The Smart Ape 🔥's banner
The Smart Ape 🔥's profile picture

The Smart Ape 🔥

@the_smart_ape71,188 subscribers

Father | Pudgy Penguin #3588 | Building with AI | I do technical stuff hard to explain | Love you Mom | Nothing is financial advice | DM open 📩 |

Shorts

claude without MCP vs claude with the right MCP servers installed.

claude without MCP vs claude with the right MCP servers installed.

29,676 просмотров

Videos

the_smart_ape's profile picture

i spent the morning tracing the whole thing on dune and the story is interesting + worth sharing. drainer wallet: 0xF7cFFC27732a5C9c4E2D592F3E33435F8dDb019A: fresh wallet, first tx ever was today 2026-05-11 at 00:52 utc. by 01:27 utc it had pulled ~$173k of assets + some memecoins from at least 5 different wallets on ethereum, base, and bsc. drained wallets: > 0x62acE10c…EE8A: ~$30k of priced assets (eth + bnb) + memecoins, drained across base / eth / bsc > 0x6131b5fae19ea4f9d964eac0408e4408b66337b5: ~$119k (eth), drained across eth + base it's clear that is not an approval/permit exploit. it's a private-key compromise. at 00:53 your wallet sent 5.8 eth to the drainer. 3 minutes later, the drainer sent 0.02 eth back to you. a few minutes after that, a 157k sat1 erc20 transfer left your wallet to the drainer. that 0.02 eth transfer was the attacker funding gas in the compromised wallet so it could keep signing transfers. the only way to make that happen is to control the wallet directly. so the attacker is signing transactions with your seed. and the part that really bothers me: among the wallets that sent funds INTO the drainer, 3 more share the exact same 8 hex chars at the same positions (62ac start, ee8a end): > 0x62ace0e0ecf70f62399b26e28eaf74cc455bee8a > 0x62ac07ae9242c354f6c307bbd9b36c749a5aee8a > 0x62ac6095d7e9189353bcbf17d439348ab7a1ee8a the 32 middle chars are completely different on each, so these are 4 genuinely distinct wallets. finding 4 wallets that all share the EXACT same 8 chars in the EXACT same positions by accident is statistically impossible. they were generated by a vanity tool specifically programmed to hunt for that shape. only your wallet sent priced assets to the drainer. the other three 62ac…ee8a wallets only sent worthless coins. these 3 don't look like victim wallets at all. looks like the attacker spent a few gpu-hours generating wallets that match the shape of your main address, then routed some of the worthless memecoins through them. why? idk, maybe: > address poisoning > trail confusion where the money is right now: most of it is still in the drainer wallet. the attacker is dumping the stolen memecoins (pod, sat1, fhe, bort, etc) into Kyberswap. but eth and bnb are just sitting there. nothing has been pushed to a cex deposit, bridged out, or sent to a mixer. once those funds hit binance/okx/bybit deposits or a tornado contract, recovery will be near-impossible. how the seed potentially leaked: > infostealer malware on the device (lumma, redline, atomic) grabbing the seed during one of the imports. these are extremely common right now and seeds in clipboard or saved as plaintext are easy pickings. > malicious browser extension intercepting the seed at paste-time into rabby or gmgn > fake support DM earlier tricking you into pasting a seed into a phishing page you didn't remember here is the dune dashboard that summarizes everything i’ve found.:

The Smart Ape 🔥

51,911 просмотров • 27 дней назад

the_smart_ape's profile picture

My Polymarket bot is finished! It’s fully automated, I just run it and let the magic happen. At the start of each "Bitcoin Up or Down" round, the bot only watches the market during the first 2 minutes (configurable). If, during that time, either UP or DOWN drops fast enough, a price drop of at least 15% over 3 seconds (configurable), the bot triggers Leg 1 and immediately buys the side that dumped. After this first buy, the bot will never buy the same side again. Instead, it waits for a hedge opportunity on the opposite side. The hedge (Leg 2) is triggered only when: Leg1 entry price + current opposite ask price auto on [sum=0.95] [move=0.15] [windowMin=2] > shares: number of shares bought each time (for both Leg 1 and Leg 2) > sum: total price threshold that allows the hedge > move: dump threshold (e.g. 0.15 = 15%) > windowMin: number of minutes from the start of the round during which Leg 1 is allowed In this example, I ran: auto on 10 0.95 0.15 4 The bot watched the market for the first 4 minutes and bought 10 DOWN shares at $0.35 after a 17% drop in 3 seconds. A few seconds later, it bought 10 UP shares at $0.56, because: 0.56 + 0.35 = 0.91 < 0.95 That locked in a clean 9% profit. Why limit the strategy to the first 4 minutes of the round? Because early in the cycle, the market still has time to dump further and then stabilize. The closer you get to the end of the round, the lower the probability of seeing large corrective moves. Early on, there’s still time for volatility to play out. You can watch the video, the first order triggers at 2:50, and the second order at 3:02. If you’re interested in the bot, DM me.

The Smart Ape 🔥

202,382 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки