eugenio8a8

@eugenio8a8 • 11,155 subscribers

I helped fix the CS2 spray CS2 Data/Mechanics Analysis CS2 updates coverage PC optimizations: https://t.co/HstDAfbSNH @SkinPlaceOff Affiliate | @RazedESport

Live Cam

eugenio8a8

Shorts

The crazy thing is, this is true. Against an armored opponent, the M4A4 does a max of 23 damage to the torso or arms, making it a 5-shot kill. But to the pelvis/stomach? 28 damage per shot, making it a 4-shot kill. So yeah…aim for the dick ahaha

Its Sunday, nothing to do, so I was watching some old CSGO clips… back when positioning mattered, holding angles was possible, and the game felt crisp. I really miss that... Share your old clips below if you want as well.

Scoreboard FPS difference, on the right the new build and in the left the old build Old build -&gt;From 482 to 420 after opening New build -&gt;From 480 to 447 after opening I did put the same effort as they did with the anti-cheat Honestly i dont care about the scoreboard fps

For some stupid people that never played CS:GO Here you have the "no silent ladder climb before cs2" (sorry i could had done better, iam just rusty as hell in movement tech, even tho is ez asf)

Visual aimpunch with armor is back on the menu. You can clearly see that when I get hit, the angles change together with the player camera. You see the angle value in the left side pay attention to the pitch value (the start value with 1.34) CS2

It was already posted on reddit, people work fast ahahah ESL

Videos

Watch Anya Live

Everyone remembers NiKo’s infamous Deagle miss at Stockholm 2021. But was it really a choke? So after he finally got his major i decided to test it. I recreated the shot and ran 100,000 shots simulations to see what actually happened. The result: only a 23.4% chance to hit.

The new map DE_SPLINTER just dropped today by FMPONE , here’s a quick tour. This might be one of the best-looking maps in all of CS2 .

I ran a simulation in my viewer with 5,000 shots to estimate the chance of Roland "ultimate" Tomkowiak hitting that nasty jumping Deagle shot. The spread values, positions, and angles were all taken directly from the demo. Result: about 1% chance of hitting that shot. Team Liquid

So I watched the demo of this game/shot, and there’s no way the AK-47 could have that much spread/inaccuracy and still land this type of shot. Here’s the demo replay, you can judge for yourself... I don’t need my tools to figure this one out.

Did ropz whiff this Deagle shot versus B8 Esports? Well, a bit. I recreated the exact shot in my CS2 viewer and ran 10k spread rays: 36.9% lethal headshot 62.6% for 31 dmg 0.5% full miss He did hit for 31, which was actually the most likely outcome.

1/8 More on CS2’s new Silent Reload: Hold reload for ~0.2s to activate it. You can trigger it at any point during the reload, but you must keep holding to stay silent Only the silent portion runs at 2x duration, so activating it early gives the longest reload, up to ~2x total.

Me for the next few weeks on Mirage with the new update… shoot vase + window vent → reload USP → stop → think → realize → “oh f***” 💀 CS2

CS2 – AWP Accuracy Case Study After scoping in, the AWP takes ~1.77s to reach full accuracy while standing. And yes, I’m not joking: the video below shows the crosshair’s accuracy/spread radius (in pixels) along with the real values displayed in the top-left corner.

So, I tested armored aimpunch in CS2 vs CS:GO, and the results might surprise you. Yep, clickbait title. They’re the same. Here’s the video comparison with the AK-47, followed by the graph. Max CS2 value: 0.478784 degrees Max CS:GO value: 0.478100 degrees CS2

For anyone who thinks armored aimpunch was only added in the recent update: They added visual aimpunch. The normal aimpunch was already applied server-side, but no visual feedback Video from before the update, using loopback 0 and Nospread The blue markers are server-side hits

How unlikely was this insane 1v3 from gr1ks of BIG versus Team Spirit CS2 ? From 27 comparable pro rounds, the CT won only 11% of the time. I then recreated every shot: 93.14% → 54.12% → 5.43%. Full sequence probability: just 2.74%

I finally found the cause of the 16:9 vs 4:3 shadow issue in CS2: CSM (Cascaded Shadow Maps). In this video you can see a simulation based on a RenderDoc capture, showing how aspect ratio changes the camera frustum and cascade coverage. CS2

So G2 HOLMES posted a crazy shot here on X yesterday, and because I had nothing better to do, I asked him for the demo to measure the odds of hitting that crazy jump shot. Out of 10K simulated shots, 304 landed on the head, making it ~ 3% chance of getting that kill.

After a month, first part of the project done — tons of learning and headaches. We’re inside the matrix now: better results, better tests, more accuracy. (Insecure mode used — otherwise VAC flags it, only for data collection.)

A friend of mine send me this, were the bomb falls under the map in mirage...well i think you got a lot of work to do.... because you broke a lot of things CS2

While playing with my friends, we noticed that grenades no longer collide with teammates. The first clip is from before the patch. We tested it after the update on a dedicated server with competitive settings, still happening. Please fix. CS2

People keep asking why spray doesn’t feel as smooth as CS:GO. My answer: until frame pacing is fixed, it won’t. I made an animation of the AK-47 spray magnitude at different FPS to show how the magnitude of the view angles, changes with FPS, as it should. CS2

CS2 – The Problem of Movement dependency on FPS In the video below, a macro holds a movement key for exactly 750.000 ms at different FPS values. The result is clear: lower FPS produces less precise final movement, while higher FPS gives much more accurate positioning.

Scoreboard FPS difference, on the right the new build and in the left the old build Old build ->From 482 to 420 after opening New build ->From 480 to 447 after opening I did put the same effort as they did with the anti-cheat Honestly i dont care about the scoreboard fps