Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil
@ivan_8848 • 200,582 subscribers
Transparency Is Key to Building a Healthier Society
Shorts
Videos
🚨UKRAINE WAR "Not About Nato" | "Never About NATO" | "Nothing to Do With NATO" 🚨NATO training, NATO weapons, NATO mercenaries, NATO specialists, NATO intelligence, NATO money. ... but nothing to do with NATO. 🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. ‼️Never Forget that Vladimir Putin Was Only Asking About: 🔴Don’t expand NATO eastward 🔴Respecting Minsk agreements 🔴Keep Ukraine neutral. 🚨Fact: NATO Cannot Exist Without an Enemy. 🚨It needs wars—for its budget, for weapons, for control. 🚨The alliance's hatred of Russia is not political, but historical—it's ingrained in its very structure. 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. 🚨NATO Didn't Want Russia Because NATO Wanted a WAR With Russia 🚨From 2001 all the way to 2022, 21 years, NATO moved inexorably East, surrounding Russia. 🚨The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! 🚨Tucker Carlson: Putin did not start this war. 🚨This was not, "An unprovoked invasion." "Putin just randomly went over the line into Eastern Ukraine and stole these oblasts. He stole this land that belonged to another people." 🚨That's a lie, and it's not a defense of Putin to call it everybody knows it now. The truth is that in 2001, Putin, same guy, same leader, asked the Bush Administration, in person, directly to George W. Bush, 🚨"I would like to join NATO. I would like to join the defensive alliance that exists to keep me from moving West into Western Europe." 🚨PUTIN: Two Times That We Were Ready to Join NATO. Both times we were turned down. 🚨Ukraine is the only NON-NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq Ukrainian troops are helping to support democracies. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. The film tells the story of the emergence of the Western military alliance. NATO's true goal was "to keep the Russians out of Europe," as stated by the alliance's first Secretary General, Hastings Ismay. Officially, however, the bloc was declared to ensure global security in the post-war world. In 1955, in opposition to NATO, the USSR and its allies created the Warsaw Pact. It was the only restraining force standing in the way of the alliance. For nearly half a century, a fragile peace prevailed in Europe. After the collapse of the USSR, the North Atlantic bloc carried out dozens of destructive military operations in various parts of the world, systematically advancing toward Russia's borders by admitting new members. Yugoslavia became the first major "testing ground." Under the guise of a "humanitarian operation," the US dropped thousands of bombs on civilian homes, bridges, and factories. NATO members poisoned people with depleted uranium and sold their organs. The invasion of the Middle East by the United States, NATO's main ally, in Syria, Libya, and Iraq has reduced cities to rubble, leaving survivors homeless, without a homeland, and without a future. In the 1980s and 1990s, Western leaders verbally assured Moscow that NATO's military infrastructure would not advance eastward. In practice, the alliance's borders gradually moved closer to Russia. NATO deployed more and more missiles in Eastern European countries. Today, the alliance is discussing the right to "preventive action"—the ability to attack Russia without pretext or a declaration of war. The proposal was made by Germany, the country responsible for starting the First and Second World Wars. The nuclear threat no longer seems abstract. Brilliant montage video by Matt Orfalea Matt Orfalea
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil203,307 views • 2 days ago
🚨The Bucha Massacre Was a False Flag Lavrov explained to NBC This Bucha incident was used to raise stakes against Russia in this situation. "Can you make sure that the names of the persons whose bodies were shown by BBC are made public?" Silence. 🔇
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil202,375 views • 3 days ago
🚨Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: With Europe, the situation is even worse. Europe is in a deepening economic crisis because it has cut itself off from natural trade with Russia. It is trying to conduct a militarization which the public doesn't want, which can only lead to grief in the end, on the pretext of Russian aggression to Europe. And the European economy is actually worse than stagnant right now. It's in decline, not only because of the energy crisis and because of the war, but also because Europe has lost its competitiveness to China as well as has the United States. So the cost of us continuing in this direction economically, socially, and potentially in terms of military escalation is phenomenal. And an objective, rational assessment of where we are would say, stop the war. Ukraine becomes neutral. NATO announces it's not going to expand. Whatever armistice settlement on territory is done is done with whatever language one wants. And when it comes to Iran, the United States just goes home from this terrible misadventure. This is how to get out of this. But it would require exposing the vacuity, the stupidity, the sheer cynicism of what this political class has been doing for decades, in fact. And they don't want to be exposed this way.
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil68,307 views • 1 day ago
🚨Prof. Mohammad Marandi Completly DESTROYS Alan Dershowitz. 🚨“YOU’RE The Evil Monster!” 🚨"You are the Nazi regime that is carrying out a holocaust in Gaza. You're afraid because you know you have no argument. You are a coward. You won't let me talk. Epstein's lawyer, Trump's lawyer, is afraid of me. I let you talk because I'm not afraid of you. People are not afraid of you anymore. You can kill Epstein. You can kill whoever you like, but we're not afraid. You can bomb my house. You can kill me with my family, but I'm not afraid of you. I'm prepared to die for the Palestinian people. But you, you who used to frequent Epstein Island, you have no principles and no morality." Mohammad Marandi vs Alan Dershowitz on Iran
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil1,358,558 views • 1 month ago
🚨John Mearsheimer is clever, logic, realistic and calm. WATCH HOW HE TOTALLY DESTROYED Piers Morgan and Anne Applebaum for less than 2 minutes. 🚨Piers Morgan: The journalist and Pulitzer Prize winning historian Anne Applebaum, who's accused you of being Putin's useful idiot. 🚨 John Mearsheimer: I was a little boy, my mother taught me, when you can't beat people with facts and logic, what you do is you smear them. You engage in name calling. And Anne Applebaum is famous for that. 📑As I often say, when I was a little boy, my mother taught me, when you can't beat people with facts and logic, what you do is you smear them. You engage in name calling. And Anne Applebaum is famous for that. She is unable to beat me with facts and logic, so she calls me Putin's puppet. I don't take these arguments seriously. The question is, what do the facts say? And if you look at the facts, it's quite clear that Putin was not bent on conquering all of Ukraine. I would point out to you, Pierce, that shortly after the war started, as you know, it started in February of 2022, and almost exactly two years ago, shortly after the war started, Putin and the Ukrainians were negotiating a deal to end the war. And that deal did not include Putin conquering all of Ukraine. All Putin wanted to do is as clear from the historical record, is make sure that you got a neutral Ukraine, which meant that Ukraine would not be part of NATO. What happened immediately after the war started in Istanbul is clear evidence, in my opinion, that Putin was not bent on conquering all of Ukraine. He just wanted to make sure it did not become part of the western alliance.
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil51,174 views • 1 day ago
🚨❗️Alex Jones: "The UK has just declared war on Russia!" 🚨Russia can legitimately under rules of war start hitting our targets." 🚨UK is at war with the biggest nuclear power in the world. 🚨This is just satanic. 📑So the new British Prime Minister Burnham came out today and said, yes, we are giving high-tech, heavy cruise missiles to Ukraine to attack Russia, and we are officially at war with Russia. Now, this has been known for a long time, but the declaration of that, the admission of that is meant to put pressure on Putin inside the Russian security state to attack European EU targets that are supplying the weapons. It's a provocation because Trump has cut off over ninety percent of the aid to Ukraine. It's collapsing. The whole thing is failing, and so they're trying to drag us into total war. So here's the bottom line. The psychotic UK government is totally unpopular, that arrests tens of thousands of people for their speech every year, is openly trying to get a provocation to get Russia who issued warnings that if you keep producing the weapons in Poland, in France, in Germany, in the UK, we're gonna hit those. He's like, "Damn right we're making them. Damn right we're hitting you. Damn right we're at war with you." He literally said the UK is at war with the biggest nuclear power in the world. This is just satanic. And if you look at the new prime minister, he has no geopolitical background, no understanding. He's being told to say this by Satanist basically. Because if the US was surrounded by all these missiles and weapons, we would go to war with Russia instantly. This violates the rules of war. 1:31It violates the threat escalation ladder, mutually assured destruction rules that have kept us from killing our...each other for seventy years. This is beyond insane. And NATO just keeps hammering inside Russia with bigger and bigger attacks, trying to get Russia to escalate and hit targets outside Ukraine. Russia's been warning they may do it, but they're winning. So the sides from the battlefield right now in Ukraine, for a lot of reasons, the Russian resolve and larger military and three-to-on weapons development and munitions production. But also Trump has cut at least ninety percent the weapons, which is a good thing. And part of that was the Iran war pulling those away. But Trump was talking about leaving NATO. He says he's leaving NATO because NATO is holding us hostage with this. It's the business model of the EU. It's collapsing demographically, economically. They say they're going to break Russia in five parts. It's delusional. But the general public has no idea this is even going on. The Iran war gets way more attention than this, and it shouldn't. We cover it a lot, but I mean, my God, this is massive. So the UK has basically declared that they're at war with Russia. Just type it in. It's all over the news. And the British Ministry of Defense came today and said, "Don't do that. 🚨Russia can legitimately under rules of war start hitting our targets." That's what they want. So does the new idiot prime minister know that? No, he obviously doesn't know it. He's just some leftist politician dumbass who runs some Muslim-controlled city in northern England. But everybody else that studies it does know what's going on. Russia continued to be restrained. That's why they sent the CIA directorbecause they knew this attack was coming to say, "We're not behind it. Please don't respond. We're cutting off the weapons." And I don't just believe the CIA director. I can watch what's happening and know that's actually a real statement. So Trump's having some pangs of sanity here. Let's hope he doesn't wake up tomorrow with his frontal lobe dementia and go back to being pro-war. But this is a very good sign. Keep praying, keep being politically engaged. 3This is a big deal, but the UK has, under the rules of war, declared war on Russia, which was already covert, but now it's overt, which is a provocation to bring full war because NATO and the globalists are collapsing. I'll cover it all tomorrow with Joe Kent, the former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, eleven AM Central, twelve noon Eastern at the news site, and at Alex Jones on X and show live. But the main place to find it's 3:59All the feeds, everything's right there on the front page, Thank you and pray for peace. And thank you, Russia, for being restrained. People go, "Oh, you're a Russian agent. Oh, you kissed their ass. You're a stooge." No, if they were surrounding us doing this, I'd be calling for war. I'm not for starting a fight with the biggest nuclear power. This is bullshit. Russia's enemies are our enemies socially, culturally, spiritually. I stand with America and the West and with any other country that stands against the globalists. It's that simple. God bless you all.
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil129,622 views • 4 days ago
🚨Piers Morgan Has Received Totally 100% Real and Accurate Lesson in Geopolitical History From Jeffrey Sachs 🚨Piers should be congratulated for allowing someone who has something knowledgeable to say to say it. 🚨ENJOY!!! 📑To my mind, this is overwhelmingly about the first issue, is about NATO, because that's been the issue on the table for 30 years. Territory was not on the table until two years ago. I think the non-negotiable parts of what Putin is saying, I would guess really non-negotiable, so we have to think about them, is that NATO will not enlarge to Ukraine, and I think Crimea is non-negotiable for, Russia's, core security, interests and perceptions and, history. So I think what's really absolutely core to what President Putin is saying is he would like to stop the war. 🚨He doesn't wanna take over Ukraine. He doesn't wanna take more of Ukraine. But what I do think is at the core of this all along was Russia, throughout its history, has always believed in keeping some safety from the West, which has repeatedly invaded, Russia. And after the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, the US and Germany had said to Gorbachev and to Yeltsin, 🚨"We won't expand NATO one inch eastward." But then, like always with the United States, they, they lied, they cheated, and they started the expansion. And then, the Russians, I was, observing this all along. The first expansions, which were in Central Europe, didn't come too close to Russia, and they said, "Ugh, we don't like that. You cheated. You told us no." But okay, that's Hungary, Poland, and Czech Republic. That was 1999 under Clinton. But then it just kept coming and kept coming and kept coming, and they said with rising decibels, and, rising fervor, "Stop coming closer." And their ultimate red line has been consistent. It is Ukraine and Georgia. Why? 🚨 Well, it, it goes back, Piers, to, the British Empire to, 1853 to 1856, actually to Lord Palmerston. He had an idea. 🚨Surround Russia in the Black Sea. 🚨Render Russia's fleet in the Black Sea in Sevastopol, which was there in 1853 just like it's, there in 2024. Render it essentially inoperable. Control the Dardanelles. This is a long story. And, then Russia is a second or third-rate power. And President Putin is responding to what has been a British, imperial attempt for, 175 years and a US attempt since 1991, basically to surround Russia with NATO. And what Putin has been saying is, "Don't do that. Stop. Leave, Ukraine as a kind of buffer zone." And Ukraine was perfectly happy with that, and public opinion was perfectly happy with that, and they didn't wanna join NATO. And in 2009, they elected Viktor Yanukovych, who promised them neutrality, which was the promise that Ukraine itself had made in declaring its independence, that they would be permanently a neutral country. Cause they're in between West and East. They're in between Europe and Western Europe or European Union and Russia. So they wanted just, "Okay, we'll be, we'll be neutral." But then the United States did team up to overthrow Yanukovych in February 2014, and that's when this war started. That's when Russia, stopped saying, "Well, we'll lease a base in Crimea. Rather, we'll take back Crimea. We don't want it to fall into NATO hands," just like, the Tsar did not want, Sevastopol to fall into Palmerston's hands. So this is basically a long, long story. I think the rest is negotiable. I basically think either the US and Europe don't understand what they're doing, which is not impossible, or they're still on what has been a 30-year neocon agenda, which I know about in detail, which is get NATO all the way to surround Russia, because that was the plan of Zbigniew Brzezinski and Dick Cheney and others going right back to the 1990s. They still wanna do it, and they think they can still accomplish this. Okay. That's where I find your, I wouldn't say trust, I don't think that's the right word, but you seem very reliant on accepting Putin's worldview rather than perhaps the stark reality of the barbarism with which he's executed this war. 🚨Yeah, maybe because I know too much about the United States. Because the first war in Europe after world War two was the US bombing of Belgrade for 78 days to change borders of a european state. 🚨The idea was to break Serbia, to create Kosovo as an enclave, and then to install Bondsteel, which is the largest NATO base in the Balkans, in the southwest Balkans. So the US started this under Clinton, that we will break the borders, we will illegally bomb another country. We didn't have any UN authority. This was a, quote, NATO mission to do that. Then I know the United States went to war repeatedly, illegally, in what it did in Afghanistan and then what it did in Iraq and then what it did in Syria, which was the Obama administration, especially Obama and Hillary Clinton, tasking the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad. And then what it did with NATO illegally bombing Libya to topple Muammar Gaddafi and then what it did in Kiev in February 2014. I happened to see some of that with my own eyes. The US overthrew Yanukovych together with right wing ukrainian military forces. We overthrew a president. And what's interesting, by the way, is we overthrew Yanukovych the day after the European Union representatives had reached an agreement with Yanukovych to have early elections, a government of national unity and a stand down of both sides that was agreed. The next thing that happens is the opposition, quote unquote, says, we don't agree. They stormed the government buildings and they deposed Yanukovych. And within hours, the United States says, yes, we support the new government. It didn't say, oh, we had an agreement that's unconstitutional what you did. So we overthrew a government contrary to a promise that the European Union had made. And by the way, Russia, the United States, and the EU were parties to that agreement. And the United States an hour afterwards backed the coup. Okay, so everyone's got a little bit to answer for. In 2015, the Russians did not say, we want the Donbas back. They said, peace should come through negotiations. And negotiations between the ethnic Russians in the east of Ukraine and this new regime in Kiev led to the Minsk II agreement. The Minsk II agreement was voted by the UN Security Council unanimously. It was signed by the government of Ukraine. It was guaranteed explicitly by Germany and France. And you know what? And it's been explained to me in person. It was laughed at inside the us government. This is after the UN Security Council unanimously accepted it. The Ukrainian said, we don't want to give autonomy to the region. Oh, but that's part of the treaty. The US told them, don't worry about it. Angela Merkel explained in Die Zeit in a notorious interview after the 2022 escalation. She said, oh, you know, we knew that Minsk two was just a holding pattern to give Ukraine time to build its strength. No, Minsk too was a UN security council unanimously adopted treaty that was supposed to end the war. So when it comes to who's trustworthy, who to believe and so forth, I guess my problem, Piers, is I know the United States government, I know it very well. I don't trust them for a moment. I want these two sides actually to sit down in front of the whole world and say, these are the terms. Then the world can judge, because we could get on paper clearly for both sides of the world, we're not going to overthrow governments anymore. The United States needs to say, we accept this agreement. The United States needs to say, Russia needs to say, we're not stepping 1ft farther than whatever the boundary is actually reached and NATO's not going to enlarge.
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil134,693 views • 6 days ago
🚨Tucker Carlson Warning “It Could Lead to NUCLEAR WAR.” 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 🇷🇺✍️West’s delusion that it can control Russia by force is long-standing - Tucker Carlson Those in the West making the decisions regarding the proxy war in Ukraine have wanted an open war with Russia “since day one,” says Tucker Carlson. “They expect that they'll win somehow. Of course, they won't,” he notes. “There is something about Russia and the idea that outside powers can conquer it, take its resources or something, prevent it from becoming a global power that is very alluring to Western leaders. But there is zero track record of success,” Carlson says, warning that “It could lead to nuclear war.” 📑But in the war ongoing against Russia has deteriorated to the point that the Russians are considering using nuclear weapon. And so we've done everything we could by calling people to find out, is that true? And it's hard to know exactly if that's true. But here's the way to think about it. So the war in Russia, despite getting almost no attention in American media, is not only ongoing, but it's accelerating. That's the first thing to know. And it's accelerating because NATO, the United States, and the Western European powers are hitting targets, including civilian targets and energy targets, deep within mainland Russia. And that would include a school, killing people on beaches with drones, hitting the Kremlin itself multiple times in drone attacks. So that's becoming more intense. Public opinion in Russia clearly is moving in a more bellicose direction. There are elections underway in Russia right now, which end September twentieth, the Duma elections, the lawmakers' elections. And it's very clear that more and more Russians, and it's hard to quantify this precisely, but are surprised and dismayed that their government is allowing attacks, not by Ukraine, but by Ukraine sponsors, NATO and the United States, against Russia. And it's not destroying the Russian economy, we haven't been able to do that, but it is hurting the Russian economy, and of course, it is a threat to ordinary Russians. 🚨People are getting killed on beaches by drone attacks paid for by the United States or NATO. And if those attacks are being targeted with coordinates given to the Ukrainians by the CIA, and that's exactly what's happening, then your average Russian is beginning to wonder, "Why aren't we doing anything about this?" And so there is mounting pressure on the leadership of that country, Vladimir Putin, who despite American and Western propaganda, is not an absolute totalitarian dictator, which is to say he can't make any decision he wants. He is subject to the opinions, influenced by the opinions of all kinds of different power centers within that country, including public opinion. So the point is, pressure is mounting on Putin to do something to stop these attacks on Russia. And of course, the people mounting the attacks, paying for them, it's not the Ukrainians, by the way, there is no real Ukraine anymore. Its population has been decimated in this war. The big decisions are made by outside powers. Ukraine has no sovereignty, unfortunately for Ukraine. But the, the people who are making the decisions, and that would include the CIA in the United States, the NSA in the United States, the heads of state of Great Britain and France and Germany and basically the rest of the West, those people clearly understand that we're moving toward some sort of more open conflict with Russia. And that's kind of the point. Push Russia to do something radical against the West, blow up Kiev, for example, the Ukrainian capital, hit Poland, maybe even lob some kind of weapon into Western Europe. And at that point, you get what they've wanted since day one, which is an open war with Russia that they expect that they'll win somehow. Which of course they won't. But the delusion that Western powers can control Russia by force is longstanding. I mean, many leaders have fallen to that delusion. 🚨Napoleon himself in 1812 famously invaded Russia, got all the way to Moscow, occupied Moscow for a month in 1812, and then retreated and destroyed the entire French army. Hundreds of thousands of French soldiers died on the march back to Paris. But totally undeterred, crazed with hubris, Napoleon continued to pick other wars, and in less than three years, he was defeated finally, famously, in a fight with the Brits at Waterloo and died at fifty-one in exile. And France was never again, to this day, a global power. 🚨So he destroyed France and the French Empire because he thought that he can control Russia through force. 🚨And of course, you know, a hundred and 30 years later, almost within living memory, the German government under Adolf Hitler did exactly the same thing in Operation Barbarossa and marched all the way to Moscow once again and was once again totally destroyed. So there's something about Russia -and the idea that outside powers can conquer it, take its resources or something, prevent it from becoming a global power, that is very alluring to Western leaders. But there is zero track record of success. Now, once again, within living memory of the last attempt, which was the German attempt in 1941 to do the same thing, European and American leaders have decided that no, this time it will be different, and we will control Russia through force. But of course, that's not going to happen. It will not work, and it could lead to nuclear war. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil56,377 views • 2 days ago
🚨Colonel Douglas Macgregor explains why the globalists are hell bent on destroying Russia and replacing Putin: 🚨"Their agenda is to destroy Russia. Why? They would like to replace Putin because Putin presides over the last major power in Europe that has a national identity, a national language, a national culture that rests on the foundation of orthodox Christianity. That makes Russia the enemy of the globalists. What have the globalists done to us? 🚨They flooded our countries with non Europeans with a specific goal of diluting us, destroying our national identity, eliminating our culture. Expunging any remaining power that Christianity may wield culturally inside the west and they want to do that to Russia. 🚨They want to do that to Russia because Russia has enormous resources, mineral, agricultural, oil, gas and rare metals. If you can remove Putin, you can strip of its resources and enrich yourselves. That's why Russia has to go. Russia is holding out."
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil232,953 views • 11 days ago
0:41
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
🚨Everyone who goes after Russia has a problem. 🚨I'm thinking of Napoleon, Adolf Hitler. 🚨This is Russia. Zelenskyy will press the button, and we'll be in trouble' – retired French Army Colonel Peer de Jong refuses to fight the Russians and recalls Napoleon's fate. 'Zelenskyy is demanding, literally with all his might, ever more means to carry out strikes. And here I return to SCALP missiles, drones, Storm Shadow. The problem is, will we Europeans agree to be drawn into a conflict tomorrow? Because as a result of some misunderstanding, we could find ourselves drawn into it. Zelenskyy will press the button, say: 'Destroy this target,' and Putin will take it badly. And then they'll explain to us that the Russians are some kind of incompetent, that they're incapable of anything, and so on. But this is Russia. All those who tried to challenge Russia ended up running into problems. I think of Napoleon, of Adolf Hitler. So I ask myself again: why do we need all this? Because I wouldn't want Europe to end up drawn into a war it doesn't want.'
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil102,134 views • 6 days ago
🚨KIM DOTCOM IS A LEGEND 🚨Watch: ENJOY 🚨TUCKER: How is the war in Ukraine resolved? What does that look like? 🚨KIM DOTCOM: On, it looks like now on the battlefield, you know. So Russia will win against Ukraine, and, I don't think there will be a settlement. No. 🚨TUCKER: Do you believe that NATO will continue to attack Russia? KIM DOTCOM: I think, the attacks on Russia will continue for many years. I don't see the US and, Europe giving up. So, I think what Russia has to prepare for is a bigger war. TUCKER: A bigger war with United... directly with the United States and Europe? KIM DOTCOM: With Europe, yeah. TUCKER: You think that this will evolve or devolve into a direct conflict between NATO and Russia where Russia is hitting Europe, Europe is hitting Russia? KIM DOTCOM: Yeah. I think so. TUCKER: And who wins? KIM DOTCOM: Russia, of course, because Europe has no, armies. You know, NATO is a toothless tiger. Yeah. TUCKER: Why would the Western powers, why would NATO want a war with Russia? I've never understood that. KIM DOTCOM: Their alternative is the US loses, and if the US loses, it will go down. You know, the West has invested a lot in, US. So all the debt is,owned by debtors. Europe is a big debtor to the United States. So if the US stock markets, for example, all the European companies that are go down, all the European companies that are listed in the US are also going down. So we, we are talking about a loss of maybe trillions, you know. It's not something that the West, can do. They want to, prevent the US from going under. TUCKER: I think, I understand that, and I'd like to see the US not go under also, but I think they're accelerating the destruction of the United States. This is having the opposite effect. If you wanted to wreck the US and bring the empire to its knees in the most humiliating, painful, expensive way, this is what you would do. KIM DOTCOM: Yeah, but, the debt has now reached levels that are unsustainable. So it's just a matter of time. You know, to run the US government costs 20 billion a day. It's impossible. TUCKER: It's impossible. That's right.
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil322,540 views • 25 days ago
🚨⚠️Lavrov Challenges NATO’s Article 5 Over Britain’s Actions Against Russia Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov questions NATO’s role in the Ukraine conflict and raises the issue of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty. Responding to reports about Britain’s support for Ukraine and its involvement in strikes against Russia, Lavrov warns that Moscow will take Britain’s actions into account and says Russia has the right to regard direct British military involvement as participation in the war. Lavrov also questions whether NATO members are acting collectively while presenting their involvement as national actions, asking whether Article 5 is being interpreted as collective defense or “collective attack.”
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil101,952 views • 8 days ago
🚨"So why, Mr. Kissinger, should we expand NATO?" 🚨And Kissinger says, "If you can't antagonize Russia when they're weak, what are you going to do when they're strong?" The West is losing the Ukraine War big time. But that does not mean the NATO lunatics are willing to give up their plans for total global domination. Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: 📑But this is the amazing thing. I was there exactly at that juncture... Mm ... when I was, sitting across the table from Boris Yeltsin, and he's saying, "Yes, we want to be a normal democratic country. We want peace. We want market economy." And I said, "Mr. President, I'm sure that the United States will give you full support for that." Of course, I was completely wrong. The United States was ready to bring him down the same way. What they wanted in the US was, "Bend your knee to us. We are the sole superpower. We're going to, run the show. And yes, if you want to be a fourth-rate power, we'll let you live." But this is ... But why? You had the Matlocks, you had the Kennans. All of these people were Americans, too. Why did those goddamn neocons win the debate? If you look in, by the way, 1994, the wonderful segment of Jack Matlock debating Henry Kissinger on the McNeal News Hour, and people can find it just on the website, it's truly amazing. This is the year 1994, and the, we used to have, intelligent mainstream news, and, Robert McNeal was the, newscaster, very intelligent. And you took 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 60 minutes for a serious discussion of a serious issue, and the issue on this show was should NATO enlarge? Mm. And Ambassador Matlock said, "No, this is not the time for that. You know, we're just reestablishing good, trusting relations with Russia. There's no threat. There's no reason. We should leave well enough alone and just, go on to deepen our relations with Russia. The Cold War has ended, and we have a chance for peace." And then they ask Kissinger, "Mr. Kissinger, should NATO expand?" And he says, "Yes, NATO should expand." And McNeal says, "Um, why, Mr. Kissinger? "Is Russia a threat?" He says, "No, no, no, no, no, no, Russia's no threat." Well, is this, in the security needs of, the countries of Central Europe?" "No, no, no, no, no, no, no, nothing to do with that." "Well, Mr. Kissinger, wouldn't this antagonize Russia?" "Oh, yes. Yes, it would antagonize Russia," he says. 🚨"So why, Mr. Kissinger, should we expand NATO?" 🚨And Kissinger says, "If you can't antagonize Russia when they're weak, what are you going to do when they're strong?" Mm. That's the logic that was used. Mm. And this is absolutely remarkable logic, and this is exactly on the record, exactly at that hinge moment, exactly in this debate. You presume, yes, we're going to be in conflict, so we might as well start the conflict now. The idea that there could be peace doesn't dawn on Mr. Kissinger, which is a little odd because he actually was the student of the Concert of Europe. That was his scholarship. He knew that after the Napoleonic Wars, it was a balance of major powers that kept the peace in Europe for decades, arguably for a century, to avoid a cataclysmic war. There were, of course, several wars in Europe, in, the Crimean War, the war of Italian unification, the war, creating the German state. But there was no great war of Europe, and the Concert of Europe played a decisive institutional role, and it was the opposite of what Kissinger said, Kissinger said, "Well, we need to antagonize them. It's either now or later." And that is the mindset, but the mindset in the United States was even worse than that. I know these people, and I remember the times, and this was the time absolutely of the supreme arrogance of the American strategists. They were, as they told themselves every day, the indispensable nation. They were the world's sole superpower. They were the most powerful country that had ever strode the planet, many times more powerful than the Roman Empire. This is what they told themselves. And these were nasty people and greedy people and, of course, above all, arrogant people.
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil22,066 views • 1 day ago
"The EU must spend its budget on Ukraine" — Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen delivered a passionate speech in Berlin in support of funding the war. "Russia is testing our resilience and threatening us. We see hybrid attacks all over Europe. This happens almost every day. We must rearm and continue to support Ukraine. More weapons, more ammunition. And we must protect our borders. Just recently, we saw once again how aggression truly threatens Europe. We must control our borders. We must stand together to ensure the safety of our citizens. Therefore, the EU budget must prioritize security and defense, continue to provide significant support to Ukraine, and protect our external borders."
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil59,236 views • 5 days ago
Piers: “What happens to a country like Russia, which committed war crimes emerges unpunished for any of this?” Sachs: “Well, if the US were punished for all its war crimes, the world would be a better place. If Israel was punished for its genocide.”
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil91,130 views • 8 days ago