
GMI Cloud
@gmi_cloud • 6,129 subscribers
AI-native Inference Cloud. Questions: https://t.co/0lGtMMaeY6 JP - @gmicloudJapan,SG - @gmicloudsg
Shorts
Videos

We tested Kimi K3 against Claude Fable 5 on 3D modeling and animation Asked both to recreate the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars in 1) pixel style 2) original style. Both are on Max effort. Kimi K3 took a bit longer than Fable 5 to generate, but came in ~1/3 cheaper on the 1st test, and less than half the cost on the 2nd. Interestingly, Kimi K3 handled the details at the same level as Fable 5 on the original creation, yet it wasn't at Fable's level for the pixel style. Test 1 (Pixel) Kimi K3: 1hr 11min · $14.5 Fable 5: 49min · $21 Test 2 (Original) Kimi K3: 1hr 17min · $19.3 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $47.2
GMI Cloud75,592 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮
GMI Cloud149,945 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲
GMI Cloud126,686 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Claude fable 5 is operating in a completely different dimension 🤯 Compared it with Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT 5.5, the visual gap is insane. From 3D fluid dynamics to volumetric animation and complex physics, Fable 5 crushes the game. It’s not even close.
GMI Cloud319,682 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GMI Studio is officially here. We’ve moved beyond multimodal hubs to create a dedicated workflow engine for high-end AI creation. - Long-form video (2 min+). - 1 image, 10 video styles, cinematic output. - 1.4x faster generation speed, powered by GMI inference. - Social feed: Discover and like. The beta is over. The studio is open.
GMI Cloud971,337 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)
GMI Cloud86,444 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Initially, our virtual employees were deployed across Mac Minis in our office and AWS EC2 instances. But they were scattered and hard to access. GMI Agent Box helps us scale more employees and manage them all in one place.” - Chenglin Wei, CTO of Topify.ai We sat down with Chenglin on how Topify uses Agent Box to run agentic employees with isolated environments, centralized management, and a clearer view into usage and monetization.
GMI Cloud113,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GMI is investing $500M to build a high-density AI data center in Taiwan powered by ~7,000 NVIDIA Blackwell GB300 GPUs across 96 racks, delivering nearly 2M tokens/sec when it comes online in March 2026. A new 50MW U.S. facility is also in development to support growing demand. Thanks to Reuters and Bloomberg Bloomberg for covering the update
GMI Cloud604,133 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Claude Opus 4.8 beats Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro !! We ran a multimodal gaming comparison across these four closed source models. Opus 4.8 took the longest to generate, but it came out ahead, capturing the most elements from the prompt and successfully hitting the rival cars. GPT 5.5 is still good, but Gemini is no longer the best multimodal model now
GMI Cloud116,249 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ran two prompts in Kimi K2.7 Code HighSpeed, Kimi K2.7 Code, and GLM 5.2 HighSpeed is 2.5 to 4.2 times faster than Kimi K2.7 Code while producing comparable quality 4.5 to 15 times faster than GLM 5.2, and half the price (or less) These are simple tests, so the pricing difference is small and speed difference could diverge a lot But definitely a hell of a lot faster with good output
GMI Cloud38,008 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Compared MiniMax M3 against three other frontier open-source models: DeepSeek V4, Qwen 3.7 Max, and MiMo 2.5 Pro MiniMax M3 crashed others on: 1. collision physics 2. 3D pinball generation It was the only model that produced a result for the 3D pinball test For human motion rendering and hexagon sketching, Qwen 3.7 Max still tops
GMI Cloud51,116 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Spent 2 hours on Artificial Analysis’s video comparison page, and Happy Horse kept showing up. So we recorded a few matchups: - Veo 3.1 Lite vs Happy Horse - Kling v3 vs Happy Horse - SkyReel v4 vs Happy Horse - PixVerse v6 vs Happy Horse Early take: it’s surprisingly good at multi-shot generation.
GMI Cloud59,976 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Xiaomi MIMO V2.5 Pro MIMO V2.5-Pro wins by: 1. ~1 min faster than DeepSeek-V4-Pro 2. cleaner aesthetic Our reasoning: MIMO V2.5 Pro is natively multimodal, so it has a stronger sense of what good visuals look like. Curious to see how DeepSeek V4 Vision will change that
GMI Cloud40,379 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
