American Optimist's banner
American Optimist's profile picture

American Optimist

@AmOptimistShow15,553 subscribers

Official Account of @JTLonsdale's American Optimist podcast 🎙📺 NEW EPISODES: https://t.co/bQnaq8kHE8

Shorts

Reagan vs Mamdani in their own words...

Reagan vs Mamdani in their own words...

14,355 просмотров

Videos

AmOptimistShow's profile picture

Marc Andreessen: if you're the parents of a smart kid where I grew up [rural Wisconsin] and you think you're going to get them into a top university in this country, you're fooling yourself... What level of untapped talent exists in this country that a combination of DEI and immigration have basically cut out of the loop for the last 50 years? Marc: Nobody wants to talk about, but I've started to talk about the intersection of DEI and immigration that has really warped our perceptions on high skilled immigration over the last 50 years. You look at the foreign enrollment rates at the top universities, which went from 2 or 3 or 4 percent 50 years ago or whatever to 27% or 30% or 50%... Joe: Columbia's over half. Marc: 70% or whatever it is. And so there's been this massive transformation in who gets educated. And then there's been this massive transformation of who gets admitted through affirmative action, as we now know it, DEI. This goes straight to the political divide in the country, which is, if you're parents of a kid where I grew up [rural Wisconsin] and you've got a smart kid and you think you're going to get them into, you know, a top university in this country, like you're fooling yourself. There is this really fundamental question which is, what level of untapped talent exists in this country that a combination of DEI and immigration have basically cut out of the loop for the last 50 years? And how long can we have this story to everybody in the Midwest and in the South that says, sorry, because of historical oppression, your kids are SOL.

American Optimist

5,189,151 просмотров • 1 год назад

AmOptimistShow's profile picture

NEW: The U.S. military just used sea drones in combat for the first time. Joe Lonsdale explains the significance with Ed Ludlow: "There are three Saronic Corsairs involved in an attack on [Iran's] Bandar Abbas Base... imagine what you can do with hundreds of them... Saronic is one of the most important defense companies in the US... It's become more obvious to the leadership in the Pentagon that the very top startups are way ahead of the primes in a bunch of areas." Ed Ludlow: There was news just before we came on air... Could you explain it to us the basics of what CENTCOM is demonstrating in a video? Joe Lonsdale: CENTCOM just put this out so I can only say what was public, but they said there are three [Saronic] Corsairs involved in an attack on the Bandar Abbas Base. These are unmanned drones. The same drones that save the pilots in the Strait of Hormuz... And in this case, they're being used in an attack. Right now, there's three of them, and you can imagine what you can do with hundreds of them. Saronic -- we co-founded out of 8VC. Ed: That's what you explained earlier. This format's different... Joe: 30% of our money goes towards companies we help build. So Dino is the main founder along with Vib -- Dino Mavrookas who is a Navy Seal -- and they've built an amazing team of top talent around them in Austin, Texas. They're scaling very, very quickly; it's one of the most important defense companies in the US. Ed: So could I ask you for your assessment of how Secretary Hegseth has or has not changed the relationship between the Pentagon, the Department of War, and how it works with start ups? Joe: Listen, I think it's become more obvious to the leadership in the Pentagon that the very top startups are way ahead of the primes in a bunch of areas. And what they've done is they've shifted things. And he's been very bold about this to focus on fair competition... What was happening before is the incentives were to create very, very exquisite designs that were very, very expensive. So you might be able to build the best thing in the world, but it's 100 times more expensive. And what Palmer [Luckey] at Anduril and Dino at Saronic and others have demonstrated is actually there are designs so you can make 100 or 1,000 more of these for the same cost, and that are many times even better.

American Optimist

25,942 просмотров • 5 дней назад

AmOptimistShow's profile picture

Joe Lonsdale: The people in charge of the sociology department at Yale and the education school at Stanford are still god**mn socialists who hate business and are bad for our civilization. But they've learned not to say certain things... A lot of people say, 'Oh, I'm not hearing this stuff anymore. It must be gone.' It's not gone. It's going to come out again as soon as they win. ZUBY: interviews Joe Lonsdale for Real Talk with Zuby Zuby: I feel like there's a change that is happening over the last couple of years with the pendulum starting to swing back. Joe: It's happening in some areas and others. Zuby: How do you see it? Joe: A lot of this, again, is tied to Marxists and socialists who are actively plotting to take over institutions. That's what they've done for the last 60 years. There's the very famous march through the institutions... I thought it was a conspiracy theory when I first heard about it. But it's very clear they've done this very successfully. And you can think of it almost like a virus... In this case, I think the virus has learned to hide itself... A lot of the people who run all of these conquered institutions haven't changed. The people in charge of the sociology department at Yale and the people in charge of the education school at Stanford are still godd*mn socialists who hate businesses and who are bad for our civilization. But they've learned not to say certain things. They've learned not to very publicly and openly say, 'We shouldn't have advanced math anymore,' which is what the education department in general is doing. They're going around getting rid of advanced math for equity purposes... A lot of people say, 'Oh, I'm not hearing this stuff anymore. It must be gone.' It's not frickin gone. It's going to come out again as soon as they win, as soon as they feel like they're safe. But right now they're hiding. I think it's hiding everywhere.

American Optimist

86,820 просмотров • 20 дней назад

AmOptimistShow's profile picture

NEW: Joe Lonsdale shocks CNBC on AI regulation debate: Andrew Ross Sorkin: Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Joe: The FDA has killed millions of people... Andrew: Killed?? Joe: Massive bureaucracy makes it cost 10 or 100X more than it should... there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do... China would love for us to have a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. Andrew Ross Sorkin: We're all trying to figure out what this could look like. Is there ultimately going to be an FDA for AI models? Is that a good thing or a bad thing for somebody who's thinking the way you do? Joe: Listen, the FDA has killed millions of people. Let's be totally clear, right? Andrew: Killed?? Joe: It's literally led to the deaths of millions of people, Andrew... There's all these new therapies, especially now, by the way, with AI that we could be developing... Andrew: It's also hopefully saved some lives... Joe: I mean the trade off is probably 100 to 1. There's a very famous story from 60 years ago where they caught some stuff that was killing people in Europe and saved them here. They've used that as an excuse to make this massive bureaucracy that makes it cost 10 or 100 times more to do drugs than it should, which means there's tons of these new drugs you could be developing to save lives that we're just not able to do. I would be investing billions more to save lives, but I can't. So the equivalent is terrifying to me. The government is bad at these things. The bureaucrats are bad at these things. Now there's a there's another argument here, which is that you have things like Mythos and OpenAI's new technology that's really, really good at hacking into everything. And you probably don't want like, that new technology going to the bad guys right away. So there has to be some sort of trade off, some sort of framework. We have to be really careful not to make the mistakes the FDA has made. Andrew: So what would you do? What do you think that should look like? Joe: There probably should be some national agreement on regulation on new powerful models. It should be as small and as narrow as possible. It should not have the same bureaucracy. You should make sure the government from the start, has metrics on the speed at which it has to go and the transparency, because you're gonna have cronyism, you're gonna have the big guys capture it. You're going to slow it down. Pharma loves the FDA against biotech. It makes it too expensive for us to build our own pharma companies. We have to sell to them. This is what the big guys want. Google and Microsoft and OpenAI and the rest of them, they want to create rules to make it so they can... Andrew: They've all been calling for it. I mean, you remember Sam Altman, Dario, others early on said, "Regulate us; you need to regulate us. Please, regulate us." The question is was that a genuine call for action or do you think that was a "We think Washington's never going to do this. So we'll say it, and get some nice PR points." Joe: If you are the leader in the space and you have tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars, you want there to be really complicated regulation with people you can hire who go in and out of your company, who work there because you know you're going to be able to control it and influence it. ...And by the way, China has pre-IND (Investigational New Drug process) and IND of 30 and 60 days about right now. We have 200 and 500 days. And so we've completely delayed anything we do. We've handed more than a third now of our biotech sector to China in the last six years because we're so slow. We definitely don't want to do that on the AI side. That would be a disaster. China would love for us to do a massive regulatory bureaucracy for AI and let them get ahead. We cannot allow that to happen. Squawk Box

American Optimist

192,392 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад