Jean-François Gariépy 🧬's banner
Jean-François Gariépy 🧬's profile picture

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

@JFGariepy70,853 subscribers

Biologist 🦎 | Author, The Revolutionary Phenotype 🧬 | Host, JFG Tonight 🎥 | Single

Shorts

I'm now convinced based on this video that the second and third shots were just as justified as the first. We can see that the ICE agent is being hit by the car throughout the series of shots. The leftist argument that "we are seeing the front grill of the car, therefore he was not in front of the car" does not hold. A front bumper can absolutely side-bash you. The agent at this point does not have his eyes on the wheels, he does not know where they are headed. All he knows is that there is a car striking his body and he could get swallowed under the wheels, lose a leg, or die. There is no doubt that he was correct in his belief that he was in the process of being assaulted by a potentially deadly car attack.

I'm now convinced based on this video that the second and third shots were just as justified as the first. We can see that the ICE agent is being hit by the car throughout the series of shots. The leftist argument that "we are seeing the front grill of the car, therefore he was not in front of the car" does not hold. A front bumper can absolutely side-bash you. The agent at this point does not have his eyes on the wheels, he does not know where they are headed. All he knows is that there is a car striking his body and he could get swallowed under the wheels, lose a leg, or die. There is no doubt that he was correct in his belief that he was in the process of being assaulted by a potentially deadly car attack.

25,343 просмотров

Videos

This woman is practicing Altruistic Punishment in a world that has lost its senses. Now, I do not recommend being as direct as she was in her use of words, as this can bring trouble to you, but she is morally right in her position. Her son has had his stuff taken from him by a Black boy who apparently has so little parental care going for him that he's in this park without any parent present (a random brown skin immigrant comes to his defense). What she's trying to do is for the Black boy to experience punishment for his behavior, so that he learns that stealing is not okay (too bad, her efforts are in vain, he won't learn). She's trying to impose White Societal Standards unto a Black boy. This is what America was all about from the beginning; the 1st amendment allows the punitive use of speech, but it doesn't allow to steal toys. Now we see outrage on social media because she used a "slur." Well, let us remind ourselves that slurs are speech, and that speech is less hurtful than theft or assault. She has thus shown restraint in her intervention compared to how her child was affected by the situation. And now we see the defenders of the Black boy on social media coming out and saying "The Black boy has autism!!!" Give me a fucking break. Autism is about to be used to justify Black aggressive behavior and lack of parental care and you should resist all of it. It is very rare in a group of White children that you'll see any of them steal items from the others, and if they do so, their parents will immediately be there to teach them proper behavior. Plenty of autistic White boys out there whose parents will be there to teach them social boundaries. In other words, this is a racial problem, and the lady is certainly right about that.
0:48

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

JFGariepy's profile picture

This woman is practicing Altruistic Punishment in a world that has lost its senses. Now, I do not recommend being as direct as she was in her use of words, as this can bring trouble to you, but she is morally right in her position. Her son has had his stuff taken from him by a Black boy who apparently has so little parental care going for him that he's in this park without any parent present (a random brown skin immigrant comes to his defense). What she's trying to do is for the Black boy to experience punishment for his behavior, so that he learns that stealing is not okay (too bad, her efforts are in vain, he won't learn). She's trying to impose White Societal Standards unto a Black boy. This is what America was all about from the beginning; the 1st amendment allows the punitive use of speech, but it doesn't allow to steal toys. Now we see outrage on social media because she used a "slur." Well, let us remind ourselves that slurs are speech, and that speech is less hurtful than theft or assault. She has thus shown restraint in her intervention compared to how her child was affected by the situation. And now we see the defenders of the Black boy on social media coming out and saying "The Black boy has autism!!!" Give me a fucking break. Autism is about to be used to justify Black aggressive behavior and lack of parental care and you should resist all of it. It is very rare in a group of White children that you'll see any of them steal items from the others, and if they do so, their parents will immediately be there to teach them proper behavior. Plenty of autistic White boys out there whose parents will be there to teach them social boundaries. In other words, this is a racial problem, and the lady is certainly right about that.

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

760,013 просмотров • 1 год назад

JFGariepy's profile picture

I have found what happened to the bullet in Charlie Kirk's neck. I am challenging Ian Carroll to review the evidence I present in this video and change his view on his position that 30-06 is inconsistent with the injuries of Charlie. In summary, the bullet had a yaw of repose induced by the angle of elevation of the shooting position. This increased yaw of repose still allowed enough energy to pierce the skin at the entry point of the bullet, but induced a tumbling of the bullet internally. As it tumbled, it reached an angled approach toward what would have been the exit skin point. Being angled at the point of exit, the bullet couldn't pierce through the back of the skin, so it instead stretched the skin. The skin's elasticity as it returned part of the stretch energy to the bullet threw it back inside Charlie's body, traveling only minimally and getting stopped around the spinal cord. My position on the plausibility and in fact likelihood of this scenario is based on mathematical ballistics modeling, live tests of 30-06 bullets, several hunter reports as well as personal surgical experience and finally, video from the assassination itself. This is an ironclad destruction of Ian Carroll's claim to Nicholas J. Fuentes that the 30-06 story is implausible. It is indeed very likely, and I respectfully ask Ian Carroll, whom I respect, to review his stance in light of this evidence. Full show at:

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

321,396 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад