Jean-François Gariépy 🧬's banner
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬's profile picture

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

@JFGariepy71,620 subscribers

Biologist 🦎 | Author 📔 | White People Food 🥩 | The Revolutionary Phenotype 🧬 | Host, JFG Tonight 🎥

Shorts

I'm now convinced based on this video that the second and third shots were just as justified as the first. We can see that the ICE agent is being hit by the car throughout the series of shots. The leftist argument that "we are seeing the front grill of the car, therefore he was not in front of the car" does not hold. A front bumper can absolutely side-bash you. The agent at this point does not have his eyes on the wheels, he does not know where they are headed. All he knows is that there is a car striking his body and he could get swallowed under the wheels, lose a leg, or die. There is no doubt that he was correct in his belief that he was in the process of being assaulted by a potentially deadly car attack.

I'm now convinced based on this video that the second and third shots were just as justified as the first. We can see that the ICE agent is being hit by the car throughout the series of shots. The leftist argument that "we are seeing the front grill of the car, therefore he was not in front of the car" does not hold. A front bumper can absolutely side-bash you. The agent at this point does not have his eyes on the wheels, he does not know where they are headed. All he knows is that there is a car striking his body and he could get swallowed under the wheels, lose a leg, or die. There is no doubt that he was correct in his belief that he was in the process of being assaulted by a potentially deadly car attack.

25,422 просмотров

Videos

JFGariepy's profile picture

I have found what happened to the bullet in Charlie Kirk's neck. I am challenging Ian Carroll to review the evidence I present in this video and change his view on his position that 30-06 is inconsistent with the injuries of Charlie. In summary, the bullet had a yaw of repose induced by the angle of elevation of the shooting position. This increased yaw of repose still allowed enough energy to pierce the skin at the entry point of the bullet, but induced a tumbling of the bullet internally. As it tumbled, it reached an angled approach toward what would have been the exit skin point. Being angled at the point of exit, the bullet couldn't pierce through the back of the skin, so it instead stretched the skin. The skin's elasticity as it returned part of the stretch energy to the bullet threw it back inside Charlie's body, traveling only minimally and getting stopped around the spinal cord. My position on the plausibility and in fact likelihood of this scenario is based on mathematical ballistics modeling, live tests of 30-06 bullets, several hunter reports as well as personal surgical experience and finally, video from the assassination itself. This is an ironclad destruction of Ian Carroll's claim to Nicholas J. Fuentes that the 30-06 story is implausible. It is indeed very likely, and I respectfully ask Ian Carroll, whom I respect, to review his stance in light of this evidence. Full show at:

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

323,645 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад