Jason Lavigne's banner

Jason Lavigne

@JasonLavigneAB • 24,329 subscribers

Host of @TheLavigneShow, journalist, filmmaker, author, entrepreneur, ex-paralegal (ON), homesteader, husband & father.

Shorts

Alberta, Help us identify this man. He walked into Mitch Sylvestre's store, placed two bullets on the counter and said "These are for Mitch." If you know who this man is, contact the RCMP. Here's a statement from Mitch Sylvestre "We will take pictures of you and then we will put you up on the internet and then we will find you. We will identify you. Then we will charge you. And anyone that tells you to do that, we will charge them as well. We will take every step that we can to protect our people. We are conducting a legal democratic path laid out by the Supreme Court of Canada for Alberta Independence."

Alberta, Help us identify this man. He walked into Mitch Sylvestre's store, placed two bullets on the counter and said "These are for Mitch." If you know who this man is, contact the RCMP. Here's a statement from Mitch Sylvestre "We will take pictures of you and then we will put you up on the internet and then we will find you. We will identify you. Then we will charge you. And anyone that tells you to do that, we will charge them as well. We will take every step that we can to protect our people. We are conducting a legal democratic path laid out by the Supreme Court of Canada for Alberta Independence."

111,188 views

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

34,521 views

Someone pulled the fire alarm at the stayfreealberta event while Jeffrey Rath was speaking. It was quickly cleared and the speech continued. Nice try lefties.

Someone pulled the fire alarm at the stayfreealberta event while Jeffrey Rath was speaking. It was quickly cleared and the speech continued. Nice try lefties.

25,809 views

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

This morning at the Let Alberta Decide Stampede Pancake breakfast, Keith Wilson blew the roof off the place as the audience welcomed him to the stage. He's right, we need to find common ground with the undecided. Let's do this!

This morning at the Let Alberta Decide Stampede Pancake breakfast, Keith Wilson blew the roof off the place as the audience welcomed him to the stage. He's right, we need to find common ground with the undecided. Let's do this!

20,719 views • 6 days ago

Alberta, Help us identify this man. He walked into Mitch Sylvestre's store, placed two bullets on the counter and said "These are for Mitch." If you know who this man is, contact the RCMP. Here's a statement from Mitch Sylvestre "We will take pictures of you and then we will put you up on the internet and then we will find you. We will identify you. Then we will charge you. And anyone that tells you to do that, we will charge them as well. We will take every step that we can to protect our people. We are conducting a legal democratic path laid out by the Supreme Court of Canada for Alberta Independence."

Alberta, Help us identify this man. He walked into Mitch Sylvestre's store, placed two bullets on the counter and said "These are for Mitch." If you know who this man is, contact the RCMP. Here's a statement from Mitch Sylvestre "We will take pictures of you and then we will put you up on the internet and then we will find you. We will identify you. Then we will charge you. And anyone that tells you to do that, we will charge them as well. We will take every step that we can to protect our people. We are conducting a legal democratic path laid out by the Supreme Court of Canada for Alberta Independence."

111,188 views • 4 months ago

I call BS. Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston is now saying the $25,000 woods ban is for your safety, so you don't die by fire. However, a 29-year veteran Nova Scotia firefighter, Peter R Mac Isaac, just revealed that no one has ever died in a Nova Scotia forest fire. Ever. Who do you believe? A politician who keeps changing his excuses, or a 29-year Conservation Officer who participated in over 100 forest fires in Nova Scotia?

I call BS. Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston is now saying the $25,000 woods ban is for your safety, so you don't die by fire. However, a 29-year veteran Nova Scotia firefighter, Peter R Mac Isaac, just revealed that no one has ever died in a Nova Scotia forest fire. Ever. Who do you believe? A politician who keeps changing his excuses, or a 29-year Conservation Officer who participated in over 100 forest fires in Nova Scotia?

190,712 views • 11 months ago

Reported Assault Near Jasper Avenue and 109 Street in Edmonton Don Bonnar of Alberta Sovereignty Now was reportedly assaulted today near Jasper Avenue and 109 Street in Edmonton. According to early reports, Bonnar was approached by an unknown individual and attacked near the road. During the incident, he was nearly struck by a vehicle and sustained an injury to his foot. The extent of his injuries is not yet known. Bonnar is well known in Alberta sovereignty circles and is often seen driving his truck displaying Alberta flags and Alberta Sovereignty Now signage. He is an active advocate for Alberta sovereignty and has been visible at events across the province. It is reported that Bonnar spoke with a police officer near the scene, though it is not yet clear whether a formal investigation is underway. Violence and intimidation have no place in political discourse. No matter where someone stands politically, no one should be assaulted, threatened, or put in danger for peacefully expressing their views. This incident could have ended with serious injury or worse. More details will be shared as they become available.

Reported Assault Near Jasper Avenue and 109 Street in Edmonton Don Bonnar of Alberta Sovereignty Now was reportedly assaulted today near Jasper Avenue and 109 Street in Edmonton. According to early reports, Bonnar was approached by an unknown individual and attacked near the road. During the incident, he was nearly struck by a vehicle and sustained an injury to his foot. The extent of his injuries is not yet known. Bonnar is well known in Alberta sovereignty circles and is often seen driving his truck displaying Alberta flags and Alberta Sovereignty Now signage. He is an active advocate for Alberta sovereignty and has been visible at events across the province. It is reported that Bonnar spoke with a police officer near the scene, though it is not yet clear whether a formal investigation is underway. Violence and intimidation have no place in political discourse. No matter where someone stands politically, no one should be assaulted, threatened, or put in danger for peacefully expressing their views. This incident could have ended with serious injury or worse. More details will be shared as they become available.

15,513 views • 20 days ago

🚨PROOF: CBC’s Headline Misrepresented Premier Smith’s Position🚨 I’ve obtained the English version of what Premier Danielle Smith actually said in her Radio-Canada interview, and it confirms that CBC’s original headline was false. The Premier did not say she would campaign against Alberta sovereignty in the event of a referendum. Her answer in French matches exactly what she told me at the UCP AGM: She supports Alberta sovereignty within a united Canada, and she reiterated that position, nothing more. CBC has now quietly updated its article and added a correction stating the Premier did not specify which side she would take. In fact, the Premier also said Thomas Lukaszuk’s petition is a referendum on separation, not sovereignty within Canada. In addition, with the repealing of section 2(4) of the Citizens Initiative Act proposed yesterday, the Premier has opened the door for the Alberta Prosperity Project’s binding constitutional question: “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta shall become a Sovereign Country and cease to be a province in Canada?” Watch the clip yourself. The Premier’s words speak for themselves.

🚨PROOF: CBC’s Headline Misrepresented Premier Smith’s Position🚨 I’ve obtained the English version of what Premier Danielle Smith actually said in her Radio-Canada interview, and it confirms that CBC’s original headline was false. The Premier did not say she would campaign against Alberta sovereignty in the event of a referendum. Her answer in French matches exactly what she told me at the UCP AGM: She supports Alberta sovereignty within a united Canada, and she reiterated that position, nothing more. CBC has now quietly updated its article and added a correction stating the Premier did not specify which side she would take. In fact, the Premier also said Thomas Lukaszuk’s petition is a referendum on separation, not sovereignty within Canada. In addition, with the repealing of section 2(4) of the Citizens Initiative Act proposed yesterday, the Premier has opened the door for the Alberta Prosperity Project’s binding constitutional question: “Do you agree that the Province of Alberta shall become a Sovereign Country and cease to be a province in Canada?” Watch the clip yourself. The Premier’s words speak for themselves.

95,806 views • 7 months ago

Canada, Here's the person who now hold the balance of power in parliament. Elisabeth May can likely be bought off with a LCBO gift card. Just remember, she's an open supporter of various terrorists and groups calling for the destruction of Canada. What an absolute nightmare.

Canada, Here's the person who now hold the balance of power in parliament. Elisabeth May can likely be bought off with a LCBO gift card. Just remember, she's an open supporter of various terrorists and groups calling for the destruction of Canada. What an absolute nightmare.

84,669 views • 7 months ago

Alberta, In 25 seconds MOU Mark just took the wind out of Danielle Smith's sails. With 6 days to go, it looks like Premier Smith's deadline will come and go without a deal. By having "necessary conditions" including BC Premier Eby, First Nation, and stakeholder's agreement and cooperation on a pipeline west, this is a no-go. It's time to fire up the "or else" train.

Alberta, In 25 seconds MOU Mark just took the wind out of Danielle Smith's sails. With 6 days to go, it looks like Premier Smith's deadline will come and go without a deal. By having "necessary conditions" including BC Premier Eby, First Nation, and stakeholder's agreement and cooperation on a pipeline west, this is a no-go. It's time to fire up the "or else" train.

61,853 views • 7 months ago

Alberta MLA Eric Bouchard calls out Alberta NDP leader Naheed Nenshi for labeling Ivermectin "quakery" when people used it to treat Covid, but acknowledged it's benefits for Nenshi when he used it. It's time Nenshi saves face and admits, Ivermectin is actually very Safe & Effective.

Alberta MLA Eric Bouchard calls out Alberta NDP leader Naheed Nenshi for labeling Ivermectin "quakery" when people used it to treat Covid, but acknowledged it's benefits for Nenshi when he used it. It's time Nenshi saves face and admits, Ivermectin is actually very Safe & Effective.

36,541 views • 4 months ago

This is what the stayfreealberta lineup at my event looked like today from 1-7PM. There were 7-8 canvassers taking signatures. The estimate I received was 3500-5000 signatures were collected. Thank you Chris Carbert for the video. It was great to see you there.

This is what the stayfreealberta lineup at my event looked like today from 1-7PM. There were 7-8 canvassers taking signatures. The estimate I received was 3500-5000 signatures were collected. Thank you Chris Carbert for the video. It was great to see you there.

50,652 views • 6 months ago

Here was my question to Danielle Smith on Saturday at the UCP AGM after her keynote speech. If Alberta, through a referendum, gave the Premier a new mandate for independence, would she follow through? Here is her response.

Here was my question to Danielle Smith on Saturday at the UCP AGM after her keynote speech. If Alberta, through a referendum, gave the Premier a new mandate for independence, would she follow through? Here is her response.

51,567 views • 7 months ago

Alberta, When I sat down with Premier Danielle Smith last week to talk about Mark Carney, the Premier was clear. He has until the Grey Gup, November 16th, to add Alberta's pipeline projects to the major projects list because, as the Premier said, "I think we're getting pretty close to Albertans being completely fed up, they want to see action, or, um, or not. We need to know one way or the another." Do you think Carney will provide action that aligns with Alberta's needs, or not?

Alberta, When I sat down with Premier Danielle Smith last week to talk about Mark Carney, the Premier was clear. He has until the Grey Gup, November 16th, to add Alberta's pipeline projects to the major projects list because, as the Premier said, "I think we're getting pretty close to Albertans being completely fed up, they want to see action, or, um, or not. We need to know one way or the another." Do you think Carney will provide action that aligns with Alberta's needs, or not?

55,884 views • 8 months ago

🚨ANNOUNCEMENT: THE SHOT USA TOUR🚨 We’re taking The Shot: Sean Hartman’s Story across the United States. This is more than a film. It’s a movement for truth, accountability, and the families who were ignored. TOUR DATES & CITIES Fort Lauderdale — Tuesday, May 26 Tampa — Wednesday, May 27 Orlando — Thursday, May 28 Tallahassee — Friday, May 29 Pensacola — Saturday, May 30 Austin — Sunday, May 31 Houston — Monday, June 1 Dallas — Tuesday, June 2 Oklahoma City — Wednesday, June 3 Meet & Greet Guests Include: • Dr. Peter McCullough • Dr. Mary Talley Bowden • Dr. James Thorp • Nicolas Hulscher • Allen Martin • Harry Fisher • Edward Szall • Jason Lavigne Tickets (USD): Early-Bird $30 VIP $100 More dates to be added More Meet & Greet VIPs to be announced This tour brings together families, doctors, whistleblowers, and truth-seekers for one powerful night in each city. If you’ve been looking for answers… this is where the conversation is happening. 👇 Link below in the comments 👇

🚨ANNOUNCEMENT: THE SHOT USA TOUR🚨 We’re taking The Shot: Sean Hartman’s Story across the United States. This is more than a film. It’s a movement for truth, accountability, and the families who were ignored. TOUR DATES & CITIES Fort Lauderdale — Tuesday, May 26 Tampa — Wednesday, May 27 Orlando — Thursday, May 28 Tallahassee — Friday, May 29 Pensacola — Saturday, May 30 Austin — Sunday, May 31 Houston — Monday, June 1 Dallas — Tuesday, June 2 Oklahoma City — Wednesday, June 3 Meet & Greet Guests Include: • Dr. Peter McCullough • Dr. Mary Talley Bowden • Dr. James Thorp • Nicolas Hulscher • Allen Martin • Harry Fisher • Edward Szall • Jason Lavigne Tickets (USD): Early-Bird $30 VIP $100 More dates to be added More Meet & Greet VIPs to be announced This tour brings together families, doctors, whistleblowers, and truth-seekers for one powerful night in each city. If you’ve been looking for answers… this is where the conversation is happening. 👇 Link below in the comments 👇

18,303 views • 2 months ago

The Law Says the Birds Don’t Have to Be Destroyed! The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is insisting that all ostriches at the Universal Ostrich Farm must be culled. However, Canadian law makes it clear that there are alternatives — especially when the value of scientific research is at stake. Dr. Steven Pelech has made it clear: there IS research value. Health of Animals Act — Section 48(2) “Treatment” 🔗 “The Minister may treat any animal… or require its owner… to treat it… where the Minister considers that the treatment will be effective in eliminating or preventing the spread of the disease…” This provides authority for a treatment and containment protocol — including quarantine, testing, vaccination, or biocontainment — instead of culling, if it prevents the spread. Health of Animals Regulations — Section 5(1)(a) Inspector Discretion 🔗 A veterinary inspector may order an exposed or suspect animal “to quarantine, keep separate or treat the animal,” rather than destroy it. This is textbook discretion: if risk can be managed through separation and treatment, destruction is not the only option. Health of Animals Act — Section 13(2)(a) “Reserve for Experimentation” 🔗 “The Minister may reserve for experimentation an animal required to be destroyed under this Act…” Even if destruction is ordered, the Minister can reserve animals for controlled research. Parliament established this “research valve” specifically to preserve animals of scientific value. The law doesn’t force destruction. It provides discretion — and a choice. The government can choose science over slaughter.

The Law Says the Birds Don’t Have to Be Destroyed! The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is insisting that all ostriches at the Universal Ostrich Farm must be culled. However, Canadian law makes it clear that there are alternatives — especially when the value of scientific research is at stake. Dr. Steven Pelech has made it clear: there IS research value. Health of Animals Act — Section 48(2) “Treatment” 🔗 “The Minister may treat any animal… or require its owner… to treat it… where the Minister considers that the treatment will be effective in eliminating or preventing the spread of the disease…” This provides authority for a treatment and containment protocol — including quarantine, testing, vaccination, or biocontainment — instead of culling, if it prevents the spread. Health of Animals Regulations — Section 5(1)(a) Inspector Discretion 🔗 A veterinary inspector may order an exposed or suspect animal “to quarantine, keep separate or treat the animal,” rather than destroy it. This is textbook discretion: if risk can be managed through separation and treatment, destruction is not the only option. Health of Animals Act — Section 13(2)(a) “Reserve for Experimentation” 🔗 “The Minister may reserve for experimentation an animal required to be destroyed under this Act…” Even if destruction is ordered, the Minister can reserve animals for controlled research. Parliament established this “research valve” specifically to preserve animals of scientific value. The law doesn’t force destruction. It provides discretion — and a choice. The government can choose science over slaughter.

49,115 views • 9 months ago

Alberta, Calgary has filled The Big Four tonight as Derek Smith starts the event as the MC. It is stunning to see how well stayfreealberta has packed this building.

Alberta, Calgary has filled The Big Four tonight as Derek Smith starts the event as the MC. It is stunning to see how well stayfreealberta has packed this building.

31,145 views • 5 months ago

🚨BREAKING: After 3½ Years, Crown’s Case Against Csaba Vizi Collapses in Just 6 Minutes🚨 Timeline of the Csaba Vizi Case – Collapse of the Crown’s Prosecution February 19, 2022 – Arrest and Charges Csaba Vizi, a trucker participating in the Ottawa Freedom Convoy, was arrested during the police operation to clear downtown Ottawa. He was charged with four offences: - Resisting arrest - Mischief (two counts) - Disobeying a court order (the “no-honking” injunction) Vizi alleged that despite kneeling and attempting to comply, he was assaulted by police during the arrest, leaving him with injuries. (Video attached below) Before September 25, 2025 – Charges Narrowed Over time, two charges were withdrawn by the Crown: the resisting arrest charge and one mischief count. By September 2025, only two remained: - Mischief (single count) - Disobeying a court order September 25, 2025 – Charter Ruling 9:15 AM – Justice Macfarlane delivers his decision on the defence Charter application. - “Vacuum of evidence”: no arresting officer testified, no video of the arrest, and no clear evidence of who arrested Vizi. (Note: The arrest video exists; it was of his beating. Presumably this is why the Crown didn't provide it as evidence to the Court.) - The arrest was ruled unlawful, making the subsequent search unlawful. - Seizure of Vizi’s driver’s licence deemed an unreasonable search. - s. 10a breach: Police failed to explain the alleged court order adequately. - s. 10b breach: Inconsistent evidence about access to counsel. - s. 24(2): Video evidence obtained through these breaches was ruled inadmissible. With no evidence left, the Crown still failed to withdraw. The matter was adjourned to October 3 to determine whether a trial would proceed. October 3, 2025 – Acquittal 9:45 AM – Court convened to decide if a December trial would move forward. Early confusion: No Crown was present; defence counsel, Ms. Magas, and Vizi (via Zoom) were already in place. 9:57 AM – Fill-in Crown Wlodarczyk arrived. 9:59 AM – Judge re-entered. 10:00 AM – The Crown conceded, stating they would call no further evidence and requested an acquittal. 10:01 AM – Justice Macfarlane entered Not Guilty verdicts on both charges. 10:05 AM – Court concluded. The collapse of a case that dragged on for more than three years was over in just six minutes. Key Takeaway The Crown pursued this prosecution, despite a glaring lack of evidence, repeated Charter violations, and a failure even to call the arresting officer as a witness. Mr. Vizi endured years of stress, legal battles, costs, and uncertainty — only to have the court find that there was never enough evidence to justify a trial. The Crown arrived in court unprepared, disorganized, and unable to meet the most basic evidentiary standard. Justice was delayed for years, then delivered in a matter of minutes. Here is the arrest video 👇👇👇

🚨BREAKING: After 3½ Years, Crown’s Case Against Csaba Vizi Collapses in Just 6 Minutes🚨 Timeline of the Csaba Vizi Case – Collapse of the Crown’s Prosecution February 19, 2022 – Arrest and Charges Csaba Vizi, a trucker participating in the Ottawa Freedom Convoy, was arrested during the police operation to clear downtown Ottawa. He was charged with four offences: - Resisting arrest - Mischief (two counts) - Disobeying a court order (the “no-honking” injunction) Vizi alleged that despite kneeling and attempting to comply, he was assaulted by police during the arrest, leaving him with injuries. (Video attached below) Before September 25, 2025 – Charges Narrowed Over time, two charges were withdrawn by the Crown: the resisting arrest charge and one mischief count. By September 2025, only two remained: - Mischief (single count) - Disobeying a court order September 25, 2025 – Charter Ruling 9:15 AM – Justice Macfarlane delivers his decision on the defence Charter application. - “Vacuum of evidence”: no arresting officer testified, no video of the arrest, and no clear evidence of who arrested Vizi. (Note: The arrest video exists; it was of his beating. Presumably this is why the Crown didn't provide it as evidence to the Court.) - The arrest was ruled unlawful, making the subsequent search unlawful. - Seizure of Vizi’s driver’s licence deemed an unreasonable search. - s. 10a breach: Police failed to explain the alleged court order adequately. - s. 10b breach: Inconsistent evidence about access to counsel. - s. 24(2): Video evidence obtained through these breaches was ruled inadmissible. With no evidence left, the Crown still failed to withdraw. The matter was adjourned to October 3 to determine whether a trial would proceed. October 3, 2025 – Acquittal 9:45 AM – Court convened to decide if a December trial would move forward. Early confusion: No Crown was present; defence counsel, Ms. Magas, and Vizi (via Zoom) were already in place. 9:57 AM – Fill-in Crown Wlodarczyk arrived. 9:59 AM – Judge re-entered. 10:00 AM – The Crown conceded, stating they would call no further evidence and requested an acquittal. 10:01 AM – Justice Macfarlane entered Not Guilty verdicts on both charges. 10:05 AM – Court concluded. The collapse of a case that dragged on for more than three years was over in just six minutes. Key Takeaway The Crown pursued this prosecution, despite a glaring lack of evidence, repeated Charter violations, and a failure even to call the arresting officer as a witness. Mr. Vizi endured years of stress, legal battles, costs, and uncertainty — only to have the court find that there was never enough evidence to justify a trial. The Crown arrived in court unprepared, disorganized, and unable to meet the most basic evidentiary standard. Justice was delayed for years, then delivered in a matter of minutes. Here is the arrest video 👇👇👇

44,192 views • 9 months ago

🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨 The Grus Justice Project has released the trailer for the upcoming film Silencing Detective Grus, produced in collaboration with Matador Films. This is a serious, compelling production designed to bring worldwide attention to the investigation of infant deaths in Ottawa by Helen Grus, a Detective with the Ottawa Police Service. According to the Grus Justice Project, Detective Grus uncovered a cluster of infant fatalities and pursued inquiries in cases where she was not formally assigned. In March 2025, a tribunal found Detective Grus guilty of “Discreditable Conduct” under the Police Services Act for initiating an “unauthorized project” and interfering in a case without proper approval. The film’s creators argue that this production isn’t simply about one remarkable case. It’s a test of police independence, the integrity of investigations when political and public-health interests are involved, and the protections of both citizens and officers when investigations challenge institutional narratives. Please share this widely. The world needs to know what is happening. Visit: and DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY Vincent Gircys Denis Rancourt

🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨 The Grus Justice Project has released the trailer for the upcoming film Silencing Detective Grus, produced in collaboration with Matador Films. This is a serious, compelling production designed to bring worldwide attention to the investigation of infant deaths in Ottawa by Helen Grus, a Detective with the Ottawa Police Service. According to the Grus Justice Project, Detective Grus uncovered a cluster of infant fatalities and pursued inquiries in cases where she was not formally assigned. In March 2025, a tribunal found Detective Grus guilty of “Discreditable Conduct” under the Police Services Act for initiating an “unauthorized project” and interfering in a case without proper approval. The film’s creators argue that this production isn’t simply about one remarkable case. It’s a test of police independence, the integrity of investigations when political and public-health interests are involved, and the protections of both citizens and officers when investigations challenge institutional narratives. Please share this widely. The world needs to know what is happening. Visit: and DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY Vincent Gircys Denis Rancourt

38,289 views • 8 months ago

Canada, This should boil your blood over the police response in Ottawa over the Freedom Convoy in 2022. Retired Ontario Provincial Police Constable Vincent Gircys was there. As a former member of the Emergency Response Team, Vincent is clear that the officers "would have been provided an intelligence briefing that was false." Watch the entire episode below. Vincent expands on the problems with policing in Canada. It's shocking.

Canada, This should boil your blood over the police response in Ottawa over the Freedom Convoy in 2022. Retired Ontario Provincial Police Constable Vincent Gircys was there. As a former member of the Emergency Response Team, Vincent is clear that the officers "would have been provided an intelligence briefing that was false." Watch the entire episode below. Vincent expands on the problems with policing in Canada. It's shocking.

35,078 views • 10 months ago

A gentle reminder from Bruce Pardy that it was the Stephen Harper government in 2012 that repealed the sections of the Criminal Code that allowed residents to use "whatever force is necessary" against trespassers. AKA Castle Doctrine. Maxime Bernier, who was part of the government at that time, clarifies that in an effort to strengthen gun ownership rights, the law was changed as a compromise to the left as a political solution. In hindsight, this was a compromise that should not have happened, and we would be better off with the old laws that we had.

A gentle reminder from Bruce Pardy that it was the Stephen Harper government in 2012 that repealed the sections of the Criminal Code that allowed residents to use "whatever force is necessary" against trespassers. AKA Castle Doctrine. Maxime Bernier, who was part of the government at that time, clarifies that in an effort to strengthen gun ownership rights, the law was changed as a compromise to the left as a political solution. In hindsight, this was a compromise that should not have happened, and we would be better off with the old laws that we had.

34,572 views • 10 months ago