Kacee Allen's banner
Kacee Allen's profile picture

Kacee Allen

@KaceeRAllen20,145 subscribers

Host of @KaceeAllenShow🎙️• Catholic 🇻🇦• KY📍• America First Independent 🇺🇸 🦅 • @SocialSight • [email protected]

Shorts

A man in a gray shirt stole a camera from behind Charlie Kirk five minutes after Kirk's assassination, used the very chair Charlie was sitting in to reach it, removed the memory card, and walked away. How is this not a person of interest?FBI

A man in a gray shirt stole a camera from behind Charlie Kirk five minutes after Kirk's assassination, used the very chair Charlie was sitting in to reach it, removed the memory card, and walked away. How is this not a person of interest?FBI

302,130 views

Charlie Kirk warned that a war with Iran would be a “profound mistake for our country.”

Charlie Kirk warned that a war with Iran would be a “profound mistake for our country.”

75,625 views

Videos

KaceeRAllen's profile picture

CLEAN BREAK MEMO (1996) 🇮🇱🇺🇸 The "Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" is a 1996 policy paper crafted by a group led by Richard Perle for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that said war should be waged on 7 middle eastern countries: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. The memo had contributions from figures like Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, who later influenced U.S. policy under the Bush administration. The memo, produced by the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, proposed a bold shift in Israel’s security strategy, rejecting the Oslo Accords’ “land for peace” model in favor of a proactive, militarized approach to ensure Israel’s regional dominance. It advocated abandoning negotiations with Palestinians, marginalizing Yasser Arafat, and pursuing regime change in Iraq to destabilize Syria and weaken Iran, thereby reshaping the Middle East’s power dynamics. The strategy emphasized preemptive actions, such as targeting Syria’s alleged weapons programs and supporting proxy forces, while fostering alliances with Jordan and Turkey. Critically, it urged Israel to align with U.S. interests, leveraging American military and political power to execute these goals. The memo influenced U.S. intervention in Iraq in 2003, as its authors, now in key U.S. roles, pushed for regime change, aligning with Israel’s goal of neutralizing regional threats. The memo’s legacy is its perceived role as a blueprint for destabilizing Middle Eastern governments, for the expansion of the state of Israel. Today, Israel is trying to get U.S. support to make a regime change in Iran, to complete their plan from the 90’s.

Kacee Allen

105,721 views • 11 months ago

KaceeRAllen's profile picture

THE HANNIBAL DIRECTIVE HISTORY AND HOW IT WAS ACTIVATED DURING OCT. 7TH 🇮🇱🇵🇸 The Hannibal Directive, a controversial Israeli military policy introduced in 1986, was initially developed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in response to the capture of three soldiers by Hezbollah in Lebanon. Named after the Carthaginian general Hannibal, who chose death over capture, the directive aimed to prevent the abduction of Israeli soldiers by authorizing the use of maximum force, even if it risked the lives of the captured soldiers themselves. Drafted by Northern Command leaders following a series of costly prisoner exchanges—viewed as unfavorable to Israel—the policy reflected a strategic preference for thwarting enemy captures over preserving the lives of hostages, prioritizing national security and deterrence over individual safety. Kept secret for years under military censorship, the directive emerged from a context of asymmetric warfare, where captured soldiers could be leveraged for significant political concessions, as seen in exchanges like the 1985 Ahmad Jibril deal. Over time, its use sparked ethical debates, with critics arguing it violated the IDF’s moral code, leading to its official revocation in 2016 by then-Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, though questions lingered about whether it was ever fully abandoned. On October 7, 2023, during Hamas’s attack on southern Israel, evidence suggests the Hannibal Directive was reactivated and expanded beyond its original scope. As Palestinian fighters breached Israeli borders, targeting military bases and settlements, the IDF faced chaos and uncertainty about the scale of abductions. Reports from Israeli media, including a detailed Haaretz investigation, indicate that the directive was invoked as early as 7:18 a.m. at the Erez crossing, with orders to use drones, helicopters, and tanks to prevent vehicles—potentially carrying Israeli captives—from returning to Gaza. A blanket order at 11:22 a.m. stated, “Not a single vehicle can return to Gaza,” implying a willingness to sacrifice civilians and soldiers alike to foil Hamas’s objectives. Testimonies from survivors, such as those from Kibbutz Be’eri, where tank shells killed hostages, and accounts of helicopter fire on fleeing civilians, align with admissions from former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in 2025, who confirmed its “tactical” use in some areas. Video: Stew Peters Network

Kacee Allen

75,165 views • 1 year ago