M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)
@MNageswarRaoIPS • 108,239 subscribers
Former Director, CBI. “In a time of universal deceit, telling truth is revolutionary act”~Orwell. #EqualRightsForHindus & #RSS_Mukt_Bharat. Backup @MNR_IPS
Shorts
Videos
Hey Bhagwan! Elections Near, Save Hindus! It is an open secret that the Sangh Parivar maintains a quid pro quo relationship with radical and opportunistic Muslim elements. While these groups strategically help the Sangh Parivar engineer communal polarisation and force gullible Hindus into its fold, its governments reciprocate by protecting the religious, economic, and political interests of Muslims. Note the extraordinary levels of minority appeasement under BJP rule. During my student days at Osmania University in Hyderabad in the early 1980s, I was an active member of the ABVP. Time and again, communal riots broke out in which poor Hindus—rickshaw pullers, daily-wage earners, and labourers—were slaughtered. Distressed by the loss of innocent lives, I naively asked visiting senior Sangh Parivar leaders a direct question during a post-dinner hostel meeting: "Why do Muslim rioters only attack or kill poor, working-class Hindus, and not Sangh Parivar leaders?" The leaders abruptly brushed my question aside and changed the topic. In hindsight, the truth is stark: almost every major BJP leader in Hyderabad has cooked their political meals over the funeral pyres of innocent, poor, gullible Hindus. Look at the national pattern. Communal riots and tensions occur almost exclusively in states where the BJP is out of power, only to vanish mysteriously the moment it forms the government—and then erupt again whenever the BJP's political fortunes face a downward trend. In the early 2000s, the Gujarat BJP was riven with internal factionalism and was on the verge of losing power in the upcoming October 2002 Assembly elections. Narendra Modi replaced Keshubhai Patel as Chief Minister in October 2001. Assembly elections were due within a year. Then, on February 27, 2002, a Muslim mob attacked the Sabarmati Express at Godhra, burning alive 59 Hindus returning from an Ayodhya pilgrimage. Mind you, the train carried predominantly Hindu passengers across multiple coaches, yet only the specific coach containing Ayodhya pilgrims was targeted. Why? Because Ayodhya has the greatest potential for polarisation. And overnight, Narendra Modi became "Hindu Hriday Samrat", launched onto the national and international stage, and has never looked back in his political career. There is even a story reported in the media that Narendra Modi lived for several years in Godhra's Rani Masjid as an RSS Pracharak during the 1970s. With such cozy relationships, it is no wonder Godhra's Muslims burned alive 59 Hindus to help their friends. However, it must be noted that the RSS-BJP-Modi regime did not like the fact that Hindu society spontaneously erupted in outrage, leading to the post-Godhra riots. So, they ensured that more Hindus were killed in police firing and that hundreds of Hindus were booked and left to languish in jail for life. After all, how dare Hindu society spontaneously erupt without directives from the RSS-BJP? Therefore, the Sangh Parivar systematically extinguished whatever residual fire was left in Hindu society by teaching Hindus a lesson for generations to come. But the February 2002 Godhra massacre of 59 Hindus was too far removed from the Gujarat Assembly elections due in October 2002. As amnesia quickly sets in among Hindus, they needed to be reminded. So, the Muslim bhai-log arranged another massacre of 33 Hindus and seriously injured more than 80 Hindus at the Akshardham temple in Gandhinagar in September 2002, so that Hindus would not forget whom to vote for in the October 2002 Assembly elections. The fact that there was no post-Godhra type reaction by Hindu society to the Akshardham temple massacre of 33 Hindus amply demonstrates how effectively the Sangh Parivar destroyed the defensive fighting spirit of Hindu society within seven months. Coming back, whenever the BJP faces political erosion or impending electoral defeat in a state, radical Muslim groups suddenly become hyperactive: Pulwama (2019): In February 2019, a horrific massacre occurred when 40 security personnel—predominantly Hindus—were ambushed and killed by Muslims just weeks before the April/May General Elections, sweeping the BJP back to power. Pahalgam & Operation Sindhoor (2025): In April 2025, Muslims massacred 27 Hindu men in Pahalgam after checking their private parts. The RSS-BJP-Modi Government of India responded with a theatrical laser show called Operation Sindhoor, fronted by two women officers, Colonel Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, as protagonists of the mockery. And the BJP seized power in Delhi and returned to power in Bihar in the April/May 2025 Assembly elections. The AIMIM Factor: As an old, time-tested proxy from Hyderabad, AIMIM strategically fields candidates across multiple states to split opposition Muslim votes, guaranteeing easy victories for BJP candidates. Now, with key Assembly elections fast approaching in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Goa, and Punjab in early 2027, and the prospect of the BJP losing these states looming large due to huge Hindu disenchantment, the RSS-BJP-Modi machinery dug up Vande Mataram. They passed a law decreeing that the full song must not only be sung, but that its singing is now mandatory at all official functions and in schools. Predictably, their Muslim allies quickly become hyperactive condemning it so that Hindus become outraged and join the ranks of the BJP. It is precisely within this tactical background that Syed Qasim Rasool Ilyas—former SIMI leader, National President of the Welfare Party of India, and father of Umar Khalid (who orchestrated the Delhi riots in which several Hindus were killed)—is reportedly organising a Sharia Bachao Andolan to Save India at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi, on September 17, 2026.👇 "Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence, three or more times is a pattern." This famous saying perfectly describes the conspiratorial quid pro quo involving the massacre of Hindus to manufacture fear so that they vote out of panic for the BJP. For the BJP, this Sharia Bachao Andolan is an extremely important catalyst to polarise Hindus and win the upcoming UP, Uttarakhand, Goa, and Punjab Assembly elections. The Sangh Parivar will do everything within its power to facilitate its success, creating the exact spectacle needed to polarise and scare Hindus into voting for them once more. O Hindus, beware! Do not fall for the #PseudoHindutva shenanigans of the Sangh Parivar. They are the greatest traitors and Hindu drohis in all of world history. #RSS_Mukt_Bharat
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)25,561 views • 11 days ago
శ్రీ చంద్రబాబు నాయుడు గారు, ఇంత పచ్చిగా అబద్ధాలు చెప్పడం ఇకనైనా మానండి! దేశంలో విద్యుత్ రంగ సంస్కరణలకు శ్రీకారం చుట్టిన తొలి రాష్ట్రం ఉమ్మడి ఆంధ్రప్రదేశ్ కాదు, ఒడిశా! 1992లోనే అప్పటి ఒడిశా ముఖ్యమంత్రి బిజూ పట్నాయక్ గారు విస్తృత సంప్రదింపులతో ఈ ప్రక్రియను ప్రారంభిస్తే... ఆ తర్వాత వచ్చిన జె.బి. పట్నాయక్ గారి కాంగ్రెస్ ప్రభుత్వం దాన్ని ముందుకు తీసుకెళ్లి 'ఒడిశా విద్యుత్ సంస్కరణల చట్టం - 1995'ను తీసుకొచ్చింది. ఒడిశా విద్యుత్ నియంత్రణ మండలి (OERC) ఏర్పాటు, అప్పటి రాష్ట్ర విద్యుత్ సంస్థ (OSEB)ను ఉష్ణ విద్యుత్ ఉత్పత్తి, జల విద్యుత్ ఉత్పత్తి, మరియు నాలుగు పంపిణీ సంస్థలుగా విభజన చేసి విద్యుత్ రంగ సంస్కరణలను 1995 నాటికి తెచ్చారు. ఇదంతా మీరు మీ మామగారికి వెన్నుపోటు పొడిచి ముఖ్యమంత్రి పీఠం ఎక్కకముందే జరిగిపోయిన నిజం! మరో ముఖ్య విషయం: విద్యుత్ సంస్కరణల ఘనతను కాంగ్రెస్ ముఖ్యమంత్రి జే.బి. పట్నాయక్ గారు మాజీ ముఖ్యమంత్రి మరియు ఆనాటి ప్రతిపక్ష నాయకుడు బిజూ పట్నాయక్ గారికే ఇచ్చారు తప్ప ఎప్పుడూ తన ఖాతాలో వేసుకోలేదు... దాన్నే హూందాతనం అంటారు! సొంత డప్పు వాయించుకోవడం, పచ్చి అబద్ధాలు ఆడటం, ఇతరుల కృషిని తన ఖాతాలో వేసుకోవడం, తాను చేసే తప్పులకు చేస్తూ ఇతరులను నిందించడం లాంటివి గౌరవప్రదమైన నాయకత్వ లక్షణాలు కావు, అది కేవలం నైతిక పతనం!
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)36,086 views • 1 month ago
Mr Rahul Gandhi Ji, Countering an opponent requires proper understanding them. Your grasp of the RSS-BJP and their #PseudoHindutva ideology and strategies is so superficial and detached from reality that it is no wonder Hindus label you as the BJP's star campaigner. Were it not for you and your ilk, the Congress would have defeated the BJP and returned to power—either in 2019, or definitely in 2024. Your are fulfilling the RSS dream of #Congress_Mukt_Bharat. This is exactly why I castigate left-liberals as the herding dogs of the RSS-BJP; their actions consistently push Hindus directly into the #PseudoHindutva fold.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)27,383 views • 1 month ago
సతీ సహగమనం అనే తప్పుడు ప్రచారాలతో హిందూ మతాన్ని, హిందూ సమాజాన్ని, హిందూ నాగరికతపై బురద చల్లుతున్న వారికి చారిత్రక ఆధారాలతో ఇంత చక్కగా సమాధానం చెప్పిన SS Laxmi Laavu గారికి అభినందనలు.💐 సతీ సహగమనం అనేది హిందూ వ్యతిరేక కాల్పనిక అత్యాచార సాహిత్యం. ఆ వాస్తవాన్ని చారిత్రక ఆధారాలతో మీనాక్షి జైన్ గారు వెలికి తీసి సతీ సహగమనం అనేది మసిపూసి మారేడు కాయగా చిత్రీకరించబడిన ఒక బూచి అని ప్రపంచానికి చూపించారు.👇 మన దౌర్భాగ్యం ఏమిటంటే — క్రైస్తవ మిషనరీలు, ముస్లీం ముల్లాలు, మార్క్సిస్టు చరిత్రకారులు సృష్టించిన హిందూ వ్యతిరేక విద్యా వ్యవస్థ వలన హిందువులు అహిందూకరణకు గురవుతున్నారు. తద్వారా హిందువులు నామమాత్రపు హిందువులుగా, హిందూ వ్యతిరేకులుగా మారుతున్నారు. #కుహనాహిందుత్వ వాదులైన ఆర్ఎస్ఎస్, భాజపా, మోదీలు ఆ హిందూ వ్యతిరేక విద్యా వ్యవస్థను మరింత బలపరచి, పెంచి పోషిస్తున్నారు.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)45,464 views • 2 months ago
Jagan garu, Temples belong to Hindus only. They are out of bounds for Non-Hindus. As a Christian you cannot enter any Temple. If you are so keen, then you first do #gharwapasi to the religion of your ancestors namely Hinduism by re-conversion. Then Hindus will welcome you to Temples with #Poorna_Kumbham. YS Jagan Mohan Reddy
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)324,176 views • 2 years ago
Bharat Mata is not, and cannot be, a Goddess. The term Bharat Mata inspires patriotism. As a poetic symbol, there is nothing wrong with it. The problem begins when poetry is mistaken for theology. Honour vs. Worship The famous line from the Rāmāyaṇa, "Jananī Janmabhūmiśca Svargādapi Garīyasī" (One's mother and motherland are greater than heaven), is often cited to justify worshipping Bharat Mata. However, this verse teaches love, gratitude, and duty toward our birthplace—not religious worship. Sanātana Dharma clearly distinguishes between honour and worship: - We honour Parents, teachers, and the nation. - We worship Bhagavan and deities established by Hindu scriptures. The motherland is a metaphor deserving reverence, not a deity demanding worship. No Scriptural Authority Hindu tradition already has a complete theology of the Divine Mother. Deities like Durga, Lakshmi, Saraswati, Parvati, Kali, and Bhūdevī are worshiped because they are recognised by pramāṇa—the Vedas, Itihasas, Purāṇas, Agamas, and traditional sampradayas. Bharat Mata fits none of these categories: - No Hindu scripture identifies Bharat Mata as a deity. - No traditional lineage prescribes her worship. - No classical temple tradition includes her. Some compare Bharat Mata to Bhūdevī (or Prithvi Mata), but this comparison is inaccurate. Bhūdevī is a scripturally recognized cosmic deity representing the entire Earth, not a specific modern country. India is part of Bhūdevī, but Bhūdevī is not Bharat Mata. A Modern Political Symbol Where did Bharat Mata come from? She is a modern political symbol. - Origins: She emerged during the 19th-century Bengal Renaissance through the wholesale imitation of the Westphalian model of territorial nationalism, with the Indian territory personified and deified as Bharat Mata. - Adoption: The symbol was later adopted by political organisations like the RSS. While this history explains her political importance, it does not give her religious or scriptural authority. Religious vs. Political Spheres India is a secular republic. If Bharat Mata represents the nation, she represents a political entity, not a divine one. A "secular goddess" is a self-contradictory idea. Political symbols belong in civic life—public institutions, rallies, and civic ceremonies. They do not belong in Hindu temples. Temples are consecrated only for Bhagavan and scripturally recognised deities. Installing Bharat Mata statues or pictures in temples is therefore not an act of patriotism but an act of sacrilege. Furthermore, a nation cannot grant moksha (liberation), nor can it replace religion. In Hindu thought: - Only Bhagavan is divine. - Patriotism, no matter how noble, can never replace spiritual devotion. Sacred Geography vs. Political Cartography Confusing political geography with sacred geography leads to several contradictions: - Sacred sites exist beyond modern borders: Holy places like Kashi, Ayodhya, Tirupati, and Puri are sacred because of their association with Bhagavan, not because they fall within India's current map. Conversely, sacred sites like Kailasa, Manasa Sarovar, Pashupatinath, and Janakpur lie outside modern India, yet their sanctity remains unchanged. - Political borders change; divinity does not: The political map of India changed under the Mauryas, Guptas, Mughals, British, and post-1950 Republic. If a deity (Bharat Mata) is bound to political borders, does that deity expand, shrink, or divide whenever the map changes? Hindu theology recognises no gods whose existence depends on human history or political maps. Hindutva is Universal Religion Sanatana Dharma is a universal faith, not a country-bound religion. Crores of Hindus live outside India: - A Hindu born in Nepal owes civic loyalty to Nepal. - Hindus in Mauritius, Fiji, South Africa, the UK, Australia, or the USA owe civic loyalty to their respective nations while remaining fully Hindu. If worshipping Bharat Mata were a mandatory religious duty, global Hindus would face a constant conflict between civic duty to their home country and religion which worships India (Bharat Mata). True Dharma does not impose such local constraints. Conclusion India deserves our love, gratitude, service, and protection as the cradle of Hindu civilisation. But love is not worship, patriotism is not religion, and a nation is not Goddess. When Param Pujya Jagadguru Sankaracharya of Jyotirmath Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati Maharaj Ji 1008.Guru stated that Bharat Mata is not a goddess, his view aligned directly with classical Hindu scriptures and theology. Grounded in śāstra and sampradaya, his position reflects traditional doctrinal clarity: Bharat Mata is not, and cannot be, a Goddess.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)38,793 views • 2 months ago
Dear General V K Singh Ji, In Bhubaneswar city, an Army officer and his fiancée consume 10 pegs of liquor and drive a car in the mid of night around 2 am, indulge in a brawl with engineering students around 2-30 am, and then land up in Bharatpur Police Station creating ruckus inside the police station, so much so that the PS staff had to seek help of PCR. When sent to hospital for medical examination and blood test which is the standard protocol of investigation, they refused. Here👇is a video clip for you to make your own judgement about the Army officer and his 'lady' fiancée? You may also obtain more video footage of CCTV cameras of the incident which are available in social media. Odisha Police has more than 600 Police Stations and they together register and investigate about 2 lakh cases annually. Lakhs of people visit Police Stations including women and Army officers to report their grievances or seek help. It is not that they misbehave with people visiting police stations. Sir, we, the Indian Police, respect and honour our Military because that is the last resort in defending the country from external enemies. A reciprocation from Military towards Police which defends the country from internal enemies, is a normal expectation. Our work is complementary as we together protect the country from within and without. Sir, it is not done that you, having been a Chief of Army Staff (COAS) and later a Central Minister, jumped to conclusion and castigated Odisha Police for the drunken brawl and uncouth behaviour of an Army officer and his fiancée, and Odisha Police officers were not even at fault. But I would not chastise the Indian Army by asking, “Is this the kind of discipline that the Indian Army imparts and inculcates in its officers?”. Because an individual’s aberration does not represent an esteemed institution. Finally, I request you to your good offices and ask the COAS to take this Army Officer to task for his conduct unbecoming of a soldier, and for besmirching the fair name of the Indian Army. ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY Rajnath Singh CMO Odisha DGP, Odisha Odisha Police COMMISSIONERATE POLICE #ankitapradhan
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)276,032 views • 2 years ago
A Twist in the Tale: Has BJP become the adda of corrupt? In the run up to the 2014 general elections, the BJP centred its campaign around alleged corruption under the Congress-led UPA government, promising ‘ache din’ . Several times during the campaign, Narendra Modi Ji grandiloquently promised to jail the corrupt. He was equally loud about bringing back 'all the looted money stashed away in Swiss banks and eliminating black money'. People gave BJP a decisive mandate and Modi became PM in 2014. On 8th November 2016 in a public broadcast PM Modi declared that Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes would cease to be legal tender and grandiosely announced that the purpose of #demonetisation was to crackdown on corruption and eliminate black money. It, however, turned out to be spurious. Recently, Supreme Court Justice B. V. Nagarathna said in a conference in Hyderabad that in the Indian economy at that time, Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes comprised 86% of the currency and wondered about the goal of the demonetisation exercise since 98% of those notes came back to banks. She also questioned about black money eradication as demonetisation became a good way of converting black money into white money. In 2017 the BJP government introduced #ElectoralBond Scheme, which was anonymous financial contributions to political parties, by amending several laws namely, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Companies Act, 2013, the Income Tax Act, 1961. Its avowed purpose was to enhance transparency and accountability in political funding by eliminating black money, corruption. etc. The Supreme Court has recently struck down this secret political funding as unconstitutional and directed disclosure of complete details of all electoral bonds. From the data available in public domain, thanks to the Supreme Court, it came to light that the BJP is the biggest beneficiary as out of total Rs. 11,450 crores it received Rs. 6,566 crores which is 57%. Contemporaneous evidence indicates that #ElectoralBonds have all the ingredients of a huge scam such as quid pro quo and corruption, shell and loss making companies donating to political parties huge sums of money suspected to be kickbacks, and laundering of black money. In order to shield our democratic process from foreign interference, the laws regulating foreign contributions prohibited political parties and candidates in elections from accepting foreign contributions. But the BJP government through Finance Acts, 2016 and 2018 amended with retrospective effect the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 2010 (#FCRA) by changing the definition of ‘foreign source’ not only condoning the past illegalities committed but also permitting political parties to receive foreign funds, and thereby paved way for foreign intrusion into our political and electoral process compromising our sovereignty. Further, notwithstanding the huge propaganda of alleged action against Foreign Funded NGOs, there has been a huge spike in #FCRA remittances since the 2014-15. While during the 20 years between financial years 1994-1995 and 2013-14 an amount of Rs. 1,51,036 Crores was received, during the 8 years between 2014-15 and 2023-24 Rs. 1,46,392 was received. Data for financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24 is not yet available. However, from the trends of #FCRA remittances in the preceding years it will be around Rs. 50,000 Crores together for both the financial years, making the total FCRA remittances during 10 year rule of BJP to be around Rs. 2,00,000 Crores which is humongous. Even if a small fraction of that huge amount of foreign funds has gone to political parties or candidates in elections, it amounts to serious subversion of our democracy and constitution. What sort of patriotism is this? Several months prior to 2014 general elections, a spate of alleged scams during UPA rule surfaced namely, Chit Fund scam, Chopper scam, Tatra truck scam, 2G Spectrum scam, CWG scam, Coal scam, Adarsh scam, etc. The courts, CBI, ED and IT proactively initiated action as a result several Congress and UPA leaders came under scanner. Though the BJP came to power on the anti-corruption plank, hardly any political leaders of significance was convicted, nor even paisa of black money stashed away in Swiss banks was brought back. On the other hand, the BJP has allegedly been misusing the law enforcement agencies to arm-twist the opposition political leaders under cloud either to defect to or align with the BJP. Out of 25 important opposition leaders who were allegedly under the scanner and joined BJP, 23 have reportedly got reprieve. Politicians like Andhra Pradesh CM YS Jagan who faces 38 criminal cases including 11 CBI and 7 ED cases, have been buying peace from the BJP. As a result none of his cases have seen the light of the day, notwithstanding the direction of Supreme Court to speed up trial of cases against politicians. Likewise, the DMK leaders namely, the Maran brothers, A. Raja, Karunanidhi’s daughter Kanimozhi have been acquitted, after they not so secretly cosied up to BJP, thanks to the lacklustre prosecution of their cases before the courts. These are only representative examples of how the BJP has become the adda for the leaders facing allegations of corruption, money laundering, etc. It is quite possible that some of them may be genuinely innocent. But as their innocence has been established only after their defection to or aligning with the ruling BJP, it creates dark shadows by raising serious moral questions. Last year, fourteen political parties approached the Supreme Court against the alleged misuse of central investigating agencies in arresting opposition political leaders and other citizens exercising their fundamental right to dissent and disagree with the ruling BJP. It was alleged that 95% of political leaders investigated by CBI and ED belong to opposition. That is, out of 121 prominent politicians facing ED probe between 2014 and 2022, 115 are opposition leaders who had been booked, raided, questioned or arrested. To wriggle out of or deflect the allegations of promoting corruption, shielding the corrupt who have joined or aligned with the BJP and targeting opposition leaders, etc, one of the standard refrains of the BJP has been that as Narendra Modi has no family he cannot be corrupt or has no motivation to be corrupt or shield the corrupt. That is a disingenuous argument. Late Jayalalitha, who was a spinster with no family, was convicted for corruption and was sent to jail. There are many prominent leaders who are unmarried or have no families facing cases or allegations of corruption. I don’t mean to even hint let alone allege that Narendra Modi is personally financially corrupt. I merely want to call out their bluff by highlighting the point that there is no connection between one’s familial status and corruption. It must be recalled that Manmohan Singh, whose personal financial integrity was impeccable, presided over a corrupt regime. As such, personal financial honesty of PM or a CM is meaningless if his party and government are not honest. Barring honourable exceptions, every political party while in opposition grandiloquently talks against corruption, not necessarily because they are honest, but because they try to make a virtue of out of lack of opportunities to make money. Notwithstanding its anti-corruption rhetoric the BJP is no stranger to corruption as its unsavory history tells. In 2001, none other than its National President late Bangaru Laxman was caught on the camera taking bribe from one Mathew Samuel, and was later convicted by a Special CBI Court on 27th April 2012 and sentenced to four years in jail. Further, BJP’s former CM of Karnataka Sri B. S. Yeddyurappa faced charges of corruption and was also in jail for a while. There are allegations of misdeeds of BJP government in PM-CARES Fund which is mired in secrecy, in sale of Air India to Tatas for peanuts, about CAG’s concern about astronomical escalation in cost of construction of Dwarka Expressway from Rs. 18.2 crores per km to Rs. 251 crores per km, in the utility of more than Rs. 14,000 crores public funds for Namami Gange project while the sacred Ganga is on the verge becoming a sewer like Yamuna, and several others. The #ElectoralBondScam which points to several alleged scams, is only a tip of the iceberg. It seems further action to take it to logical end has come to a naught. Therefore, having seen the fate of investigation and trial of all the alleged scams and how the political class sabotage, it is imperative that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising serving or retired officers specially chosen by the Supreme Court, which will not be part of any Law Enforcement Agency but independently directly reporting to the Supreme Court, would alone will be able to unravel the truth. It is pertinent to recall the stellar role of RTI Act and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (before it was amended in 2018) in exposing alleged corruption in the Congress-led UPA government. Information is power. So, the RTI Act empowered people to seek information from public authorities on all official matters (barring a very few exceptions). Based on that information obtained through RTI process about alleged corrupt deals, illegalities, etc during UPA rule, the CBI which had no legal shackles could initiate enquiries and investigation into those allegations. The BJP while in opposition used and exploited this situation to the hilt to oust the Congress-led UPA from power. And having formed government the BJP is acutely aware of the dangers for the corrupt lurking in these laws. So they have systematically wrecked the RTI Act so much so that it has gone from citizens’ most powerful tool to an Act on life support. In 2018 they amended the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. As per new section 17A introduced therein, “No police officer shall conduct any enquiry or inquiry or investigation into any offence alleged to have been committed by a public servant under this Act, where the alleged offence is relatable to any recommendation made or decision taken by such public servant in discharge of his official functions or duties, without the previous approval” of respective governments or appointing authority of the public servant. Which government will permit investigation into its own misdeeds? While Justice R. M. Lodha in 2013 denounced the CBI as a ‘caged parrot’, the BJP government translated his oral observation into a legal reality by destroying the Prevention of Corruption Act. Evidently, the real purpose of BJP undermining RTI Act and emasculating the CBI was to prevent visitation of fate similar to that of UPA by insulating and firewalling themselves from any future enquiries and investigations into their alleged corrupt deeds. Finally, there is an uncanny resemblance between the BJP’s anti-corruption rhetoric with a story in Jeffrey Archer’s popular book, ‘A Twist in the Tale’, which goes like this: Ignatius Agarbi was the new Financial Minister of Nigeria. He begins a sweep on corruption and makes a name for himself. Impressed by his extreme honesty, his president entrusted him to find out how many Nigerians have stashed their bribes in Switzerland. He arrives at the Swiss Bank with a briefcase. Despite his greatest persuasion, the Swiss banker refuses to break their code of privacy. In the end, Ignatius places a gun to the head of the Swiss banker and threatens to kill him. Still the banker refuses to divulge any confidential information. Ignatius, who was actually extremely corrupt, was only checking to find out if the Swiss Banks would actually reveal the name of an account holder. Delighted with their secrecy, Ignatius deposits $5 million in cash which he had skimmed as Financial Minister.”
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)239,217 views • 2 years ago
Tejasvi Surya Ji, Your post is a masterclass in misdirection, sidestepping the real criticisms levelled against Modi, which is typical of the Goebbelsian propaganda of the Sangh Parivar. The issue is not Modi’s lack of fluency in English. It is his uncouth conduct, exaggerated gestures, boisterous laughter, and attempts to fake fluency in English. Recall that nobody mocked Atal Bihari Vajpayee for speaking Hindi on global stages. On the contrary, he was applauded for his dignified conduct and for taking Hindi to international fora. Your claim of Modi coming from absolute poverty is another big lie. The "tea-seller at a non-existent railway station" story has been debunked repeatedly, yet it is peddled to craft a false underdog image. Modi’s childhood photos in a suit and tie and NCC uniform, his foreign tours as a young adult as per his own claims, and other evidence contradict the assertions of “absolute poverty.” While it is true that he did not have an elite education, he himself stated in TV interviews that he had minimal formal education. Furthermore, his penchant for a luxurious lifestyle, expensive attire, high-end gadgets, and customised Boeing jets contradicts the humble-origins-to-power tale. Modi’s background, while not elite, was far from destitute, and his lifestyle today screams opulence, not humility. The claim that Modi embodies "civilisational confidence" by speaking Hindi internationally is hollow when his governance aligns with foreign deep-state agendas. His ties to the CIA-linked ACYPL, of which he is an alumnus, and policies promoting wokeism in education and governance raise questions about whose interests he serves. Far from being a civilisational warrior, Modi’s tenure has seen India’s diplomatic clout wane—evidenced by the lack of global support after tragedies like the #Pahalgam massacre, where 25 Hindus were killed by Islamic terrorists, and the fiasco of Operation Sindoor to deceive gullible Hindus. Even traditional allies like Russia have grown distant. His economic deals, often hyped, lack transparency and tangible outcomes for India’s masses. The hallmark of Modi’s diplomacy is personal branding at government expense, to the detriment of India, in pursuit of foreign awards and the elusive Nobel Prize. Modi’s governance has allegedly perfected corruption into an art and science, and it has grown exponentially, as evidenced by the Electoral Bonds scheme, which the Supreme Court struck down with scathing remarks. Transparency in Modi’s governance is a joke, with the RTI Act nearly neutralised, and secrecy has become the norm, as evidenced by the PM CARES Fund, reportedly breeding organised corruption. The claim of restoring civilisational self-respect is equally laughable. Hindus continue to be second-class citizens, and #Minority_Appeasement has increased by leaps and bounds, putting the Congress and other parties to shame. With his divisive "hisab chukta" policies, he has escalated casteism to new heights, destroying Hindu society. His refusal to amend Articles 25–30 to grant #EqualRightsForHindus, to #FreeTemples from government control, and his continuation and incentivisation of policies that make India the second-largest #Beef exporter, as well as his refusal to ban #Polygamy and #FCRA expose a betrayal of civilisational interests. Lastly, the #PseudoHindutva RSS-BJP-Modi trio stands as the greatest Hindu drohis in world history. Tejasvi Surya
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)107,331 views • 1 year ago
Late Bibek Debroy elaborates and contextualises with important nuance the story of Ekalavya in the Mahabharata, and how the caste oppression narrative is disingenuous. Watch Untimely death of Bibek Debroy is indeed a great loss to Hindu society.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)136,175 views • 1 year ago
"అప్పులేని వాడు అందరికన్నా ధనవంతుడు" అనే జీవిత సత్యాన్ని చాటి చెప్పింది మన హైందవ నాగరికత. 1300 సంవత్సరాల విదేశి ఆక్రమణలను, దుర్మార్గపు పాలనను మన పూర్వికులు తట్టుకోగలగడానికి ఒక ముఖ్య కారణం మన వారి పొదుపు, అప్పు చేసి పప్పు కూడుకు దూరం, విలాసాలకు దూరం. "నేను అప్పుకు దూరం. ఒక కుటుంబాన్ని ఉద్దరించాలంటే ఒక వ్యక్తి త్యాగం చేయాల్సిందే." ఈ👇వీడియో చూడండి, అందరికి చూపించండి, పాటించండి.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)119,538 views • 1 year ago
“Good Buddhism vs. Bad Hinduism" I serendipitously came across a video short featuring Koenraad Elst, who offers a profound observation. Please watch it👇before proceeding to read further. The "good Buddhism, bad Hinduism" narrative lacks roots in ancient Indian history. Buddhism emerged as a Darshana, an agnostic philosophical school rejecting the Vedas as pramaña, within the broader ecosystem of Hindutva. Please note that Hindutva, originally coined by Chandranath Basu in 1892, is the modern indigenous name for our ancient religion Sanatana Dharma, and we use it in that sense, not in any political or nationalistic sense. Buddhism drew almost all core concepts like karma, dharma, and samsara from Vedic traditions with Buddhist texts heavily borrowing from them. In ancient India, lay practitioners often blended Buddhism and Hindutva seamlessly, without a sharp divide. Buddhism was, in essence, deeply rooted in Hindutva until external forces reframed it. This false binary took shape in the 19th century through colonial Orientalist scholarship, filtered through a Judeo-Christian lens. Western scholars, including missionaries and Indologists like Max Müller, portrayed Hindutva’s polytheism and “idol worship” as superstitious and its caste system as “socially oppressive”, likening it to pre-Reformation Catholicism. Meanwhile, Buddhism’s focus on “compassion” and monastic simplicity was romanticised as a "Protestant-like" reform — enlightened, universal, and akin to Christian ethics. Financial disparities reinforced this: Buddhist studies received patronage from Japan, China, and Western donors, while Hindutva, tied to an impoverished India, lacked similar support. Post-1947, political and ideological forces entrenched this narrative. Nehruvian socialism and Marxist historiography cast Buddhism as a “rational”, “progressive force”, crediting it for Hindutva’s “positive” elements while blaming Hindutva for its inadequacies. Ambedkar’s 1956 mass conversion to Buddhism — his invented Navayana Buddhism, which retains little of traditional Buddhism beyond its name — presented it as an escape from “Hindu oppression,” focusing on caste critique, despite Buddhism’s own historical monastic hierarchies and caste-like structures. Left-leaning academics, media, and textbooks perpetuated this to push anti-Hindu, “egalitarian” agendas, ignoring Buddhism’s elite urban origins. In the West, Buddhism’s “philosophical” image (meditation, mindfulness, and lack of a creator god) aligns with secular and New Age preferences, making it a marketable, “cool” non-theistic tradition. Hindutva, with its diverse rituals and deities, is stereotyped as exotic yet backward, scrutinised over caste without nuance as caste is only social organisation. This fuels more funding, academic positions, and media portrayals (e.g., films like Little Buddha) glorifying Buddhism, while Hindutva faces disproportionate criticism, nay vilification. This narrative is driven by diverse actors with aligned goals of vilifying Hindutva: colonial Christian Indologists and missionaries demonised it to aid conversions; Indian intellectuals like Nehru, Ambedkar, and Marxist historians like Romila Thapar advanced pseudo-secular, anti-Hindutva agendas; modern English media and deep-state-inspired Dalit groups promote Ambedkarite views, framing Buddhism as empowerment; Western academics like Sheldon Pollock and outlets like The New York Times benefit from well-funded Buddhist studies chairs that outnumber those for Hindutva; Buddhist institutions, from ancient monasteries to modern Tibetan exile networks and Western converts, emphasise differences to secure patronage; and global cultural dynamics promote Buddhism as a “universal” export, erasing its Hindu roots to enable Hinduphobia and support missionary conversion tactics. Buddhists following traditional schools such as Theravāda, Mahāyāna, and Vajrayāna must understand and recognize that Hindutva (Sanātana Dharma) is the foundation of Buddhism, without which it cannot exist. They should not fall for the deep-state-inspired Ambedkarite Navayāna narratives, which have nothing to do with traditional Buddhism, or Abrahamic strategies that divide and destroy non-Abrahamic traditions. In Southeast Asia and elsewhere, including India, Christian missionaries, not Hindus, have been converting Buddhists, thereby altering the religious character of those societies and destroying Buddhism. Likewise, Islam has destroyed Buddhism in Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics. As recently as 2001, the Islamic Taliban bombed and destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas. The Islamic term but parasti, meaning "idol worship," is derived from the word Buddha, in reference to the idols associated with Buddhism. Therefore, in their own self-interest , traditional Buddhists must reject false victimhood and the anti-Hindu weaponisation of their tradition, for Hindus are not their enemy. On the contrary, the enemies of Buddhism and Hindutva are the same; they merely try to create a wedge between Buddhists and Hindus to destroy both.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)52,463 views • 11 months ago
सादर प्रणाम गुरुदेव Shri Jyotirmath । राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ विगत कई दशकों से मुसलमानों की तुष्टिकरण हेतु 'रोटी-बेटी' की नीति अपनाता आ रहा है। इसी उद्देश्य से मुस्लिम राष्ट्रीय मंच की स्थापना की गई, जिसके माध्यम से हिन्दू परिवारों को बार-बार प्रेरित किया जाता है कि वे अपनी पुत्रियों का विवाह मुस्लिम युवकों से करें। इस नीति के परिणामस्वरूप भारतीय जनता पार्टी में कई मुस्लिम नेता और कार्यकर्ता ऐसे हैं, जिन्होंने हिन्दू कन्याओं से विवाह किया। उदाहरणस्वरूप— - स्वर्गीय सिकन्दर बख्त (पत्नी: राज शर्मा) - मुख्तार अब्बास नकवी (पत्नी: सीमा) - शाहनवाज हुसैन (पत्नी: रेणु) इस प्रकार #छद्माहिंदुत्व संघ परिवार द्वारा 'लव जिहाद' को संस्थागत रूप से प्रोत्साहन मिल रहा है। निष्पक्ष विश्लेषण से स्पष्ट है कि संघ परिवार के प्रत्येक कार्यक्रम एवं कार्य हिन्दू-विरोधी सिद्ध होते हैं। 'रोटी-बेटी' योजना इसका केवल एक प्रमुख उदाहरण है। अतः यह कहना अतिशयोक्ति नहीं कि समग्र इतिहास में संघ परिवार हिन्दुओं द्वारा स्थापित सबसे बड़ा हिन्दू-द्रोही संगठन सिद्ध हुआ है। इसलिए, हिन्दू धर्म की रक्षा के लिए संघ परिवार का सम्पूर्ण उन्मूलन अनिवार्य है; अन्यथा यह हिन्दू धर्म को जड़ से नष्ट कर देगा। विनम्रतापूर्वक 🙇♂️🙏 #RSS_Mukt_Bharat
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)29,739 views • 6 months ago
Chandrababu Naidu's insane obsession with IT, computers, and alliances with figures like Bill Gates—who have no skin in the game—guided his governance at the direct expense of rural areas, small towns, and party cadres. This neglect triggered crushing electoral defeats in 2004 and 2019. His son Nara Lokesh appears to have inherited the same tunnel vision, intensifying the IT-centric, Gates-aligned strategy while repeating the very same neglect. As the adage warns: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” Far from learning any lessons, the father-son duo seems determined to repeat 2004 and 2019. Such is the nature of power: they will almost certainly dismiss this as hostile criticism rather than constructive advice for course correction.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)31,013 views • 7 months ago