Knowledge North's banner
Knowledge North's profile picture

Knowledge North

@KnowledgeNorth7,066 subscribers

🔻 History, heresiology, anthropology and all things muslamic — and I use em dashes. https://t.co/LSSFvG81k6

Shorts

Last year, I called this Jvnior out as a likely Israeli agent. 🥸 I denounced his debasement of Islam till he blocked me—validating my suspicion. Here he is again, mocking the true religion. 👇 May the Most High rid us of him, as the foreskin is rid of with circumcision. ✂️

Last year, I called this Jvnior out as a likely Israeli agent. 🥸 I denounced his debasement of Islam till he blocked me—validating my suspicion. Here he is again, mocking the true religion. 👇 May the Most High rid us of him, as the foreskin is rid of with circumcision. ✂️

22,468 görüntüleme

Videos

KnowledgeNorth's profile picture

Yet again, we see the evil consequences of the ignorant Muslim working against the interests of dawa, provoking blasphemous Islamophobic attacks against the sacred symbols of Islam. If one suspects a non-Muslim evangelist of being a bad faith actor, a grifter or clip farmer, then there's no obligation to engage them at all. On the contrary, as with brother Mohammed Abd Al-Razack / محمد عبد الرزاق Al-Yamani's dignified example, we see a firm refusal to engage, in keeping with Allah's Commands (see: Q.26:63, Q.4:140, Q6:68). But if you are going to engage, then keep it respectful (again, in keeping with Quranic ethics, such as Q.16:25), so as not to provoke a far more egregiously disrespectful reaction, as we're warned against in Q.6:108. Instead, what we see here is the Muslim side contribute to a 4-fold evil: 1. A Muslim suggests that the Paul and Jesus!?! (unclear) are portrayed in the Bible as being homosexuals. 2. The Christian, GodLogic_GL, then retaliates—after his repeated warnings not do go down that route—by throwing the accusation of homosexuality back at the Prophet of Islam. 3. A Muslim, smile2jannah, shares a misleading, out-of-context clip of the non-Muslim retaliation only. 4. Christians all over the shop then have field day attacking Islam on account of deceitful Muslim behaviour — as if the initial, unnecessarily disrespectful behaviour wasn't enough of a home-goal. To add insult to injury, its the Christian who is directing Muslims to behave according to the Quranic principle outlined in Q.6:108! I've never communicated with Zeeshan smile2jannah. He doesn’t strike me as a dishonest person — though its bad enough he associates with dishonest people. Its entirely possible he forwarded the clip just as he received it. Of course, due diligence dictates that you first check the wider context of any clip you forward to avoid future regret. Then again, diligence and discernment are maybe too much to expect form people these days. 😔 Imam Qurtubi (d. 1273) on Q.6:108: حُكْمُهَا بَاقٍ فِي هَذِهِ الْأُمَّةِ عَلَى كُلِّ حَالٍ، فَمَتَى كَانَ الْكَافِرُ فِي مَنَعَةٍ، وَخِيفَ أَنْ يَسُبَّ الْإِسْلَامَ، أَوِ النَّبِيَّ عَلَيْهِ السَّلَامُ، أَوِ اللَّهَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فَلَا يَحِلُّ لِمُسْلِمٍ أَنْ يَسُبَّ صُلْبَانَهُمْ وَلَا دِينَهُمْ وَلَا كَنَائِسَهُمُ، وَلَا يَتَعَرَّضُ إِلَى مَا يُؤَدِّي إِلَى ذَلِكَ ، لِأَنَّهُ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الْبَعْثِ عَلَى الْمَعْصِيَةِ "This ruling remains in effect among this umma in all circumstances. So when the disbelievers are in a position of strength and its feared they will revile Islam or the Prophet or Allah, Mighty and Majestic; then it is not permissible for a Muslim to revile their crosses or their religion or their churches, or to do anything that would lead to such like. Because that is tantamount to provoking and inciting towards sin."

Knowledge North

27,808 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Daha fazla içerik yok.