
Yishi
@ohyishi • 97,096 subscribers
janitor @OneKeyHQ
Shorts
Videos

We get asked this a lot: “How do I know my hardware wallet hasn’t been tampered with before it gets to me?” Between the factory and your door, a wallet spends time in warehouses and in transit. Packaging is only one part of preventing supply chain attacks, but it matters. It helps you check for signs of tampering when the wallet arrives. That’s why we’ve put a lot of work into ours. OneKey has four layers of protection: 1. Clear shrink wrap around the whole box. 2. A destructible seal on the box that breaks when removed. 3. A holographic tamper-evident seal on the device that shows “VOID” when peeled off. 4. Device authentication in the official OneKey App, plus firmware signature checks by the Secure Element (SE). Our manufacturer is in the same tier as those making Apple and Google Pixel devices. To enter the factory, you have to pass through multiple gates and three security checks, sign in, and verify your identity. All phones and other communication devices have to be handed over and kept in lockers. There are cameras throughout the factory. There’s still a lot more to do. We’ll keep tightening security and improving these measures.
Yishi156,401 次观看 • 1 个月前

we just added support for bip-360 (p2mr) address, still in draft but soon. possibly the first wallet in the world to ship a quantum-ready address. bc1z is a segwit v2 output defined in bip-360. p2mr stands for pay to merkle root. unlike taproot, it commits only to a script-tree merkle root and completely removes the key-path spend. there is no internal public key embedded or committed in the output itself. in taproot, an internal public key is always part of the output, even if it is never used. with p2mr, the output contains only the merkle root of the script tree. a public key is revealed only at spend time, inside the executed script branch, not at receive time. this design avoids publishing long-lived public keys on chain in advance, reduces long-term public key exposure, and shrinks the attack surface in a potential quantum future where exposed public keys could become vulnerable. it is a structural hardening step at the address level. it does not change consensus rules, does not break existing wallets, and existing addresses continue to work as usual. job’s not done 🫡
Yishi37,709 次观看 • 8 个月前
没有更多内容可加载
