the course of ~20 hrs. I would not say Opus 5 is a "game changer", but its noticeably better, and sometimes faster. The demo video below is local sandbox mode, but 64hz LAN multiplayer works pretty well too. Ported over some Counterstrike maps (dust and assault), if you're into classics. Source code below. Run it with 3 commands.

Opus 5 DID NOT 1 shot this paper sketch style multiplayer FPS game, with highly satisfying shooting mechanics. Been seeing all these "look at Opus 1 shotted" demos, tried the public prompts on Ultracode, and what it produces is a stuff of nightmares, worthy only of a selective screen recording for X. These are cool capability tests, but not games. I've been building this black/white themed high action and performance FPS that feels good to play for the last week or so . This was done as a series of ~100 prompts using Fable 5, Sol, Grok 4.5 and now Opus 5, over the course of ~20 hrs. I would not say Opus 5 is a "game changer", but its noticeably better, and sometimes faster. The demo video below is local sandbox mode, but 64hz LAN multiplayer works pretty well too. Ported over some Counterstrike maps (dust and assault), if you're into classics. Source code below. Run it with 3 commands.

Yegor Sak

25,479 views • 2 months ago

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

404,542 views • 26 days ago

An Anthropic researcher sat down next to me at a hackathon last week. Claude Opus 4.7 was running 4 agents on my laptop. Live. No manual input. She looked at the terminal and said: "What is this?" I showed her. 4 agents. 678 trades. 81% win rate. $16,200 last 30 days. She worked on the evals team. She'd never seen Claude pointed at 88 million on-chain trades. The setup is 3 public repos. All free. -> 88 million Polymarket trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. Every resolution. -> the framework that bridges Claude Opus 4.7 directly to live markets. Order placement, position tracking, exit timing. -> real-time WebSocket order book. Depth on both sides. No polling, no lag. Four agents. One loop. Agent 1 identifies which wallets win consistently across 88 million trades. Agent 2 reverse-engineers their entry timing. Agent 3 monitors order book volume spikes. Agent 4 sizes positions using Kelly. No overbet. Drawdown capped at 1.4% over 678 trades. 85% of windows get killed. No trade. The bot only enters when 3 signals align: -> Elite wallet consensus pointing the same direction. -> Price divergence with Binance and Coinbase both agreeing. -> Order book imbalance confirming the bias. Single-source price data was 57% accurate. All three together: 81%. Exit before resolution. Always. Losers hold to 0 or $1. The agents copy their exits. The agents don't gamble on that. My stack: Claude Opus 4.7 at $19/mo, VPS Hetzner at $4.99/mo, Everything else free. Total stats: $23.99/month. 30 days: 678 trades, 81% win rate, net +$16,200, max drawdown -1.2%, avg hold 4h 12m. She asked if Anthropic could test this internally. "We run Claude on benchmarks and evals. Nobody pointed it at a live market dataset with 88 million rows." Claude Opus 4.7 didn't need a system prompt. It read the wallet index, understood the signal structure, and wrote the combiner logic in one pass. The people who built the model hadn't thought to point it at this data. I had. Copy the live trades: -> all 4 agents run 24/7. The window is open right now. Save this, follow me and comment OPUS. I will send the guide to you.

An Anthropic researcher sat down next to me at a hackathon last week. Claude Opus 4.7 was running 4 agents on my laptop. Live. No manual input. She looked at the terminal and said: "What is this?" I showed her. 4 agents. 678 trades. 81% win rate. $16,200 last 30 days. She worked on the evals team. She'd never seen Claude pointed at 88 million on-chain trades. The setup is 3 public repos. All free. -> 88 million Polymarket trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. Every resolution. -> the framework that bridges Claude Opus 4.7 directly to live markets. Order placement, position tracking, exit timing. -> real-time WebSocket order book. Depth on both sides. No polling, no lag. Four agents. One loop. Agent 1 identifies which wallets win consistently across 88 million trades. Agent 2 reverse-engineers their entry timing. Agent 3 monitors order book volume spikes. Agent 4 sizes positions using Kelly. No overbet. Drawdown capped at 1.4% over 678 trades. 85% of windows get killed. No trade. The bot only enters when 3 signals align: -> Elite wallet consensus pointing the same direction. -> Price divergence with Binance and Coinbase both agreeing. -> Order book imbalance confirming the bias. Single-source price data was 57% accurate. All three together: 81%. Exit before resolution. Always. Losers hold to 0 or $1. The agents copy their exits. The agents don't gamble on that. My stack: Claude Opus 4.7 at $19/mo, VPS Hetzner at $4.99/mo, Everything else free. Total stats: $23.99/month. 30 days: 678 trades, 81% win rate, net +$16,200, max drawdown -1.2%, avg hold 4h 12m. She asked if Anthropic could test this internally. "We run Claude on benchmarks and evals. Nobody pointed it at a live market dataset with 88 million rows." Claude Opus 4.7 didn't need a system prompt. It read the wallet index, understood the signal structure, and wrote the combiner logic in one pass. The people who built the model hadn't thought to point it at this data. I had. Copy the live trades: -> all 4 agents run 24/7. The window is open right now. Save this, follow me and comment OPUS. I will send the guide to you.

slash1s

46,379 views • 5 months ago

I BUILT BRIER WITH ANTHROPIC AND GROK - AN LLM SYSTEM THAT CALLS 490 OUT OF 500 CORRECTLY AND SEALS EVERY ONE INTO A ROBINHOOD CHAIN BLOCK free, open, and every figure reproduces on your machine in 4 seconds with no API key - $50 to $750 in 2 days ask → panel → seal → wait → settle → grade brier - runs Opus 5 and Sonnet 5 side by side and reads 400 markets a second before it says a single number I ran 200 events in 10 minutes, knew the answer to each one before it landed, and sent it straight to the chain the hash goes into a Robinhood Chain block, and from there it goes to the exchange or the platform it was right 77% of the time, and in 2 days one free GitHub repo brought in $750 all of it without a single line of code - built entirely by the new Anthropic and Grok models the repo is open and free - take it and seal your first forecast before the market opens

I BUILT BRIER WITH ANTHROPIC AND GROK - AN LLM SYSTEM THAT CALLS 490 OUT OF 500 CORRECTLY AND SEALS EVERY ONE INTO A ROBINHOOD CHAIN BLOCK free, open, and every figure reproduces on your machine in 4 seconds with no API key - $50 to $750 in 2 days ask → panel → seal → wait → settle → grade brier - runs Opus 5 and Sonnet 5 side by side and reads 400 markets a second before it says a single number I ran 200 events in 10 minutes, knew the answer to each one before it landed, and sent it straight to the chain the hash goes into a Robinhood Chain block, and from there it goes to the exchange or the platform it was right 77% of the time, and in 2 days one free GitHub repo brought in $750 all of it without a single line of code - built entirely by the new Anthropic and Grok models the repo is open and free - take it and seal your first forecast before the market opens

Noisy

48,731 views • 20 days ago

ox alpha vs deepseek v4 flash vision vs grok 4.6 vs gemini 3.7 flash vs – on photo-to-3d four vision models got one photograph each and had to rebuild the place inside it as a Three.js scene. twelve scenes, twelve first-try runs, zero console errors the setup: one reference photo per scene, sent as an image on OpenRouter. the prompt never says what is in the picture – no "motel", no "bar", no "gas station". the model has to read the photo and rebuild it: layout, materials, hour of the day, and whatever is around the corner that the frame does not show tasks – three photographs of early-2000s america: 1. a motel at night, neon pylon lit, snow on the ground 2. an old new york tavern interior, tin ceiling, tiled floor 3. an abandoned service station in the california desert, midday sun each scene ships as one self-contained html file, procedural geometry and canvas textures only, no downloads. three timed camera shots, and shot 1 has to reproduce the framing of the reference photo models: xAI grok 4.6, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek deepseek v4 flash vision exp, and ox alpha – a stealth model on openrouter, free, no lab attached to it yet results: - wall clock, three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 11m 12s #2 deepseek v4 flash – 15m 20s #3 grok 4.6 – 28m 11s #4 ox alpha – 38m 54s - output tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 77,396 #2 ox alpha – 87,613 #3 grok 4.6 – 105,687 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 127,884 - lines of code shipped #1 ox alpha – 2,090 #2 deepseek v4 flash – 2,291 #3 grok 4.6 – 3,529 #4 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,989 - total price #1 ox alpha – $0.000 #2 deepseek v4 flash – $0.091 #3 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.136 #4 grok 4.6 – $0.697 observations: • grok is 7.7x the price of deepseek. it is the only model that read the light – low sun, real shadows on the station, a cold night on the motel • gemini is the fastest and the least deliberate. 17,158 reasoning tokens against deepseek's 99,172, and it still shipped the most code – 3,989 lines • deepseek thought hardest and rendered plainest. 99,172 reasoning tokens, 5.8x gemini's, spent on layout rather than on light. its motel is the second best in the set for $0.030 • ox alpha is free and reads a photo as well as anything here – it lifted "family units / kitchenettes" off the pylon and redrew it in canvas conclusion: twelve scenes, four models, zero fixes, and the whole run cost $0.924! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

ox alpha vs deepseek v4 flash vision vs grok 4.6 vs gemini 3.7 flash vs – on photo-to-3d four vision models got one photograph each and had to rebuild the place inside it as a Three.js scene. twelve scenes, twelve first-try runs, zero console errors the setup: one reference photo per scene, sent as an image on OpenRouter. the prompt never says what is in the picture – no "motel", no "bar", no "gas station". the model has to read the photo and rebuild it: layout, materials, hour of the day, and whatever is around the corner that the frame does not show tasks – three photographs of early-2000s america: 1. a motel at night, neon pylon lit, snow on the ground 2. an old new york tavern interior, tin ceiling, tiled floor 3. an abandoned service station in the california desert, midday sun each scene ships as one self-contained html file, procedural geometry and canvas textures only, no downloads. three timed camera shots, and shot 1 has to reproduce the framing of the reference photo models: xAI grok 4.6, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek deepseek v4 flash vision exp, and ox alpha – a stealth model on openrouter, free, no lab attached to it yet results: - wall clock, three scenes #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 11m 12s #2 deepseek v4 flash – 15m 20s #3 grok 4.6 – 28m 11s #4 ox alpha – 38m 54s - output tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 77,396 #2 ox alpha – 87,613 #3 grok 4.6 – 105,687 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 127,884 - lines of code shipped #1 ox alpha – 2,090 #2 deepseek v4 flash – 2,291 #3 grok 4.6 – 3,529 #4 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,989 - total price #1 ox alpha – $0.000 #2 deepseek v4 flash – $0.091 #3 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.136 #4 grok 4.6 – $0.697 observations: • grok is 7.7x the price of deepseek. it is the only model that read the light – low sun, real shadows on the station, a cold night on the motel • gemini is the fastest and the least deliberate. 17,158 reasoning tokens against deepseek's 99,172, and it still shipped the most code – 3,989 lines • deepseek thought hardest and rendered plainest. 99,172 reasoning tokens, 5.8x gemini's, spent on layout rather than on light. its motel is the second best in the set for $0.030 • ox alpha is free and reads a photo as well as anything here – it lifted "family units / kitchenettes" off the pylon and redrew it in canvas conclusion: twelve scenes, four models, zero fixes, and the whole run cost $0.924! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

24,470 views • 1 month ago

Big edits today on Tiny World Builder 1. Pushing latest rendering mechanics and fixes live 2. Bringing back accounts and logins for saving builds 3. Whole new editing system for placement, changing, drawing terrain etc. 4. Adding our first sponsor! (more slots available) 5. Deploy API and MCP updates with tests so you can see how it works 6. More "stamps" (assets) with textures etc and adjusting defaults of some of the japanese garden builds Multiple instances of Codex running with xhigh 5.5 using that x2 usage, and Claude Opus 4.7 too, with Gemini 3.5 helping and Grok is in the corner shouting obscenities at the others. No rest for the wicked, and I am very, very wicked. Tiny World Builder

Big edits today on Tiny World Builder 1. Pushing latest rendering mechanics and fixes live 2. Bringing back accounts and logins for saving builds 3. Whole new editing system for placement, changing, drawing terrain etc. 4. Adding our first sponsor! (more slots available) 5. Deploy API and MCP updates with tests so you can see how it works 6. More "stamps" (assets) with textures etc and adjusting defaults of some of the japanese garden builds Multiple instances of Codex running with xhigh 5.5 using that x2 usage, and Claude Opus 4.7 too, with Gemini 3.5 helping and Grok is in the corner shouting obscenities at the others. No rest for the wicked, and I am very, very wicked. Tiny World Builder

Jason Kneen

11,531 views • 4 months ago

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

atomic.chat

898,646 views • 2 months ago

ANTHROPIC AND GROK LEAKED A $4.2M FILE THAT SHOWS YOU 14 DAYS OF THE FUTURE AND TURNS $50 INTO $10,000 A MONTH an event lands - 4 seconds later you already have the breakdown from 700 indicators, and you can see exactly how to make $10k a month off it event → filter → anomaly → signal → calendar five blocks of 3 minutes, and out comes 14 days of calendar with a source next to every date I ran my own week ahead in 10 minutes and found 6 dates the feed won't talk about until the day after tomorrow prints, earnings, policy meetings, lock-up expiries - all of it is already scheduled, nobody just bothers to assemble it Opus 5 and Grok 4.6 run in parallel, one takes the stream, the other looks for what breaks pattern it never tells you where the price goes - it tells you which date you missed all of it without a single line of code, built entirely by the new Anthropic and Grok models the repo is open and free - go see your next 14 days before the market opens ↓

ANTHROPIC AND GROK LEAKED A $4.2M FILE THAT SHOWS YOU 14 DAYS OF THE FUTURE AND TURNS $50 INTO $10,000 A MONTH an event lands - 4 seconds later you already have the breakdown from 700 indicators, and you can see exactly how to make $10k a month off it event → filter → anomaly → signal → calendar five blocks of 3 minutes, and out comes 14 days of calendar with a source next to every date I ran my own week ahead in 10 minutes and found 6 dates the feed won't talk about until the day after tomorrow prints, earnings, policy meetings, lock-up expiries - all of it is already scheduled, nobody just bothers to assemble it Opus 5 and Grok 4.6 run in parallel, one takes the stream, the other looks for what breaks pattern it never tells you where the price goes - it tells you which date you missed all of it without a single line of code, built entirely by the new Anthropic and Grok models the repo is open and free - go see your next 14 days before the market opens ↓

Noisy

54,185 views • 20 days ago

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 views • 25 days ago

A guy named Vladimir Romanyuk literally simulated the entire universe on a consumer PC. It is called SpaceEngine. Open it and you can leave Earth, pass the Moon, cross the Solar System, exit the Milky Way, and reach a galaxy billions of light-years away. The entire journey is seamless. You can explore: > Known planets and exoplanets > Black holes with glowing disks > Nebulae and star clusters > Asteroids and comets > Billions of unknown galaxies > Trillions of planetary systems Real objects are placed using data from astronomical catalogs. Where humanity’s maps end, SpaceEngine uses science-based procedural generation to create stars, planets, atmospheres, oceans, and entire galaxies that could exist. You can land on almost any planet or moon and explore its alien landscape. You can accelerate time and watch planets complete their orbits in seconds. You can even pilot spacecraft, enter black holes, explore the universe in VR, or build your own solar systems. Most games create a few worlds and call them enormous. Vladimir built something so large that Earth becomes nearly impossible to find once you leave it.

A guy named Vladimir Romanyuk literally simulated the entire universe on a consumer PC. It is called SpaceEngine. Open it and you can leave Earth, pass the Moon, cross the Solar System, exit the Milky Way, and reach a galaxy billions of light-years away. The entire journey is seamless. You can explore: > Known planets and exoplanets > Black holes with glowing disks > Nebulae and star clusters > Asteroids and comets > Billions of unknown galaxies > Trillions of planetary systems Real objects are placed using data from astronomical catalogs. Where humanity’s maps end, SpaceEngine uses science-based procedural generation to create stars, planets, atmospheres, oceans, and entire galaxies that could exist. You can land on almost any planet or moon and explore its alien landscape. You can accelerate time and watch planets complete their orbits in seconds. You can even pilot spacecraft, enter black holes, explore the universe in VR, or build your own solar systems. Most games create a few worlds and call them enormous. Vladimir built something so large that Earth becomes nearly impossible to find once you leave it.

Ihtesham Ali

30,438 views • 2 months ago