brakeboosted's banner

brakeboosted

@brakeboosted • 27,773 subscribers

[email protected] for business inquiries. support me here: https://t.co/S6SAbXCDqe

Shorts

For Charles the underlying pace is there. The gap and some change in turn 4 alone with the mistake. Lost the rear on the apex kerb, big lift of the throttle. 1.5 tenths in the drain. Some consistent laps will go a long way to help his confidence. Let's see how the sprint goes, but I don't think a revolution in the approach is required.

For Charles the underlying pace is there. The gap and some change in turn 4 alone with the mistake. Lost the rear on the apex kerb, big lift of the throttle. 1.5 tenths in the drain. Some consistent laps will go a long way to help his confidence. Let's see how the sprint goes, but I don't think a revolution in the approach is required.

55,300 次观看

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

I'll leave this here Scuderia Ferrari HP @FIA The entire DRS flap is rotating under load. You can see at the pivot points, the flap is not aligning with the wing tips. The flap is backing off at high speed, shedding drag. How is this okay?

I'll leave this here Scuderia Ferrari HP @FIA The entire DRS flap is rotating under load. You can see at the pivot points, the flap is not aligning with the wing tips. The flap is backing off at high speed, shedding drag. How is this okay?

9,439,862 次观看 • 2 年前

Ferrari were doing something odd at the safety car restart. Clutch disengaged, revs up, then launches into it. Standing start procedure almost. I suppose it's only doable when you are leading the restart.

Ferrari were doing something odd at the safety car restart. Clutch disengaged, revs up, then launches into it. Standing start procedure almost. I suppose it's only doable when you are leading the restart.

670,912 次观看 • 5 个月前

do I need to say anything?

do I need to say anything?

1,269,263 次观看 • 10 个月前

I miss when F1 used to do virtual track guides.

I miss when F1 used to do virtual track guides.

145,972 次观看 • 2 个月前

Ferrari has introduced a new rear wing specification where the SLM actuators are positioned within the end plates. No actuator/pod positioned where you'd typically expect it to be. Whether it is supposed to invert the flaps as it is, is unclear at the moment. They've been in the garage for the bigger part of an hour with the screens up.

Ferrari has introduced a new rear wing specification where the SLM actuators are positioned within the end plates. No actuator/pod positioned where you'd typically expect it to be. Whether it is supposed to invert the flaps as it is, is unclear at the moment. They've been in the garage for the bigger part of an hour with the screens up.

339,922 次观看 • 8 个月前

A lot of things are being put under the "deployment issue" umbrella, and it's unsurprising that not everyone understands how complicated the power demand rules are. This isn't an "issue" in the usual sense of the word, but rather oddities in the regulations being exposed by the near 50/50 power split. Sometimes, the way the driver uses the throttle pedal induces "deployment issues." We already saw what happened when a moment that usually proves inconsequential ruined Leclerc's SQ3 lap in China. In this case, Hadjar, who is lifting through 130R to manage tyres, is affected by the quirks of the power demand rules. The MGU-K must give at least 200 kW of electrical power for 1 second when he goes from lifting to beyond 98% throttle. Throttle position >98% is defined as the power-limited pending period. What accentuates the issues for Isack here, is that from 130R to Casio Triangle - where cars typically harvest when not attacking - instead of recovering energy, it spends an extra couple seconds deploying it. He is left completely exposed on the subsequent straight because it used energy when it was supposed to recover it. It's easy to fix in this case. Don't lift on the next laps. Where it becomes tricky is when the driver uses the throttle in a way that doesn't necessarily help the "issue" due to their driving habits, or trying to push a little harder at some points. It's precisely this thats frustrating so many drivers. Because they don't really know they're doing something "wrong." The reason its become such a prominent aspect is because of the need to have 100% optimal deployment all the time, the product of a 50/50 power split.

A lot of things are being put under the "deployment issue" umbrella, and it's unsurprising that not everyone understands how complicated the power demand rules are. This isn't an "issue" in the usual sense of the word, but rather oddities in the regulations being exposed by the near 50/50 power split. Sometimes, the way the driver uses the throttle pedal induces "deployment issues." We already saw what happened when a moment that usually proves inconsequential ruined Leclerc's SQ3 lap in China. In this case, Hadjar, who is lifting through 130R to manage tyres, is affected by the quirks of the power demand rules. The MGU-K must give at least 200 kW of electrical power for 1 second when he goes from lifting to beyond 98% throttle. Throttle position >98% is defined as the power-limited pending period. What accentuates the issues for Isack here, is that from 130R to Casio Triangle - where cars typically harvest when not attacking - instead of recovering energy, it spends an extra couple seconds deploying it. He is left completely exposed on the subsequent straight because it used energy when it was supposed to recover it. It's easy to fix in this case. Don't lift on the next laps. Where it becomes tricky is when the driver uses the throttle in a way that doesn't necessarily help the "issue" due to their driving habits, or trying to push a little harder at some points. It's precisely this thats frustrating so many drivers. Because they don't really know they're doing something "wrong." The reason its become such a prominent aspect is because of the need to have 100% optimal deployment all the time, the product of a 50/50 power split.

267,077 次观看 • 6 个月前

This cropped view makes it much more obvious, especially if you don't know what we are looking for. It is there and it is undeniable. Intentional or not, this is providing and advantage. This is what I like to call “passive active aero” moveable surface that are designed to move without manual input or a computerized activation system.

This cropped view makes it much more obvious, especially if you don't know what we are looking for. It is there and it is undeniable. Intentional or not, this is providing and advantage. This is what I like to call “passive active aero” moveable surface that are designed to move without manual input or a computerized activation system.

829,932 次观看 • 2 年前

Thank the gods every so often for those who have the cognitive complexity, who are able to put it into words better than I ever could, to recognize the gaps and who have the ability to synthesize the evidence. Thank the gods for Jon Noble.

Thank the gods every so often for those who have the cognitive complexity, who are able to put it into words better than I ever could, to recognize the gaps and who have the ability to synthesize the evidence. Thank the gods for Jon Noble.

22,561 次观看 • 27 天前

没有更多内容可加载