Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd's banner
Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd's profile picture

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

@ibmsulaymani • 8,269 subscribers

https://t.co/4tianb9dCL

Shorts

“I can read Arabic.” ~ Daniel Haqiqatjou

“I can read Arabic.” ~ Daniel Haqiqatjou

255,805 views

Daniel Haqiqatjou: “The Wahhābīs supported the Arab revolt.” The man who claims to be some revolutionary critique of Wahhabism can’t even tell the difference between King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz and Sharīf Ḥusayn. Embarrassing.

Daniel Haqiqatjou: “The Wahhābīs supported the Arab revolt.” The man who claims to be some revolutionary critique of Wahhabism can’t even tell the difference between King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz and Sharīf Ḥusayn. Embarrassing.

119,287 views

Daniel Haqiqatjou didn’t like my name being brought up.

Daniel Haqiqatjou didn’t like my name being brought up.

33,053 views

Try not to cringe at the broken Arabic

Sensitive content

Try not to cringe at the broken Arabic

126,095 views

🧵 𝐃𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐡ʾ𝐚𝐫ī𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌ā𝐭𝐮𝐫ī𝐝ī𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐚𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬? 𝐅𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭 One of the most commonly repeated tropes you hear from the opponents of Sunnī orthodoxy are the “fabricated” works that are allegedly the basis for the Sunnī creed. In light of this phenomena, let’s have some fun by applying the false conditions they mandate on our works onto their books, the books of the Ashʾarī and Māturīdī kalām schools. Their creedal works consist of manuscripts with no chains, dates, unknown scribes and narrators, and sometimes even liars! [1] Kitāb al-Tawḥīd by Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī (d. 333H) [2] Kitāb al-Ghunyah by al-Mutawallī (d. 478H) [3] Kitāb al-Lumaʾ Fī al-Radd ʿAlā Ahl al-Zaygh wal-Bidaʾ by Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʾarī (d. 324H) [4] Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn by Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʾarī [5] Istihsān al-Khawḍ Fī ʿIlm al-Kalām by al-Ashʾarī [6] Mujarrad Maqālāt al-Ashʾarī by Ibn Fūrak (d. 406H) [7] Mushkil al-Ḥadīth wa-Bayānuh by Ibn Fūrak [8] Sharḥ al-ʿĀlim wal-Mutaʿallim by Ibn Fūrak [9] Al-Ḥudūd Fī al-Uṣūl by Abū Bakr Ibn Fūrak [10] Kitāb al-Bayān by al-Bāqillānī (d. 403H) [11] Kitāb al-Inṣāf (also titled Risālat al-Ḥurrah) by al-Bāqillānī [12] Kitāb al-Tamhīd by al-Bāqillānī [13] The Book of the Questions of the People of Rayy by al-Bāqillānī [14] Laṭāʾif al-Ishārāt by Abū al-Qāsim al-Qushayrī (d. 465H) [15] The Complaint of Ahl al-Sunnah by al-Qushayrī [16] The Creed of Abū Isḥāq al-Isfarāʾīnī (d. 418H) [17] Al-Tabṣīr Fī al-Dīn by Abū al-Muẓaffar al-Isfarāʾīnī (d. 471H) [18] Al-Shāmil by al-Juwaynī (d. 478H) [19] Al-Asmāʾ wal-Ṣifāt by ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Baghdādī (d. 429H) [20] ʿIyār al-Naẓar by ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Baghdādī

🧵 𝐃𝐨 𝐀𝐬𝐡ʾ𝐚𝐫ī𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌ā𝐭𝐮𝐫ī𝐝ī𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐚𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬? 𝐅𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭 One of the most commonly repeated tropes you hear from the opponents of Sunnī orthodoxy are the “fabricated” works that are allegedly the basis for the Sunnī creed. In light of this phenomena, let’s have some fun by applying the false conditions they mandate on our works onto their books, the books of the Ashʾarī and Māturīdī kalām schools. Their creedal works consist of manuscripts with no chains, dates, unknown scribes and narrators, and sometimes even liars! [1] Kitāb al-Tawḥīd by Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī (d. 333H) [2] Kitāb al-Ghunyah by al-Mutawallī (d. 478H) [3] Kitāb al-Lumaʾ Fī al-Radd ʿAlā Ahl al-Zaygh wal-Bidaʾ by Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʾarī (d. 324H) [4] Maqālāt al-Islāmiyyīn by Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʾarī [5] Istihsān al-Khawḍ Fī ʿIlm al-Kalām by al-Ashʾarī [6] Mujarrad Maqālāt al-Ashʾarī by Ibn Fūrak (d. 406H) [7] Mushkil al-Ḥadīth wa-Bayānuh by Ibn Fūrak [8] Sharḥ al-ʿĀlim wal-Mutaʿallim by Ibn Fūrak [9] Al-Ḥudūd Fī al-Uṣūl by Abū Bakr Ibn Fūrak [10] Kitāb al-Bayān by al-Bāqillānī (d. 403H) [11] Kitāb al-Inṣāf (also titled Risālat al-Ḥurrah) by al-Bāqillānī [12] Kitāb al-Tamhīd by al-Bāqillānī [13] The Book of the Questions of the People of Rayy by al-Bāqillānī [14] Laṭāʾif al-Ishārāt by Abū al-Qāsim al-Qushayrī (d. 465H) [15] The Complaint of Ahl al-Sunnah by al-Qushayrī [16] The Creed of Abū Isḥāq al-Isfarāʾīnī (d. 418H) [17] Al-Tabṣīr Fī al-Dīn by Abū al-Muẓaffar al-Isfarāʾīnī (d. 471H) [18] Al-Shāmil by al-Juwaynī (d. 478H) [19] Al-Asmāʾ wal-Ṣifāt by ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Baghdādī (d. 429H) [20] ʿIyār al-Naẓar by ʿAbd al-Qāhir al-Baghdādī

45,678 views

If you remember this gem, hats off to you.

If you remember this gem, hats off to you.

15,132 views

Videos

LIVE
1.2k

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.aiSponsored•Livecam
Streaming Now

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

HD live stream
Exclusive private shows
1.2k viewers online

Free preview available • Premium content

Here is Muḥammad Ḥijāb boasting to Asrār Rashīd about how his great-grand father was a Ṣūfī “saint” in Ṭantā. The Ṣūfī “saints” of Egypt were responsible for spreading some of the worst filth, corruption, shirk and innovation to their own people. For a so-called “Atharī-Ḥanbalī” there is no pride to be taken for having heritage in such satanic traditions.
3:20
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Here is Muḥammad Ḥijāb boasting to Asrār Rashīd about how his great-grand father was a Ṣūfī “saint” in Ṭantā. The Ṣūfī “saints” of Egypt were responsible for spreading some of the worst filth, corruption, shirk and innovation to their own people. For a so-called “Atharī-Ḥanbalī” there is no pride to be taken for having heritage in such satanic traditions.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

90,408 views • 17 days ago

Daniel Haqiqatjou has a long history of defending Assad’s rule in Syria, claiming his rule wasn’t sectarian and Sunnīs voluntarily fought for his army and weren’t forced. He claimed that sectarianism in Assad’s rule is “US propaganda.” Haqiqatjou must not be allowed to rewrite his track record on this subject. We come with receipts.
1:54
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Daniel Haqiqatjou has a long history of defending Assad’s rule in Syria, claiming his rule wasn’t sectarian and Sunnīs voluntarily fought for his army and weren’t forced. He claimed that sectarianism in Assad’s rule is “US propaganda.” Haqiqatjou must not be allowed to rewrite his track record on this subject. We come with receipts.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

83,162 views • 28 days ago

Itachi: Is the Ashʾarī/Māturīdī rejection of Allāh being above the throne a bidʿah or an acceptable disagreement? Muḥammad Ḥijāb: *Spends 3 minutes not answering the question*
2:02
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Itachi: Is the Ashʾarī/Māturīdī rejection of Allāh being above the throne a bidʿah or an acceptable disagreement? Muḥammad Ḥijāb: *Spends 3 minutes not answering the question*

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

108,409 views • 1 month ago

“I grew up with this feeling that the Ṣaḥābah betrayed their trust to the Prophet ﷺ. My dad was very clear in his dislike towards Sunnīs, and growing up in Irān they would have a specific day just for cursing ʿUmar b. al-Khaṭṭāb.” ~ Daniel Haqiqatjou
1:01
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

“I grew up with this feeling that the Ṣaḥābah betrayed their trust to the Prophet ﷺ. My dad was very clear in his dislike towards Sunnīs, and growing up in Irān they would have a specific day just for cursing ʿUmar b. al-Khaṭṭāb.” ~ Daniel Haqiqatjou

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

47,080 views • 1 month ago

Come on Mohammed Hijab this is embarrassing. You claimed that the Imāms of the Najdī daʾwah made takfīr of every Muslim living under Ottoman rule, yet when Adnan asked you to provide evidence you immediately changed the subject.
1:05
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Come on Mohammed Hijab this is embarrassing. You claimed that the Imāms of the Najdī daʾwah made takfīr of every Muslim living under Ottoman rule, yet when Adnan asked you to provide evidence you immediately changed the subject.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

137,190 views • 3 months ago

When the British offered King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz an alliance against the Ottomans, King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz rejected it, saying his famous statement: “I don’t want people to say that ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz rose up against the alleged ‘Caliphate’ during its time of trial.” However when the Ottomans offered King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Makkah in exchange for fighting the British with them, King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz also refused this, for he did not trust the Ottomans at all due to their frequent treachery and deceit. ~ Sh Faiṣal al-Jāsim
2:24
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

When the British offered King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz an alliance against the Ottomans, King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz rejected it, saying his famous statement: “I don’t want people to say that ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz rose up against the alleged ‘Caliphate’ during its time of trial.” However when the Ottomans offered King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Makkah in exchange for fighting the British with them, King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz also refused this, for he did not trust the Ottomans at all due to their frequent treachery and deceit. ~ Sh Faiṣal al-Jāsim

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

219,904 views • 7 months ago

The same Dr Shadee makes takfīr on those who believe Allāh is above the throne. Never let an Ashʾarī accuse the Wahhābīs of being the takfīrīs when their classical scholars literally mass takfīr the Muslim populations in their books.
0:26
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

The same Dr Shadee makes takfīr on those who believe Allāh is above the throne. Never let an Ashʾarī accuse the Wahhābīs of being the takfīrīs when their classical scholars literally mass takfīr the Muslim populations in their books.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

236,945 views • 9 months ago

⚠️ Trigger Warning: Truth Bomb ⚠️ The Ottoman Sulṭān ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd II was actually the one that gave away Palestine to the Jews. Some of you simply aren’t ready for this conversation yet.
1:55
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

⚠️ Trigger Warning: Truth Bomb ⚠️ The Ottoman Sulṭān ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd II was actually the one that gave away Palestine to the Jews. Some of you simply aren’t ready for this conversation yet.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

137,249 views • 7 months ago

Brothels and prostitution houses were established throughout the Ottoman Empire, including in Makkah and Madīnah.
2:02

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Brothels and prostitution houses were established throughout the Ottoman Empire, including in Makkah and Madīnah.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

143,661 views • 8 months ago

Daniel Haqiqatjou and Mohammed Hijab behave in the exact same way: Make an argument, get completely refuted, and wait for a few months to repeat it in the hopes that everyone forgot you were embarrassed. The Ottomans and their Egyptian puppets made takfīr on the Wahhābīs first and proceeded to wage war on them, whereas Mohammed Hijab invents his own history and claims it happened in reverse. Again, I addressed this months ago and Ḥijāb had no refutation.
1:04
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Daniel Haqiqatjou and Mohammed Hijab behave in the exact same way: Make an argument, get completely refuted, and wait for a few months to repeat it in the hopes that everyone forgot you were embarrassed. The Ottomans and their Egyptian puppets made takfīr on the Wahhābīs first and proceeded to wage war on them, whereas Mohammed Hijab invents his own history and claims it happened in reverse. Again, I addressed this months ago and Ḥijāb had no refutation.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

36,296 views • 1 month ago

Another comedic masterpiece from Daniel Haqiqatjou: “The First Saudi State allied with the British to help them create Israel.” The First Saudi State ended in 1818. The British mandate of Palestine began in 1917.
0:35
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Another comedic masterpiece from Daniel Haqiqatjou: “The First Saudi State allied with the British to help them create Israel.” The First Saudi State ended in 1818. The British mandate of Palestine began in 1917.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

57,598 views • 3 months ago

Daniel Haqiqatjou describes the alleged ‘mass killing’ the Wahhābīs carried out in al-Ṭāʾif in 1803, slaughtering people praying in mosques, studying the Qurʾān, and even babies being breastfed by their mothers. He even plays sounds effects of babies crying to emotionally manipulate the listener. ❌ There’s just one problem: This is all fake news. None of this ever happened. Aḥmad Zaynī Daḥlān was a well known a liar and wasn’t even alive when ʿUthmān al-Muḍāyifī took al-Ṭāʾif.
0:51
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Daniel Haqiqatjou describes the alleged ‘mass killing’ the Wahhābīs carried out in al-Ṭāʾif in 1803, slaughtering people praying in mosques, studying the Qurʾān, and even babies being breastfed by their mothers. He even plays sounds effects of babies crying to emotionally manipulate the listener. ❌ There’s just one problem: This is all fake news. None of this ever happened. Aḥmad Zaynī Daḥlān was a well known a liar and wasn’t even alive when ʿUthmān al-Muḍāyifī took al-Ṭāʾif.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

93,715 views • 6 months ago

Muḥammad Ḥijāb told you to your face that he refuses to criticise the leaders in the Muslim world because it’s ’not his place to do so,’ which made you visibly uncomfortable. If you were consistent, you would call him a paid agent like you do to others, but it’s obvious you have one standard for your friends and another for your critics.
1:17
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Muḥammad Ḥijāb told you to your face that he refuses to criticise the leaders in the Muslim world because it’s ’not his place to do so,’ which made you visibly uncomfortable. If you were consistent, you would call him a paid agent like you do to others, but it’s obvious you have one standard for your friends and another for your critics.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

73,548 views • 5 months ago

Here is Daniel Haqiqatjou’s new friend promoting Yāsir al-Ḥabīb’s book that accuses ʿĀʾishah of vile things, including zinā. He accuses ʿĀʾishah of killing the Prophet ﷺ and also takfīrs Abū Bakr and ʿUmar, calling them ‘al-jibt’ and ‘al-ṭāghūt.’ Daniel Haqiqatjou Is this the man you call your “brother” now?
0:51
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Here is Daniel Haqiqatjou’s new friend promoting Yāsir al-Ḥabīb’s book that accuses ʿĀʾishah of vile things, including zinā. He accuses ʿĀʾishah of killing the Prophet ﷺ and also takfīrs Abū Bakr and ʿUmar, calling them ‘al-jibt’ and ‘al-ṭāghūt.’ Daniel Haqiqatjou Is this the man you call your “brother” now?

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

86,832 views • 6 months ago

SHOCKING: Sālim al-Ṭawīl says the people of Gaza are NOT martyrs!
0:24
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

SHOCKING: Sālim al-Ṭawīl says the people of Gaza are NOT martyrs!

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

140,445 views • 1 year ago

How did the Ottoman Empire take care of Makkah and Madīnah? They didn’t.
2:29
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

How did the Ottoman Empire take care of Makkah and Madīnah? They didn’t.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

77,256 views • 7 months ago

Cursing the Ṣaḥābah is a common practice in Irān Here is a 13-minute compilation of prominent Rāfiḍī clearings in Irān insulting, cursing and making takfīr of the Ṣaḥābah, as well as public congregations in Irān partaking in such cursing. Daniel Haqiqatjou wants to hide these examples from you in order to run cover for Khameini’s taqīyyah.
13:48
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

Cursing the Ṣaḥābah is a common practice in Irān Here is a 13-minute compilation of prominent Rāfiḍī clearings in Irān insulting, cursing and making takfīr of the Ṣaḥābah, as well as public congregations in Irān partaking in such cursing. Daniel Haqiqatjou wants to hide these examples from you in order to run cover for Khameini’s taqīyyah.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

92,103 views • 9 months ago

The Ottoman Empire, under Sulṭān Selim I in 922-923H, brutalised the populations of Egypt and Syria upon conquering them. This included burning books, violating the honour of women, slaughtering children and looting wealth. (Full video linked in the quoted video)
1:43
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

The Ottoman Empire, under Sulṭān Selim I in 922-923H, brutalised the populations of Egypt and Syria upon conquering them. This included burning books, violating the honour of women, slaughtering children and looting wealth. (Full video linked in the quoted video)

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

95,379 views • 9 months ago

More terrible information from Daniel Haqiqatjou’s documentary Fake News ❌: “The entire Arabian Peninsula was under Ottoman rule, so the Wahhābī takeover of Najd was a rebellion against the Ottomans.” Reality ✅: “Apart from the Ḥijāz and al-Aḥsāʾ, the Arabian Peninsula and its numerous towns were ruled by separate individual governors who were constantly at war with each other.” Kindly consult my thread below for an enormous collection of proof for this.
0:37
ibmsulaymani's profile picture

More terrible information from Daniel Haqiqatjou’s documentary Fake News ❌: “The entire Arabian Peninsula was under Ottoman rule, so the Wahhābī takeover of Najd was a rebellion against the Ottomans.” Reality ✅: “Apart from the Ḥijāz and al-Aḥsāʾ, the Arabian Peninsula and its numerous towns were ruled by separate individual governors who were constantly at war with each other.” Kindly consult my thread below for an enormous collection of proof for this.

Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd

22,127 views • 1 month ago