Bill Mitchell's banner
Bill Mitchell's profile picture

Bill Mitchell

@mitchellvii504,952 subscribers

CEO of YourVoice™ Studios, Inc. Host of YourVoice America. This account is owned and managed by Bill Mitchell. So excited for the next 4 years! #MAGA

Shorts

🇺🇸 🇫🇷 IS THE WORLD FINALLY WAKING UP TO TRUMP-STYLE NATIONALISM?! A Paris court just cleared Marine Le Pen to run for President in 2027. The polls dropped within hours. Le Pen now leads every single matchup. She is beating Macrons handpicked successors by double digits. One poll has her crushing a rival 55 to 45. This is not a fluke. This is a pattern. France is watching decades of open borders, weak growth and revolving door governments and deciding they have had enough. Sound familiar? From France to Italy to the Netherlands, voters keep reaching for the same medicine. Put the nation first. Control the border. Stop apologizing for loving your own country. Call it nationalism. Call it common sense. The chattering class can call it whatever helps them sleep at night. The old guard sold globalism as inevitable. Turns out it was just unpopular. Trump did not start this fire. He just proved it could win.

🇺🇸 🇫🇷 IS THE WORLD FINALLY WAKING UP TO TRUMP-STYLE NATIONALISM?! A Paris court just cleared Marine Le Pen to run for President in 2027. The polls dropped within hours. Le Pen now leads every single matchup. She is beating Macrons handpicked successors by double digits. One poll has her crushing a rival 55 to 45. This is not a fluke. This is a pattern. France is watching decades of open borders, weak growth and revolving door governments and deciding they have had enough. Sound familiar? From France to Italy to the Netherlands, voters keep reaching for the same medicine. Put the nation first. Control the border. Stop apologizing for loving your own country. Call it nationalism. Call it common sense. The chattering class can call it whatever helps them sleep at night. The old guard sold globalism as inevitable. Turns out it was just unpopular. Trump did not start this fire. He just proved it could win.

300,559 views

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 COULD LETTING THE ARABS TAKE KHARG ISLAND WHILE AMERICA OWNS THE SKY BE THE MOVE THAT BREAKS IRAN?! Here is the play almost nobody is talking about. Kharg Island is the jugular. Nearly all of Iran's oil flows through that one 20 mile patch of rock, close to 90 percent of exports and roughly 78 billion dollars a year that funds the regime and its Revolutionary Guard. Cut it off, and the money that pays for missiles and terror dries up. The problem is simple. Americans are not ready to send our sons and daughters onto that island, and no one should pretend otherwise. So here is the answer. Let the nations Iran has actually been bombing do the walking. Saudi Arabia fields around 250,000 troops and an air force stronger than Iran's. The UAE is a lean 65,000 strong force the Pentagon calls Little Sparta. These are not weak partners. Give the Saudis, the Emiratis, and the Jordanians the ground assignment, flush the IRGC out into the open, and let overwhelming American and allied airpower do what it does best. Make no mistake, an island assault is a hard and dangerous mission, not a weekend raid. But this is the rare fight where the countries with the grievance and the manpower carry the ground, and America carries the sky. Iran built its empire on that one island. It is time somebody took it away.

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 COULD LETTING THE ARABS TAKE KHARG ISLAND WHILE AMERICA OWNS THE SKY BE THE MOVE THAT BREAKS IRAN?! Here is the play almost nobody is talking about. Kharg Island is the jugular. Nearly all of Iran's oil flows through that one 20 mile patch of rock, close to 90 percent of exports and roughly 78 billion dollars a year that funds the regime and its Revolutionary Guard. Cut it off, and the money that pays for missiles and terror dries up. The problem is simple. Americans are not ready to send our sons and daughters onto that island, and no one should pretend otherwise. So here is the answer. Let the nations Iran has actually been bombing do the walking. Saudi Arabia fields around 250,000 troops and an air force stronger than Iran's. The UAE is a lean 65,000 strong force the Pentagon calls Little Sparta. These are not weak partners. Give the Saudis, the Emiratis, and the Jordanians the ground assignment, flush the IRGC out into the open, and let overwhelming American and allied airpower do what it does best. Make no mistake, an island assault is a hard and dangerous mission, not a weekend raid. But this is the rare fight where the countries with the grievance and the manpower carry the ground, and America carries the sky. Iran built its empire on that one island. It is time somebody took it away.

235,902 views

Yeah, I don't think future presidents will complain when they no longer have to hold state dinners with world leaders in a tent.

Yeah, I don't think future presidents will complain when they no longer have to hold state dinners with world leaders in a tent.

1,506,289 views

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 BREAKING: IS A DESPERATE IRAN NOW THREATENING TO LEAVE MILLIONS OF ARABS WITHOUT WATER?! Now you finally see who they really are. Tehran is warning that if America keeps hitting the regime, it will start blowing up the desalination plants that give its own Arab neighbors their drinking water. Kuwait pulls nearly 90 percent of its water from those plants, and Iran already set one on fire on Friday. That is not a strategy, that is a cornered animal biting every hand still willing to feed it. Iranian official Mohsen Rezaei snarled that "no political border will be secure against Iran's offensive forces," even as President Trump vowed to obliterate their power plants, oil wells and Kharg Island if the regime refuses to stand down. The mullahs are torching every last bridge to the Gulf at the exact moment they need those neighbors most. A regime this unhinged can never be allowed within a thousand miles of a nuclear weapon.

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 BREAKING: IS A DESPERATE IRAN NOW THREATENING TO LEAVE MILLIONS OF ARABS WITHOUT WATER?! Now you finally see who they really are. Tehran is warning that if America keeps hitting the regime, it will start blowing up the desalination plants that give its own Arab neighbors their drinking water. Kuwait pulls nearly 90 percent of its water from those plants, and Iran already set one on fire on Friday. That is not a strategy, that is a cornered animal biting every hand still willing to feed it. Iranian official Mohsen Rezaei snarled that "no political border will be secure against Iran's offensive forces," even as President Trump vowed to obliterate their power plants, oil wells and Kharg Island if the regime refuses to stand down. The mullahs are torching every last bridge to the Gulf at the exact moment they need those neighbors most. A regime this unhinged can never be allowed within a thousand miles of a nuclear weapon.

223,907 views

⛽ HERE'S THE PART NOBODY EXPLAINS TO YOU ABOUT GAS PRICES! Trump is right: Oil companies are playing both ends against the middle! A gas station owner does not set his own fuel cost. He buys his gasoline wholesale from a refiner or distributor, often locked into a supply contract with a major oil company brand. That wholesale price is set upstream. By the refiners. By the majors. Not by the guy running the register. So why is wholesale still high when crude is sitting at $68 a barrel. The industry's answer is inventory lag. Refiners are still selling fuel made from oil they bought weeks ago at higher prices. Chevron's own CFO has said publicly that lower crude prices take time to work through the supply chain before drivers see real savings. Fine. But here is the question that breaks that excuse wide open. If stations are selling old inventory bought at yesterday's price, why does the pump price jump the second crude spikes, before that expensive new oil has even been delivered. You cannot have it both ways. Slow to fall because of old cheap inventory, but instant to rise before the new expensive inventory even arrives. The real answer is something called replacement cost pricing. Retailers price gas based on what it will cost to refill the tank tomorrow, not what they paid for the gas sitting in the ground today. That is why prices jump like lightning when crude rises. But somehow that same forward looking logic disappears the moment crude falls. Suddenly everybody remembers the inventory they are still working through. That is not a supply chain mystery. That is a choice. Economists call the pattern rockets and feathers. Prices shoot up like rockets the second crude spikes. They drift down like feathers when crude falls. The same companies pricing forward on the way up are mysteriously pricing backward on the way down. Trump named the companies directly. ExxonMobil. Chevron. Shell. BP. He said it plainly in the Oval Office, that they are the ones not passing along the savings they should already be passing along. California gets singled out too. Gas there averages over five dollars a gallon, with state taxes piling on top of everything else. This is not Trump bullying small business. This is Trump asking the companies holding the lever why the logic only runs in one direction. Lower oil should mean lower gas, with the same speed it took to raise it.

⛽ HERE'S THE PART NOBODY EXPLAINS TO YOU ABOUT GAS PRICES! Trump is right: Oil companies are playing both ends against the middle! A gas station owner does not set his own fuel cost. He buys his gasoline wholesale from a refiner or distributor, often locked into a supply contract with a major oil company brand. That wholesale price is set upstream. By the refiners. By the majors. Not by the guy running the register. So why is wholesale still high when crude is sitting at $68 a barrel. The industry's answer is inventory lag. Refiners are still selling fuel made from oil they bought weeks ago at higher prices. Chevron's own CFO has said publicly that lower crude prices take time to work through the supply chain before drivers see real savings. Fine. But here is the question that breaks that excuse wide open. If stations are selling old inventory bought at yesterday's price, why does the pump price jump the second crude spikes, before that expensive new oil has even been delivered. You cannot have it both ways. Slow to fall because of old cheap inventory, but instant to rise before the new expensive inventory even arrives. The real answer is something called replacement cost pricing. Retailers price gas based on what it will cost to refill the tank tomorrow, not what they paid for the gas sitting in the ground today. That is why prices jump like lightning when crude rises. But somehow that same forward looking logic disappears the moment crude falls. Suddenly everybody remembers the inventory they are still working through. That is not a supply chain mystery. That is a choice. Economists call the pattern rockets and feathers. Prices shoot up like rockets the second crude spikes. They drift down like feathers when crude falls. The same companies pricing forward on the way up are mysteriously pricing backward on the way down. Trump named the companies directly. ExxonMobil. Chevron. Shell. BP. He said it plainly in the Oval Office, that they are the ones not passing along the savings they should already be passing along. California gets singled out too. Gas there averages over five dollars a gallon, with state taxes piling on top of everything else. This is not Trump bullying small business. This is Trump asking the companies holding the lever why the logic only runs in one direction. Lower oil should mean lower gas, with the same speed it took to raise it.

307,891 views

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

💔 ROBERTS AND BARRETT JUST STABBED US IN THE BACK. AGAIN. The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. RNC that states do not have to receive mail-in ballots by Election Day for them to count. Postmarked by Election Day is good enough. Your ballot can wander through the postal system for days after the polls close and still be counted. And who wrote the majority opinion? Amy Coney Barrett. Who joined her? John Roberts. Along with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson. The usual liberal bloc did what the usual liberal bloc does. But Barrett and Roberts had the power to stop this and chose not to. This is not a surprise from Roberts at this point. But Barrett? This is the justice we were promised would be different. This is the justice we fought for. This is the justice who just handed the left exactly what they wanted on mail-in ballot integrity. Five to four. One vote. That is the margin by which election integrity lost today. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh dissented. Alito was scathing. He wrote that allowing ballots to pour in after Election Day, while preliminary results are already being reported publicly, creates greater opportunity for fraud and risks further destroying public confidence in our elections. He is right. He has always been right on this. Here is what this means on the ground. States can now set their own deadlines for when mail-in ballots must be received after Election Day. Mississippi had five days. Washington State has twenty-one days. Twenty-one days of ballots trickling in after you thought the election was over. Think about what that looks like. Think about what that feels like to watch. You know exactly what it feels like. We have all lived it. Alito said it plainly in his dissent. When thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. He cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. We did not need a study to tell us that. The Save America Act, if passed, could address some of this going forward through Congress. But today's ruling makes clear that the legislative route is now the only route. The Court just took the judicial option off the table. Roberts and Barrett handed that decision to the same Congress where we are still fighting for a real majority. Barrett and Roberts folded. Again. Remember this the next time someone tells you that winning the White House is enough. It is not enough if the judges we are told to trust keep crossing the line when it matters most. Personnel is policy. And today, our personnel failed us.

290,315 views

HEAT WAVE: ARE MAMDANI'S SOCIALIST POLICIES WORKING FOR NEW YORKERS ROASTING IN THIS HEAT WAVE? New York just lived through one of its hottest stretches in over a decade. This is exactly when leadership gets tested. Mamdani's answer was a thermostat suggestion. Set your AC to seventy eight degrees. Turn off your lights. Unplug what you can. Meanwhile in Riverdale, a Bronx neighborhood with a large Jewish community, Con Edison simply cut the power. Thousands of families sat in the dark and the heat while the mayor asked everyone else to sacrifice a little more. You cannot conserve your way out of a grid that cannot carry the load. That is not a talking point. That is physics. New York shut down Indian Point, its reliable nuclear plant, and leaned hard into wind and solar promises. Now the hottest week of the year arrives and the lights go out in the Bronx. Socialism always sounds generous in a speech. It looks very different when your refrigerator stops running and your kids cannot sleep through a heat emergency. The mayor who built his campaign on standing up for working class neighborhoods just watched a working class neighborhood lose power while a celebrity wedding lit up Madison Square Garden across town. That contrast writes itself. Nobody needed to manufacture it. Good intentions do not keep a refrigerator cold. Reliable power does. New Yorkers just found out the hard way which one their mayor actually delivered.

HEAT WAVE: ARE MAMDANI'S SOCIALIST POLICIES WORKING FOR NEW YORKERS ROASTING IN THIS HEAT WAVE? New York just lived through one of its hottest stretches in over a decade. This is exactly when leadership gets tested. Mamdani's answer was a thermostat suggestion. Set your AC to seventy eight degrees. Turn off your lights. Unplug what you can. Meanwhile in Riverdale, a Bronx neighborhood with a large Jewish community, Con Edison simply cut the power. Thousands of families sat in the dark and the heat while the mayor asked everyone else to sacrifice a little more. You cannot conserve your way out of a grid that cannot carry the load. That is not a talking point. That is physics. New York shut down Indian Point, its reliable nuclear plant, and leaned hard into wind and solar promises. Now the hottest week of the year arrives and the lights go out in the Bronx. Socialism always sounds generous in a speech. It looks very different when your refrigerator stops running and your kids cannot sleep through a heat emergency. The mayor who built his campaign on standing up for working class neighborhoods just watched a working class neighborhood lose power while a celebrity wedding lit up Madison Square Garden across town. That contrast writes itself. Nobody needed to manufacture it. Good intentions do not keep a refrigerator cold. Reliable power does. New Yorkers just found out the hard way which one their mayor actually delivered.

240,901 views

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.

ALITO'S DISSENT ON MAIL-IN BALLOTS IS A MASTERPIECE AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT While the mainstream media is busy celebrating today's ruling, four justices stood in the breach and said what every honest American already knows. Alito's dissent in Watson v. RNC is not just a legal argument. It is a warning shot about where this country is headed if we do not get serious about election integrity. Read these words carefully. Alito wrote that when thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the result of an election, charges of a rigged election explode. That is a sitting Supreme Court Justice, in an official dissent, validating what the corporate media has spent four years calling a conspiracy theory. He went further. Alito cited research showing that drawn-out ballot counting produces a large and significant decrease in Americans' trust in elections. Not a talking point. Not a campaign slogan. Peer reviewed research cited in a Supreme Court dissent. The problem is real, it is documented, and five justices just decided to ignore it. On fraud, Alito was surgical. He pointed out that as far back as 2005, a commission chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker concluded that absentee voting was the largest source of potential voter fraud in American elections. Jimmy Carter. The left canonizes that man. His own commission said mail-in ballots are the biggest fraud vulnerability we have. And today's majority just threw the door open wider. Then Alito did something remarkable. He painted a picture of exactly what this ruling could produce. A close presidential election. One state still counting. The leading candidate watching his margin shrink day after day as new batches of mail-in ballots arrive. The lead flipping with days to spare before electors must cast their votes. He was not writing fiction. He was describing something we have already watched happen in slow motion in race after race since 2020. He also torched the majority's logic directly. Barrett and Roberts argued that the word election in federal law only governs when voters CAST their ballots, not when officials RECEIVE them. Alito called this what it is. The electorate's choice is not complete, he argued, until all the ballots have been collected and the decision is fixed. A ballot sitting in a mail truck three days after Election Day is not a completed act of voting. It is an open question. And open questions are where fraud lives. He also raised something nobody else is talking about. What is the limiting principle here? If states can accept ballots five days late, can they accept them twenty-one days late? Washington State already does. Can a state eliminate receipt deadlines entirely? Alito asked that question directly and the majority gave no answer. They opened a door and refused to say how far it swings. Thomas and Gorsuch stood with Alito completely. Kavanaugh joined most of it. And Barrett, the justice we were told would hold the line, wrote the opinion that Alito was dissenting against. History will not be kind to this decision. But it may be very kind to this dissent. The greatest dissents in Supreme Court history are often the ones that turn out to be right. Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch put it on the record today. The question is what we do with it.

248,916 views

🇺🇸 🇨🇳 JUST-IN: THEY ARE ALREADY LEAKING AGAINST TRUMP'S PRIMETIME SPEECH BEFORE HE HAS EVEN FINISHED WRITING IT, WHAT ARE THEY SO AFRAID OF! Nobody firebombs an empty building! Thursday night at nine, President Trump addresses the nation on election integrity. He is calling it really, really big news. "It doesn't get bigger," he told reporters, "because without free and fair elections, you don't have a country." Then Reuters dropped Wednesday. Four anonymous officials, warning the country that whatever the President says could be "misleading." Their own story admits the speech text is not finalized. They are fact-checking a document that does not exist yet. That is not journalism. That is a fire alarm pulled by people who already smell smoke. A White House task force has spent weeks pulling records from the intelligence community, and somebody inside that building sprinted to a reporter the second the request landed. The same crowd that spent four years telling us questions about voting machines were forbidden is suddenly desperate to get ahead of the answers. If there is nothing there, let him say it and laugh him off the stage. Why the preemptive strike? The SAVE America Act is sitting in the Senate right now, one filibuster away from law. Thursday night, forty million Americans find out exactly why the swamp fought this hard to keep it there. Thoughts? ⬇️

🇺🇸 🇨🇳 JUST-IN: THEY ARE ALREADY LEAKING AGAINST TRUMP'S PRIMETIME SPEECH BEFORE HE HAS EVEN FINISHED WRITING IT, WHAT ARE THEY SO AFRAID OF! Nobody firebombs an empty building! Thursday night at nine, President Trump addresses the nation on election integrity. He is calling it really, really big news. "It doesn't get bigger," he told reporters, "because without free and fair elections, you don't have a country." Then Reuters dropped Wednesday. Four anonymous officials, warning the country that whatever the President says could be "misleading." Their own story admits the speech text is not finalized. They are fact-checking a document that does not exist yet. That is not journalism. That is a fire alarm pulled by people who already smell smoke. A White House task force has spent weeks pulling records from the intelligence community, and somebody inside that building sprinted to a reporter the second the request landed. The same crowd that spent four years telling us questions about voting machines were forbidden is suddenly desperate to get ahead of the answers. If there is nothing there, let him say it and laugh him off the stage. Why the preemptive strike? The SAVE America Act is sitting in the Senate right now, one filibuster away from law. Thursday night, forty million Americans find out exactly why the swamp fought this hard to keep it there. Thoughts? ⬇️

189,193 views

The problem with killing Iranian leaders is that these guys aren't Patton. They aren't Eisenhower. They aren't Winston Churchill. With Iranian leaders it's just the next thug in line. If attacked would they just throw down their arms and surrender like the Iraqis did?

The problem with killing Iranian leaders is that these guys aren't Patton. They aren't Eisenhower. They aren't Winston Churchill. With Iranian leaders it's just the next thug in line. If attacked would they just throw down their arms and surrender like the Iraqis did?

158,264 views

🇺🇸 VANCE IS TRUMP'S GUY: Trump's just told us who's running in 2028 and it's JD Vance - and honestly, it's the smartest move he could make! Rubio can run as J.D.'s vice president Here's what actually happened. Trump polled these two against each other for months. Let them compete. Vance crushed his book tour - walked out of The View looking like a winner, handled every interview perfectly. That's when Trump made the call. So Trump watches how his guys perform under pressure, sees who connects with people, sees who handles the establishment left without flinching. That's not cruel politics - that's exactly how you find the right successor. Rubio already said he won't challenge Vance if he runs. The guy's only 55 - young enough to be Vance's vice president and run at 65. That's actually a path forward, not a dead end. Both of these guys are better than anything the Democrats have. Both are tied to Trump's movement. Both respect each other publicly. This could be the best political partnership we've seen if they handle it right. Who's your favorite in 2028, Vance or Rubio?

🇺🇸 VANCE IS TRUMP'S GUY: Trump's just told us who's running in 2028 and it's JD Vance - and honestly, it's the smartest move he could make! Rubio can run as J.D.'s vice president Here's what actually happened. Trump polled these two against each other for months. Let them compete. Vance crushed his book tour - walked out of The View looking like a winner, handled every interview perfectly. That's when Trump made the call. So Trump watches how his guys perform under pressure, sees who connects with people, sees who handles the establishment left without flinching. That's not cruel politics - that's exactly how you find the right successor. Rubio already said he won't challenge Vance if he runs. The guy's only 55 - young enough to be Vance's vice president and run at 65. That's actually a path forward, not a dead end. Both of these guys are better than anything the Democrats have. Both are tied to Trump's movement. Both respect each other publicly. This could be the best political partnership we've seen if they handle it right. Who's your favorite in 2028, Vance or Rubio?

142,574 views

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 BREAKING: TRUMP JUST PULLED THE PLUG ON IRAN'S OIL MONEY! Iran wanted to play games in the Strait of Hormuz. Three tankers hit with unknown projectiles in a matter of days. Now the bill just came due. The Treasury Department is revoking the license that let Iran sell oil under the June ceasefire deal. That waiver was a gift, not a right, and Iran just spat on it. A US official put it plainly. "As President Trump and the administration have repeatedly affirmed, the MOU in effect with Iran is entirely performance based." Translation. Behave or lose the deal. Another official didn't mince words either. "Iran's actions in the Strait were wholly unacceptable to the United States and will be met with consequences." This is not a slap on the wrist. Oil exports are Iran's lifeline to China and its only real source of hard currency. Cutting that off is aiming straight at the regime's wallet. Iran signed up for a deal that required keeping the strait open. Instead they fired on a Qatari LNG carrier, a Saudi supertanker, and a third vessel hit by a drone. That is not a misunderstanding. That is a pattern. You do not get to torch tankers with one hand and collect sanctions relief with the other. Oil prices jumped more than three percent on the news, proof that markets know exactly what this means. Consequences are not just words anymore. Iran wanted leverage. What they got was a reminder that Trump's deals come with strings, and he is not afraid to pull them.

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 BREAKING: TRUMP JUST PULLED THE PLUG ON IRAN'S OIL MONEY! Iran wanted to play games in the Strait of Hormuz. Three tankers hit with unknown projectiles in a matter of days. Now the bill just came due. The Treasury Department is revoking the license that let Iran sell oil under the June ceasefire deal. That waiver was a gift, not a right, and Iran just spat on it. A US official put it plainly. "As President Trump and the administration have repeatedly affirmed, the MOU in effect with Iran is entirely performance based." Translation. Behave or lose the deal. Another official didn't mince words either. "Iran's actions in the Strait were wholly unacceptable to the United States and will be met with consequences." This is not a slap on the wrist. Oil exports are Iran's lifeline to China and its only real source of hard currency. Cutting that off is aiming straight at the regime's wallet. Iran signed up for a deal that required keeping the strait open. Instead they fired on a Qatari LNG carrier, a Saudi supertanker, and a third vessel hit by a drone. That is not a misunderstanding. That is a pattern. You do not get to torch tankers with one hand and collect sanctions relief with the other. Oil prices jumped more than three percent on the news, proof that markets know exactly what this means. Consequences are not just words anymore. Iran wanted leverage. What they got was a reminder that Trump's deals come with strings, and he is not afraid to pull them.

158,537 views

IRAN LEADERS FALLING! - It's astonishing how Iran's freshly appointed IRGC commander-in-chief was eliminated in a U.S.-Israeli strike almost right after taking the job. "Brig. Gen. Bahman Behmard... killed in a U.S.–Israeli airstrike while inside an underground command centre," according to the latest breaking reports. The regime's top brass keeps vanishing - this is what real pressure looks like.

IRAN LEADERS FALLING! - It's astonishing how Iran's freshly appointed IRGC commander-in-chief was eliminated in a U.S.-Israeli strike almost right after taking the job. "Brig. Gen. Bahman Behmard... killed in a U.S.–Israeli airstrike while inside an underground command centre," according to the latest breaking reports. The regime's top brass keeps vanishing - this is what real pressure looks like.

463,575 views

TAKE A BREATH. TODAY WAS ROUGH. HERE IS WHAT IS STILL COMING. I know. It was a bad day. Barrett and Roberts handed the left a win on mail-in ballots that stings, and it is going to sting for a while. We are not going to pretend otherwise. But before you check out for the night, you need to know what is still coming, because some of the biggest decisions of this entire term have not dropped yet. And some of them could be very good for our side. Here is where things stand. Today the Court decided two major cases. On mail-in ballots, Barrett wrote the majority and sided with the liberals. Ballots postmarked by Election Day can be received days later and still count. Roberts went with her. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and mostly Kavanaugh dissented. It was a gut punch and we covered it in detail earlier. The other big decision today was actually a win. The Court upheld Trump's authority to fire Rebecca Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission. Trump called it one of the most important presidential power decisions ever handed down. He is not wrong. That one matters for executive authority in ways that will echo for years. Now here is what is still coming. BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP. This is the big one. Trump signed an executive order on day one of his second term ending automatic citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants and temporary visa holders. Every lower court blocked it as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court is the last stop. Conservative justices showed skepticism toward the administration's position during oral arguments, so do not expect a clean sweep, but this ruling is going to reshape immigration policy no matter how it lands. TRANSGENDER ATHLETES. The Court is set to rule on the Idaho and West Virginia bans on biological males competing in women's sports. The conservative justices appeared ready to uphold those bans during arguments. This could be a significant win that enshrines once and for all that Title IX does not require schools to allow biological males to compete against women. There is also a case on presidential firing power at the Federal Reserve involving Governor Lisa Cook, and a geofence warrant case involving Fourth Amendment privacy rights. The Court has not announced the final day of the term. It could be later this week or it could slip into early July. Here is the bottom line. Today hurt. The mail-in ballot ruling is a real setback and we are going to fight it through Congress. But this term is not over. The decisions still coming have the potential to deliver wins on the issues that matter most to this movement, the border, women's sports, and the limits of government power. Stay in the fight. Tomorrow is another day and the Court is not done yet.

TAKE A BREATH. TODAY WAS ROUGH. HERE IS WHAT IS STILL COMING. I know. It was a bad day. Barrett and Roberts handed the left a win on mail-in ballots that stings, and it is going to sting for a while. We are not going to pretend otherwise. But before you check out for the night, you need to know what is still coming, because some of the biggest decisions of this entire term have not dropped yet. And some of them could be very good for our side. Here is where things stand. Today the Court decided two major cases. On mail-in ballots, Barrett wrote the majority and sided with the liberals. Ballots postmarked by Election Day can be received days later and still count. Roberts went with her. Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, and mostly Kavanaugh dissented. It was a gut punch and we covered it in detail earlier. The other big decision today was actually a win. The Court upheld Trump's authority to fire Rebecca Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission. Trump called it one of the most important presidential power decisions ever handed down. He is not wrong. That one matters for executive authority in ways that will echo for years. Now here is what is still coming. BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP. This is the big one. Trump signed an executive order on day one of his second term ending automatic citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants and temporary visa holders. Every lower court blocked it as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court is the last stop. Conservative justices showed skepticism toward the administration's position during oral arguments, so do not expect a clean sweep, but this ruling is going to reshape immigration policy no matter how it lands. TRANSGENDER ATHLETES. The Court is set to rule on the Idaho and West Virginia bans on biological males competing in women's sports. The conservative justices appeared ready to uphold those bans during arguments. This could be a significant win that enshrines once and for all that Title IX does not require schools to allow biological males to compete against women. There is also a case on presidential firing power at the Federal Reserve involving Governor Lisa Cook, and a geofence warrant case involving Fourth Amendment privacy rights. The Court has not announced the final day of the term. It could be later this week or it could slip into early July. Here is the bottom line. Today hurt. The mail-in ballot ruling is a real setback and we are going to fight it through Congress. But this term is not over. The decisions still coming have the potential to deliver wins on the issues that matter most to this movement, the border, women's sports, and the limits of government power. Stay in the fight. Tomorrow is another day and the Court is not done yet.

160,296 views

People talk about the idea that President Trump's ceasefire has given Iran time to rebuild their weapon systems. What they don't talk about is that a ceasefire has given American intelligence time to know exactly where those weapon systems are and how to destroy them!

People talk about the idea that President Trump's ceasefire has given Iran time to rebuild their weapon systems. What they don't talk about is that a ceasefire has given American intelligence time to know exactly where those weapon systems are and how to destroy them!

109,140 views

OBAMACARE STICKER SHOCK! - Hardworking dad stares at $27,000 yearly health insurance bill for his family. $2,000 a month just for coverage with a $13,000 deductible. "How the hell are regular families supposed to survive when even having insurance means bankruptcy if someone gets sick?" An American family's 2026 Bronze Saver Plus health insurance plan costs $2,094.15 per month, totaling $27,229 per year. It has a $13,000 deductible and $20,300 maximum out-of-pocket. Who else is done with this? ⬇️

OBAMACARE STICKER SHOCK! - Hardworking dad stares at $27,000 yearly health insurance bill for his family. $2,000 a month just for coverage with a $13,000 deductible. "How the hell are regular families supposed to survive when even having insurance means bankruptcy if someone gets sick?" An American family's 2026 Bronze Saver Plus health insurance plan costs $2,094.15 per month, totaling $27,229 per year. It has a $13,000 deductible and $20,300 maximum out-of-pocket. Who else is done with this? ⬇️

398,757 views

💩 SOMEBODY EXPLAIN JOHN ROBERTS TO US. BECAUSE WE CANNOT FIGURE HIM OUT! George W. Bush nominated John Roberts to the Supreme Court in 2005. He was confirmed 78 to 22. Republicans were thrilled. Conservatives had high hopes. He was supposed to be one of us. That was twenty one years ago. Let us look at what we got. Roberts was the deciding vote that saved Obamacare. Twice. In 2012 he rewrote the individual mandate as a tax to make it constitutional when it clearly was not. In 2015 he twisted the plain language of the statute to save it again when the text of the law was clearly on our side. The left was as shocked as we were that he saved it. And then he did it again. He sided with the liberals to strike down Louisiana's abortion clinic regulations in 2020, regulations nearly identical to ones he had previously voted to uphold. He joined the liberals to protect DACA, shielding Obama's unconstitutional amnesty program from being unwound by a Republican president. Today he joined Barrett and the three liberal justices to rule that mail in ballots do not need to be received by Election Day. On an election integrity case, with a Republican president in the White House fighting for the outcome, Roberts went the other way. This is not a one time thing. This is not a coincidence. This is a pattern spanning two decades. Roberts has voted with the liberal bloc on healthcare, immigration, abortion, and now election integrity. The cases that matter most to this movement are the cases where Roberts most often finds a reason to walk across the aisle. His defenders say he is protecting the institutional integrity of the Court. That he is playing a long game. That he is keeping the Court from appearing too political. Here is the problem with that argument. The left does not worry about appearing too political. They never have. They fight for every inch and they do not apologize for it. While Roberts is busy protecting the reputation of an institution, the institution keeps handing defeats to the people who believed in it. We are not asking for a rubber stamp. We are asking for a justice who applies the Constitution as written without one eye permanently fixed on what the New York Times editorial board is going to say the next morning. Alito does that. Thomas does that. Gorsuch does that. Roberts has given us twenty one years of carefully crafted, institutionally minded, reputation protecting decisions that keep landing on the wrong side of the most important fights of our time. George W. Bush picked him. Make of that what you will.

💩 SOMEBODY EXPLAIN JOHN ROBERTS TO US. BECAUSE WE CANNOT FIGURE HIM OUT! George W. Bush nominated John Roberts to the Supreme Court in 2005. He was confirmed 78 to 22. Republicans were thrilled. Conservatives had high hopes. He was supposed to be one of us. That was twenty one years ago. Let us look at what we got. Roberts was the deciding vote that saved Obamacare. Twice. In 2012 he rewrote the individual mandate as a tax to make it constitutional when it clearly was not. In 2015 he twisted the plain language of the statute to save it again when the text of the law was clearly on our side. The left was as shocked as we were that he saved it. And then he did it again. He sided with the liberals to strike down Louisiana's abortion clinic regulations in 2020, regulations nearly identical to ones he had previously voted to uphold. He joined the liberals to protect DACA, shielding Obama's unconstitutional amnesty program from being unwound by a Republican president. Today he joined Barrett and the three liberal justices to rule that mail in ballots do not need to be received by Election Day. On an election integrity case, with a Republican president in the White House fighting for the outcome, Roberts went the other way. This is not a one time thing. This is not a coincidence. This is a pattern spanning two decades. Roberts has voted with the liberal bloc on healthcare, immigration, abortion, and now election integrity. The cases that matter most to this movement are the cases where Roberts most often finds a reason to walk across the aisle. His defenders say he is protecting the institutional integrity of the Court. That he is playing a long game. That he is keeping the Court from appearing too political. Here is the problem with that argument. The left does not worry about appearing too political. They never have. They fight for every inch and they do not apologize for it. While Roberts is busy protecting the reputation of an institution, the institution keeps handing defeats to the people who believed in it. We are not asking for a rubber stamp. We are asking for a justice who applies the Constitution as written without one eye permanently fixed on what the New York Times editorial board is going to say the next morning. Alito does that. Thomas does that. Gorsuch does that. Roberts has given us twenty one years of carefully crafted, institutionally minded, reputation protecting decisions that keep landing on the wrong side of the most important fights of our time. George W. Bush picked him. Make of that what you will.

108,571 views

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.

TRUMP JUST ENDED THE U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? Is Trump finally ending mail-in voter fraud? He fired the three remaining commissioners this week, leaving the board with zero members. The EAC is the obscure little agency that sets voting machine standards and controls the federal mail voter registration form. Here is the real story behind it. For over a year Trump has pushed two basic reforms through that commission: proof of citizenship to register, and rules requiring USPS to stop blindly mailing ballots to anyone without verifying they are eligible for mail voting. The old board slow walked both. So he cleared it out. Replacements need Senate confirmation, this is not a hostile takeover, it is the president using the power the Supreme Court just confirmed he has! Now the post office piece. Trump's executive order directs USPS to track ballots and only deliver them to voters on an approved list. Courts have already blocked several parts of it, ruling the president cannot unilaterally rewrite election rules, that power sits with states and Congress. What this really means is Trump keeps applying pressure on citizenship verification and mail ballot accountability heading into the midterms. Democrats are calling it interference because tighter verification makes it harder to run up numbers through a system nobody can fully audit. This is a developing story. Nothing is more important for November than voter integrity.

90,829 views

🇺🇸 HERE'S WHAT NO ONE IS TELLING YOU ABOUT THE 2026 MIDTERMS! The GOP is doing something no party has ever done before. A full presidential-style convention. For the midterms. Let that sink in. While Republicans are building a stage, firing up a crowd, and showing America exactly what they stand for, Democrats are sitting in the locker room with no game plan and no coach. What are they going to run on? Grocery prices that crushed working families? The open border they cheered for? More government control dressed up as "progress"? Go ahead, step to the podium and make the case for socialism. We'll wait. This convention isn't just a rally. It's a statement. The Republican Party is playing offense while the left is still trying to figure out what team they're on. Energy wins elections. Momentum wins elections. And right now the GOP has both. The machine is warming up. The base is ready. And come November 2026, this could be the move that changes everything. History is being made in real time. Don't miss it!

🇺🇸 HERE'S WHAT NO ONE IS TELLING YOU ABOUT THE 2026 MIDTERMS! The GOP is doing something no party has ever done before. A full presidential-style convention. For the midterms. Let that sink in. While Republicans are building a stage, firing up a crowd, and showing America exactly what they stand for, Democrats are sitting in the locker room with no game plan and no coach. What are they going to run on? Grocery prices that crushed working families? The open border they cheered for? More government control dressed up as "progress"? Go ahead, step to the podium and make the case for socialism. We'll wait. This convention isn't just a rally. It's a statement. The Republican Party is playing offense while the left is still trying to figure out what team they're on. Energy wins elections. Momentum wins elections. And right now the GOP has both. The machine is warming up. The base is ready. And come November 2026, this could be the move that changes everything. History is being made in real time. Don't miss it!

99,951 views

Videos

mitchellvii's profile picture

🤯 MAMDANI INVESTOR EXODUS: Even billionaires have a breaking point! Zohran Mamdani just froze rents on over a million apartments in New York City. Investor Sergey Brin just responded by walking out the door! The world's third-richest man dumped his entire stake in a NYC rent-stabilized apartment fund for six cents on the dollar. Not a typo. Six cents. That is what Mamdani's socialist utopia looks like in practice. A $268 billion man taking a bath just to get as far away from New York City housing policy as humanly possible. And Brin is not alone. The fund he fled is sitting on $84 million in unpaid rent and facing foreclosure on a half-billion dollar loan. The University of California already wrote down its own $115 million investment by 50%. Meanwhile Brin took his pennies and quietly bought a $51 million waterfront estate in Miami. That is the market giving Mamdani a one-finger salute on the way out of town. An A&E Real Estate spokesperson put it plainly: "Institutional capital - both equity investors and lenders - are fleeing New York City's rent-stabilized apartment sector. They understand New York is in a doom loop." A doom loop. Built by design. Celebrated as compassion. Margaret Thatcher said it best: "The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." New York is not running out. It is chasing the money out. There is a difference, and it is worse. When the capital is gone, the maintenance stops. When the maintenance stops, the buildings rot. And the same tenants Mamdani claims to be protecting will be the ones living in the wreckage. This is not a rent freeze. It is a slow-motion demolition of the housing stock, dressed up in the language of justice. Congratulations, New York. You got the mayor you voted for.

Bill Mitchell

778,016 views • 2 months ago