SheThinksFreely
@L08818 • 11,173 subscribers
Unfiltered Truth | Dedicated to investigative research & analytical thinking |📍NY Notifications ON🔔
Shorts
Videos
👀Wait, what??!?!?! "JOE KENT 'noted that there were 12 Israeli cell phones on the ground' that day"? Did Candace Owens just admit that Joe Kent was the source of the anonymous leaks re Israeli cell phones on UVU campus?!? Sure as heck sounds that way 🫢 I have yet to find Joe Kent ever making that claim publicly. So how does Candace know it came from Kent? I think she just accidentally identified Mel’s "anonymous" administration source LOL
SheThinksFreely368,611 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
![😡ABSO-FKN-LUTELY NOT! Joe Kent and an unhinged Alex Jones finally admit what we already knew: con artist 1% libertarians think they can LIE and STEAL their way into power. That we'll align with Democratic Socialists like Bernie Sanders and AOC. And Tulsi's 2020 coalition, whatever tf that is. HELL NAW! I will NEVER “unite” with this. Ever. The loser libertarian fringe has finally removed the mask and they’re telling us exactly what they want: • “Ron Paul is great.” 👉No. Ron Paul has explicitly argued for “open all borders” in the past. 👉The Ron Paul/Rothbard intellectual ecosystem has a direct Frankfurt School strand through Hans-Hermann Hoppe [Jürgen Habermas]. If you're unfamiliar w the Frankfurt School I have 2 words for you: CRITICAL THEORY. • Organize around anti-war / anti AIPAC politics. Just like "the squad". • Invoke “Fourth Turning” crisis rhetoric. When asked how this differs from the Libertarian Party, they can barely answer. Because it doesn’t. This is Ron Paul libertarianism repackaged as a left/right populist coalition and aimed straight at the GOP. Hate, grievance and a weakened America is not a winning policy platform. It's why they've been LYING about President Trump's accomplishments. The same as Ron Paul did to Reagan. I'll be damned if I sit back while the Republican Party is turned into a vehicle for open borders, loser libertarianism, Bernie’s socialist base, and the retreat of American power. F*CK NO. EXPOSE & EXILE.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2095631804971569646/amplify_video_thumb/2095631451320643584/img/q71C-Qwa-SnW8OTX.jpg)
1:55
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
😡ABSO-FKN-LUTELY NOT! Joe Kent and an unhinged Alex Jones finally admit what we already knew: con artist 1% libertarians think they can LIE and STEAL their way into power. That we'll align with Democratic Socialists like Bernie Sanders and AOC. And Tulsi's 2020 coalition, whatever tf that is. HELL NAW! I will NEVER “unite” with this. Ever. The loser libertarian fringe has finally removed the mask and they’re telling us exactly what they want: • “Ron Paul is great.” 👉No. Ron Paul has explicitly argued for “open all borders” in the past. 👉The Ron Paul/Rothbard intellectual ecosystem has a direct Frankfurt School strand through Hans-Hermann Hoppe [Jürgen Habermas]. If you're unfamiliar w the Frankfurt School I have 2 words for you: CRITICAL THEORY. • Organize around anti-war / anti AIPAC politics. Just like "the squad". • Invoke “Fourth Turning” crisis rhetoric. When asked how this differs from the Libertarian Party, they can barely answer. Because it doesn’t. This is Ron Paul libertarianism repackaged as a left/right populist coalition and aimed straight at the GOP. Hate, grievance and a weakened America is not a winning policy platform. It's why they've been LYING about President Trump's accomplishments. The same as Ron Paul did to Reagan. I'll be damned if I sit back while the Republican Party is turned into a vehicle for open borders, loser libertarianism, Bernie’s socialist base, and the retreat of American power. F*CK NO. EXPOSE & EXILE.
SheThinksFreely78,605 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen
![THIS is the pattern people are talking about when they warn about stochastic terrorism. Listen to Seraphin's interaction with THE AUDIENCE: • “If we don’t have civil war, what are we doing?” • “We’re not voting our way out of this.” • “Our enemies are everywhere.” • “There’s no hope.” • Mocks being called a “stochastic terrorist.” • “What good do debates do?” • Talk about “rising people up.” • “I thought something would have [happened] already…” • “One spark. That one catalyst.” • “When’s it going to be ACTION?” • Immediately catches himself: “I don’t mean…” Then: “Yeah, I do, but I don’t.” • “Everybody’s asking the same question.” • It would be hard to “sacrifice and go off.” • Then justifies it: “Sometimes you got to do what you got to do for their future.” It's a progression: CIVIL WAR ⬇️ VOTING IS USELESS ⬇️ ENEMIES EVERYWHERE ⬇️ NO HOPE ⬇️ WORDS ARE USELESS ⬇️ SOMETHING SHOULD'VE HAPPENED ALREADY ⬇️ ONE SPARK ⬇️ ACTION ⬇️ SACRIFICE He KNOWS what his audience is becoming because they tell him directly. He hears the escalation firsthand: civil war, voting is futile, “one spark,” “one catalyst,” action, sacrifice but rather than drawing a clear line against political violence, he reinforces the grievance, validates the callers. God forbid one of these lunatics actually acts. At that point, plausible deniability won’t work. EXPOSE & EXILE.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2096631149594350068/amplify_video_thumb/2096631044459872260/img/aRwa6xVnJzjUUVCw.jpg)
THIS is the pattern people are talking about when they warn about stochastic terrorism. Listen to Seraphin's interaction with THE AUDIENCE: • “If we don’t have civil war, what are we doing?” • “We’re not voting our way out of this.” • “Our enemies are everywhere.” • “There’s no hope.” • Mocks being called a “stochastic terrorist.” • “What good do debates do?” • Talk about “rising people up.” • “I thought something would have [happened] already…” • “One spark. That one catalyst.” • “When’s it going to be ACTION?” • Immediately catches himself: “I don’t mean…” Then: “Yeah, I do, but I don’t.” • “Everybody’s asking the same question.” • It would be hard to “sacrifice and go off.” • Then justifies it: “Sometimes you got to do what you got to do for their future.” It's a progression: CIVIL WAR ⬇️ VOTING IS USELESS ⬇️ ENEMIES EVERYWHERE ⬇️ NO HOPE ⬇️ WORDS ARE USELESS ⬇️ SOMETHING SHOULD'VE HAPPENED ALREADY ⬇️ ONE SPARK ⬇️ ACTION ⬇️ SACRIFICE He KNOWS what his audience is becoming because they tell him directly. He hears the escalation firsthand: civil war, voting is futile, “one spark,” “one catalyst,” action, sacrifice but rather than drawing a clear line against political violence, he reinforces the grievance, validates the callers. God forbid one of these lunatics actually acts. At that point, plausible deniability won’t work. EXPOSE & EXILE.
SheThinksFreely54,425 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen
Many people may forget - Or are simply unaware But I haven’t, I’ve never liked her or cared for her establishment takes. Megyn Kelly has been part of a network railing against President Trump for a decade. Newt Gingrich called her out for it 2016 when she refused to label Bill Clinton a sexual predator on air - yet had no problem saying it about candidate Trump The temporal context is important: this was shortly after the Billy Bush, grab em by the box, “October Surprise” audio was released. The deep state establishment believed that was the end of Trump’s campaign - they were wrong. Notice Kelly citing polls re women hurting Trumps odds, the same as she’s doing now w young men heading into midterms. Kelly did her best to hurt Trump through his entire campaign, siding w, and acting in conjunction w, the deep state establishment. She’s never changed. She’s executing the same playbook now.
SheThinksFreely335,921 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
Rush Limbaugh understood long ago what Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Thomas Massie and their entire coalition are being forced to accept in real time: There is no need for a "new" movement, bipartisan or otherwise, to replace MAGA when President Trump leaves office. WE came before Trump, and we're not going anywhere. MAGA 🇺🇸
SheThinksFreely175,865 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten
!["Cooking the [immigration] books" my ASS! Greg Bovino is telling people the Trump administration is “cooking the books” by counting BORDER CROSSERS as INTERIOR deportations. So I did something apparently nobody making this argument bothered to do: I PULLED THE RAW ICE DATA AND TOOK THE BORDER OUT OF THE EQUATION. Here’s what’s actually in the Aug. 21 ICE data, through Aug. 6, 2026: • Trump FY2026 YTD INTERIOR ONLY already exceeds the highest Obama-era figures • Interior share: 85% trounces Obama's high of 64% • 571,539 ICE arrests since Jan. 20, 2025. • 276,085 were AT-LARGE arrests. These are ICE arrests outside the custodial jail-transfer pipeline. They are not Border Patrol turning somebody around at the border. • 509,442 arrests led to an ICE detention stay. • 372,340 Trump era ICE arrest records already end with the detention outcome “REMOVED.” • 158,527 of those removals followed AT-LARGE arrests. Read that last number again. 158,527 removals following at-large ICE arrests. Exactly how did Border Patrol “cook” those into existence? It gets worse for Bovino, because things are now ACCELERATING 🌬️ JULY 2026: • 49,091 ICE arrests • 24,725 at-large arrests • 25,181 classified as “Other Immigration Violator” • 29,513 ICE-arrest → detention → REMOVED outcomes July was the HIGHEST ICE arrest month going back to October 2022. It was also the HIGHEST ICE arrest linked removal month in that entire series. And July’s 49,091 arrests were: +52% from May +66% from February and nearly 3X February 2025. At large arrests alone were about 3.5X February 2025. Oh, and July was the first full Trump month in which “Other Immigration Violator” arrests were a MAJORITY: 51.3%. This is broad scale interior immigration enforcement and anyone who claims otherwise is LYING. Bovino can criticize DHS by omitting stats and the reality of what they say, but I pulled the raw data and it obliterates his propaganda. This guy isn't exposing “fuzzy math.” He's misleading you by not showing you the numbers. EXPOSE THE CON.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2094478969131151836/amplify_video_thumb/2094473429894287360/img/BDnx_7v0BW2FhtiZ.jpg)
"Cooking the [immigration] books" my ASS! Greg Bovino is telling people the Trump administration is “cooking the books” by counting BORDER CROSSERS as INTERIOR deportations. So I did something apparently nobody making this argument bothered to do: I PULLED THE RAW ICE DATA AND TOOK THE BORDER OUT OF THE EQUATION. Here’s what’s actually in the Aug. 21 ICE data, through Aug. 6, 2026: • Trump FY2026 YTD INTERIOR ONLY already exceeds the highest Obama-era figures • Interior share: 85% trounces Obama's high of 64% • 571,539 ICE arrests since Jan. 20, 2025. • 276,085 were AT-LARGE arrests. These are ICE arrests outside the custodial jail-transfer pipeline. They are not Border Patrol turning somebody around at the border. • 509,442 arrests led to an ICE detention stay. • 372,340 Trump era ICE arrest records already end with the detention outcome “REMOVED.” • 158,527 of those removals followed AT-LARGE arrests. Read that last number again. 158,527 removals following at-large ICE arrests. Exactly how did Border Patrol “cook” those into existence? It gets worse for Bovino, because things are now ACCELERATING 🌬️ JULY 2026: • 49,091 ICE arrests • 24,725 at-large arrests • 25,181 classified as “Other Immigration Violator” • 29,513 ICE-arrest → detention → REMOVED outcomes July was the HIGHEST ICE arrest month going back to October 2022. It was also the HIGHEST ICE arrest linked removal month in that entire series. And July’s 49,091 arrests were: +52% from May +66% from February and nearly 3X February 2025. At large arrests alone were about 3.5X February 2025. Oh, and July was the first full Trump month in which “Other Immigration Violator” arrests were a MAJORITY: 51.3%. This is broad scale interior immigration enforcement and anyone who claims otherwise is LYING. Bovino can criticize DHS by omitting stats and the reality of what they say, but I pulled the raw data and it obliterates his propaganda. This guy isn't exposing “fuzzy math.” He's misleading you by not showing you the numbers. EXPOSE THE CON.
SheThinksFreely26,847 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen
Donald Trump tells world renowned photographer Platon: “I am The Storm” 🌩️
SheThinksFreely159,189 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
These people are SICK! I don't know how I missed this pure political fairytale coming from Elizabeth Lane and Zee Sanchez, the founder of Unf*ck America, which positioned itself as a counter to Turning Point. They are participating in story hour to construct fan fiction in which: ✡️Charlie Kirk supposedly “broke” with a shadowy Zionist system. 🙊Trump is not now, nor ever was, ever really in charge. 🫥Trump is controlled by hidden forces. 🤺Charlie became Trump’s enemy. ⚰️ And then, ominously, “the rest is history.” It is nefarious insinuation cloaked as insight. They provide NO evidence of a secret rupture, no evidence that Trump threatened Charlie, no evidence that the “deep state” controls Trump, and no evidence connecting Trump to whatever fate they are implying. They simply stack conspiracy clichés on top of one another until the audience is invited to reach the ugliest possible conclusion for them. This is how foreign malign influence campaigns & propaganda work when the facts are inconvenient: invent a hidden plot, assign everyone a secret motive, and present speculation as revelation. This is manufactured mythology of the lowest kind.
SheThinksFreely52,306 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
![👀 Check this out and tell me your thoughts: coincidence or something else? Steve Baker, nearly 2 years apart, discussing 2 different federal cases on 2 different podcasts, admits to the audience what his objective is, and it's not "justice": “WIN IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION.” Even more bizarre, both times he tees it up the same way: “I TOLD THEM…” 🗣️ In 2024 re: his own J6 case: “I have told the DOJ. I have told the FBI. I have told the court…” Then: “We are going to try my case in the COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION.” And immediately, Kyle Seraphin identifies using media to shape narrative as: “A useful tactic.” Why? Because there is “power in the media and public sentiment” and you have to “push certain things.” 🗣️Then in 2026, 678 days later, re: the J6 pipe 💣federal case AGAIN: “I told them on that call…” Then again: “We can win this in the COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION.” What an odd coincidence. Except what if it isn’t? CIA files on Soviet active measures describe the intent of influence operations as: ▪️designed to shape public opinion manipulate media narratives ▪️discredit institutions ▪️influence how populations interpret events The "method" maps disturbingly well onto a documented influence playbook: ✔️Bypass the institution ✔️Go directly to the audience ✔️Use media to influence public sentiment ✔️“Push certain things” ✔️Shape and win the narrative And the 2024 episode where they explain this? It was literally called: “THE METHOD.” Might Steve Baker be giving us a peak behind the [Iron] curtain? I would never pretend to know. But I also can't ignore what jumps out at me from these 2 clips.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2094766304058056915/amplify_video_thumb/2094766031512158208/img/515iGXmhy2VRzj4e.jpg)
👀 Check this out and tell me your thoughts: coincidence or something else? Steve Baker, nearly 2 years apart, discussing 2 different federal cases on 2 different podcasts, admits to the audience what his objective is, and it's not "justice": “WIN IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION.” Even more bizarre, both times he tees it up the same way: “I TOLD THEM…” 🗣️ In 2024 re: his own J6 case: “I have told the DOJ. I have told the FBI. I have told the court…” Then: “We are going to try my case in the COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION.” And immediately, Kyle Seraphin identifies using media to shape narrative as: “A useful tactic.” Why? Because there is “power in the media and public sentiment” and you have to “push certain things.” 🗣️Then in 2026, 678 days later, re: the J6 pipe 💣federal case AGAIN: “I told them on that call…” Then again: “We can win this in the COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION.” What an odd coincidence. Except what if it isn’t? CIA files on Soviet active measures describe the intent of influence operations as: ▪️designed to shape public opinion manipulate media narratives ▪️discredit institutions ▪️influence how populations interpret events The "method" maps disturbingly well onto a documented influence playbook: ✔️Bypass the institution ✔️Go directly to the audience ✔️Use media to influence public sentiment ✔️“Push certain things” ✔️Shape and win the narrative And the 2024 episode where they explain this? It was literally called: “THE METHOD.” Might Steve Baker be giving us a peak behind the [Iron] curtain? I would never pretend to know. But I also can't ignore what jumps out at me from these 2 clips.
SheThinksFreely22,760 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen
📢PSA to the Libertarians, Anarchists and all other anti-American subversives: WE, THE PEOPLE (AKA MAGA) WILL NEVER UNITE WITH YOU! What you're advocating for is NOT “limited government.” 👿 Doug French, President Emeritus of the Mises Institute, explicitly says ANARCHY IS THE POINT. Discussing the collapse of Rome and anarchy breaking out, French says that is “what we’re after.” Then, when someone argues that anarchy would leave people defenseless, French makes the collective position even clearer: “You are on record, as opposed to the rest of this crowd, that anarchy breaking out would be a bad thing?” In other words: thinking anarchy is BAD puts you opposite “the rest of this (Libertarian) crowd.” 👿 Hans-Hermann Hoppe, leading Libertarian/Anarcho-Capitalist Philosopher, longtime Mises Institute scholar, and Founder of the Property and Freedom Society, calls the American Army “a laughingstock.” 👿 Stephan Kinsella, Libertarian Theorist & Ron Paul Institute speaker says areas they need to develop are “fairly esoteric” to include strategy. And Hoppe tells the audience the “general IQ is going down,” while the “few people who still have a high IQ” have a greater responsibility to preserve and spread these ideas. They truly believe they're smarter than the masses. EL OH EL Anarchy is the objective. The American military is a “laughingstock.” And THEY are the enlightened high-IQ class entrusted with preserving the esoteric knowledge. Notice any thru line amongst these prominent political and media voices tied to the broader Mises Rothbard Hoppe ecosystem? Ron Paul. Dave Smith. Scott Horton. Thomas Massie. Andrew Napolitano. Daniel McAdams. Tom Woods. Which podcasts do they frequent? Who is platforming them? They're very open about where they want to take things: THE YOUTH 🧒The Mises Institute says TikTok and Instagram are “the most important arena for informing and organizing the next generation” and called it a “top priority.” 🧒The Ron Paul Scholars program recruits college students for a foreign policy and civil liberties “boot camp.” So when this network targets young Americans through war, Israel, foreign policy, distrust of government and endless grievance against “the establishment,” understand the ideology behind the sales pitch. Here's the part they somehow don't understand: You represent roughly 1% of the electorate for a reason. You have never built a governing majority. You have never won a national mandate. And you are NOT going to co-opt MAGA and turn it into an anarchist project built on hatred, grievance and contempt for America’s military and institutions. MAGA is not your vehicle. America is not your experiment. And constitutional conservatives do not have to “unite” with people whose stated destination is ANARCHY. They are telling you exactly who they are. Believe them. Most importantly: SHAME THEM. CALL THEM OUT. EXPOSE THEM FOR WHO THEY TRULY ARE AND WHAT THEY'RE TRULY ATTEMPTING TO DO. MAGA 🇺🇸
SheThinksFreely31,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
The Circle Jerk Network & their endless web of ideological grievance 👇 Tucker Carlson, who supports Ron Paul, has Darryl Cooper, who supports Ron Paul, on his show for the 3rd time. Why? To peddle hopelessness and grievance. This isn't "America First". This is an attempt at a power grab. This is a grift.
SheThinksFreely40,930 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
You can't make this up! These people literally read off a script! Alex Jones today 👇 Trump and Kash suck If I start seeing some good I'll be like "hey great!" I'm just gonna call BALLS AND STRIKES Donald Trump is dumb and he sucks Kyle Seraphin last night 👇 Trump sucks If he starts making progress I'll call it out I'll call it as I see it, BALLS AND STRIKES Donald Trump sucks It's unfathomable that people fall for this stupidity lol
SheThinksFreely108,909 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
Kash Patel dropping multiple BOOMS this am 💥 💥 💥 Steer clear of the miserable doom people, they won't be talking about this: 💣The "diseased temple" was built over 20-30 years (IYKYK) 💣 We've got ALL the evidence 💣We've got all the info we need 💣Election Integrity: we have the information that backs President Trump's claim - it's being folded into the entire ongoing CONSPIRACY case (Fort Pierce, FL) 💣Working w DOJ & are going to be making arrests 💣💣"Stay tuned this week, you might see a thing or two" Oh, and he also annonced he will be dropping a defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic tomorrow. I can't wait to see what happens!
SheThinksFreely87,525 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten
WTF is Joe Kent talking about? He's being very slick with his wording here. He repeatedly says NCTC was “running an investigation,” “working the case,” and was ordered to “stop investigating.” But NCTC is not the FBI. Its own framework says: NCTC identifies and analyzes intelligence leads and sends them to the appropriate agencies “for action.” It is expressly prohibited from directing the execution of operations. Kent spent decades in special operations/intelligence, worked as a CIA paramilitary officer, and ultimately ran NCTC. He damn well knows the difference between intelligence analysis and a criminal investigation. Could NCTC examine possible foreign ties? Absolutely. Could Kent legitimately say his analysts had unresolved intelligence leads? Absolutely. But repeatedly telling an audience "we were investigating the Charlie Kirk case” blurs that jurisdictional line and makes NCTC sound like an independent law enforcement investigative body. It isn’t. That distinction isn’t semantics. It’s the entire point. And he knows it. It appears to me he's blurring the lines on purpose. If true, what might one call this type of behavior?
SheThinksFreely20,635 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat