MJ Murphy
@hothingsgirlsay • 23,501 subscribers
XX FEMALE; I love to make others laugh, but I care more about women’s rights. NYC Standup Comic & Designer of Sellout Experiences and Events.
Videos
6:00
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
They do it every single time. The debate starts with a policy: Sports. Prisons. Changing rooms. Data collection. Safeguarding. Sex-based rights. And then suddenly we’re no longer talking about the policy. We’re told we’re debating someone’s existence. No. We’re debating a policy. We’re debating rules. We’re debating competing rights and competing interests. Changing the subject from policy to existence is one of the most effective rhetorical tricks in this entire debate because it instantly turns disagreement into cruelty. The moment someone says: “Why are you debating my existence?” Stop them. Bring it right back. “No. We’re debating a policy.” Again. And again. And again. Because if they can convince people that policy disagreement equals denying someone’s existence, they’ve already won the argument without having to defend the policy. Who’s willing to start calling this out? Not next year. Not when it’s convenient. Now. Every time it happens. “No. That’s not what we’re debating.” Watch how often the conversation changes the moment you refuse to let them switch the subject.
MJ Murphy90,180 次观看 • 15 天前
What you’re watching here is a classic reframing pattern. Ilana starts with something almost everyone can agree with: Most people have felt uncomfortable in their body. Women are told they’re too fat, too thin, too curvy, not curvy enough. Men are told they’re too weak, too soft, not muscular enough, not masculine enough. That part is true. But then comes the linguistic sleight of hand. She takes ordinary body insecurity… and slides it into the claim that the “trans experience” is just a more visible version of what everyone feels. That is the frame. Not: this is a specific belief system. Not: this involves medicalization. Not: this has consequences for women’s spaces, sports, prisons, or children. Instead, the frame becomes: “Everyone feels wrong in their body, and trans identity is just the brave, visible example of finding your true self.” That sounds compassionate. But it also erases the distinction between discomfort with your body and rejecting the reality of your sex. Because almost everyone has felt insecure. But that does not mean everyone is secretly experiencing some version of transness. That is the NLP move. Ilana creates agreement with a universal human experience… then she attaches that agreement to a much more controversial claim. And once you accept the frame, disagreement starts to sound cruel. That is how the spell works.
MJ Murphy12,414 次观看 • 2 天前
People have been asking me to break this conversation down, and this is the first clip I’m doing. Watch how the language gets used to hypnotize people in real time. Women’s sex-based spaces get downgraded to spaces “typically reserved” for women. Serious concerns about privacy, boundaries, trauma, and safeguarding get reduced to mere “discomfort.” Male inclusion gets framed as compassion, while female objection gets framed as prejudice. This is how rights are eroded: not all at once, but word by word. In this clip I break down the persuasion tactics, the reframing, the minimization, the false equivalencies, and the emotional language designed to make women doubt their own boundaries. Because women did not fight for shelters, prisons, locker rooms, rape crisis centers, and sports categories just for men to redefine them with polished talking points. And remember this line: if women’s discomfort is not a reason to exclude men, then men’s discomfort is not a reason to be included. Once you learn to spot the language tricks, the spell breaks. #WomenMatter #SexBasedRights #ProtectWomen #NLP #Persuasion #DebateBreakdown #RealityMatters #WomensSports #FreeSpeech #CriticalThinking
MJ Murphy81,567 次观看 • 1 个月前
