The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️
@SamSiff • 28,709 subscribers
Human Rights Activist | Confrontationist | Counsellor 🧑💼 If you don’t fight, you’re already dead. Be the change you seek. Stand. Speak. Defy. 🫡
Shorts
Videos
0:27
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
If the genders were reversed, this wouldn’t be called “bullying.” It would have been called molestation…! Imagine if four men cornered a young girl in a lift, laughed at her discomfort, recorded it on their phones, and uploaded it for entertainment. There would be wall-to-wall outrage, prime-time debates, hashtags, and demands for immediate arrests. But when a young boy is visibly uncomfortable and four women surround him, mock him, and film the incident for content, suddenly it’s called a “prank,” “fun,” or “just harmless entertainment.” Harassment doesn’t become acceptable because the victim is male. Recording someone’s discomfort for social media clout isn’t content—it’s bullying with a camera.
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️27,663 views • 1 day ago
We warned about this from the very beginning. No Seal No Deal. We repeatedly stressed the importance of proper background checks before marriage. She was already deeply involved in glamour events, social media content creation, reel culture, living independently outside her home city, unstable lifestyle patterns, and multiple past relationships. Despite all these visible red flags, the husband’s family still chose to overlook everything, accepted her past, and proceeded with the marriage in good faith. But the fear always remained the same — if there is no accountability, no self-discipline, and no genuine change in behaviour, the past eventually returns and destroys the future. What followed was exactly what had been feared: Constant conflicts, serious allegations, abortions, denial, emotional manipulation, and eventually open justification from her own family. When the husband reportedly questioned her regarding adultery, instead of addressing the accusation with honesty or responsibility, her brother allegedly replied: “So what if she has done that? Who are you to question her?” Thats why we always say No Seal No Deal.. Else be ready to go to jail later because of questioning your wives - Because a past never dies and repeats
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️180,223 views • 14 days ago
1:04
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
I think this is also dowry harassment.. Let’s punish her husband.. 😂😂😂😂
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️51,801 views • 10 days ago
Retired Judge Giribala Singh just EXPOSED the real truth in Twisha Sharma case! “Twisha’s parents never came to see her in five months. They were earning out of her looks and now not allowing her cremation. We have faith in the probe agencies and my truth.” She revealed: Twisha was on psychiatric treatment, had drug issues (marijuana even during pregnancy), severe mood swings & instability. In-laws supported her fully, but her own family pushed her into glamour world & neglected her. No dowry harassment — just a tragic suicide by a troubled girl. Media & one side trying to malign a respected family. Truth is coming out! Support fair investigation.
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️66,367 views • 17 days ago
These women want equality? But they want free seats saying we are women..
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️201,285 views • 2 months ago
😂 Went for a simple rishta call. Got a full list of demands instead: • Nuclear family only • Foreign trips mandatory • Equal chores (but with maid) • High salary + emotional ATM Bhai, this isn’t marriage. This is a job application with benefits. Modern Women turned arranged marriage into a transaction. Then wonder why good men are running away. Rishta = Terms & Conditions accepted? ❌
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️85,555 views • 1 month ago
Still they got her married? 🤡 Clearly shows this uncle is lying and stories are being cooked up later to build public sympathy. 🤡 Now suddenly new allegations are coming every day — ₹10 lakh demanded, ₹2 lakh paid immediately, baraat delayed and what not. But the biggest question is — if they themselves are openly claiming they paid dowry amounts, then why was an FIR not registered against the people who allegedly “gave” dowry as well? Law applies to both taking and giving. Or does law work only selectively when drama has to be created in media? Even after the Supreme Court has repeatedly warned against media trials and emotional public narratives, fake accusers continue turning every case into a TV serial so that allegations alone start looking like proof. This is exactly how public perception is manipulated before investigation or trial is even completed.
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️19,841 views • 6 days ago
2:41
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
When you see a man getting beaten by his wife… Don’t help him. Yes, don’t. Because he doesn’t deserve it. All his life he thought giving everything to a woman would bring him respect. He forgot to build himself — physically, mentally, financially. We’ve seen men transfer entire properties to their wife’s name just to “show respect.” Men compromise, adjust, and quietly take her abuse just because “she’s a woman.” They think being soft and feminine with her will get them love. It doesn’t. First, build yourself. Women don’t love the man who cries and submits. They respect the man who dominates. That’s a real man.
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️69,524 views • 28 days ago
CJI Surya Kant just exposed the Supreme Court’s rotting bias in real time. “Have you paid maintenance to wife” he questions.. The case was not of maintenance but a PIL. This shows how illegal he acts. A man suffering 7-8 years in a broken marriage comes to court asking for basic gender parity in divorce law — a provision that lets ONLY wives weaponise maintenance and then file for divorce. Instead of addressing the constitutional absurdity, the CJI sneers: “What is your problem with it?” and “I wanted you to admit this.” Equal sympathy for the wife, huh? Tell that to the thousands of men being looted, harassed, and trapped in marriages by one-sided laws while the system laughs. This isn’t justice. This is institutional misandry wearing a robe. Dismissing a PIL on technicalities while women file PILs for everything under the sun. The message to every law student and suffering husband is crystal clear: In India, men’s rights don’t matter. Only “women’s empowerment” does — even if it means blatant discrimination. CJI Surya Kant. History will remember this as one of the many moments when the Supreme Court chose gender politics over equality.
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️59,703 views • 24 days ago
Viral Karnataka HC Court Clip: Lawyer demands ₹6.16 Lakh monthly maintenance from ex-husband! Judge shuts it down: “Does anybody spend this much… ₹6 lakh per month for a single lady?” Breakdown claimed: • ₹4–5 Lakh for knee treatment (physio + medicines) • ₹15,000 for “basic needs” — bangles, sandals, slippers, watches, dresses • ₹60,000 for food Lawyer also argued the ex-husband wears expensive branded clothes (₹10,000 Calvin Klein T-shirts) while she manages in old clothes. Judge’s reality check: If she wants to spend like that, let her earn it herself.
The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨⚖️73,658 views • 1 month ago