M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)
@MNageswarRaoIPS • 107,465 subscribers
Former Director, CBI. “In a time of universal deceit, telling truth is revolutionary act”~Orwell. #EqualRightsForHindus & #RSS_Mukt_Bharat. Backup @MNR_IPS
Shorts
Videos
Jagan garu, Temples belong to Hindus only. They are out of bounds for Non-Hindus. As a Christian you cannot enter any Temple. If you are so keen, then you first do #gharwapasi to the religion of your ancestors namely Hinduism by re-conversion. Then Hindus will welcome you to Temples with #Poorna_Kumbham. YS Jagan Mohan Reddy
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)324,081 просмотров • 1 год назад
Dear General V K Singh Ji, In Bhubaneswar city, an Army officer and his fiancée consume 10 pegs of liquor and drive a car in the mid of night around 2 am, indulge in a brawl with engineering students around 2-30 am, and then land up in Bharatpur Police Station creating ruckus inside the police station, so much so that the PS staff had to seek help of PCR. When sent to hospital for medical examination and blood test which is the standard protocol of investigation, they refused. Here👇is a video clip for you to make your own judgement about the Army officer and his 'lady' fiancée? You may also obtain more video footage of CCTV cameras of the incident which are available in social media. Odisha Police has more than 600 Police Stations and they together register and investigate about 2 lakh cases annually. Lakhs of people visit Police Stations including women and Army officers to report their grievances or seek help. It is not that they misbehave with people visiting police stations. Sir, we, the Indian Police, respect and honour our Military because that is the last resort in defending the country from external enemies. A reciprocation from Military towards Police which defends the country from internal enemies, is a normal expectation. Our work is complementary as we together protect the country from within and without. Sir, it is not done that you, having been a Chief of Army Staff (COAS) and later a Central Minister, jumped to conclusion and castigated Odisha Police for the drunken brawl and uncouth behaviour of an Army officer and his fiancée, and Odisha Police officers were not even at fault. But I would not chastise the Indian Army by asking, “Is this the kind of discipline that the Indian Army imparts and inculcates in its officers?”. Because an individual’s aberration does not represent an esteemed institution. Finally, I request you to your good offices and ask the COAS to take this Army Officer to task for his conduct unbecoming of a soldier, and for besmirching the fair name of the Indian Army. ADG PI - INDIAN ARMY Rajnath Singh CMO Odisha DGP, Odisha Odisha Police COMMISSIONERATE POLICE #ankitapradhan
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)275,884 просмотров • 1 год назад
Dear Dr. Sagar Preet Hooda, IPS Director General of Police, Chandigarh DGP Chandigarh Police Subject: Request for intervention regarding FIR No. 44 dated 19-04-2026 registered by East Sector 26 Police Station, Chandigarh 1. I write this letter through X with the sincere hope that it reaches your attention. The present issue concerns FIR No. 44 dated 19-04-2026 registered by East Sector 26 Police Station, Chandigarh against Professor Madhu Kishwar Madhu Purnima Kishwar and a few others under Sections 66C, 66D and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Sections 196, 318, 336(1), 336(3), 336(4), 340, 353 and 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was registered on the complaint of one Satinder Singh, who alleged that a video clip was being circulated by various social media users with misleading claims that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was receiving a facial massage from a woman. According to the complaint, several social media accounts amplified this allegedly false narrative. As understood, the complainant further stated that his preliminary verification revealed that the video was originally posted by one Pardeep Kaur Dhillon through Facebook, YouTube and Instagram accounts on 12 April 2026, and that the person in the video was actually Jaspal Singh Sarai, who was apparently receiving a facial massage from a woman. However, even a plain reading of the complaint does not disclose the commission of any offence, much less a cognizable offence. Surprisingly, the police registered the FIR invoking an extraordinary range of provisions relating to identity theft, cheating, forgery, promoting enmity, defamation, public mischief, and even obscenity. 2. Let us briefly examine the applicability of each provision invoked in the FIR: (i) Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 criminalises fraudulent or dishonest use of another person’s electronic signature, password, or unique identification feature. The fundamental question is: whose identity has Professor Madhu Kishwar allegedly stolen? Was it the identity of Satinder Singh? If not, what is his locus standi in lodging such a complaint? If the allegation concerns some other person, has that person complained? In the absence of any such complaint, how is an offence under this section made out? (ii) Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 relates to cheating by personation through a communication device or computer resource. Whom did Professor Madhu Kishwar allegedly impersonate? Who was deceived, and what wrongful gain or loss occurred? Did she impersonate Satinder Singh or any other person? If not, how does the complainant acquire locus standi under this provision? (iii) Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 criminalises publication or transmission of obscene material in electronic form. The complainant himself states that the video was originally posted by Pardeep Kaur Dhillon and depicted Jaspal Singh Sarai receiving a facial massage from a woman. The video, by any objective standard, contains no obscene or lascivious material. Neither individuals were nude, nor was any sexual act depicted. It was merely a professional facial massage. Professor Madhu Kishwar merely reposted the content on X. Therefore, the essential ingredients of Section 67 are entirely absent. (iv) Section 196 of BNS concerns promoting enmity between groups on grounds such as religion, race, language, place of birth, or residence, and acts prejudicial to communal harmony. How does reposting a video of a man receiving a facial massage — even assuming someone believed the man resembled Prime Minister Narendra Modi — amount to promoting enmity between groups or disturbing public harmony? The provision appears wholly inapplicable. (v) Section 318 of BNS deals with the offence of cheating. The essential ingredients of cheating require deception causing wrongful loss, delivery of property, or inducement to act or omit in a manner causing harm. How does reposting a social media video satisfy any of these ingredients? Even assuming, for the sake of argument, that Prime Minister Narendra Modi felt personally aggrieved, the complaint would have to come from him or an authorised representative. What is the locus standi of Satinder Singh or any unrelated third party in this matter? (vi) Sections 336(1), 336(2) and 336(3) of BNS These provisions deal with forgery involving false documents or electronic records. How does reposting a pre-existing video amount to creating a false document or forged electronic record? No document was fabricated. No electronic record was forged. Again, even assuming that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the aggrieved person, why has no complaint been filed either by him or by any authorised representative? How does Satinder Singh acquire standing in such circumstances? (vii) Section 340 of BNS concerns fraudulent or dishonest use of a forged document or electronic record. When there is no forged document at all, the provision itself cannot apply. Further, the alleged victim has neither filed nor authorised any complaint. In such circumstances, invocation of Section 340 appears entirely untenable. (viii) Section 353 of BNS concerns statements or reports intended to incite mutiny, offences against the State, public disorder, or inter-community violence. How can reposting a video of a man receiving a facial massage — even if someone attributes resemblance to Prime Minister Narendra Modi — possibly amount to incitement of mutiny, public disorder, or offences against the State? The invocation of this section is wholly unsustainable. (ix) Section 356 of BNS concerns defamation. However, Section 222 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 clearly provides that defamation can be prosecuted only by the aggrieved person. If the aggrieved person is a public servant, proceedings can be initiated only by a Public Prosecutor with prior sanction of the Central or State Government as the case may be. Neither Satinder Singh nor any unrelated individual has the legal standing to initiate such proceedings. 3. Dr. Hooda Ji, permit me to share a version of a well-known satirical anecdote about policing, which bears a striking resemblance to the present case, where Professor Madhu Kishwar is being compelled to endure the ordeal of criminal prosecution despite the absence of the essential ingredients of the offences invoked against her. A man sees an old friend running down the street — terrified, panting, and sweating. He stops him and asks, “What is wrong? Why are you running?” The friend replies, “The police are arresting all bulls!” The man says, “But you are not a bull. Why are you running?” The friend shouts back, “We both know I am not a bull. But by the time I prove it to the police and the courts, I will have spent the rest of my life in jail!” Terrified by hearing this, the other man also starts running. 4. Dr. Hooda Ji, I have heard that you are a competent, upright and distinguished officer. It is the solemn responsibility of senior officers of the IPS to prevent abuse of the criminal justice process and to ensure that policing does not degenerate into a spectacle in which criminal law is stretched beyond recognition to harass individuals for expressing views that may inconvenience those in power. 5. I therefore request your kind intervention to prevent the continued harassment and persecution of Professor Madhu Kishwar for her views on public issues, and to direct immediate closure of the case. 6. This letter has also been converted into video format and attached.👇 With Regards
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)17,299 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
A Twist in the Tale: Has BJP become the adda of corrupt? In the run up to the 2014 general elections, the BJP centred its campaign around alleged corruption under the Congress-led UPA government, promising ‘ache din’ . Several times during the campaign, Narendra Modi Ji grandiloquently promised to jail the corrupt. He was equally loud about bringing back 'all the looted money stashed away in Swiss banks and eliminating black money'. People gave BJP a decisive mandate and Modi became PM in 2014. On 8th November 2016 in a public broadcast PM Modi declared that Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes would cease to be legal tender and grandiosely announced that the purpose of #demonetisation was to crackdown on corruption and eliminate black money. It, however, turned out to be spurious. Recently, Supreme Court Justice B. V. Nagarathna said in a conference in Hyderabad that in the Indian economy at that time, Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes comprised 86% of the currency and wondered about the goal of the demonetisation exercise since 98% of those notes came back to banks. She also questioned about black money eradication as demonetisation became a good way of converting black money into white money. In 2017 the BJP government introduced #ElectoralBond Scheme, which was anonymous financial contributions to political parties, by amending several laws namely, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the Companies Act, 2013, the Income Tax Act, 1961. Its avowed purpose was to enhance transparency and accountability in political funding by eliminating black money, corruption. etc. The Supreme Court has recently struck down this secret political funding as unconstitutional and directed disclosure of complete details of all electoral bonds. From the data available in public domain, thanks to the Supreme Court, it came to light that the BJP is the biggest beneficiary as out of total Rs. 11,450 crores it received Rs. 6,566 crores which is 57%. Contemporaneous evidence indicates that #ElectoralBonds have all the ingredients of a huge scam such as quid pro quo and corruption, shell and loss making companies donating to political parties huge sums of money suspected to be kickbacks, and laundering of black money. In order to shield our democratic process from foreign interference, the laws regulating foreign contributions prohibited political parties and candidates in elections from accepting foreign contributions. But the BJP government through Finance Acts, 2016 and 2018 amended with retrospective effect the Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 2010 (#FCRA) by changing the definition of ‘foreign source’ not only condoning the past illegalities committed but also permitting political parties to receive foreign funds, and thereby paved way for foreign intrusion into our political and electoral process compromising our sovereignty. Further, notwithstanding the huge propaganda of alleged action against Foreign Funded NGOs, there has been a huge spike in #FCRA remittances since the 2014-15. While during the 20 years between financial years 1994-1995 and 2013-14 an amount of Rs. 1,51,036 Crores was received, during the 8 years between 2014-15 and 2023-24 Rs. 1,46,392 was received. Data for financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24 is not yet available. However, from the trends of #FCRA remittances in the preceding years it will be around Rs. 50,000 Crores together for both the financial years, making the total FCRA remittances during 10 year rule of BJP to be around Rs. 2,00,000 Crores which is humongous. Even if a small fraction of that huge amount of foreign funds has gone to political parties or candidates in elections, it amounts to serious subversion of our democracy and constitution. What sort of patriotism is this? Several months prior to 2014 general elections, a spate of alleged scams during UPA rule surfaced namely, Chit Fund scam, Chopper scam, Tatra truck scam, 2G Spectrum scam, CWG scam, Coal scam, Adarsh scam, etc. The courts, CBI, ED and IT proactively initiated action as a result several Congress and UPA leaders came under scanner. Though the BJP came to power on the anti-corruption plank, hardly any political leaders of significance was convicted, nor even paisa of black money stashed away in Swiss banks was brought back. On the other hand, the BJP has allegedly been misusing the law enforcement agencies to arm-twist the opposition political leaders under cloud either to defect to or align with the BJP. Out of 25 important opposition leaders who were allegedly under the scanner and joined BJP, 23 have reportedly got reprieve. Politicians like Andhra Pradesh CM YS Jagan who faces 38 criminal cases including 11 CBI and 7 ED cases, have been buying peace from the BJP. As a result none of his cases have seen the light of the day, notwithstanding the direction of Supreme Court to speed up trial of cases against politicians. Likewise, the DMK leaders namely, the Maran brothers, A. Raja, Karunanidhi’s daughter Kanimozhi have been acquitted, after they not so secretly cosied up to BJP, thanks to the lacklustre prosecution of their cases before the courts. These are only representative examples of how the BJP has become the adda for the leaders facing allegations of corruption, money laundering, etc. It is quite possible that some of them may be genuinely innocent. But as their innocence has been established only after their defection to or aligning with the ruling BJP, it creates dark shadows by raising serious moral questions. Last year, fourteen political parties approached the Supreme Court against the alleged misuse of central investigating agencies in arresting opposition political leaders and other citizens exercising their fundamental right to dissent and disagree with the ruling BJP. It was alleged that 95% of political leaders investigated by CBI and ED belong to opposition. That is, out of 121 prominent politicians facing ED probe between 2014 and 2022, 115 are opposition leaders who had been booked, raided, questioned or arrested. To wriggle out of or deflect the allegations of promoting corruption, shielding the corrupt who have joined or aligned with the BJP and targeting opposition leaders, etc, one of the standard refrains of the BJP has been that as Narendra Modi has no family he cannot be corrupt or has no motivation to be corrupt or shield the corrupt. That is a disingenuous argument. Late Jayalalitha, who was a spinster with no family, was convicted for corruption and was sent to jail. There are many prominent leaders who are unmarried or have no families facing cases or allegations of corruption. I don’t mean to even hint let alone allege that Narendra Modi is personally financially corrupt. I merely want to call out their bluff by highlighting the point that there is no connection between one’s familial status and corruption. It must be recalled that Manmohan Singh, whose personal financial integrity was impeccable, presided over a corrupt regime. As such, personal financial honesty of PM or a CM is meaningless if his party and government are not honest. Barring honourable exceptions, every political party while in opposition grandiloquently talks against corruption, not necessarily because they are honest, but because they try to make a virtue of out of lack of opportunities to make money. Notwithstanding its anti-corruption rhetoric the BJP is no stranger to corruption as its unsavory history tells. In 2001, none other than its National President late Bangaru Laxman was caught on the camera taking bribe from one Mathew Samuel, and was later convicted by a Special CBI Court on 27th April 2012 and sentenced to four years in jail. Further, BJP’s former CM of Karnataka Sri B. S. Yeddyurappa faced charges of corruption and was also in jail for a while. There are allegations of misdeeds of BJP government in PM-CARES Fund which is mired in secrecy, in sale of Air India to Tatas for peanuts, about CAG’s concern about astronomical escalation in cost of construction of Dwarka Expressway from Rs. 18.2 crores per km to Rs. 251 crores per km, in the utility of more than Rs. 14,000 crores public funds for Namami Gange project while the sacred Ganga is on the verge becoming a sewer like Yamuna, and several others. The #ElectoralBondScam which points to several alleged scams, is only a tip of the iceberg. It seems further action to take it to logical end has come to a naught. Therefore, having seen the fate of investigation and trial of all the alleged scams and how the political class sabotage, it is imperative that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising serving or retired officers specially chosen by the Supreme Court, which will not be part of any Law Enforcement Agency but independently directly reporting to the Supreme Court, would alone will be able to unravel the truth. It is pertinent to recall the stellar role of RTI Act and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (before it was amended in 2018) in exposing alleged corruption in the Congress-led UPA government. Information is power. So, the RTI Act empowered people to seek information from public authorities on all official matters (barring a very few exceptions). Based on that information obtained through RTI process about alleged corrupt deals, illegalities, etc during UPA rule, the CBI which had no legal shackles could initiate enquiries and investigation into those allegations. The BJP while in opposition used and exploited this situation to the hilt to oust the Congress-led UPA from power. And having formed government the BJP is acutely aware of the dangers for the corrupt lurking in these laws. So they have systematically wrecked the RTI Act so much so that it has gone from citizens’ most powerful tool to an Act on life support. In 2018 they amended the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. As per new section 17A introduced therein, “No police officer shall conduct any enquiry or inquiry or investigation into any offence alleged to have been committed by a public servant under this Act, where the alleged offence is relatable to any recommendation made or decision taken by such public servant in discharge of his official functions or duties, without the previous approval” of respective governments or appointing authority of the public servant. Which government will permit investigation into its own misdeeds? While Justice R. M. Lodha in 2013 denounced the CBI as a ‘caged parrot’, the BJP government translated his oral observation into a legal reality by destroying the Prevention of Corruption Act. Evidently, the real purpose of BJP undermining RTI Act and emasculating the CBI was to prevent visitation of fate similar to that of UPA by insulating and firewalling themselves from any future enquiries and investigations into their alleged corrupt deeds. Finally, there is an uncanny resemblance between the BJP’s anti-corruption rhetoric with a story in Jeffrey Archer’s popular book, ‘A Twist in the Tale’, which goes like this: Ignatius Agarbi was the new Financial Minister of Nigeria. He begins a sweep on corruption and makes a name for himself. Impressed by his extreme honesty, his president entrusted him to find out how many Nigerians have stashed their bribes in Switzerland. He arrives at the Swiss Bank with a briefcase. Despite his greatest persuasion, the Swiss banker refuses to break their code of privacy. In the end, Ignatius places a gun to the head of the Swiss banker and threatens to kill him. Still the banker refuses to divulge any confidential information. Ignatius, who was actually extremely corrupt, was only checking to find out if the Swiss Banks would actually reveal the name of an account holder. Delighted with their secrecy, Ignatius deposits $5 million in cash which he had skimmed as Financial Minister.”
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)224,608 просмотров • 2 лет назад
Modi Ji, in the past 11 years of your rule it is only unmitigated & comprehensive SCAM IN INDIA. Your government has not left any ministry, any department, any agency, any sector, any area, any economic and social activity UNSCAMMED. Your Lutera Sarkar through myriad extortionary taxes, charges, surcharges, cesses, tolls, etc has been sucking the last drop of blood of commonmen, and destroyed MSME, small businesses and manufacturing. Yet this👇
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)144,979 просмотров • 1 год назад
Tejasvi Surya Ji, Your post is a masterclass in misdirection, sidestepping the real criticisms levelled against Modi, which is typical of the Goebbelsian propaganda of the Sangh Parivar. The issue is not Modi’s lack of fluency in English. It is his uncouth conduct, exaggerated gestures, boisterous laughter, and attempts to fake fluency in English. Recall that nobody mocked Atal Bihari Vajpayee for speaking Hindi on global stages. On the contrary, he was applauded for his dignified conduct and for taking Hindi to international fora. Your claim of Modi coming from absolute poverty is another big lie. The "tea-seller at a non-existent railway station" story has been debunked repeatedly, yet it is peddled to craft a false underdog image. Modi’s childhood photos in a suit and tie and NCC uniform, his foreign tours as a young adult as per his own claims, and other evidence contradict the assertions of “absolute poverty.” While it is true that he did not have an elite education, he himself stated in TV interviews that he had minimal formal education. Furthermore, his penchant for a luxurious lifestyle, expensive attire, high-end gadgets, and customised Boeing jets contradicts the humble-origins-to-power tale. Modi’s background, while not elite, was far from destitute, and his lifestyle today screams opulence, not humility. The claim that Modi embodies "civilisational confidence" by speaking Hindi internationally is hollow when his governance aligns with foreign deep-state agendas. His ties to the CIA-linked ACYPL, of which he is an alumnus, and policies promoting wokeism in education and governance raise questions about whose interests he serves. Far from being a civilisational warrior, Modi’s tenure has seen India’s diplomatic clout wane—evidenced by the lack of global support after tragedies like the #Pahalgam massacre, where 25 Hindus were killed by Islamic terrorists, and the fiasco of Operation Sindoor to deceive gullible Hindus. Even traditional allies like Russia have grown distant. His economic deals, often hyped, lack transparency and tangible outcomes for India’s masses. The hallmark of Modi’s diplomacy is personal branding at government expense, to the detriment of India, in pursuit of foreign awards and the elusive Nobel Prize. Modi’s governance has allegedly perfected corruption into an art and science, and it has grown exponentially, as evidenced by the Electoral Bonds scheme, which the Supreme Court struck down with scathing remarks. Transparency in Modi’s governance is a joke, with the RTI Act nearly neutralised, and secrecy has become the norm, as evidenced by the PM CARES Fund, reportedly breeding organised corruption. The claim of restoring civilisational self-respect is equally laughable. Hindus continue to be second-class citizens, and #Minority_Appeasement has increased by leaps and bounds, putting the Congress and other parties to shame. With his divisive "hisab chukta" policies, he has escalated casteism to new heights, destroying Hindu society. His refusal to amend Articles 25–30 to grant #EqualRightsForHindus, to #FreeTemples from government control, and his continuation and incentivisation of policies that make India the second-largest #Beef exporter, as well as his refusal to ban #Polygamy and #FCRA expose a betrayal of civilisational interests. Lastly, the #PseudoHindutva RSS-BJP-Modi trio stands as the greatest Hindu drohis in world history. Tejasvi Surya
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)106,874 просмотров • 1 год назад
Late Bibek Debroy elaborates and contextualises with important nuance the story of Ekalavya in the Mahabharata, and how the caste oppression narrative is disingenuous. Watch Untimely death of Bibek Debroy is indeed a great loss to Hindu society.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)136,060 просмотров • 1 год назад
सादर प्रणाम गुरुदेव Shri Jyotirmath । राष्ट्रीय स्वयंसेवक संघ विगत कई दशकों से मुसलमानों की तुष्टिकरण हेतु 'रोटी-बेटी' की नीति अपनाता आ रहा है। इसी उद्देश्य से मुस्लिम राष्ट्रीय मंच की स्थापना की गई, जिसके माध्यम से हिन्दू परिवारों को बार-बार प्रेरित किया जाता है कि वे अपनी पुत्रियों का विवाह मुस्लिम युवकों से करें। इस नीति के परिणामस्वरूप भारतीय जनता पार्टी में कई मुस्लिम नेता और कार्यकर्ता ऐसे हैं, जिन्होंने हिन्दू कन्याओं से विवाह किया। उदाहरणस्वरूप— - स्वर्गीय सिकन्दर बख्त (पत्नी: राज शर्मा) - मुख्तार अब्बास नकवी (पत्नी: सीमा) - शाहनवाज हुसैन (पत्नी: रेणु) इस प्रकार #छद्माहिंदुत्व संघ परिवार द्वारा 'लव जिहाद' को संस्थागत रूप से प्रोत्साहन मिल रहा है। निष्पक्ष विश्लेषण से स्पष्ट है कि संघ परिवार के प्रत्येक कार्यक्रम एवं कार्य हिन्दू-विरोधी सिद्ध होते हैं। 'रोटी-बेटी' योजना इसका केवल एक प्रमुख उदाहरण है। अतः यह कहना अतिशयोक्ति नहीं कि समग्र इतिहास में संघ परिवार हिन्दुओं द्वारा स्थापित सबसे बड़ा हिन्दू-द्रोही संगठन सिद्ध हुआ है। इसलिए, हिन्दू धर्म की रक्षा के लिए संघ परिवार का सम्पूर्ण उन्मूलन अनिवार्य है; अन्यथा यह हिन्दू धर्म को जड़ से नष्ट कर देगा। विनम्रतापूर्वक 🙇♂️🙏 #RSS_Mukt_Bharat
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)29,647 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
"అప్పులేని వాడు అందరికన్నా ధనవంతుడు" అనే జీవిత సత్యాన్ని చాటి చెప్పింది మన హైందవ నాగరికత. 1300 సంవత్సరాల విదేశి ఆక్రమణలను, దుర్మార్గపు పాలనను మన పూర్వికులు తట్టుకోగలగడానికి ఒక ముఖ్య కారణం మన వారి పొదుపు, అప్పు చేసి పప్పు కూడుకు దూరం, విలాసాలకు దూరం. "నేను అప్పుకు దూరం. ఒక కుటుంబాన్ని ఉద్దరించాలంటే ఒక వ్యక్తి త్యాగం చేయాల్సిందే." ఈ👇వీడియో చూడండి, అందరికి చూపించండి, పాటించండి.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)119,498 просмотров • 1 год назад
विद्या विनयं ददाति, विनयाद् याति पात्रताम्। It means, education gives humility, and from humility comes worthiness. Modi's endless foreign trips are not about building India's friendships with the world. They are a loud, shameless drama to show off. His crude behaviour abroad, full of cheap stunts, insults India's pride, and he cares little for the shame it brings. His mad rush to visit including small, unimportant countries leaves India alone, with no real friends on the global stage. Modi's uncouth ways reveal his only goal: to fool gullible Hindu voters with a fake image of a world-loved leader to win votes. Uneducated and brash, Modi is not just a problem at home but a major embarrassment for India abroad.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)73,031 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад
“Good Buddhism vs. Bad Hinduism" I serendipitously came across a video short featuring Koenraad Elst, who offers a profound observation. Please watch it👇before proceeding to read further. The "good Buddhism, bad Hinduism" narrative lacks roots in ancient Indian history. Buddhism emerged as a Darshana, an agnostic philosophical school rejecting the Vedas as pramaña, within the broader ecosystem of Hindutva. Please note that Hindutva, originally coined by Chandranath Basu in 1892, is the modern indigenous name for our ancient religion Sanatana Dharma, and we use it in that sense, not in any political or nationalistic sense. Buddhism drew almost all core concepts like karma, dharma, and samsara from Vedic traditions with Buddhist texts heavily borrowing from them. In ancient India, lay practitioners often blended Buddhism and Hindutva seamlessly, without a sharp divide. Buddhism was, in essence, deeply rooted in Hindutva until external forces reframed it. This false binary took shape in the 19th century through colonial Orientalist scholarship, filtered through a Judeo-Christian lens. Western scholars, including missionaries and Indologists like Max Müller, portrayed Hindutva’s polytheism and “idol worship” as superstitious and its caste system as “socially oppressive”, likening it to pre-Reformation Catholicism. Meanwhile, Buddhism’s focus on “compassion” and monastic simplicity was romanticised as a "Protestant-like" reform — enlightened, universal, and akin to Christian ethics. Financial disparities reinforced this: Buddhist studies received patronage from Japan, China, and Western donors, while Hindutva, tied to an impoverished India, lacked similar support. Post-1947, political and ideological forces entrenched this narrative. Nehruvian socialism and Marxist historiography cast Buddhism as a “rational”, “progressive force”, crediting it for Hindutva’s “positive” elements while blaming Hindutva for its inadequacies. Ambedkar’s 1956 mass conversion to Buddhism — his invented Navayana Buddhism, which retains little of traditional Buddhism beyond its name — presented it as an escape from “Hindu oppression,” focusing on caste critique, despite Buddhism’s own historical monastic hierarchies and caste-like structures. Left-leaning academics, media, and textbooks perpetuated this to push anti-Hindu, “egalitarian” agendas, ignoring Buddhism’s elite urban origins. In the West, Buddhism’s “philosophical” image (meditation, mindfulness, and lack of a creator god) aligns with secular and New Age preferences, making it a marketable, “cool” non-theistic tradition. Hindutva, with its diverse rituals and deities, is stereotyped as exotic yet backward, scrutinised over caste without nuance as caste is only social organisation. This fuels more funding, academic positions, and media portrayals (e.g., films like Little Buddha) glorifying Buddhism, while Hindutva faces disproportionate criticism, nay vilification. This narrative is driven by diverse actors with aligned goals of vilifying Hindutva: colonial Christian Indologists and missionaries demonised it to aid conversions; Indian intellectuals like Nehru, Ambedkar, and Marxist historians like Romila Thapar advanced pseudo-secular, anti-Hindutva agendas; modern English media and deep-state-inspired Dalit groups promote Ambedkarite views, framing Buddhism as empowerment; Western academics like Sheldon Pollock and outlets like The New York Times benefit from well-funded Buddhist studies chairs that outnumber those for Hindutva; Buddhist institutions, from ancient monasteries to modern Tibetan exile networks and Western converts, emphasise differences to secure patronage; and global cultural dynamics promote Buddhism as a “universal” export, erasing its Hindu roots to enable Hinduphobia and support missionary conversion tactics. Buddhists following traditional schools such as Theravāda, Mahāyāna, and Vajrayāna must understand and recognize that Hindutva (Sanātana Dharma) is the foundation of Buddhism, without which it cannot exist. They should not fall for the deep-state-inspired Ambedkarite Navayāna narratives, which have nothing to do with traditional Buddhism, or Abrahamic strategies that divide and destroy non-Abrahamic traditions. In Southeast Asia and elsewhere, including India, Christian missionaries, not Hindus, have been converting Buddhists, thereby altering the religious character of those societies and destroying Buddhism. Likewise, Islam has destroyed Buddhism in Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics. As recently as 2001, the Islamic Taliban bombed and destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas. The Islamic term but parasti, meaning "idol worship," is derived from the word Buddha, in reference to the idols associated with Buddhism. Therefore, in their own self-interest , traditional Buddhists must reject false victimhood and the anti-Hindu weaponisation of their tradition, for Hindus are not their enemy. On the contrary, the enemies of Buddhism and Hindutva are the same; they merely try to create a wedge between Buddhists and Hindus to destroy both.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)52,290 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад
Chandrababu Naidu's insane obsession with IT, computers, and alliances with figures like Bill Gates—who have no skin in the game—guided his governance at the direct expense of rural areas, small towns, and party cadres. This neglect triggered crushing electoral defeats in 2004 and 2019. His son Nara Lokesh appears to have inherited the same tunnel vision, intensifying the IT-centric, Gates-aligned strategy while repeating the very same neglect. As the adage warns: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.” Far from learning any lessons, the father-son duo seems determined to repeat 2004 and 2019. Such is the nature of power: they will almost certainly dismiss this as hostile criticism rather than constructive advice for course correction.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)31,013 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад
FOR AMBEDKARITES A Bitter Lesson Etched in Blood: Jogendra Nath Mandal He was the Scheduled Caste icon who betrayed his own. Jogendra Nath Mandal demanded Pakistan, allied with Jinnah, and became its first Law Minister, abandoning India for Muslim promises of equality. His fatal mistake? Convincing lakhs of SCs to stay in Pakistan (and later Bangladesh), trusting Islam. In Islam, every non-Muslim is a kafir—to be converted or eliminated. In Christianity, every non-believer is a heathen—destined for the same fate. Result: Endless Islamic genocidal persecution. Rape, forced conversions, bonded labor, murder - SCs reduced to subhuman Kafirs, suffering to this day. Mandal? He fled in terror back to Hindu India when the mask slipped and Muslims turned on him leaving his people to rot. Ambedkarites: This is the fate you court when you cheer Muslim and Christian applause to dismantle Hindu society, the only force that ever sheltered you. Destroy Hindutva (Sanatana Dharma), and no Ambedkar, no Phule, no Mandal can save you. Only chains, conversions, and graves await.
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)41,151 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад
MODI: THE CORRUPTION CROWN Arun Shourie, citing a CAG report, states that during Narendra Modi's tenure as Chief Minister, the Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation spent Rs. 21,000 crore on oil and gas exploration without discovering a single teaspoon of oil or a litre of natural gas. Where did this money go? To describe the media's silence on the issue, Shourie quotes a Zulu proverb: “A dog with a bone in its mouth cannot bark.”
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)52,381 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад
Your Job Is Not Your Life Donald J. Trump
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)70,576 просмотров • 1 год назад
ఆహా.. అద్భుతమైన తిథుల పాట! గురువుగారెవరో గానీ, చాలా అందంగా రాసి పిల్లలకు నేర్పించారు. 🙏
M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)13,135 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад