Rex v Lucy Letby - Full Disclosure
@RexvsLucyLetby • 2,978 subscribers
Dedicated to establishing if the evidence on the case provided Lucy Letby a fair trial & Thirlwall Inquiry developments DM open for information about the case
Videos
![🔴NEW from BBC 5 Live Breakfast | Interview with Shoo Lee & Judith Moritz on the Lucy Letby case. Lee: "If the medical evidence does not support malfeasance, is the rest of the circumstantial evidence enough to support the conviction? Moritz: ... "[Dr Lee] can't get into discussion about any of the non-medical evidence he's quickly written off that as circumstantial, but it was extensive and so was Letby's performance in the witness box...](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1897958566344245650/amplify_video_thumb/1897957886774390784/img/H6zIhsR3jVOkdXuH.jpg)
🔴NEW from BBC 5 Live Breakfast | Interview with Shoo Lee & Judith Moritz on the Lucy Letby case. Lee: "If the medical evidence does not support malfeasance, is the rest of the circumstantial evidence enough to support the conviction? Moritz: ... "[Dr Lee] can't get into discussion about any of the non-medical evidence he's quickly written off that as circumstantial, but it was extensive and so was Letby's performance in the witness box...
Rex v Lucy Letby - Full Disclosure14,420 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
The importance of establishing the correct starting point is sufficiently demonstrated by this example. "Mr Michael Mansfield QC submitted that although Professor Meadow did not expressly give statistical evidence, he offered it to the jury by implication." ... "It will immediately be apparent that much depends on the starting point which is adopted. The first approach is, putting it colloquially, that lightning does not strike three times in the same place. If so, the route to a finding of guilt is wide open. Almost any other piece of evidence can reasonably be interpreted to fit this conclusion. For example, if a mother who has lost three babies behaved or responded oddly, or strangely, or not in accordance with some theoretically "normal" way of behaving when faced with such a disaster, her behaviour might be thought to confirm the conclusion that lightning could not indeed have struck three times. If however the deaths were natural, virtually anything done by the mother on discovering such shattering and repeated disasters would be readily understandable as personal manifestations of profound natural shock and grief. The importance of establishing the correct starting point is sufficiently demonstrated by this example." R - v - Angela Cannings #LucyLetby
Rex v Lucy Letby - Full Disclosure10,603 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr
Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar