Magic hat 🎩's banner

Magic hat 🎩

@themagic_tophat • 29,171 subscribers

Anonymous football fan. Post about football finance / business and Arsenal.

Shorts

The Sun made this list of Arsenal’s “reffing hell” It missed the most egregious decision not to red card an assault on Saka. But it also missed most of these incidents in the thread below too! And these are only for 2019-2021. They don’t cover 2022-2024! There’s a story here.

The Sun made this list of Arsenal’s “reffing hell” It missed the most egregious decision not to red card an assault on Saka. But it also missed most of these incidents in the thread below too! And these are only for 2019-2021. They don’t cover 2022-2024! There’s a story here.

652,175 Aufrufe

Forget about the parade. Bring him to the fucking carpet. ❤️

Sensitive content

Forget about the parade. Bring him to the fucking carpet. ❤️

118,502 Aufrufe

Now which one of these do Man Utd fans think is a nailed on penalty and the other not? 🙄

Now which one of these do Man Utd fans think is a nailed on penalty and the other not? 🙄

83,674 Aufrufe

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

This has been analysed to death and yet generally very poorly (O’Hara included). Guehi makes a failed challenge (fails to connect with the ball) that then turns into an attempted block. In doing so, he stands on Solanke’s standing foot before anything else occurs (which ends up costing Solanke his balance). Solanke makes contact with Guehi’s leg AND with the ball but it’s inconclusive which contact was made first. Even if you slowed it down frame by frame, it might not be clear. Given a goal was awarded and there was inconclusive video to clearly and obviously demonstrate a foul from Solanke, you go with the on field decision. If the video had clearly and obviously shown contact on Guehi’s leg first (before Solanke kicks the ball) then the correct decision would actually be penalty kick given Guehi’s initial challenge was careless (which occurred first). Man City players are claiming corruption (insane levels of irony) for a totally correct decision.

This has been analysed to death and yet generally very poorly (O’Hara included). Guehi makes a failed challenge (fails to connect with the ball) that then turns into an attempted block. In doing so, he stands on Solanke’s standing foot before anything else occurs (which ends up costing Solanke his balance). Solanke makes contact with Guehi’s leg AND with the ball but it’s inconclusive which contact was made first. Even if you slowed it down frame by frame, it might not be clear. Given a goal was awarded and there was inconclusive video to clearly and obviously demonstrate a foul from Solanke, you go with the on field decision. If the video had clearly and obviously shown contact on Guehi’s leg first (before Solanke kicks the ball) then the correct decision would actually be penalty kick given Guehi’s initial challenge was careless (which occurred first). Man City players are claiming corruption (insane levels of irony) for a totally correct decision.

155,187 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

HandofArsenal When the defender throws his leg in front of Saka from behind… is that the chicken or the egg Gary Neville ? The definition of a “careless challenge”. Clear foul.

HandofArsenal When the defender throws his leg in front of Saka from behind… is that the chicken or the egg Gary Neville ? The definition of a “careless challenge”. Clear foul.

72,729 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In 10 years time, I’m going to write a book on Arteta. Not with a focus on football, but about growth in a leadership journey.

In 10 years time, I’m going to write a book on Arteta. Not with a focus on football, but about growth in a leadership journey.

55,282 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar