Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior's banner
Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior's profile picture

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

@Andreafreedom7638,666 subscribers

American Constitutionalist, equality of opportunity, equal application of law, limited government, Pro-life, peace, limited foreign intervention

Shorts

Usually I’m ahead of the curve when critically assessing a person, I even get push back from some of my most ardent followers. Although pushback doesn’t stop my pursuit of truth. In the end, most if not all, come around and see what I saw albeit a little late. Personally I don’t know 💯 percent why a person is no good. I have this gift of sizing people up almost immediately with little data. When my red alert radar antenna spikes to a ten, many times I’m not sure why yet but the reason eventually materializes. Personally I watched Megyn Kelly with a renewed optimism that she had truly shed her old skin and emerged as a committed moderate conservative. After all I believe in redemption. Like many of you, our optimism was short lived. Others it took a little longer to wake up. All good because we welcome everyone and anyone that understands whether the realization hit yesterday or a year ago, or longer.

Usually I’m ahead of the curve when critically assessing a person, I even get push back from some of my most ardent followers. Although pushback doesn’t stop my pursuit of truth. In the end, most if not all, come around and see what I saw albeit a little late. Personally I don’t know 💯 percent why a person is no good. I have this gift of sizing people up almost immediately with little data. When my red alert radar antenna spikes to a ten, many times I’m not sure why yet but the reason eventually materializes. Personally I watched Megyn Kelly with a renewed optimism that she had truly shed her old skin and emerged as a committed moderate conservative. After all I believe in redemption. Like many of you, our optimism was short lived. Others it took a little longer to wake up. All good because we welcome everyone and anyone that understands whether the realization hit yesterday or a year ago, or longer.

35,323 次观看

TPUSA Host Jack Posobeic Admires Russian Philosopher Alexander Dugin! Posobeic, who served as a U.S. Naval Reserve intelligence officer from 2012 to 2018, lost his security clearance in 2017, for allegedly sharing classified information. And TPUSA takes Posobeic seriously? Come on Man! Jack is also a frequent guest on Steve Bannon’s War Room. The same Bannon who also ascribes to Alexander Dugin! On his social media, he has long promoted the work of Russian neofascist Aleksandr Dugin, tweeting about Dugin’s 1997 book, The Foundations of Geopolitics. Dugin, a Russian philosopher has brought admiration from some in the political influencer sphere including Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and others. Dugin deploys"hybrid warfare" by exploiting the U.S. cultural wars, portraying Russia as a traditionalist ally against the "Beast" of hypermodernity. Dugin's "Fourth Political Theory" (FPT) synthesizes anti-liberalism/anti-capitalism with holism, drawing from pre-modern sources (Plato, medieval hierarchies) to unite left/right/religions against hypermodernity. Eurasianism champions tellurocracy (land power) and Eastern sobornost' (collectivism/hierarchy) over Western atomization; socialism is a flawed but superior. Dugin specifically targets the U.S. right with aims to fracture it between "Atlanticists" (pro-globalist neocons/liberals) and "Eurasianists" (traditionalist paleocons/nationalists), drawing sympathy from the latter by critiquing U.S. interventions. His ideas resonate in far-right media (e.g., Tucker Carlson interviews), fueling anti-woke critiques and isolationism to weaken NATO/EU cohesion by dividing America from Europe per his geopolitics. This "hybrid warfare" exploits U.S. cultural wars, portraying Russia as a traditionalist ally against the "Beast" of hypermodernity, ultimately subordinating sympathetic Westerners to multipolar anti-liberalism.

TPUSA Host Jack Posobeic Admires Russian Philosopher Alexander Dugin! Posobeic, who served as a U.S. Naval Reserve intelligence officer from 2012 to 2018, lost his security clearance in 2017, for allegedly sharing classified information. And TPUSA takes Posobeic seriously? Come on Man! Jack is also a frequent guest on Steve Bannon’s War Room. The same Bannon who also ascribes to Alexander Dugin! On his social media, he has long promoted the work of Russian neofascist Aleksandr Dugin, tweeting about Dugin’s 1997 book, The Foundations of Geopolitics. Dugin, a Russian philosopher has brought admiration from some in the political influencer sphere including Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and others. Dugin deploys"hybrid warfare" by exploiting the U.S. cultural wars, portraying Russia as a traditionalist ally against the "Beast" of hypermodernity. Dugin's "Fourth Political Theory" (FPT) synthesizes anti-liberalism/anti-capitalism with holism, drawing from pre-modern sources (Plato, medieval hierarchies) to unite left/right/religions against hypermodernity. Eurasianism champions tellurocracy (land power) and Eastern sobornost' (collectivism/hierarchy) over Western atomization; socialism is a flawed but superior. Dugin specifically targets the U.S. right with aims to fracture it between "Atlanticists" (pro-globalist neocons/liberals) and "Eurasianists" (traditionalist paleocons/nationalists), drawing sympathy from the latter by critiquing U.S. interventions. His ideas resonate in far-right media (e.g., Tucker Carlson interviews), fueling anti-woke critiques and isolationism to weaken NATO/EU cohesion by dividing America from Europe per his geopolitics. This "hybrid warfare" exploits U.S. cultural wars, portraying Russia as a traditionalist ally against the "Beast" of hypermodernity, ultimately subordinating sympathetic Westerners to multipolar anti-liberalism.

37,899 次观看

Is This You Jack Posobiec Publicly Supporting a Future De Facto Theocratic MAGA Christian Integralism Nation? Two video clips for the price of one! Posobiec suggests replacing our Republic with a Theocracy—it appears the voice in the background is Steve Bannon! The integralist proposal disturbs many people (including Catholics) because integralists reject liberal freedom of religion and embraces religious coercion. Given the untoward implications of integralism, most familiar with the view set it aside on the basis of an argument like the following: 1) If integralism is true, religious coercion is not wrong. 2) But religious coercion is wrong. 3) Therefore, integralism is false. I don’t think integralism can be so easily dismissed. The reason is that integralism has a certain elegance and simplicity and even obviousness. It tells us that states should help people achieve their ultimate good. Besides feasibility worries, why wouldn’t this be the best thing for the state to do? Are non-integralists really asking the state to do less than the best? Doesn’t that just sound crazy when we state it openly? What anti-integralists need is a satisfying explanation as to why integralism is axiologically false. The anti-integralist need to explain why integralism has the wrong conceptions of value, reasons, and practical rationality. The more time I spent with their position, the harder I find it is to articulate attractive alternatives approaches that are compatible with Christian belief. I now think integralism can only be answered with some fundamental revisions to standard theistic ethical theories, in particular natural law theory and divine command theory. We need a theistic deontology, but one where side-constraints are grounded in the divine nature (most natural rights theorists ground rights in the divine nature only obliquely). I think I can convey the power of the integralist challenge by using an analogy with act-consequentialism in normative ethics (which holds that the right acts are those that maximize well-being). Integralism and act-consequentialism are simple, elegant theories with seemingly untoward implications, but they are so elegant that many theorists will adopt the view and simply accept the implications. And even good men will do so, like Peter Singer (a lead consequentialist) and Adrian Vermeule (a lead integralist). Written by Kevin Vallier 2019. Personally I want nothing more than for Turning Point USA to succeed. Clarification is needed as to why the organization actively promotes an individual that has a vision for America that is antithetical to our Constitution! Link to Vallier article in reply section.

Is This You Jack Posobiec Publicly Supporting a Future De Facto Theocratic MAGA Christian Integralism Nation? Two video clips for the price of one! Posobiec suggests replacing our Republic with a Theocracy—it appears the voice in the background is Steve Bannon! The integralist proposal disturbs many people (including Catholics) because integralists reject liberal freedom of religion and embraces religious coercion. Given the untoward implications of integralism, most familiar with the view set it aside on the basis of an argument like the following: 1) If integralism is true, religious coercion is not wrong. 2) But religious coercion is wrong. 3) Therefore, integralism is false. I don’t think integralism can be so easily dismissed. The reason is that integralism has a certain elegance and simplicity and even obviousness. It tells us that states should help people achieve their ultimate good. Besides feasibility worries, why wouldn’t this be the best thing for the state to do? Are non-integralists really asking the state to do less than the best? Doesn’t that just sound crazy when we state it openly? What anti-integralists need is a satisfying explanation as to why integralism is axiologically false. The anti-integralist need to explain why integralism has the wrong conceptions of value, reasons, and practical rationality. The more time I spent with their position, the harder I find it is to articulate attractive alternatives approaches that are compatible with Christian belief. I now think integralism can only be answered with some fundamental revisions to standard theistic ethical theories, in particular natural law theory and divine command theory. We need a theistic deontology, but one where side-constraints are grounded in the divine nature (most natural rights theorists ground rights in the divine nature only obliquely). I think I can convey the power of the integralist challenge by using an analogy with act-consequentialism in normative ethics (which holds that the right acts are those that maximize well-being). Integralism and act-consequentialism are simple, elegant theories with seemingly untoward implications, but they are so elegant that many theorists will adopt the view and simply accept the implications. And even good men will do so, like Peter Singer (a lead consequentialist) and Adrian Vermeule (a lead integralist). Written by Kevin Vallier 2019. Personally I want nothing more than for Turning Point USA to succeed. Clarification is needed as to why the organization actively promotes an individual that has a vision for America that is antithetical to our Constitution! Link to Vallier article in reply section.

17,780 次观看

Jack Posobiec, Post-Liberalism, Catholic Integralism, Ultimate Goal—Overthrow Democracy! Listen very carefully to this February 2021 video of Jack Posobiec. It’s eerily similar to his Amfest 2025 speech were he holds up a rosary. On Twitter, Posobiec reportedly promoted the work of the so-called Putin “brainchild" Alexander Dugin, who was photographed meeting with former American Ku Klux Klan leader and neo-Nazi David Duke in Russia. Far-right conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec told a crowd gathered at the Conservative Political Action Conference that his goal is to "overthrow" democracy and replace it with a Christian-based ideology. Catholic integralism is a political philosophy advocating for the integration of the Catholic Church and the state. It rejects the separation of church and state, proposing a Christian confessional state where the government promotes the common good, including the spiritual well-being of its citizens.

Jack Posobiec, Post-Liberalism, Catholic Integralism, Ultimate Goal—Overthrow Democracy! Listen very carefully to this February 2021 video of Jack Posobiec. It’s eerily similar to his Amfest 2025 speech were he holds up a rosary. On Twitter, Posobiec reportedly promoted the work of the so-called Putin “brainchild" Alexander Dugin, who was photographed meeting with former American Ku Klux Klan leader and neo-Nazi David Duke in Russia. Far-right conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec told a crowd gathered at the Conservative Political Action Conference that his goal is to "overthrow" democracy and replace it with a Christian-based ideology. Catholic integralism is a political philosophy advocating for the integration of the Catholic Church and the state. It rejects the separation of church and state, proposing a Christian confessional state where the government promotes the common good, including the spiritual well-being of its citizens.

15,405 次观看

Videos

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

VDH Stunned: "Never Seen Anything Like This” Megyn Kelly Claims Manipulated! "Her first {Kelly}… excursus on it was very empirical. She said it right last summer... She was confident when she said that because she was looking at the evidence.” ~ Victor Davis Hanson Victor Davis Hanson observed that public figures such as Pete Buttigieg, Megyn Kelly, and others like them had dismissed Israel in ways he had never seen before. Hanson declared that he had never witnessed anything quite like the current discourse surrounding the issue. Hanson pointed to his friend Megyn Kelly’s recent passionate interview, which had gone viral after viewers juxtaposed clips of it with her appearance on his program the previous summer. At that time, Kelly had been adamant about the necessity of military action to neutralize the nuclear threat and had offered strong arguments about Islam. Hanson reviewed the long history of attacks on American targets across five or six presidential administrations, citing the bombings of the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, the Beirut embassy and Marine barracks assaults, the deployment of shape charges against U.S. forces, the underwear (or “panty”) bomber attempt, the Fort Hood shooting, the San Bernardino attack, the Orlando nightclub massacre, the September 11 attacks, and the bombing of the USS Cole. In every case, Hanson emphasized, the perpetrators were not Jewish terrorists but Islamic extremists. He rejected as “crazy” the suggestion, attributed to Tucker Carlson, that Israel posed a greater threat to the United States than either China or the Islamic world. Hanson expressed sharp disappointment in Kelly’s later claim that she had been manipulated by pro-Israel voices in the United States, calling the assertion pathetic for someone as intelligent as she is. The evidence, Hanson argued, had always been clear and publicly available. Her original position the previous summer had been confident and firmly empirical; she had not been misled but had drawn conclusions based squarely on the facts.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

176,749 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Is The MAGA Split Real: Shawn Ryan & Megyn Kelly Pedophilia Smears, & Israel? Megyn Kelly "did a lot for me... So to hear her say that {Israel is a cancer} is extremely painful." ~ Batya Ungar-Sargon In today's episode of Jillian Michaels’ podcast, guest Batya Ungar-Sargon joined for a wide-ranging discussion on political realignment, the state of the Democratic Party, and growing tensions inside the conservative movement. During the conversation, Michaels highlighted a striking moment that has since become a flashpoint in the ongoing MAGA divide. Michaels played and referenced a clip from Joshua Carr, young conservative, who directly addressed Shawn Ryan’s recent comments on The Shawn Ryan Show. Carr stated “the GOP has not changed that much in the last eight years. Shawn, they have not left you behind. You left them completely. Go watch Shawn Ryan from two years ago. He’s awesome. He actually talks about conservatism rather than Israel 24/7 or why we should align ourselves with the left. Hillary Clinton called us deplorables. Joe Biden called us fascist. And now Sean Ryan calls us pedophiles supporting Israel. And Megan Kelly did not disagree, by the way. She did not speak up at all when he said that.” Megyn Kelly reportedly chuckled at the remark and suggested Ryan use “a different acronym,” but did not challenge or strongly disagree with the characterization. Michaels used the moment to illustrate what she described as a troubling shift among some influencers. She noted that Megyn Kelly had previously told her personally that she would “never ever vote for a Democrat” and that the left’s “insanity” needed to be fought “at all costs.” Michaels contrasted that earlier stance with Kelly’s more recent positioning as an independent while appearing alongside Shawn Ryan. The controversy has now drawn sharp criticism from another corner of conservative media. On The Charlie Kirk Show, Andrew Kolvet (alongside Blake Neff) condemned the rhetoric as reckless and potentially dangerous. Kolvet stated "crazies will hurl an accusation and then if you address it then it’s like oh you defended yourself too much if you don’t address it well why are you silent on this topic. There is no right answer when it comes to pedophilia accusations. They tried to accuse Erica of being like connected to Epstein. This stuff is like it will drive fringy people, schizo people, crazy people. It will drive them to violence. And so I don’t like seeing a conversation between two people that should be responsible in this way just echoing and parroting the pedophilia stuff and the Israel [rhetoric].” Kolvet’s warning highlights a deeper concern within parts of the right: that loose accusations linking Israel support to pedophilia create an impossible situation for anyone targeted. Later in the same Jillian Michaels conversation, Michaels directly asked Batya Ungar-Sargon how she was processing the shift in people she had considered decent, specifically naming Megyn Kelly:“I’m having a hard time holding the fact that I think their narrative is becoming so dangerous and hurtful and harmful while still holding the fact that they were very decent human beings to me and continue to be. Like, do you struggle with that?" "I know you were very good. I know you were on Megan Kelly’s show all the time and now she just went on Shawn Ryan and said Israel is America’s cancer. How are you feeling about this?” Batya Ungar-Sargon responded stating "I mean in general I don’t have that problem because people are very mean to me including people who I am very nice to. With Megan though specifically she did a lot for me personally. She had me on her show many times. A lot of my followers met me through her. So to hear her say that is extremely painful because of everything I owe her. You know, she was very personally good to me. That is very painful.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

34,857 次观看 • 8 天前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Megyn Kelly Attacks Dave Rubin! "I hate to disappoint Tucker's critics. Mark my words, JD Vance will never condemn him because he's not a dick." ~ Megyn Kelly On today's episode of The Megyn Kelly Show, host Megyn Kelly, joined by guest Emily Jashinsky, addressed the escalating attacks on Vice President JD Vance, drawing parallels to the criticisms once leveled at former President Donald Trump. Kelly highlighted the shifting narrative from media and political opponents, noting how Vance is now being painted as "even worse than Trump." She elaborated, "Trump, you know, was he really a racist? But JD Vance is definitely a racist. He's an anti-Semite. He's associated with Tucker Carlson, who everybody knows is an anti-Semite and a Nazi. Mark Levin told me so." Kelly pointed out the efforts to tie Vance to Carlson through their friendship, emphasizing that Vance has not condemned him despite pressure. "You're a long time waiting. He's never going to condemn Tucker. I hate to disappoint Tucker's critics. Mark my words, JD Vance will never condemn him because he's not a dick. He is going to stick by his friend. And I don't think JD Vance thinks that Tucker is an anti-Semite or believes any of the things that people are saying about him. And he's not going to say something he doesn't believe." The discussion then turned to a pointed social media response from commentator Dave Rubin, who urged Vance to distance himself from Carlson's family amid broader concerns about rising antisemitism. Kelly read Rubin's post aloud: "Mr. VP, I submit this respectfully. You're totally right. Nobody should be judged for their parents' words or actions. But, and I think you know this, the very people relentlessly attacking Jews now have Indians next up on the docket. And that includes your wife, even if she eventually converts to Christianity." Rubin continued, "So yes, Tucker can interview whoever he wants. His brother can post garbage memes all day, and his son who may be just fine, can work for the vice president, but I think people are asking you to stand up when you see something evil. While I know you are trying to hold an increasingly fractured coalition together, you were elected to be a leader, not follow the whims of the trolls. And since they eventually will turn on your own family, at some point you might want to get ahead of it. Those are my two cents, and I'll continue to defend all the good things you and President Trump are doing. Something that this crew of people never do." Kelly sought Jashinsky's take, asking, "What do you make of that one?"Jashinsky called the post "unfortunate," describing it as "a kind of verging on public virtue signal" that risks "needlessly tear[ing] people apart." Kelly agreed, observing a growing divide within conservative circles. She remarked, "There's definitely a faction of the conservative right that's the more neoconi[sh] fashion, the more pro-Israel faction that is turning into BLM 2020. I mean that it's very alienating and it's very not conservative and it's not going to serve anybody well. Not the right, not them." Jashinsky echoed the sentiment, adding, "It's a pointless exercise because most conservatives will recoil when faced with the choices of like say it say it my way rather than get on board. That is just not for us. That just like it's not how we've operated. It's not like in our DNA. So yeah, I agree with you on that wholeheartedly." The conversation built on a discussion from the previous day's show with guest Glenn Greenwald, underscoring the pattern of personal attacks on Vance as a tactic to undermine the administration's coalition.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

570,156 次观看 • 7 个月前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

VDH Pointing At Megyn Kelly Morphing Into A Zombie: “They’ve Lost Their Minds” “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead... you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn." Victor Davis Hanson, the historian and national speaker, addressed the evolving landscape of American attitudes toward Israel and antisemitism in a recent in today's episode of the Victor Davis Hanson In His Own Words, highlighting what he described as a troubling shift across the political spectrum. Hanson argued that while the Democratic Party and elements of the cultural left had long embraced antisemitic tendencies, certain voices on the right were now joining in, leaving staunch support for Israel primarily in the hands of former President Donald Trump and the MAGA base. Hanson traced the roots of the problem to the political left, noting that during the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, and further intensified by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, “they became anti-semitic.” In contrast, he emphasized, “It was the Republican party that stood up for Israel.”He expressed particular disappointment with figures once aligned with conservative or Republican circles who have recently voiced skepticism toward Israel. Citing Megyn Kelly as an example, Hanson recounted her public reflection: “I think I’ve been mistaken. And I might have been affected too much by people who were pro-Israel. And now I think we’ve been a little bit too hard on Islam and Netanyahu did this and Netanyahu did this.” Hanson grouped her alongside others including Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Tucker Carlson. Of Carlson, Hanson observed that the podcaster is “very informed” and “very bright,” yet still questions strong support for Israel despite knowing key historical threats. “He knows that Roth and Johnny said that Israel was a one bomb state. One bomb could kill all the Jews. He knows what Akmanagen Akminad [Ahmadinejad] said he wanted to wipe,” Hanson stated, adding pointedly, “Why would he say it would be helpful if Iran had a bomb?” Hanson noted the absence of forceful pushback within conservative circles. “There’s no party that says, ‘How dare you?’ They’re both in on it, their bases,” he said, referring to growing tolerance for anti-Israel rhetoric on both sides. Hanson contrasted this with the unexpected defenders of Jewish communities amid rising campus harassment and demonization: “The only people now in the United States who will stand up and say, ‘No more. We’re not going to let you demonize a whole people and push them around and rough them up on campus and call them all these names’ is who? It’s Donald Trump and the MAGA base, the irredeemables, the clingers. They’re the people who are still supporting Israel. They still support Jews and evangelicals.” Hanson explicitly rejected other factions as reliable allies. “It is not the Democratic Party. It is not the podcaster right base. It is not the DEI people. It is not the bicoastal leftwing elite teachers unions,” Hanson declared. To illustrate the sudden, widespread nature of the shift, he invoked pop-culture metaphors of infection and transformation. “It reminds me of all of these movies like The Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Last of Us or The Walking Dead that certain people, you know, get infected and now they’re lost and they’re zombies and the other people, you never really know who’s a zombie until they turn,” he said. “Well, now they’re all turning and they’ve lost their minds.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

89,481 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Megyn Kelly’s Antithetical Turn on Islam: 8-Year Reversal Exposed! "Six months earlier she had delivered “a very good incisive critique” that focused not so much on “Israel versus Islam” but on Islam itself as “rightly suspicious..." Victor Davis Hanson highlighted a dramatic shift in the views of several prominent conservative voices on Jews and Israel. “If you took tapes of all these people,” he said, “and you look what Candace Owens was saying about Jews in Israel 8 years ago and now or Steve Bannon 8 years ago and now or Tucker Carlson 8 years ago and now,” their positions have changed radically. Hanson singled out Megyn Kelly, whom he likes “a lot,” noting that roughly six months earlier she had delivered “a very good incisive critique” that focused not so much on “Israel versus Islam” but on Islam itself as “rightly suspicious,” spotlighting “the seclusion of women and they couldn’t express themselves and the lack of free expression and rigidity.” Hanson observed that her current remarks stand “almost antithetical” to those earlier statements. He questioned what has driven “this radical change” and why there is “no push back.” Recalling the Iraq War era, Hanson remembered accusations that “the neocons planned it,” pointing to figures like Bill Kristol “in his glory days” and Richard Perle. While at the Naval Academy when the war broke out and supporting it, he was frequently asked if he was Jewish. “I said, ‘No, why?’” he recounted. “‘Well, the Jews support this.’ And I said, ‘Actually, Israel doesn’t.’” Hanson added that Israel had wanted the U.S. to stay out of Iraq and focus on Iran instead, “which might have been wiser, by the way.” Hanson warned that such sentiments have now become mainstreamed and are gaining momentum. Criticism has evolved into a “continuum” where it is acceptable to “damn” not only Israel but Jews, often masked by qualifiers such as “Well, I’m not against Jews. I’m just against Israel. I’m not against Israel. I’m just against Netanyahu.” Hanson found the surge in antisemitism on the left especially strange in the age of DEI. Hanson attributed it to “a combination of three factors that have coalesced in a synergy,” with DEI; Obama’s creation, serving as a key driver. It moved beyond the traditional Black-white historical problem of slavery and Jim Crow to a broader framework requiring, in his words, “a DNA test to verify this crackpot theory.” Under DEI logic, “67% of the country is white. Therefore they’re oppressors and they’re victimizers and the others are victims,” regardless of wealth, class, or actual circumstances. “It doesn’t matter,” he said. “You’re they are victims by the color of their skin… even if they’re whiter than the people on the other side by their ethnicity or the religion.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

82,954 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

It's Clearly Israel's War: – Megyn Kelly's New Anti-Alliance Stance! "Our government's job is not to look out for Iran or for Israel. It's to look out for us." ~ Woke Reich Megyn Kelly In today's monologue opening on The Megyn Kelly Show, Megyn Kelly expressed strong skepticism about the ongoing U.S. military involvement in the conflict with Iran, following strikes that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and resulted in the deaths of four American service members. Kelly stated that significant divisions exist over the actions taken, noting that opinions may shift in the coming days and weeks. She emphasized her view that "no one should have to die for a foreign country," adding, "I don't think those four service members died for the United States. I think they died for Iran or for Israel."She acknowledged understanding how the developments benefit Iran in the short term, observing that regime supporters appear "rather jubilant." However, Kelly stressed that the U.S. government's responsibility is solely to prioritize American interests, declaring, "our government's job is not to look out for Iran or for Israel. It's to look out for us." She described the conflict as feeling "very much to me like it is clearly Israel's war," attributing pushes for involvement to figures like Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, Lindsey Graham, and others she named as advocates for escalation. My opinion: Megyn Kelly has now fully joined the ranks of the Woke Reich Isolationists; a group that cloaks anti-interventionist rhetoric in faux-America First patriotism while echoing far-left talking points that downplay threats from regimes like Iran's, undermine alliances, and risk emboldening adversaries at America's expense. This shift marks her drift from principled conservatism, back to her left-leaning ideology and into isolationist defeatism.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

181,819 次观看 • 3 个月前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Charlie Kirk Show Blasts Megyn Kelly: “Wound Collecting” Leftist Tactic Exposed! “Crazies will hurl an accusation... this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy... it will drive them to violence." ~ Andrew Kolvet This week, "The Charlie Kirk Show" with Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet responded to remarks made by Megyn Kelly during her interview with Shawn Ryan earlier that week. Neff struggled to pinpoint the right description for the rhetoric he was hearing, saying, “I’m fishing for the right word to use, but it feels like… it feels like wound collecting if you’ve ever heard of that.” Kolvet immediately agreed, adding, “That sounds like a leftist tactic.” Neff replied, “Exactly.”The discussion centered on Kelly’s comments in the Shawn Ryan interview, where she declared of certain conspiracy-laden views, “It’s core MAGA now.” When Ryan responded with confusion with “I have no idea," the exchange turned to claims that “Trump has said from the beginning pedophile supporting Israeli lobby.” Kelly followed up, “Well, I mean I have no idea,” before suggesting, “Need a different acronym.” Kolvet warned that such tactics are dangerously irresponsible. “Crazies will hurl an accusation and then if you address it then it’s like oh you defended yourself too much if you don’t address it well why are you silent on this topic,” he explained. “There is no right answer when it comes to pedophilia accusations they tried to accuse Erica of being like connected to Epstein this this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy people it will drive them to violence and so I don’t like seeing a conversation between two people that should be responsible in this way just echoing and parroting the pedophilia stuff and the Israel.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

29,784 次观看 • 17 天前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Ben Dismantles the Online Narrative Around His Tiff With Megyn Kelly! "The reason they’re doing that is to misdirect away from their lack of basic moral character and basic moral sense." ~ Ben Shapiro In a sharp, no-holds-barred segment, Ben made it crystal clear the whole thing had zero to do with Israel. “She started saying things like, ‘I can’t even be critical of Israel.’ Well, that’s the get-out-of-jail-free card,” he explained. The real trigger, he said, was Megyn’s refusal to criticize Candace Owens for slandering Charlie Kirk’s widow. Recalling their onstage exchange about Tucker Carlson, Ben remembered pressing her: “I’d be happy to go fishing with Tucker, but that has nothing to do with whether he is right or wrong on principle… that’s what friendship very often is—actually course-correcting people.” When he asked why she wouldn’t call out the slander against Erica Kirk, the response flipped to “Ben only said that because he’s Israel-first.” Ben fired back: “In that entire narrative, I never brought up Israel. Literally, not once.” He pointed out that in his TPUSA speech he never mentioned Israel at all; his only antisemitism call-out was directed at self-described antisemite Nick Fuentes. Yet critics like Megyn spun it as dual-loyalty proof. “The reason they’re doing that is to misdirect away from their lack of basic moral character and basic moral sense,” he said, “and of course to not so subtly imply that the only thing that I care about in the world is Israel because I’m an Israel-first with dual loyalty and all the usual tropes.” Tafsik Organization and Stop Antizionism are proud to announce the World Symposium Against Antizionism, a landmark full-day conference that took place on May 17th, 2026. As the first conference in the world specifically dedicated to combatting Antizionism, this event brought together world-renowned advocates, leaders, and speakers for a day of critical dialogue and action. Ben Shapiro was the keynote speaker to start the conference. Many more high-profile speakers also were featured at the event.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

46,157 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

“Risk Again or Mean Never?” James Lindsay’s Powerful Warning: Fighting the Rising Tide! Fight the “rising tide,” and “bring people back to the values that they were hopefully raised with or to fish them out of the bad waters. ~ James Lindsay The Tafsik Organization and Stop Antizionism proudly had a full-day conference that took place on May 17, 2026. As the first conference in the world specifically dedicated to combatting Antizionism, the event brought together world-renowned advocates, leaders, and speakers for a day of critical dialogue and action. Among the high-profile speakers was James Lindsay. In his address, Lindsay examined why anti-Zionist and antisemitic content appears to be gaining traction despite not aligning with mainstream values in Canadian or American society. “Maybe the demand side is not who we think it is,” he said, suggesting that the influx of people into Western countries who have “disposable time and income” has created a large online audience that generates likes and clicks, making certain views seem more popular than they are among native populations. James noted that many immigrants to Europe, Canada, and the United States hold radical views, and that young people and U.S. veterans, the primary target groups, may be absorbing the messaging indirectly. “They’re almost getting the effect of secondhand smoke but in propaganda form,” Lindsay explained, “that’s actually being targeted to a different audience.” Lindsay also pointed to the influence of social media, particularly X, which he said has 200 million active users from third-world countries who are not physically in the West. “If you import the third world you become the third world,” he stated, clarifying that he was referring not to physical immigration but to digital interactions with millions who may not share Western values. “We are actually interacting with tons of people who we don’t know who they are… and can confuse us about where we stand on issues,” he warned. James urged listeners to seek clarity, fight the “rising tide,” and “bring people back to the values that they were hopefully raised with or to fish them out of the bad waters that they’ve landed themselves in.” Turning to solutions, Lindsay stressed that meaningful change requires grassroots pressure. “The political will is going to follow more or less massive political demand from the people,” he said. “We kind of have two choices right now… We either risk again or we mean never.” Referencing the post-World War II pledge “Never Again." Lindsay highlighted that history shows demonizing particular groups to build inclusion or grow a brand “always goes somewhere very bad… it never goes anywhere good.” Lindsay called on the audience to exercise agency: to speak out loudly, demand action from politicians, and engage fellow citizens in conversation until leaders recognize a significant public will on the issue. I concur fully with James Lindsay's statements!

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

43,753 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

J.D. Vance Should Expose Megyn Kelly’s Dangerous “It’s Core MAGA Now” Lies on the Show! Vance JD Vance should walk into that studio tomorrow ready to flip the entire narrative. No hedging. No playing nice. He should treat this appearance as the moment he draws a hard line. Megyn Kelly’s recent rhetoric is not above criticism, and he, as a key figure in the Trump administration, is the exact person to deliver that correction with force. That’s how a strong leader prepares to challenge Megyn Kelly on her own stated opinions. In a recent episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, Blake Neff and Andrew Kolvet responded to remarks made by Megyn Kelly during her interview with Shawn Ryan earlier that week. Neff struggled to pinpoint the right description for the rhetoric he was hearing, saying, “I’m fishing for the right word to use, but it feels like… it feels like wound collecting if you’ve ever heard of that.” Kolvet immediately agreed, adding, “That sounds like a leftist tactic.” Neff replied, “Exactly.” The discussion centered on Kelly’s comments in the Shawn Ryan interview, where she declared of certain conspiracy-laden views, “It’s core MAGA now.” When Ryan responded with confusion “I have no idea." The exchange turned to claims that “Trump has said from the beginning pedophile supporting Israeli lobby.” Kelly followed up, “Well, I mean I have no idea,” before suggesting, “Need a different acronym.” Kolvet warned that such tactics are dangerously irresponsible. “Crazies will hurl an accusation and then if you address it then it’s like oh you defended yourself too much if you don’t address it well why are you silent on this topic,” he explained. “You there is no right answer when it comes to pedophilia accusations they tried to accuse Erica of being like connected to Epstein this this stuff is like it will drive fringy people skitso people crazy people it will drive them to violence and so I don’t like seeing a conversation between two people that should be responsible in this way just echoing and parroting the pedophilia stuff and the Israel.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

11,717 次观看 • 7 天前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

“Eternity Is Long” – Erika Kirk Grace for My Children They will see how this world talked about their father, their mother, even themselves. ~ Erika Kirk At the Turning Point Women’s Summit, Erika Kirk reflected on the trying season her family is enduring and shared her hopes for how her young children will one day view it. “Eternity is long, but there will be a day 10 to 15 years from now when my children will look back on this season of life that us three are going through,” she said. “And they won’t remember it fully because they’re so young, but they will see everything. They will see how this world talked about their father, their mother, even themselves. They will be able to read every headline, every accusation, every lie.” Kirk explained that her deepest prayer is for her children to look past the noise. “And my prayer is their focus isn’t on all that noise, but rather on how their mother showed up and how she handled it,” she continued. “I pray God’s wisdom will prevail and they will be able to see the difference in how you can respond to situations that are completely out of your control.” Erika emphasized the character lessons she hopes will stand out. “I want them to see how you can remain gracious when people are deeply unkind. How you can remain composed and prioritize what matters most in the most chaotic situations. How you can still persevere carrying the cross that God has asked you to carry.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

24,217 次观看 • 17 天前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Megyn Kelly Compares Donald Trump Bankrupties to Potential Loss of Life in U.S. Iran Mission! "I can't help thinking about Trump's bankruptcies in real estate, you know... they can declare bankruptcy and get out of the jam... you can't pursue that kind of a strategy when it comes to war games because you're talking about American lives and blood and treasure.... we can't afford that kind of a bankruptcy." The Trump empire has over 500–540 business entities with only six bankruptcies, representing approximately ~ 1.1% of his total business ventures. Marco Rubio stated earlier ahead of the G7 Meeting the following: ✅U.S. does not need boots on Ground! ✅This is not going to be prolonged conflict! ✅Destroy their missile launchers! ✅Destroy their Navy! ✅Decapitate ability for nuclear weapons! ✅We are achieving our objectives! ✅Ahead of schedule on most objectives! Marco Rubio remained firm that the war in Iran would not be a 'prolonged conflict, and that the U.S. does not need boots on the ground to succeed. The U.S. Secretary of State made the remarks after meeting with G7 foreign ministers in France, where he says the country is on the verge of achieving its objectives in Iran. Although loss of life during a military conflict is tragic, I'll take President Trump's foreign policy strategic acumen. For historical purposes, in the 20th–21st century conventional wars, the fatality rate for deployed personnel is generally under 1%. Finally, Marco Rubio stated the current objective is not deploying boots on the ground.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

75,126 次观看 • 2 个月前

Andreafreedom76's profile picture

Megyn Kelly Please Listen: Four Major Influencers Have Spoken Out Now! Below video presents all four major influencers! “If you don’t call this stuff out, you end up with the right-wing version of AOC running your party." Over the past week, Ben Shapiro, Dinesh D'Souza, Erin Moran, and Gad Saad have courageously condemned the bad behavior on our side of the aisle. In a recent commentary, political analyst Ben Shapiro expressed concern over internal divisions within the Republican Party, attributing much of the discord to the influence of its more extreme, conspiratorial elements. He argued that those not aligned with this fringe are unfairly blamed for disrupting party unity. Shapiro pointed to remarks made by Alex Jones within the past 48 hours, quoting him as saying, “From what I’ve heard, Bondi’s not bad. She’s just lazy. Bongino is emotional and a big baby. Patel is compromised.” Shapiro used these comments to illustrate what he sees as divisive rhetoric emanating from the far-right, questioning, “Who’s the big divider?” Shapiro emphasized that while politics is inherently coalitional and individuals are free to vote as they choose, the critical issue lies in determining who will shape the Republican Party’s message and future. Shapiro framed this struggle as an ongoing battle within the conservative movement, warning that failing to challenge extreme voices could lead to the right-wing equivalent of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez dominating the party. “If you don’t call this stuff out, you end up with the right-wing version of AOC running your party,” he stated. Ben stressed the necessity of applying standards to maintain the integrity of the conservative movement, raising questions about how broad those standards should be and how much influence should be granted to those seeking to lead the party. Shapiro underscored that the discussion extends beyond electoral strategies, focusing instead on leadership and the need to condemn harmful ideas within the movement. He concluded by asserting that those unwilling to critique their own side lack credibility when criticizing opponents, stating, “If you’re not willing to do that on your own side, then frankly I don’t have a lot of respect for you when you’re attacking the other side for doing it.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

136,181 次观看 • 8 个月前