Dixie Normus
@DixieNormu95224 • 9,283 subscribers
The Vanilla Gorilla!
Shorts
Videos
0:11
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
NOW ACCEPTING SIGN-UPS For the first-ever Canton Don’t Stop Believin Sing-Off Sing your best Journey song. Hit the high notes. Miss the high notes. Commit like you’re in a packed arena and not in front of 12 confused people. Winner gets bragging rights. Loser has to sing Faithfully again until we all feel something.
Dixie Normus82,722 次观看 • 2 个月前
2:54
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Courtney Proctor said she and Michael “just didn’t talk about” the case. But on January 29, Michael texted her that the death was suspicious, told her not to tell anyone, identified Julie and Chris as witnesses, and said he needed to interview them. Then on February 1, before Proctor interviewed Julie and Chris, Courtney texted Michael that she was meeting with Julie. Later, Courtney claimed Michael did not even have Julie’s number and had to ask her for it “a few weeks into” the investigation. Michael was discussing Julie and Chris with Courtney on day one. Courtney was meeting with Julie before Michael interviewed her. Courtney and Julie communicated frequently. Yet we still do not have the communication showing who actually arranged the interview, how it was arranged, or when Proctor first contacted Julie and Chris. Courtney said they “didn’t talk about the case.” The texts say otherwise. And the missing communications trail sits directly between the investigator, his sister, and the witnesses he needed to interview. AND DONT FORGET, julie called Proctor just after their official interview, and he called her back and talked for 4 minutes
Dixie Normus50,689 次观看 • 1 个月前
So let me get this straight… Julie says she showed up at 34 Fairview around 8:00–8:30 AM, hung around for 30–45 minutes, just sitting in the kitchen of the house where a man supposedly died in the yard during a blizzard.Meanwhile… Her husband Chris says he woke up around 8:00–8:30 AM, totally on his own, like a Disney prince stretching in the sunshine, in the middle of a nor’easter, mind you. Then Julie strolls in, breaks the news that John is dead, and the two of them head back over to 34 Fairview “just after 9.” And they only stay a half hour before heading home again. Is this more Chris Albert Math?
Dixie Normus271,479 次观看 • 9 个月前
Last night, Higgy got up and tried to convince the room that everyone should’ve been focused on Karens end of the texts between the 2 of them during the trial… not him. He also said that it didn’t justify his actions since karen got his number from someone else, he should not be at fault. Correct. His actions did that all by themselves. But hey, at least last night’s speech probably won’t have Helena rushing to get the video deleted. Progress.
Dixie Normus76,188 次观看 • 2 个月前
Julie and Chris Albert did not simply hand their phones to MSP and say, “Search everything.” There was no full Cellebrite extraction, no complete download, no apparent recovery of deleted messages, and no broad review of calls, apps, photos, emails, contacts, or communications with everyone connected to the case. This was an extremely narrow, consensual search focused almost entirely on phone numbers MSP already believed belonged to Michael Proctor. MARCH 18, 2024 During Julie’s first interview, investigators asked about communications with Proctor and requested permission to look through her phone. But MSP immediately reassured her “We’re not looking to dump your phone.” They explained that a dump would extract everything, and that was not what they wanted. They were seeking only direct Proctor communications, group threads involving Proctor, and specific messages referenced in court. Julie still did not consent. “I’m just not going to make this decision right now.” She wanted to speak with Chris first. A few hours later, after leaving MSP with the phone, Julie called back and said she had found Proctor saved as “Mike Proctor,” along with one incoming message and one response. To her credit, she reported it. But she had been alone with the phone before investigators documented those messages, and she still had not authorized them to conduct their own search. MARCH 19, 2024 Julie returned and allowed MSP to view and photograph the Proctor contact and two messages she had personally found. That is not the same as consenting to an independent search. When asked again, Julie said “I have, but I haven’t figured that out with my husband just yet.” So MSP could document what Julie placed in front of them, but could not independently search the device themselves. The delays continued. Julie wanted more time, investigators and Julie played phone tag, she became ill, and scheduling carried into the following week. Julie did not sign the consent form until April 3....16 days after her first interview. Even then, the search remained extremely limited. Julie stayed in the room while an investigator manually entered several known Proctor phone numbers into the iPhone’s ordinary search function. No forensic extraction. No deleted-message recovery. They found one incoming message from Proctor’s number ending in 2093, Julie’s response, and nothing associated with four other known numbers. That tells us only what appeared through those particular manual searches on April 3. It does not establish whether deleted messages once existed, whether calls occurred instead of texts, whether another number or app was used, whether communications existed on an earlier phone or cloud backup, or whether Apple IDs, emails, aliases, or unidentified numbers were involved. In fact, during Julie’s second interview, her own phone displayed a notice that additional results would appear after Messages finished indexing. This was not a forensic examination of Julie Albert’s phone. It was a carefully restricted search of selected numbers, conducted only after more than two weeks of hesitation.
Dixie Normus39,958 次观看 • 1 个月前
Aiden finally said the quiet part out loud this am on his live "if he’s not gonna talk, I’m just gonna name him." That was not an accidental disclosure. It was a conscious decision to publicly identify Lucky because Lucky was not cooperating in the manner Aiden wanted. Aiden may say he interpreted Lucky’s silence as hiding information. But he did not actually know that. Lucky had already provided the information. What Lucky wanted was for his name to remain out of the story. So the choice presented to Lucky was effectively cooperate publicly, or be named and compared to someone hiding evidence in John O’Keefe’s death. Then, behind closed doors, Lucky was called “slow,” compared to Forrest Gump, and described as “too dumb” to protect his own interests. This is not about whether Aiden helped Karen’s defense. It is about whether a witness’s wishes and dignity mattered once his information became useful. Aiden has now admitted that he used Lucky’s identity as pressure. People can decide for themselves whether they believe that was justified, but they can no longer pretend it did not happen. Why is Aidan continuing to call lucky, who is continuing to NOT take his calls and more importantly, why will he talk about everything else but what was said during the call with lucky the nest day?
Dixie Normus29,003 次观看 • 1 个月前
Kim Fair said she’s screenshotting every one of my posts, so Kim, screenshot this one nice and clear. I’ve been saying this all along, Allie, Colin, and Higgins are not three separate stories. Their timelines overlap. If Higgins’ Jeep was where they say it was, Allie should have seen it when she pulled in. Allie Could not tell MSP how Colin was at Fairview ummm well.... colin told us in court Allie drove him!!!!! Higgins should have seen Allie arrive. Colin should have seen Higgins’ Jeep when he came out. This was not some complicated maze. There are only so many ways to get to 34 Fairview. Yet Allie could not clearly remember the route she took to pick Colin up, and now the filing says Life360 data from Jennifer McCabe’s phone showed Allie did not travel straight home after dropping Colin off and even more importantly, showed no evidence of Allie arriving at or departing from 34 Fairview or Colin’s house on January 29. So once again, the “simple explanation” is not simple at all. If Colin left the house exactly how they said he did, why does the data make the story messier instead of clearer? If Allie picked him up at 34 Fairview, why does the record not cleanly show that? If Higgins’ Jeep was there, why does nobody’s testimony cleanly account for who saw who? A normal pickup does not need this much explaining. Screenshot that.
Dixie Normus54,944 次观看 • 2 个月前
Now that we have dash cam footage from 682 we can see Kerry Roberts backs in and parks at the end of the driveway. She walks into the house. About a minute later, she comes back out. She speaks with Matt at the end of the driveway. Matt runs into the house. Kerry does not leave — she remains parked. Matt runs back out and spends about a minute at Kerry’s vehicle. Matt runs back into the house again. Officer Goode exits the house. Officer Lank walks up the driveway. Matt follows Lank roughly 30 seconds later. Kerry is still parked at the end of the driveway. After emergency vehicles leave, Kerry departs toward Chapman Street. Matt then moves his vehicle into the driveway and runs into the house. Approximately four minutes later, Lank goes into the house.
Dixie Normus118,507 次观看 • 6 个月前
there is another important detail in Julie’s text thread that is easy to overlook. she never actually answered Michael Proctor’s question. Proctor told her that Colin’s attorney was not returning his calls. He asked Julie and Chris to speak with Colin and find out what day and time worked for another interview. Julie did not say she would ask Colin. She did not provide a date. She did not refer Proctor back to the attorney. She did not decline. Instead, she answered only the personal part “Same to you and E. It all really sucks. Hope the kids are doing good.” Proctor then gave that response a thumbs-up. So where is the rest of the conversation? How was Colin’s interview ultimately coordinated? Was it done over the phone, through Chris, through the attorney, or through messages that were no longer present? Because the one Proctor exchange investigators found on Julie’s phone contains a request, but no actual answer.
Dixie Normus32,262 次观看 • 1 个月前
Lank-house episode is one of the most legitimate credibility problems in Jen and Kerry’s Jan 30th timeline, not because the evidence proves a secret meeting, but because the visit was initially undisclosed, the route changed, and the explanations became narrower only after location data surfaced. 12:13 Jen leaves her house. 12:19 Jen arrives at 1 Meadows. 12:30 Dicicco arrives @ 1 Meadows to interview witnesses 5:12 Jen leaves 1 Meadows. 5:21 Jen returns to her own house. 5:28 Jen leaves her house again. 5:36 Jen’s location is at 34 Fairview. 5:40 Jen leaves the 34 Fairview area. 5:43 Jen arrives at Lank’s house. 6:28 Jen leaves Lank’s house. 6:34 Jen arrives home. Jen was home from 5:21 to 5:28 p.m. She then arrived at Lank’s around 5:43 p.m. only about 15 minutes after leaving home. She was just at her house, why did she just poop in her own house? Why would Jen leave 1 or 2 of her daughters at 1 Meadows, return to her own house, then get back into Kerry’s car to drive past 34 Fairview and spend 45 minutes at Lank’s, only to return home without her daughters? Jen had been at Meadows much of the afternoon, was delivered back to her own home, yet left her daughters behind and immediately set out again with Kerry. The child drop-off explains why Kerry’s daughter might go to Lank’s, but it does not explain why Jen needed to accompany her after Jen had already been brought home
Dixie Normus27,801 次观看 • 1 个月前
Gallagher knew Tommy Kelleher had an Arlo camera over the front door. And according to Gallagher’s own description, that camera captured the front door walkway and part of the front lawn. If Gallagher went to that residence and obtained Solo cups from Tommy Kelleher, then the camera may have captured Gallagher arriving, approaching the door, interacting at the residence, and leaving with whatever he obtained. But somehow, nobody thought to obtain the footage? Not from the house. Not from the camera. Not from the residence where the Solo cups allegedly came from. Meanwhile, when I asked a simple question on Twitter why did Gallagher go to that house instead of 34, which was closer? Helena Rafferty emailed that tweet to herself. Why? She must have thought the question mattered. And maybe it does matter. Because if the camera captured the front door walkway and part of the lawn, then what were they hiding??? Did he really get the cups from the neighbor???
Dixie Normus34,974 次观看 • 1 个月前
Matt says: He got a call from his wife. He got dressed. He headed to 34 Fairview. He drove most of the way down Fairview, saw it was blocked. He turned around, went back up to Spring Lane → Cedarcrest → Fairview He arrived around 6:40 Jen called him at 6:35 The problem is, If Matt arrived around 6:40 that means He was already on the road before 6:35 Which means he left the house before Jen called him Which means he Left without being told where to go or Left before knowing john had been found or Left on his own initiative There is no version of this where Jen’s 6:35 call caused Matt to leave, and Matt still arrives by 6:40 after dressing and driving a rerouted path. Matt’s story depends on the call being the trigger. But the clock says The trigger comes after the movement. The explanation comes after the action For all you Football fans Matt didn’t jump the snap. He false started. Moved before Maye said hike! Everyone pretends it didn’t happen But the tape doesn’t lie Five yards. Replay the down. Except here, the “tape” is phone records and drive time.
Dixie Normus106,959 次观看 • 7 个月前
According to sworn testimony from Lank and Goode No one entered or exited the house while they were inside. Matt McCabe wasn’t even there yet. According to… you know… video footage Matt McCabe enters. Leaves. Comes back. Leaves again. Kerry Roberts is in and out. At one point, Matt, Lank, and Goode literally walk out together like it’s a group field trip. But sure… “No one came in or out.” Solid. Lock it in. And the Forensic Four? Oh they’ve got this covered, don’t worry. They will either say “You’re misinterpreting the video.” Or “It’s not relevant.” Or “Memory isn’t perfect.” Do you think lank or Goode would love to have a redo on this question????? Mama Llama Julie Carpenter Tuesday Gazette
Dixie Normus68,898 次观看 • 4 个月前
I cannot believe he is still harping on this. Today on Bus Stop Live, he again claimed people are “mischaracterizing” his relationship with Lucky Loughran. There was no relationship. Lucky spoke to him, gave him information, and asked for one simple thing, keep Lucky’s name out of the story. Aidan himself has said he believed Lucky was scared when he approached him. That made his obligation to protect Lucky’s identity even more important, not less. But he published Lucky’s name anyway. Lucky then contacted Aidan at lunchtime after the story came out, furious, and asked him directly, “Where was your obligation to keep my name out of the story”? This has been explained repeatedly. Yet Aidan continues pushing the version that benefits his narrative while ignoring the one request Lucky made, and the fact that he failed to honor it.
Dixie Normus20,885 次观看 • 1 个月前