Jason Lavigne's banner
Jason Lavigne's profile picture

Jason Lavigne

@JasonLavigneAB23,260 subscribers

Host @TheLavigneShow, journalist, author, entrepreneur, ex-paralegal (ON), homesteader, husband & father.

Shorts

Alberta, Help us identify this man. He walked into Mitch Sylvestre's store, placed two bullets on the counter and said "These are for Mitch." If you know who this man is, contact the RCMP. Here's a statement from Mitch Sylvestre "We will take pictures of you and then we will put you up on the internet and then we will find you. We will identify you. Then we will charge you. And anyone that tells you to do that, we will charge them as well. We will take every step that we can to protect our people. We are conducting a legal democratic path laid out by the Supreme Court of Canada for Alberta Independence."

Alberta, Help us identify this man. He walked into Mitch Sylvestre's store, placed two bullets on the counter and said "These are for Mitch." If you know who this man is, contact the RCMP. Here's a statement from Mitch Sylvestre "We will take pictures of you and then we will put you up on the internet and then we will find you. We will identify you. Then we will charge you. And anyone that tells you to do that, we will charge them as well. We will take every step that we can to protect our people. We are conducting a legal democratic path laid out by the Supreme Court of Canada for Alberta Independence."

110,320 просмотров

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

UPDATE The man in the video has now come forward and provided the following video to explain what he brought into Mitch Sylvester's store. Information that I have received includes - He avoided calls from the RCMP for several weeks - He left the store with the item - He is claiming it was just a misunderstanding - The RCMP still has an open investigation - Charges could still be filed - There was one item, not two as previously reported If this was infact the item he brought into the store along with his "This is for Mitch" message, this is hands down the dumbest thing anyone can do to the employees of the store, and to Mitch directly. There still is an active investigation as showing staff a bullet, or a pen that looks like a bullet, uttering a threat, and not responding to the RCMP for weeks, is still grounds for criminal charges. Thank you to the dozens of people who did recognize the man, and provided tips.

34,521 просмотров

Someone pulled the fire alarm at the stayfreealberta event while Jeffrey Rath was speaking. It was quickly cleared and the speech continued. Nice try lefties.

Someone pulled the fire alarm at the stayfreealberta event while Jeffrey Rath was speaking. It was quickly cleared and the speech continued. Nice try lefties.

25,809 просмотров

Videos

JasonLavigneAB's profile picture

The Law Says the Birds Don’t Have to Be Destroyed! The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is insisting that all ostriches at the Universal Ostrich Farm must be culled. However, Canadian law makes it clear that there are alternatives — especially when the value of scientific research is at stake. Dr. Steven Pelech has made it clear: there IS research value. Health of Animals Act — Section 48(2) “Treatment” 🔗 “The Minister may treat any animal… or require its owner… to treat it… where the Minister considers that the treatment will be effective in eliminating or preventing the spread of the disease…” This provides authority for a treatment and containment protocol — including quarantine, testing, vaccination, or biocontainment — instead of culling, if it prevents the spread. Health of Animals Regulations — Section 5(1)(a) Inspector Discretion 🔗 A veterinary inspector may order an exposed or suspect animal “to quarantine, keep separate or treat the animal,” rather than destroy it. This is textbook discretion: if risk can be managed through separation and treatment, destruction is not the only option. Health of Animals Act — Section 13(2)(a) “Reserve for Experimentation” 🔗 “The Minister may reserve for experimentation an animal required to be destroyed under this Act…” Even if destruction is ordered, the Minister can reserve animals for controlled research. Parliament established this “research valve” specifically to preserve animals of scientific value. The law doesn’t force destruction. It provides discretion — and a choice. The government can choose science over slaughter.

Jason Lavigne

49,115 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

JasonLavigneAB's profile picture

🚨BREAKING: After 3½ Years, Crown’s Case Against Csaba Vizi Collapses in Just 6 Minutes🚨 Timeline of the Csaba Vizi Case – Collapse of the Crown’s Prosecution February 19, 2022 – Arrest and Charges Csaba Vizi, a trucker participating in the Ottawa Freedom Convoy, was arrested during the police operation to clear downtown Ottawa. He was charged with four offences: - Resisting arrest - Mischief (two counts) - Disobeying a court order (the “no-honking” injunction) Vizi alleged that despite kneeling and attempting to comply, he was assaulted by police during the arrest, leaving him with injuries. (Video attached below) Before September 25, 2025 – Charges Narrowed Over time, two charges were withdrawn by the Crown: the resisting arrest charge and one mischief count. By September 2025, only two remained: - Mischief (single count) - Disobeying a court order September 25, 2025 – Charter Ruling 9:15 AM – Justice Macfarlane delivers his decision on the defence Charter application. - “Vacuum of evidence”: no arresting officer testified, no video of the arrest, and no clear evidence of who arrested Vizi. (Note: The arrest video exists; it was of his beating. Presumably this is why the Crown didn't provide it as evidence to the Court.) - The arrest was ruled unlawful, making the subsequent search unlawful. - Seizure of Vizi’s driver’s licence deemed an unreasonable search. - s. 10a breach: Police failed to explain the alleged court order adequately. - s. 10b breach: Inconsistent evidence about access to counsel. - s. 24(2): Video evidence obtained through these breaches was ruled inadmissible. With no evidence left, the Crown still failed to withdraw. The matter was adjourned to October 3 to determine whether a trial would proceed. October 3, 2025 – Acquittal 9:45 AM – Court convened to decide if a December trial would move forward. Early confusion: No Crown was present; defence counsel, Ms. Magas, and Vizi (via Zoom) were already in place. 9:57 AM – Fill-in Crown Wlodarczyk arrived. 9:59 AM – Judge re-entered. 10:00 AM – The Crown conceded, stating they would call no further evidence and requested an acquittal. 10:01 AM – Justice Macfarlane entered Not Guilty verdicts on both charges. 10:05 AM – Court concluded. The collapse of a case that dragged on for more than three years was over in just six minutes. Key Takeaway The Crown pursued this prosecution, despite a glaring lack of evidence, repeated Charter violations, and a failure even to call the arresting officer as a witness. Mr. Vizi endured years of stress, legal battles, costs, and uncertainty — only to have the court find that there was never enough evidence to justify a trial. The Crown arrived in court unprepared, disorganized, and unable to meet the most basic evidentiary standard. Justice was delayed for years, then delivered in a matter of minutes. Here is the arrest video 👇👇👇

Jason Lavigne

44,096 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

JasonLavigneAB's profile picture

⚠️⚠️Power Warning from William Makis MD!⚠️⚠️ The new interim Chief Medical Officer of Health for Alberta, Dr. Sunil Sookram, appointed April 17th, 2025 by Danielle Smith, is a real concern for the health of Albertans. Lowlights include his: - Involvement in Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). - Congratulated Mayor of Edmonton, Amarjeet Sohi, and Mayor of Calgary, Jyoti Gondek, with woke messaging of "These cities can look forward to continued progressive, inclusive leadership for years to come." - Wrote on X "We need a real vaccine passport in Alberta. One that cannot be forged. One that is mandated everywhere." - Also wrote "No healthcare worker should be unimmunized. No more excuses." Instead of Dr. Sunil Sookram, Danielle Smith had several choices, including Dr. Rodger Hodkinson, who was right the last five years and proved it when he recently beat the Alberta Collage of Physicians and Surgeons after a three year battle over "misinformation." Dr. Makis finds this inexcusable. I agree. Dr. Rodger Hodkinson call it like he sees it, frankly and honestly. - First do no harm and provide informed consent. - Stood up and took a bullet for all of us. - "It wasn't a pandemic. It was global but it didn't kill enough people." - "Everything that was done failed." - "Long COVID is not due to the persistence of the virus infection. It is due to a vaccine injury." Which doctor would you want as the Chief Medical Officer of Health for Alberta? Dr. Sunil Sookram or Dr. Rodger Hodkinson? Full episode available here Share if you care.

Jason Lavigne

43,499 просмотров • 1 год назад