Mr Bench
@therealmrbench • 44,571 subscribers
Canadian conservative commentary that ruffles feathers | Unfiltered videos on politics, faith & current events. The Real Mr Bench
Shorts
Videos
Sacrifice one person to save five? Easy answer, right? Keep watching. Because the final question changes everything. Same five lives. Same one life. Suddenly the moral argument gets a whole lot more uncomfortable. Watch the twist at the end. Then tell me this didn’t make you think about MAID in Canada.
Mr Bench264,538 次观看 • 19 天前
Mark Carney explains Canada’s withdrawal from U.S. trade negotiations. Full 23-minute speech. No clipping. After more than a year of negotiations, Canada’s negotiators are coming home and another tariff fight is beginning. Here is Carney’s explanation: ▪️ 00:00 Canada is “walking away from a bad deal.” ▪️ 03:58 “We cannot accept what they’ve offered and we will not give what they’ve asked.” ▪️ 07:28 Carney explains the latest threatened 50% U.S. tariffs. ▪️ 08:29 Canada was prepared to drop remaining retaliatory tariffs on steel, aluminum and autos if Washington substantially lowered theirs. ▪️ 09:10 Canada would encourage provinces to put U.S. alcohol back on shelves and make administrative moves around supply management. ▪️ 09:31 Carney says sovereignty, key industries, French language and culture were red lines. ▪️ 10:04 Says Washington suddenly demanded terms that were “uneconomic” and “unfair.” ▪️ 10:56 “They asked too much and they offered too little.” Negotiations suspended. ▪️ 11:21 Canada will now retaliate “dollar for dollar.” ▪️ 12:30 Carney admits those tariffs will raise prices and reduce choice for Canadians. ▪️ 13:18 onward The speech pivots into Carney selling his economic record, infrastructure plans, trade diversification and a Canada less dependent on the U.S. ▪️ 22:38 “We make our own weather.” That’s Carney’s case. Now Canadians get to decide whether this was Canada refusing a genuinely bad deal... Or the government explaining why a year of negotiating ended with no deal and another tariff war.
Mr Bench467,361 次观看 • 1 个月前
So THIS is why Mark Carney’s trade deal collapsed. After months of “constructive” talks, “progress” and assurances from Ottawa, Carney finally tells Canadians what happened. He says the U.S. demanded: • Medium and heavy-duty trucks excluded from the auto deal. • Restrictions on Canada signing other trade deals. • Restrictions affecting Canadian language, culture and sovereignty. Carney says those last-minute demands killed the deal. Fair enough. But Carney was elected as the “master negotiator.” Canada was told his experience and connections were exactly what we needed to deal with Trump. Now there’s no deal. At some point, Canadians are allowed to judge the negotiator by the negotiation.
Mr Bench399,085 次观看 • 1 个月前
Will reconciliation ever end? According to Candice… NO. Plan for this to continue for generations. She says some people haven’t even started healing yet. Her son will need healing. Her future grandchildren will need healing. And she admits: “Don’t know how many generations it’s gonna take for us to heal, and healing is forever.” So when does reconciliation end? It doesn't. So keep the funds flowing If “healing is forever,” apparently there is no finish line.
Mr Bench92,971 次观看 • 17 天前
Mark Carney says Canada was “attacked.” “You’re at war when you get attacked.” Then listen to what comes next. Carney says Ottawa is looking at the tax system and how to “shift the burden to those who are most able to pay.” Trade talks collapse. Declare Canada under attack. Start talking about who should surrender more of their money. Is Carney selling socialism to Canadians under the cover of a trade war?
Mr Bench278,252 次观看 • 1 个月前
Danielle Smith fights back tears explaining why some Albertans want out of Canada. “Does this country actually want us?” She wants Alberta to stay. But listen to the frustration behind that question. How long can Ottawa take Alberta for granted and expect loyalty in return?
Mr Bench87,859 次观看 • 26 天前
Leah Gazan wants residential-school denialism treated as criminal acts of Hate, Violence, and Genocidal denialism. She wants the Criminal Code involved. Gazan says: “I can’t think of anything more violent than denying somebody’s genocide.” Her Bill C-254 would make certain public statements a criminal offence if they wilfully promote hatred by condoning, denying, downplaying or justifying the residential-school system or by misrepresenting facts about it. But here is my concern with “misrepresenting facts”: Does that standard only go one way? Are negative stories automatically treated as established fact while anyone challenging parts of the accepted narrative risks being labelled a denialist? The bill does provide a defence if the accused establishes that the statements were true. Maximum penalty: up to two years in prison.
Mr Bench54,987 次观看 • 17 天前
