Curse's banner
Curse's profile picture

Curse

@encoresalad21,383 subscribers

Shorts

"The Jews are responsible for all of the wars in the world." - Prophet Mel Gibson

"The Jews are responsible for all of the wars in the world." - Prophet Mel Gibson

920,289 Aufrufe

This 17-second clip offers more insight into US politics than a political science degree from Harvard.

This 17-second clip offers more insight into US politics than a political science degree from Harvard.

32,210 Aufrufe

"There are Jews in the diamond and gold trades and they wanted in on what Rhodes was cooking, crazy." Helping Jews, as Rhodes did, is tantamount to helping Jews achieve their ends. In this case, Rhodes helped turn London into a refuge for Jewish terrorists, albeit indirectly. Cecil Rhodes' business partner, investor, and close friend was Nathaniel Rothschild - one of the most destructive Jews to England. Rothschild was not only the sole executor of Rhodes' will after Rhodes died, he was responsible for setting up the famous Rhodes Scholarship. Nathaniel Rothschild was pivotal in turning part of London's East End into a Jewish shtetl in the 1880s, when terrorist Jews fled Russia after the Tsar was murdered. Almost the entire Jewish population of England lived in London's East End during this period, and Rothschild supplied these Jews with welfare, free education, free healthcare, and affordable housing through his Four Percent Industrial Dwellings Company (which still operates today, and is still a Jew-first organization). So many terrorist Jews flooded London's East End (including Jack the Ripper) that parliament had to pass the Alien Act of 1905 to curb it, despite Nathaniel Rothschild's opposition. However, Rothschild was able to secure the "asylum clause," creating a window for more terrorist Jews to enter London. Thirty years later, Oswald Mosley would march through the Jewish enclave of London's East End and clash with these same Jews in what's now known as the Battle of Cable Street. Cecil Rhodes, through ignorance or indifference, was indirectly helping Nathaniel Rothschild turn England into a refuge for Jewish terrorists, whose descendants would turn Britain into a multiracial state, including the one and only Barbara Roche.

"There are Jews in the diamond and gold trades and they wanted in on what Rhodes was cooking, crazy." Helping Jews, as Rhodes did, is tantamount to helping Jews achieve their ends. In this case, Rhodes helped turn London into a refuge for Jewish terrorists, albeit indirectly. Cecil Rhodes' business partner, investor, and close friend was Nathaniel Rothschild - one of the most destructive Jews to England. Rothschild was not only the sole executor of Rhodes' will after Rhodes died, he was responsible for setting up the famous Rhodes Scholarship. Nathaniel Rothschild was pivotal in turning part of London's East End into a Jewish shtetl in the 1880s, when terrorist Jews fled Russia after the Tsar was murdered. Almost the entire Jewish population of England lived in London's East End during this period, and Rothschild supplied these Jews with welfare, free education, free healthcare, and affordable housing through his Four Percent Industrial Dwellings Company (which still operates today, and is still a Jew-first organization). So many terrorist Jews flooded London's East End (including Jack the Ripper) that parliament had to pass the Alien Act of 1905 to curb it, despite Nathaniel Rothschild's opposition. However, Rothschild was able to secure the "asylum clause," creating a window for more terrorist Jews to enter London. Thirty years later, Oswald Mosley would march through the Jewish enclave of London's East End and clash with these same Jews in what's now known as the Battle of Cable Street. Cecil Rhodes, through ignorance or indifference, was indirectly helping Nathaniel Rothschild turn England into a refuge for Jewish terrorists, whose descendants would turn Britain into a multiracial state, including the one and only Barbara Roche.

152,275 Aufrufe

"I have said this before, but I shall say it again, and again, and again. Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars." - President Roosevelt, Campaign Speech, 1940, just 14 months prior to entering WW2 in December 1941. "We will measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end — and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into." - President Trump, Inaugural Address, 2025, just 14 months prior to entering war with Iran in February 2026. Jewish wars and presidential betrayals go hand-in-hand.

"I have said this before, but I shall say it again, and again, and again. Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars." - President Roosevelt, Campaign Speech, 1940, just 14 months prior to entering WW2 in December 1941. "We will measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end — and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into." - President Trump, Inaugural Address, 2025, just 14 months prior to entering war with Iran in February 2026. Jewish wars and presidential betrayals go hand-in-hand.

67,179 Aufrufe

Videos

encoresalad's profile picture

Israel's attack against the USS Liberty was an attempt to provoke a confrontation between the US and the Soviet Union. Russian destroyers had been shadowing the USS Liberty and were actually the first to arrive on the scene after the attack, offering medical aid to the American crew members. After the attack, the White House initially thought it was Russia who did it. Had the Jerry Lewis brigade been successful at sinking the USS Liberty, Jews probably wouldn't have admitted that they did it. In fact, Johnson had to use the Hotline to call Alexei Kosygin directly to let him know that US military aircraft had been dispatched to investigate the incident, not to attack Russia. Several nuclear-armed F-4 Phantoms were recalled by Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, because the White House was terrified Russia might interpet it as an imminent attack. Russia produced the false report about Israel amassing troops on the border with Syria because Russia feared its ally was vulnerable and a threat from Egypt on Israel's southern border might dial back any escalation between Syria and Israel. When Israel decided to invade and annex the Syrian Golan Heights anyway, Russian pilots were ordered to pose as the Egyptian air force and attack Israel, including the Dimona nuclear facility. US brinkmanship dissuaded Russia from destroying Israel when President Johnson ordered the Sixth Fleet to position itself off the coast of Syria in the event that Russia tried to repel the Israeli invasion. The USS Liberty incident has ramifications far beyond a mere deliberate attack on a US ship. Jews almost succeeded in instigating WW3 between two nuclear armed counties. In the aftermath of attacking a US ship and attempting to flase flag the US into a nuclear war with Russia, the US now calls Israel its greatest ally.

Curse

20,892 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

encoresalad's profile picture

Tucker Carlson recently interviewed Jewish academic, Bret Weinstein, who spoke out against the policies of Israel. However, Bret didn't think Israel's policies were bad, just bad for Jews. He was appalled that his fellow Jews intepreted his criticism of Israel as him betraying "Team Jew." Truly remarkable. The moral of the story is that Jews generally don't make judgements using universal principles like "killing civilians is bad" or "bombing civilian infrastructure is wrong." Their principle is very particular: "is it good for Jews?" When reading Jewish academic writing, you'll get a sense of how ubiquitous this rationale is among Jews: "Is it good for Jews? – a question as old, in all probability, as the Jewish Diaspora itself – has not quite reached the end of its ancient career as a useful guide to thought." - Norman Podhoretz "I think they [anti-Jewish policies] warrant a revival among Jews of that ancient and prematurely laughed-off question, is it good for the Jews?" - Nathaniel Glazer "Is Europe good for the Jews?" - Steven Beller "And now a new generation of Jews comes to announce that 'Is it good for the Jews?' is an entirely reasonable, indeed self-respecting standard according to which the sociopolitical realm may be assessed. Some even insist it is the only appropriate standard." - Leonard Fein "Is it gut far Yidden?" - American Jewish Congress Setting aside the fact that the collective statement "good for Jews" demonstrates that Jews see themselves as a collective group – something they expressly forbid non-Jews from doing – Jews use "is it good for Jews" as a yardstick to measure all things. It is an end towards which everything else is made into a means: politics, history, and even the truth – the truth is not good unless it is good for Jews.

Curse

29,587 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

encoresalad's profile picture

Mike Cuckabee is repeating the same lie he told Tucker Carlson during his interview: "Israel spends its US military aid in the US, supporting the US economy." This lie has become the default rebuttal to anyone who challenges the rationale behind US military aid to Israel. Under the current Memorandum of Understanding, Israel is required to spend a gradually increasing amount of US aid inside of the US, while gradually decreasing the amount of aid it spends with its own defense industry in Israel. In other words, every year, "off-shore procurement" (OSP) must be reduced until the entirety of the US aid is spent within the US. The problem is, Israeli defense contractors have opened up subsidiaries in the US, so they're technically no longer considered "off-shore." So, Israel can theoretically spend all $3.8B in aid it receives every year with its own defense contractors in the US. These Israeli defense contractors may employ some American workers in non-sensitive roles, but the parent companies in Israel are still benefiting through the profit and expertise of their American operations. Some of the Israeli defense contractors who have set up subsidiaries in the US include Elbit Systems, IAI North America, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, XTEND, etc. Further, Israel is one of only a few countries that is allowed to use its aid to contract directly with US-based defense contractors, instead of being forced to use the Pentagon as a middleman to buy its weapons. This process is called Direct Commercial Sales (as opposed to Foreign Military Sales) which decreases the transparency in how Israel is spending its aid money since these transactions usually have confidentiality agreements. Having said all of this, Israel does spend some of its aid money with US defense contractors. For example, it used its aid grants to purchase the F-35 from Lockheed Martin. But, what 99% of the American public doesn't know is that the contracts for these purchases have offset agreements that force Lcokheed Martin to buy billions of dollars worth of parts, systems, and services from Israeli defense contractors which "offsets" the cost of Israel's purchases from US contractors by generating money for its own defense industry. Incidentally, the offset mechanism is a good proxy for how the new provision in the 2027 NDAA will work, essentially creating a dependency on the Israeli defense industry for the US military. Even though Israel would no longer receive aid, they would be jointly developing technology with the US, similar to what Raytheon and Rafael did with the Iron Dome. The irony of this is that after the Iron Dome was completed, Israel refused to give the US the software source code for it, so it couldn't be integrated into the US defense network. Solid partner, right? Also, in light of the shortage of rare earths within the US defense industry due to China tightening its export controls, it seems absurd that the US wants to increase its dependency on another foreign country for its own national security. In reality, the NDAA provision is just a way for Jews to hide Israel's parasitical relationship with the US since the US will continue to keep billions of dollars of weapons stockpiles in its WRSA-I weapons depot in Israel, which the Israelis can use if needed. This weapon reserve is funded by American taxpayers but is not counted as aid to Israel despite the fact that Israel uses it. And of course, Congress will pass any emergency aid appropriations if Israel needs additional military aid, just like Congress did after Israel depleted its stockpiles of bombs on Palestinian women and children. To sum up, Israel spends a significant portion of its US aid on its own contractors located in the US, and even when it does spend US aid on US contractors, they use offsets to force those contractors to buy parts from Israeli contractors. Israel is a parasite and Mike Cuckabee is aiding and abetting the fleecing of America.

Curse

13,343 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar