
Natalie Jean Beisner
@NJBeisner • 120,397 subscribers
✝️ ex-Democrat turned sane person
Shorts
Videos

A lot of Christians apparently need to hear this: being kind, generous and beloved does not make a false gospel true. I love Dolly Parton. I mean that. But since her passing, I’ve watched Christians point to how kind she was, how much money she gave away, how many books she donated, and how universally beloved she was—as though any of that changes the Gospel. It doesn’t. Dolly publicly said that everyone has their own path to God. That you can call it God, science, nature, energy—whatever works for you. That sounds nice, tolerant, and loving—but it is not Christianity. Jesus did not say He was a way to the Father. He said He is THE way. And I think Christians have become so terrified of appearing judgmental, intolerant or “unkind” that we’ve started confusing worldly niceness with biblical love. Real love does not hide the truth to spare someone’s feelings. I don’t know Dolly’s heart. I don’t know what happened between her and Jesus in the final moments of her life, and I sincerely pray she knew Him. But I can evaluate her public words. So can you. And we should. You can love Dolly. You can celebrate her extraordinary talent, generosity and uniquely American legacy. You can mourn her passing. But we need to be clear on the Gospel message. Truth does not become false because the world hates it. And falsehood does not become truth because it comes from someone the world loves. There are not many roads to God. There is one. Jesus Christ. ✝️
Natalie Jean Beisner141,809 views • 1 day ago

Idiots not realizing the Candace herself said back in December that Erika confirmed the existence of these messages and said she was mistaken when she initially didn’t see them, and Candace at the time was satisfied with that explanation. This is a perfect example of how Candace conditions her audience and subtly shifts narratives.
Natalie Jean Beisner204,250 views • 9 days ago

Andrew Wilson says Joe Rogan offered to host and moderate the debate. Candace refused anything outside her own home. Rogan then offered to come to her, and she still refused. Candace is a maniacal control freak and a liar. She said today that Tim Pool was one of only two moderators she’d outright reject. The other would obviously be Ben Shapiro. But Rogan is apparently a third. And we all know there’s an even longer list than that. Wilson also confirms that the $300,000 has been sent to Candace. While I’m not vehemently opposed to the debate, I’m sickened to know she made more in a single day than most Americans make in three years. And she’s already a multi-millionaire a couple hundred times over. She’ll do this debate, declare herself the victor, and then continue to harass and defame everyone. All while being $300k richer. A decent person would donate this money to a good cause.
Natalie Jean Beisner346,659 views • 21 days ago

Famed misogynist Charlie Kirk went on the whatever podcast, and when confronted with a woman who said she’d take the bear in the woods over the man, Charlie’s first response was to ask whether she’d been hurt by men. His second response was to apologize to her for all the hurt men have caused. His third was to excuse women who stupidly answer they’d rather have the bear by suggesting their stupidity stems from bad interactions with men. Can someone point out the misogyny to me? I’m not seeing it.
Natalie Jean Beisner4,564,243 views • 11 months ago

“Donald Trump is a fascist. He has Nazis in his administration. His entire messaging was resonating with Nazis from the very beginning.” This is so dumb for them. There’s no shortage of things on which one can legitimately and in good faith criticize President Trump; there never has been. Instead, they’re beating a dead horse, alienating millions of Americans who voted for Trump for legitimate reasons that have nothing to do with hate. This tactic and rhetoric will ensure the Democrat party loses elections; they should want to win back people who voted for Trump—not further alienate them.
Natalie Jean Beisner166,508 views • 16 days ago

Student: “You believe criminality is an inherent trait to the black race.” Charlie: “NO, I don’t. They weren’t that way in the 1940s and 50s. Black America was one of the most peaceful, flourishing, economically fastest growing communities in the country. It’s not genetic.” Everyone who’s taking out of context what Charlie said about black Americans being better off in the 1940s/50s of before the civil rights act needs to watch this. He explains his position quite clearly. He’s not calling for a return to socially accepted racism or Jim Crow; he’s pointing out that at that time, blacks outpaced whites in terms of marriage rates and fathers in the homes—despite the fact that they actually had to face a great deal of legally and socially acceptable racism. So his point is that we can’t blithely pin all of the black American community’s problems today on “racism”—if they were in fact outpacing whites when racism was actually prevalent, encouraged, written into law, and widely accepted.
Natalie Jean Beisner4,380,558 views • 11 months ago

I can’t get over this. I haven’t been touched so deeply by anything in a while. And I’m sorry, I can’t get behind the idea that only she’s to blame. Watching this documentary feels like watching everyone gather around an alcoholic for a reverse intervention where they just pour booze down the alcoholic’s throat for her. In that situation, you would call everyone pretty sick and messed up, and you’d be right. She’s really sick. The men are really sick—all 100 of them.
Natalie Jean Beisner7,552,925 views • 1 year ago

Candace to Erika: “you just got lucky and there Charlie was at the airport in Israel. And you saw him. And your mom said ‘go up to him.’ Because your mom’s a pusher. I always thought it was so strange how you never mentioned that I was at the airport with Charlie. You never said, ‘I saw Charlie with Candace.’ Because we were actually together on that trip.” Ok I’ve never been more convinced this woman was in love with Charlie. I can assure you that if another woman met the man she was going to marry while that man was on a business trip with me, and then proceeded to cut me out of their meeting story, I would feel absolutely nothing. This isn’t a thing women care about. Unless they’re in love. The fact that Charlie was on a platonic trip with Candace when Erika met him is irrelevant to both Charlie and Erika. What matters is that they met and fell in love and married. Everyone around becomes tertiary—especially when that person didn’t set you guys up or anything.
Natalie Jean Beisner1,865,118 views • 6 months ago
1:54
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
1:01
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.

“I don’t know if I’d recommend it. It’s kind of like being a prostitute. It’s more intense than I thought it’d be.” —OF girl after sleeping with 100 men in a day Interesting that she can’t come right out and say she made a huge mistake. Instead, she tiptoes around the idea, seeming to imply it might be ok for a certain type of woman.
Natalie Jean Beisner6,463,311 views • 1 year ago
2:00
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.

“There are six things that the LORD hates, seven that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers.” I am continually shocked. But I am never surprised anymore.
Natalie Jean Beisner110,629 views • 14 days ago