Peter Pistorius's banner
Peter Pistorius's profile picture

Peter Pistorius

@appfactory • 5,560 subscribers

AI Builder. Building @RedwoodJS, https://t.co/uikv19pumw, cmdcmd, https://t.co/sfOEdT9Pg1, and Kindling (soon) Previously: Built @_snaplet.

Videos

LIVE
1.2k

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.aiSponsored•Livecam
Streaming Now

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

HD live stream
Exclusive private shows
1.2k viewers online

Free preview available • Premium content

Sidequest for Pi is a context aware side channel for coding agent tangents: It's better /btw. Ask questions grounded in your active Pi session, and keep the main conversation focused. Hit the ~ key to show/hide the threaded conversation UI. > pi install npm:pi-sidequest
1:39
appfactory's profile picture

Sidequest for Pi is a context aware side channel for coding agent tangents: It's better /btw. Ask questions grounded in your active Pi session, and keep the main conversation focused. Hit the ~ key to show/hide the threaded conversation UI. > pi install npm:pi-sidequest

Peter Pistorius

25,547 views • 1 month ago

cmd+tab is the most-used, least-useful shortcut on macOS. So I replaced it. Tap both ⌘ keys live previews of every window arrow keys to pick. Never leave the keyboard. cmdcmd. Free, OSS.
0:23
appfactory's profile picture

cmd+tab is the most-used, least-useful shortcut on macOS. So I replaced it. Tap both ⌘ keys live previews of every window arrow keys to pick. Never leave the keyboard. cmdcmd. Free, OSS.

Peter Pistorius

15,658 views • 3 months ago

TLDR; GH actions, but for agents. ~0ms cache, retry-on-failure, insanely fast. Agents need validation. CI is the last defense. They shouldn't bother you unless everything is green! GH Actions is usually in the top-5 expenses for dev-teams. Add agents to that mix? It'll easily double. It's the wrong tool for the right job: Slow boot, slow cache, retrieving logs is token expensive for agents, the list goes on... So I built a tool with one amazing feature: live-reload for failures. Agent-CI is a local CI runner. I tweaked the control pane and mounts to provide 0ms caching, insanely fast boots. When a step fails it pauses, provides the agent with the failure, and waits for the agent to fix and retry just that step. It uses the standard GH Actions image (via Docker), but emulates the control pane via a local HTTP server. You don't have to change any of your existing GH workflows. Tighter loops. Greener builds. Less babysitting. (Demo below.)
0:41
appfactory's profile picture

TLDR; GH actions, but for agents. ~0ms cache, retry-on-failure, insanely fast. Agents need validation. CI is the last defense. They shouldn't bother you unless everything is green! GH Actions is usually in the top-5 expenses for dev-teams. Add agents to that mix? It'll easily double. It's the wrong tool for the right job: Slow boot, slow cache, retrieving logs is token expensive for agents, the list goes on... So I built a tool with one amazing feature: live-reload for failures. Agent-CI is a local CI runner. I tweaked the control pane and mounts to provide 0ms caching, insanely fast boots. When a step fails it pauses, provides the agent with the failure, and waits for the agent to fix and retry just that step. It uses the standard GH Actions image (via Docker), but emulates the control pane via a local HTTP server. You don't have to change any of your existing GH workflows. Tighter loops. Greener builds. Less babysitting. (Demo below.)

Peter Pistorius

15,248 views • 4 months ago

No more content to load