Dr Sherri Tenpenny's banner
Dr Sherri Tenpenny's profile picture

Dr Sherri Tenpenny

@BusyDrT227,759 subscribers

Doctor who speaks out about vaccines. Other websites: https://t.co/rDCGzNDDqG https://t.co/SsDUFVdu0e -- medical clinic https://t.co/vaorL6LwOP

Shorts

What was the FDA thinking by approving the new Moderna mRNA flu vax? Over 100 deaths and ~75% adverse events? Does this sound safe to you? I talked about in this week's Morning Coffee. Watch here: Nic Hulscher's epidemiology team just reanalyzed the FDA’s own data used to approve mFLUSIVA. Here's what they found. To prevent just ONE influenza hospitalization, 5,017 people had to be vaccinated at the COST of: ~2 excess unexplained DEATHS ~278 disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions ~3,798 adverse reactions Compared with the standard-dose flu vaccine, that amounts to approximately 1,454 ADDITIONAL adverse reactions and 233 ADDITIONAL disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions for every hospitalization prevented. Unexplained deaths were 2.55× more frequent among mFLUSIVA recipients, while disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions were 6.15× more frequent than with the standard-dose flu vaccine. Literally EVERY SINGLE solicited adverse event was more frequent in the mFLUSIVA group. Neither pivotal trial included a placebo arm, and no influenza-mortality endpoint was ever measured. Moreover, mFLUSIVA commits recipients to annual lifelong exposure to nucleoside-modified mRNA technology despite evidence of residual DNA contamination, genomic integration, protein misfolding, proteostatic collapse, body-wide biodistribution, years-long persistence, and compounded biological injury with repeated dosing. Our study and accompanying information were sent directly to Secretary Kennedy and officials at HHS, FDA, CDC, and NIH. We hope Secretary Kennedy and federal health officials make the life-saving decision to remove this extremely hazardous product from the market before widespread administration begins. In light of the evidence now before them, allowing mFLUSIVA to remain approved would be a grave mistake.

What was the FDA thinking by approving the new Moderna mRNA flu vax? Over 100 deaths and ~75% adverse events? Does this sound safe to you? I talked about in this week's Morning Coffee. Watch here: Nic Hulscher's epidemiology team just reanalyzed the FDA’s own data used to approve mFLUSIVA. Here's what they found. To prevent just ONE influenza hospitalization, 5,017 people had to be vaccinated at the COST of: ~2 excess unexplained DEATHS ~278 disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions ~3,798 adverse reactions Compared with the standard-dose flu vaccine, that amounts to approximately 1,454 ADDITIONAL adverse reactions and 233 ADDITIONAL disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions for every hospitalization prevented. Unexplained deaths were 2.55× more frequent among mFLUSIVA recipients, while disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions were 6.15× more frequent than with the standard-dose flu vaccine. Literally EVERY SINGLE solicited adverse event was more frequent in the mFLUSIVA group. Neither pivotal trial included a placebo arm, and no influenza-mortality endpoint was ever measured. Moreover, mFLUSIVA commits recipients to annual lifelong exposure to nucleoside-modified mRNA technology despite evidence of residual DNA contamination, genomic integration, protein misfolding, proteostatic collapse, body-wide biodistribution, years-long persistence, and compounded biological injury with repeated dosing. Our study and accompanying information were sent directly to Secretary Kennedy and officials at HHS, FDA, CDC, and NIH. We hope Secretary Kennedy and federal health officials make the life-saving decision to remove this extremely hazardous product from the market before widespread administration begins. In light of the evidence now before them, allowing mFLUSIVA to remain approved would be a grave mistake.

41,614 views

Videos