Sayer Ji's banner
Sayer Ji's profile picture

Sayer Ji

@sayerjigmi • 99,421 subscribers

Author, Regenerate & Shadow Empire · Founder, GreenMedInfo & Restore the 1st · Chairman, Global Wellness Forum · Sr. Advisor, MAHA Action

Videos

sayerjigmi's profile picture

🚨From the Covid-era Mockingbird Media Hall of Fame: Targeting Kids with Covid Jabs using Sesame Street Characters June 2022. Elmo, “age 3½,” shows off his bandage. His dad Louie tells parents of kids as young as six months: “I had a lot of questions… Was it safe? Was it the right decision?” About 11 seconds later, the script has answered them for you. This wasn’t a cute one-off. It was produced with the CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics, and run through the Ad Council and COVID Collaborative. That campaign raised more than $50M from corporate backers including Amazon, Apple, Google/YouTube, Walmart and Verizon, and passed $240M in donated media. “Harness the power of Sesame Workshop and the reach of the Ad Council.” That’s how Sesame’s own CMO described it. Now look at what happened after: → June 2025: FDA required expanded myocarditis/pericarditis warnings. The label says abnormal cardiac MRI findings persisting ~5 months after vaccination were “common.” Their significance is “not known.” → Aug 2025: Pfizer’s shot lost authorization for children under 5. That’s the product this ad was selling to parents of infants. → Today: CDC says giving it to healthy kids without high-risk conditions is off-label. Yet the FDA’s parent guide still says a COVID vaccine “is the best way to prevent COVID-19.” That’s almost exactly Louie’s line. A puppet and a quarter-billion in media to sell it. No PSA to walk it back.

Sayer Ji

17,672 views • 21 days ago

sayerjigmi's profile picture

The viral “debunk” of RFK Jr. on polio and SV40 trending right now leaves out the most important facts. Neil Stone reduces Robert F. Kennedy Jr's argument to “weapons grade horse💩," yet cites ZERO published support for his statement. But listen to what RFK Jr. actually says in the attached video: “Did it cause more deaths? … I would say I don’t know because we don’t have the data on that.” That isn't the claim being attributed to him. And the underlying SV40 issue is very real. FACT: Some U.S. polio vaccines administered from 1955–1963 were contaminated with SV40 (simian virus 40), a potent tumor-transforming virus. National Academies: FACT: Approximately 98 MILLION Americans received IPV during the relevant period. Historical estimates suggest 10–30 million may actually have been exposed to live SV40. FACT: The National Academies concluded that the biological evidence is STRONG that SV40 is a transforming virus. And MODERATE that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions. FACT: A controlled meta-analysis of human tumors reported significant associations between SV40 and: • Mesothelioma • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma • Bone cancers • Brain tumors The reported associations weren't trivial: approximately OR 17 for mesothelioma, OR 25 for bone cancer, OR 5.4 for NHL and OR 3.9 for brain tumors. FACT: One SEER analysis reported higher incidence in the presumed SV40-exposed birth cohort of approximately: +37% ependymoma +26% osteogenic sarcoma +34% other bone tumors +90% mesothelioma The National Academies reviewed this evidence while emphasizing the limitations of these ecological comparisons. So how large could the cancer mortality burden be if a meaningful fraction of these published SV40 associations represents genuine causation? Using current U.S. mortality from the cancers most consistently associated with SV40—NHL, mesothelioma, brain/CNS tumors and bone cancers—and applying conservative-to-moderate interpretations of the published associations, an exploratory attributable-burden sensitivity model produces roughly: ~1,000–7,000 potentially SV40-associated cancer deaths per year in the United States, with a central modeled estimate around 3,500–4,000 annually. ⚠️ That is NOT an observed SV40 death count and should not be represented as one. It is a sensitivity analysis illustrating the potential magnitude of an unresolved causal question. And here is why that question matters. Immediately before introduction of the polio vaccine, the United States averaged approximately 1,879 polio deaths annually from 1951–1954. During the catastrophic 1952 epidemic, 3,145 Americans died from polio. So our central hypothetical SV40 mortality estimate is actually of the same order of magnitude as—and potentially greater than—the annual mortality produced by polio at the height of the American epidemic. Does that prove SV40 killed more people than polio? NO. But does the available science justify declaring the possibility “weapons grade horse💩”? Also NO. Because the fundamental question remains: What was the lifetime cancer burden of unintentionally exposing millions of Americans to a powerful tumor-transforming virus? We don't know. That's precisely the point. The National Academies did not conclude that SV40-contaminated polio vaccine had been proven incapable of causing human cancer. Its actual conclusion was: “The evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between SV40-containing polio vaccines and cancer.” The report also discussed serious limitations in the epidemiological evidence, including uncertainty about who actually received contaminated vaccine and whether people born after the contaminated-vaccine era could have acquired SV40 through other routes of transmission. The intellectually honest answer to the mortality question remains: We don't know. As Kennedy actually said: “I don't know because we don't have the data.” Calling an unresolved scientific question “weapons grade horse💩” isn't a scientific rebuttal. It's a substitute for one. Read the literature. Debate the evidence. Ask the unanswered question. 🔗SV-40 studies on Greenmedinfo: 🔗Polio Myths Debunked: 🔗How Being Poisoned Can Be Mistaken for Being Infected By 'Germs' and 'Viruses'

Sayer Ji

24,420 views • 2 months ago