GMI Cloud
@gmi_cloud • 8,713 subscribers
one cloud for compute, inference, and agents
Shorts
Videos
GMI Studio is officially here. We’ve moved beyond multimodal hubs to create a dedicated workflow engine for high-end AI creation. - Long-form video (2 min+). - 1 image, 10 video styles, cinematic output. - 1.4x faster generation speed, powered by GMI inference. - Social feed: Discover and like. The beta is over. The studio is open.
GMI Cloud971,337 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten
Claude fable 5 is operating in a completely different dimension 🤯 Compared it with Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT 5.5, the visual gap is insane. From 3D fluid dynamics to volumetric animation and complex physics, Fable 5 crushes the game. It’s not even close.
GMI Cloud320,134 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
Win 3 months of MiniMax Token Plan Max and $200 in GMI credits! We're running a 14-day MiniMaxthon with MiniMax (official) , one winner per track: - Multimodal - Synthesis (Multimodal + LLM) - Reasoning (LLM only) Build for free using M3, M2.7, Music 3.0, and Speech 2.8 on GMI Submit 👇
GMI Cloud34,747 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen
Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮
GMI Cloud150,809 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲
GMI Cloud130,438 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
meet Dino, our developer representative It has a chip body cuz compute is the foundation for everything we develop here at GMI we hope to bring our API key (or Dino) to more coding platforms in the future let us know where you'd want to use GMI API key! dino emojis on the way, and we'll bring it to our discord as well
GMI Cloud105,520 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
GMI is investing $500M to build a high-density AI data center in Taiwan powered by ~7,000 NVIDIA Blackwell GB300 GPUs across 96 racks, delivering nearly 2M tokens/sec when it comes online in March 2026. A new 50MW U.S. facility is also in development to support growing demand. Thanks to Reuters and Bloomberg Bloomberg for covering the update
GMI Cloud604,810 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten
We tested Kimi K3 against Claude Fable 5 on 3D modeling and animation Asked both to recreate the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars in 1) pixel style 2) original style. Both are on Max effort. Kimi K3 took a bit longer than Fable 5 to generate, but came in ~1/3 cheaper on the 1st test, and less than half the cost on the 2nd. Interestingly, Kimi K3 handled the details at the same level as Fable 5 on the original creation, yet it wasn't at Fable's level for the pixel style. Test 1 (Pixel) Kimi K3: 1hr 11min · $14.5 Fable 5: 49min · $21 Test 2 (Original) Kimi K3: 1hr 17min · $19.3 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $47.2
GMI Cloud80,618 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Initially, our virtual employees were deployed across Mac Minis in our office and AWS EC2 instances. But they were scattered and hard to access. GMI Agent Box helps us scale more employees and manage them all in one place.” - Chenglin Wei, CTO of Topify.ai We sat down with Chenglin on how Topify uses Agent Box to run agentic employees with isolated environments, centralized management, and a clearer view into usage and monetization.
GMI Cloud113,640 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
Crazy. Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 on 3d modeling at 2/3 the price We tested Opus 5, Fable 5, and GPT 5.6 Sol on the same prompt: build an explorable Japanese suburban street in Three.js, full 3D, rendered like a hand-drawn anime background. All on Max effort. Opus 5 took the longest but delivered the most varied scenery: clean dark outlines, flat cel-shaded color bands, dense street details down to the vending machine signage. Fable paid more attention to details, and while GPT 5.6 Sol was 3-4x cheaper and the fastest, but the render shows it: sparse, washed out, barely styled. Opus 5: 1hr 21min · $26.7 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $35 GPT 5.6 Sol: 41min · $7.1
GMI Cloud53,982 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)
GMI Cloud86,695 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
Claude Opus 4.8 beats Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro !! We ran a multimodal gaming comparison across these four closed source models. Opus 4.8 took the longest to generate, but it came out ahead, capturing the most elements from the prompt and successfully hitting the rival cars. GPT 5.5 is still good, but Gemini is no longer the best multimodal model now
GMI Cloud116,538 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten