BoozeyBeauty
@BoozeyBeauty • 14,551 subscribers
someone told me that I should find Jesus... I'm still looking. 🏳️🌈🍷🍕💜
Shorts
Videos
On February 19th, 2025, Meg Kennedy calls Brian Tully to say she has texts with Karina Kolokithas from the week after John O'Keefe's murder. She held onto them for over three years up until that point. She follows up with an email and attaches 22 selective screenshots of their conversation. A few months later, when Karina is called to testify during the second Karen Read trial, Meg is seen seated in the courtroom on the O'Keefe's side. As we know, this courtroom was very small with a limited amount of individuals who could have sat for either side. This makes Meg's appearance notable for this specfic testimony. When Brennan stood to cross examine Karina, he decided to keep in short to only a few minutes. He did not mention the texts that Meg sent to Tully. After Karina left the stand, and a private sidebar was called, the camera panned to the O'Keefe's bench as Karen walked to the sidebar. Meg's face? Priceless. 😉
BoozeyBeauty54,191 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen
New footage of Jen and Matt McCabe at the O'Keefe's home the evening after the murder of John O'Keefe. On 1/30/22, Jen and Matt arrive at 8:29pm and then left with their daughter at 9:12pm. Jen looking interestingly exhausted as she first arrives and quite snappy with her daughter when they leave 45 minutes later. 🤔 Earlier that day, Jen and Kerry Roberts had spent 5 hours at the O'Keefe's. From there, they would 🔹️stop at Jen's for 7 minutes 🔹️stop at 34 Fairview Rd for 4 minutes and then proceed to Canton PD Detective Sergeant Mike Lank's home. This off-the-books meeting lasting roughly 45 minutes. Important to note, Lank has a long history with the Albert family. He, in fact, was the only officer trusted to enter 34 Fairview Rd multiple times during the early hours of 1/29/22. Jen McCabe had multiple police interviews on 1/29. At one point in the morning, she called Lank back to 34 Fairview to speak. He arrived and spoke to her in front of many Albert family members (Brian, Nicole, Chris, Julie, Kevin) and Brian Higgins. This is where Jen said, for the first time, Karen Read allegedly “admitted” to running over John. “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him”. On 2/1, she had another MSP interview at her home. Kerry Roberts had a police interview on 1/29 where she texted Jen that officers were about to interview her. Jen telling Kerry to call her after.. which is precisely what happened. On 2/1, Kerry had another police interview at Jen's where they were making a “timeline” together with Jen's sister Denise Galvin. Later that evening, Jen would be speaking to Michael Proctor on the phone and Kerry asked to speak with him as she suddenly “remembered” things. Karen Read was arrested on 2/1 at 7:40pm. After, Jen and Kerry Roberts would eagerly be texting one another about how their detective skills solved a murder. Jokingly, Kerry would claim Sandra Bullock to play her in the movie that was surely to be made. Jen adding that they were like an 80s detective sitcom show and Matt is like the character played by Tom Selleck. Due to the history of ever-changing timelines by Jen, one has to wonder.. was her spending 6 hours in total at the O'Keefe's home after the murder of John genuine (as a "caring friend") or was something more nefarious going on?
BoozeyBeauty524,872 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
Idk about you but I can't WAIT to see the group texts Proctor was on with Chris Albert that Chris said he was weary of Massachusetts State Police investigators looking at because he "didn't wanna get anyone in trouble". That phone extraction will be telling us everything... 🙃
BoozeyBeauty43,401 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen
CONFIRMED: Demoted Detective Lieutenant Brian Tully called Karen Read a "cunt" in her home after looking at the cell phone of hers that Lieutenant John Fanning seized. In this video, I removed the background noise in three variables: one completely (voice only), one enhanced voice with slight background noise, and one with stronger background noise. ‼️In all three variations you hear, and see, Tully state, "what a cunt"‼️ This makes now two officers from the Massachusetts State Police who openly stated that a murder defendant was a cunt. "Whack job cunt" - fired and decertified Michael Proctor "What a cunt" - demoted Brian Tully
BoozeyBeauty488,171 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten
The decertified and terminated Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor didn't just miss one video from John O'Keefe's Ring surveillance footage. He missed three. According to testimony, Proctor asked Trooper DiCiccio, whom he described as a "good friend," to review O'Keefe's Ring footage. DiCiccio took handwritten notes while examining the evidence. Three videos documented in those notes have never been accounted for: 🔹 12:41 AM: "Tail lights from driveway (I think she arrived home)" 🔹 5:47 AM: "Karen, Jen, Kerry @ house" 🔹 12:42 PM: "Lexus leaves" All three videos would have provided a view of Karen Read's taillight, the Commonwealth's alleged murder weapon. Yet Proctor denied that these videos ever existed, despite DiCiccio's notes indicating otherwise. 12:41 AM would likely show Karen Read arriving at John O'Keefe's home and pulling into the garage. 5:47 AM was referenced by investigators, but its counterpart video from 5:51 AM is missing. According to testimony, this was the timeframe when Karen Read, Jennifer McCabe, and Kerry Roberts were allegedly looking at the damaged taillight. Kerry testified that she observed a metal piece sticking out, and Karen allegedly removed a piece of taillight. Yet the video that should have captured those events is nowhere to be found. Somehow, conversations, blowing snow, vehicle doors opening and closing, and a vehicle leaving the property all failed to be recorded. 12:42 PM would have shown Karen Read's father driving her Lexus away from O'Keefe's residence. Initially, it was suggested that the missing footage may have been deleted by Karen Read when she returned to O'Keefe's house after leaving the hospital. John O'Keefe's mother, Peg O'Keefe, even alluded to that possibility during her testimony in the second trial. The problem with that theory is that O'Keefe's Ring account could only be accessed through his cell phone, and Karen Read did not have access to it. Even more significant, Ring's records reportedly showed that the only party to access the account was the Massachusetts State Police...
BoozeyBeauty144,717 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
Mental health gone. Family gone. Home gone. Career gone. When will it be enough for Michael Proctor for him to finally tell the truth? It's interesting looking back at these interviews to see how confident he once was with this narrative. But.. was it worth it?
BoozeyBeauty46,829 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
"It's kill an N-word in Canton day" - fired trooper Michael Proctor In a scathing plea to the court, attorney Rosemary Scappichio confirms one racist text message that is on Proctor's cell phone extraction that shows bias towards her client. "It's who this man is."
BoozeyBeauty87,720 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
In today's Karen Read hearing, Michael Proctor's attorney CONFIRMED everything we knew was on his new phone extraction.. essentially his attorney pled, “yes the phone is bad… but please don’t let her see HOW bad.” Proctor’s attorney said on the record that this 13-year phone dump contains: 🔹️Photos of intimate body parts 🔹️Images of people not involved in anything 🔹️Names of sexual assault victims 🔹️A whole lot of deeply personal material And then (I kid you not) he tells the judge to “assume” there might be ✨️homophobic texts✨️ … and “assume” there could be ✨️antisemitic messages✨️ from years ago. Sir… WHY are those your go-to examples unless that’s exactly what’s in there? 🗣🗣🗣 He continued his argument that none of it is relevant because Proctor didn’t meet Karen until January 29th, 2022 (the day John O'Keefe was murdered) and called this a “fishing expedition.” He also said this is “just a civil case” where no one is going to jail and no constitutional rights are at issue. (Meanwhile Karen is literally suing him for violating her constitutional rights.) They tried the classic, “she already got 38,707 pages of discovery.” 🙄 From a DIFFERENT phone. Before the mistrial. Before the second trial. Before all the new chaos. And then tried to tell the court that this was the improper venue and to request discovery directly from Proctor himself. The issue? Read's team has already tried that, hence filing in these other cases to force the hand of the DA's office to hand it over because Proctor has since lost that very cell phone. So no, she cannot just subpoena him directly. The ONLY copy left is with the Commonwealth. The same people fighting to keep it sealed. Multiple other defendants from Proctor cases already got this extraction. But Karen Read? Nope. The DA's office protecting Proctor (still) is no surprise but his attorney confirming to the public that yes, he is in fact a piece of shit? Priceless. 👩🍳💋
BoozeyBeauty114,187 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
Kelsey Fitzsimmons and her attorney, Tim Bradl, confirmed today that the FBI is now involved in what happened to her on June 30, 2025, as well as the break-in at her home that followed. Speaking outside the courtroom, Kelsey opened up about the devastation of having her son taken from her and how quickly a judge signed off on the order that made it happen. Bradl then made it clear this is not stopping here, saying they plan to work with legislators to push for reform around restraining orders, especially how they immediately impact custody in those first critical hours after an order is served. When asked about the circumstances surrounding the order and the connections involved, Bradl did not dodge the question. He said, “We have some other investigations to work on and we are going to leave no stone unturned. We’re going to find out how and why this happened, and who’s responsible.” He also addressed the break-in at Kelsey’s home, saying they have already been in contact with the FBI and made it clear he has “had it with Essex County,” and will be working with federal investigators to get answers. 💜
BoozeyBeauty88,823 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten
Canton PD Sgt Sean Goode was texting throughout the processing of the scene when John O'Keefe was found dead outside of Brian Albert's home at 34 Fairview Rd. Normally, this wouldn't be suspicious.. however, given the timeline of Goode being on his phone, it raises serious questions of who exactly he was speaking to and why. At 6:35:40 AM, Detective Sergeant Mike Lank gets a phone call that he says he does not remember who it was. This call lasts almost 3 mins. Immediately after he calls the Massachusetts State Police CPAC Unit for help. At 6:39:11 AM, the outdoor front light of 34FV is turned on and the door is opened. At 6:40:48 AM, Goode is seen texting after calling in a section 12 for Karen Read. We hear Goode tell Lank this while Lank is still on the phone with CPAC. Goode also asks if Lank wants to go inside because "the front door is actually open". While Lank and Goode head to the front door, Kerry Roberts and Karen Read return back. Within minutes, Karen is walked back to the ambulance and subsequently sent to the hospital for a section hold. They would draw her blood which then would be examined and given an estimate of her blood alcohol content of the time she supposedly ran into John O'Keefe. Goode and Lank would spend 18 minutes and 47 seconds inside 34 Fairview Rd with Brian Albert, Nicole Albert and Jen McCabe. While inside, Goode radios Kelly Dever in dispatch of the exact time of Jen's 911 call. Matt McCabe was also coming in and out (which was not testified to). In fact, Goode, Lank and Matt would leave the home together. At 7:02:04 AM, Goode is seen texting again. Karen Read would leave in the ambulance at 7:05:32 AM.
BoozeyBeauty50,200 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
And there it is folks: the hand off of John O'Keefe's cell phone from Kerry Roberts to Officer Mullaney. The issue? ⤵️ Mullaney never testified that he had John's phone. Goode never testified that Mullaney got the phone. Neither did Lank or Saraf. Kerry seemingly couldn't remember who she gave it to or when. From Goode's dash cam footage (all 3 front angles), we now know that Kerry was on the phone at this time and heard mentioning a "house party" (via Saraf's dash cam). She is seen on Goode's dash cam literally taking a walk all the way past 32 Fairview Rd. She apparently did not want her conversation to be heard. For time reference, the ambulance and CFD vehicles had already driven off. In the footage, we see Lank (who had recently arrived), Saraf, Goode and Mullaney huddled together in front of Saraf's cruiser/behind Kerry's SUV. Then Goode and Mullaney start to walk towards Kerry's vehicle. Goode opens the door where Karen is, asks her something, and then shuts the door. The two walk up to Mullaney's vehicle but then quickly turn around. This is where I believe Mullaney remembered seeing Kerry pick up the blanket and John's phone from where John was laying. From there, Mullaney walks to Kerry and she immediately gives him the phone.. without hesitation. Where the phone goes from there? Who knows. But it was not in Kerry's possession when her and Karen drove off roughly 5 minutes later.
BoozeyBeauty91,944 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
The behavior in these two videos is awfully.. odd (and unfortunately something I have seen before). As someone who grew up with addicts and has had most of her life touched by addicts, this behavior is concerning. In the first video clip, he takes 7 hits in the matter of 1 minute and 15 seconds. That's not the normal smoking weed behavior or "taking a few hits to get the edge off". In my opinion, from my experiences with addicts, that is classic need-to-get-high-now behavior. Typical weed smokers take a few hits and chill.. take their time. This is not that. He seems anxious and in a rush. He's not a teenager trying to hide his pipe from his parents. This is a grown man with a career and child. Was he rushing because he wasn't supposed to be doing it? Maybe. But that doesn't explain the need to get absolutely blazed as quickly as he could with a newborn in the house.. and this same pattern is seen on video after video. This behavior would align also with the allegations Kelsey listed recently in probate court documents. If in fact he was using other substances, taking a shit ton of hits as fast as he did could explain that. An addicts brain can be a complicated one, however, once you recognize the pattern you'll see it clear as day.
BoozeyBeauty76,005 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten
Footage from the Canton Police Department's audit meeting has been mysteriously deleted. The missing footage was of one of the auditors answering a question about the Canton Sallyport cameras - specifically regarding the claim that they are motion-activated and one filming inverted. Interestingly, the footage right when the auditor is to say who he spoke to within the department, cuts and jumps back to this Canton resident asking another question. I remember this answer as I was there. I remember thinking how ridiculous the auditor sounded by attempting to dodge the very clear question of: "how do you know it films inverted if you didn't look at it yourself?" He said he spoke to then chief Helena Rafferty. He claimed that there was a button on these cameras that you can press to film inverted. That somehow this button must have been pressed at some point and was never corrected. Bullshit. And now that very answer is gone. Just like Brian Higgins speech at former police chief's Ken Berkowitz retirement party where he said that Berky was the person you call to hide a dead body. You don't delete video footage for any reason. Why remove this answer from a continuously recorded audit hearing? Why remove one person's speech from a continuously recorded party? Why remove video footage of a vehicle in a garage?
BoozeyBeauty33,754 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Sometimes it's not what's in the footage.. but rather what is missing. Where is Allie McCabe's vehicle driving Colin Albert home? Per their testimony, we should see them driving by to drop Colin off around 12:15am. Where is Allie's car going home minutes later? 🤔
BoozeyBeauty77,894 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
Here is this same piece of unidentified evidence being held up during trial 2 by Yuri Bukhenik. As we can see, it is thin and flimsy but still able to hold it's shape. There is a tab on the side that, per the crime lab, is about a 1/2 inch wide. This does not match what any takeout container or lid would look like.. even run over as some have suggested. There is no indentation of where a lid would attach to a bottom container and it is far too thin for it to be for food storage. It does, however, match the description for a protective covering over something round. Jeep enthusiasts often use a multitude of aftermarket parts for the vehicles, including protective shields over the head and fog lamps as well as any other auxiliary lights they may add on. These coverings can vary in material from polycarbonate, to acrylic, to tempered glass, to plastic, etc. It's important to note that Brian Higgins' Jeep not only had the plow with added head lamps on it but also a lift and specialized tires, amongst other upgrades he added to the vehicle. So his Jeep was not standard by any means. What I find interesting is that this item was found with other pieces of tail light on the lawn.. not the street. This was the same day John O'Keefe's hat and supposed drinking straw were found. We also still do not know where the apparent glass that was on Karen's bumper came from. This debris not matching her tail light, the drinking glass or any of the pieces Bukhenik found later at the scene. Oddly, it did match one singular piece found by Proctor on 2/11/22. My best guess is that the unidentified round item and the 3 matching pieces of apparent glass are correlated somehow.. perhaps one day we will get that answer.
BoozeyBeauty39,760 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
Some of y'all in Canton need to ask the auditors why they reported the Canton Police Department's cameras as motion-activated when they are, and always have been, continuously recording. Or why they said one filmed inverted when it never did. Discretion or corruption?
BoozeyBeauty29,573 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Thank you, Katherine Loftus (NoteMyObjection), for confirming that your cousin Molly works as a victim witness advocate in the Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office. That’s relevant context for viewers as they evaluate your content and consider any potential bias. As for the rest, this is being framed as something it isn’t. When you position yourself as an “unapologetically honest” legal voice and platform witnesses, transparency is crucial. You don’t get to benefit from that credibility while dismissing reasonable questions about bias as “malicious.” And to be clear, my video does not meet any legal definition of malice. Criticism one may not like does not equate to maliciousness. As an attorney, you know this. You say you don’t use sources, but relationships, proximity, and access are relevant whether you choose to label them that way or not. That’s reality, especially when you’re speaking on cases tied to the same office your family is connected to. Again, that’s not an attack, it is however context your audience deserves. You also stated in your interview that having a strong opinion in this case leads people to attack looks instead of substance. Yet in your most recent video, you did exactly that. I don’t go there, because it’s not my style. I hold myself to a higher standard than reducing an argument to personal attacks, especially when the criticism is about substance, not appearance. So the claim that “this side” avoids substance doesn’t really hold up when you’re doing the opposite. As for the block, I explicitly stated in my video why I blocked you: mocking what I went through and continue to deal with. I believe in being transparent with my audience. What is hypocritical, though, is deciding some people are victims of harassment while others are experiencing the same things (home visits, employer calls, public confrontations, threats) are dismissed as “drama.” It’s also notable that in your interview with Kerry, none of that behavior was addressed. Perhaps next time do a little more research into the person you’re interviewing? Many of us are dying to know why your interviewee was calling herself and Jen McCabe “detectives,” and why a victim witness advocate out of the same DA’s office referred to them as “the best detectives around.”
BoozeyBeauty42,758 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
THE MISSING CANTON LIBRARY FOOTAGE 🗣🚨 On February 7th, 2022, Louis Jutras from Canton’s IT Division emailed Trooper Dunne (Norfolk County MSP) surveillance footage from the Canton Public Library, per MSP’s request. Because of the town’s camera system setup, the footage was shared via a download link rather than direct files. Dunne then forwarded that same link to lead investigator Trooper Michael Proctor. A follow up email, obtained by @Marbury_v_Mad through a FOIA request, shows that Proctor sought help from Norfolk County Forensic Video Technician Colleen Crawford. But why would Proctor need assistance if the footage could have been easily downloaded and preserved in its raw form, with original metadata? Data that was never provided to Karen Read’s defense team. Then there’s Brian Tully, the officer chosen to testify about this footage. A curious choice since Dunne received the original link and Proctor led the investigation, both would’ve been far more relevant witnesses. As Proctor’s supervisor, Tully would likely have known about the missing footage from the Canton Library. Did he also communicate with Crawford? The original file sent by Jutras was a full one-hour segment (12:00 a.m.–1:00 a.m.), yet the version later used in evidence has missing roughly two minutes from 12:37 a.m. to 12:39 a.m. And now, this newly uncovered correspondence shows Proctor personally thanked Crawford for her help with this very footage.
BoozeyBeauty92,443 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten
In a rare interview, last week Norfolk County District Attorney, Michael Morrissey, gloated about his career as a lifetime politician and DA - bragging about how many elections he has been through. When asked if he would do anything differently, he does not mention his time as a DA. Instead, he says he would change things he did prior to becoming DA. AKA: he does not regret wasting millions of taxpayer dollars for two Karen Read trials that concluded with an OUI conviction. He does not regret hand picking men like Michael Proctor to investigate cases like the murder of John O'Keefe. He. Does. Not. Care. And frankly, neither does his chief trial counsel who is running for a promotion to take Morrissey's seat.
BoozeyBeauty25,266 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat