Thoughtful Money®
@thoughtfulmoney • 12,657 subscribers
Actionable insights from the world's top experts in money & the markets 45+ million interview views/streams/downloads to-date Posts are *not* financial advice
Videos
This Isn’t 1999 or 2007 — The Passive Bid Changed The Market Forever In this Short video, Bill Fleckenstein bill fleckenstein and Adam Taggart discuss why the passive bid has become the dominant force in markets—and why today’s environment is nothing like 1999 or 2007. Most market participants are focusing on the wrong variables: macro data, geopolitics (war, tariffs), valuations, you name it. These matter far less than one dominant force: the “passive bid.” What is the passive bid? It is the continuous inflows into passive investing vehicles (index funds, ETFs, retirement accounts), which mechanically deploy capital that buys regardless of valuation or macro conditions. This creates a persistent upward force in markets, largely disconnected from fundamentals. On top of the passive bid, you have a Federal Reserve willing to inject liquidity and policies like QE (Quantitative Easing) — even if rebranded (e.g., “RMP” – Reserve Management Purchases). This results in cheap capital, liquidity flooding markets, and reinforcement of upward price trends. So, passive inflows + easy money = structurally bullish environment. Why is it so hard to fight/break? bill fleckenstein uses the following metaphor: the passive bid is like a supertanker moving through water. It’s slow, massive, and powerful – it creates waves behind it (secondary strategies). What followed this trend: – Growth of algorithmic and systematic strategies – “Copycat” or momentum-following participants (“pilot fish”) – Factor investing built on past market behavior This ecosystem feeds on itself: passive flows → drive trends, algos detect trends → amplify them, and more capital follows → reinforces trend. Here is an example: the 2025 Tariffs shock happened when systematic strategies were heavily positioned. It triggered forced selling, momentum reversal, and psychological panic. As a result, the market decline fed on itself. But importantly, this wasn’t a fundamental repricing – it was a mechanical unwind. Labor market deterioration is what could actually break the system – not war or macro shocks, not even valuations. A shift from workers contributing to retirees withdrawing could reduce inflows into passive vehicles, and potentially reverse the bid. Today's market is driven by flows, not fundamentals. The behavior looks “crazy” (mania-like) – similar to what we have seen in 1999 and 2007. But there is a critical difference: back then, we had no QE, no dominant passive flows. Today, we have massive passive bid and central bank liquidity support. Therefore, historical analogies no longer work. Get access to my notes with the key takeaways from this interview with Bill Fleckenstein by visiting my Substack (link below) ⬇️
Thoughtful Money®104,586 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
The Fed Is Trapped — And Gold Knows It $GLD #gold Please ❤️like, bookmark🔖, and 🔁share with fellow investors In this Short video, Andy Schectman Andy Schectman and Adam Taggart discuss why the breakout in gold and #silver $SLV may have real legs — and why the most important signal isn’t simply that precious metals are rising, but that they’re doing it despite higher interest rates and higher oil prices. * Normally, rising Treasury yields should be a headwind for gold. Higher yields increase the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset and should attract global capital into U.S. Treasuries and the dollar. But that’s not what’s happening. Yields are rising. Gold is rising. And the dollar is falling. Andy sees that combination as a potential warning that investors are demanding higher yields to own U.S. government debt rather than viewing those yields as an increasingly attractive safe-haven return. In other words, this could be less about economic strength and more about declining confidence in Treasuries. * That leads to the bigger thesis: the Fed may be trapped. Years of suppressed interest rates created distortions in asset prices, capital allocation and leverage. Allow rates to rise too far, and those vulnerabilities begin to surface. But cap yields or inject liquidity to keep the financial system stable, and the pressure doesn’t disappear — it can instead show up through higher inflation and a weaker currency. * Andy argues that the era of genuine balance-sheet normalization may already be over. He points to roughly $40 billion per month of liquidity/purchases and what he views as de facto yield-curve control through efforts to prevent Japan from selling Treasuries. * Meanwhile, #crudeoil adds another problem. Higher energy prices eventually feed through transportation, manufacturing, food and other costs, and Andy argues that the full inflationary impact can take roughly six months to appear. That may explain why gold is moving now. His view is that sophisticated traders are “skating to where the puck is going”: front-running the possibility that policymakers ultimately cannot allow rates to keep rising and will eventually have to suppress yields or provide additional liquidity. * That’s why the current relationship matters so much: – Treasury yields up – Gold up – Dollar down If higher yields alone were restoring confidence in U.S. assets, gold should face much stronger competition from Treasuries. Instead, precious metals continue to attract buyers. * And Andy sees another major difference versus the 2011 gold peak: persistent record buying by major strategic players. That structural demand gives him more confidence that this isn’t simply a dead-cat bounce. * Bottom line: Andy believes this is a real breakout. Gold may be front-running a world in which the Fed faces an increasingly difficult choice between allowing rates to rise and exposing financial vulnerabilities, or suppressing rates and risking even greater inflationary pressure. The Fed is trapped — and gold may already know which way this ends. #yields $TLT $BND 💡 Get access to my notes with the key takeaways from this interview with Andy Schectman by visiting my Substack (link below)⬇️
Thoughtful Money®11,038 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen
The Housing Crash Nobody Wants to Talk About Please ❤️like, bookmark🔖, and 🔁share with fellow investors In this Short video, Melody Wright Melody Wright and Adam Taggart discuss why the U.S. housing market could be headed for a prolonged downturn that may ultimately prove worse than the 2008 housing crash. * The U.S. housing market may look stable on the surface, but the biggest problems are only beginning to emerge. While national home prices have not fallen significantly, Melody believes the market is effectively frozen and could be headed for a correction that ultimately exceeds the Global Financial Crisis in both depth and duration. * The core issue isn't supply—it's demand. There simply aren't enough qualified buyers. The spring selling season, normally the strongest period for home sales, was a major disappointment. Lower mortgage rates early in the year briefly created optimism, but geopolitical uncertainty quickly reversed that momentum. As a result, housing activity remains sluggish. * The buyers who are still transacting fall into two main groups: affluent households purchasing higher-end homes and buyers using government-backed financing programs such as FHA, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac. Outside those segments, affordability has become a major obstacle, leaving much of the market without sufficient demand. * The market is also becoming increasingly bifurcated. In parts of the South and West, home sales have picked up compared to last year, but prices are declining as sellers accept lower offers to complete transactions. That's genuine price discovery. Meanwhile, the Northeast and Midwest continue to see weak sales volumes, with June transactions down roughly 7% year over year. Because so few homes are changing hands, median prices have remained relatively stable, masking underlying weakness. * Melody argues that this cycle differs from 2008 in several important ways. One major concern is demographics. Younger generations simply don't have the purchasing power needed to replace aging homeowners at current price levels. Affordability challenges, higher living costs, and slower household formation limit the pool of future buyers. Another difference is the absence of a likely rescue from institutional investors. After the financial crisis, large firms purchased distressed homes and converted them into rental properties, helping stabilize the market. Melody doubts that level of institutional buying will return during this cycle. If private demand remains weak, the government could eventually become the buyer of last resort by purchasing excess housing inventory and converting it into affordable housing programs. * The timeline is another key part of the thesis. The previous housing downturn took roughly four to five years to bottom, but this cycle could last even longer because demographic pressures may persist into the mid-2030s. Instead of a sharp collapse followed by a quick recovery, Melody expects a prolonged period of stagnation and gradual price adjustment. * One event that could dramatically accelerate the process would be a major stock market correction. A significant decline in equities $SPX $QQQ would reduce household wealth, weaken consumer confidence, and further erode purchasing power, potentially causing housing prices to fall much faster than they otherwise would. * So, today's housing market isn't healthy simply because national prices remain elevated. Beneath the surface, demand is weak, affordability remains stretched, regional markets are diverging, and long-term structural forces continue to point toward a prolonged housing downturn that many investors may be underestimating. #housingmarket 💡 Get access to my notes with the key takeaways from this interview with Melody Wright Melody Wright by visiting my Substack (link below) ⬇️
Thoughtful Money®16,535 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Why SpaceX's Valuation Is Now A Market-Wide Risk Please ❤️like, bookmark🔖, and 🔁share with fellow investors In this short video, Eric Jackson and Adam Taggart discuss why $SPCX is no longer just another IPO and how its valuation could influence the entire AI trade. * As the largest IPO ever, #SpaceX immediately became one of the market's most influential stocks. Its size means major index funds like $QQQ and ETFs are forced buyers, making its performance increasingly important for the broader market. * The bigger issue is perception. Investors aren't valuing #SPCX purely as a space company—they're treating it as one of the defining AI companies of the next decade. A large portion of its premium valuation reflects expectations that it will play a central role in the AI revolution. That creates an important risk. * If SpaceX continues executing, it could reinforce confidence across the AI trade. But if it disappoints over the next few quarters, investors may begin questioning whether the entire AI theme has become too expensive. Just as $NVDA, $AAPL, and other mega-cap leaders $MAGS often influence sentiment across the market, weakness in SpaceX could trigger a broader re-rating of AI stocks and weigh on $QQQ. * This isn't about whether SpaceX will be successful over the next 10–20 years. It very well could be. The concern is whether today's valuation already assumes that everything goes perfectly. At prices above $200, investors are paying for an extremely optimistic future with very little room for execution mistakes. Even around $150, the risk/reward isn't especially compelling. A much more attractive entry would be closer to $100, where the downside is more limited while meaningful upside still remains. * That's also why rushing into newly public companies has historically been a difficult strategy. Many IPOs trade below their offering price within six to eight months as excitement fades and insider lockup periods expire, increasing selling pressure. Waiting often produces a much better entry than chasing the initial hype. * SpaceX certainly may become one of the greatest companies of the next decade, but that doesn't automatically make it a great stock at today's price. Great businesses and great investments aren't always the same thing. When expectations are already priced for perfection, even a fantastic company can become a market-wide risk. #ElonMusk #TSLA 💡 Get access to my notes with the key takeaways from this interview with Eric Jackson by visiting my Substack (link below) ⬇️
Thoughtful Money®17,922 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
Why The Shadow Banking System Could Trigger The Next Major Crisis Please ❤️like, bookmark🔖, and 🔁share with fellow investors In this Short video, Danielle Danielle DiMartino Booth and Adam Taggart discuss why the shadow banking system—not traditional banks—could become the source of the next major financial crisis. * Private credit may have disappeared from the headlines, but that doesn't mean the risks have disappeared with it. In this discussion, the focus shifts beyond private credit itself to the much larger theme—the shadow banking system—and why it could become the next major source of financial instability. * Companies have raised a record $251 billion through equity sales in the first half of the year. That surge has also drawn renewed attention to private equity, which sits at the center of the private credit ecosystem. The concern isn't simply the size of private credit—it's whether the underlying private asset valuations are realistic. * A key issue is the feedback loop between private and public markets. Many public companies own private investments, and gains from those holdings can boost reported earnings. If those private assets are being valued too aggressively, investors have to ask whether the "E" in the P/E ratio is as solid as it appears. Inflated valuations can support stronger earnings, higher stock prices, and more capital raising, creating a cycle that works well until confidence begins to crack. * Although fears around private credit have faded in recent months, Danielle argues that the market has simply moved into an "acceptance phase," not a resolution phase. The structural problems remain, but investors have largely stopped talking about them. * Meanwhile, non-bank financial institutions now control roughly $258 trillion in assets, representing more than half of global financial assets and exceeding the size of the traditional regulated banking system. Unlike banks, these institutions operate with far less transparency and oversight, making it much harder to assess the true level of risk. * At the same time, higher interest rates continue to pressure borrowers. Public company bankruptcies are already running about 40% higher than a year ago, suggesting financial stress is building. If publicly traded companies are struggling under today's financing conditions, the health of private companies—where financial information is far less accessible—remains a major unknown. * Danielle rates concern about private markets at roughly a 7–8 out of 10 now. The combination of opaque valuations, rising bankruptcies, higher-for-longer interest rates, and the enormous size of the shadow banking system creates a meaningful systemic risk. While this doesn't guarantee another financial crisis, it highlights an area that many investors may be underestimating simply because it has faded from the daily news cycle. #privatecredit #privateequity 💡 Get access to my notes with the key takeaways from this interview with Danielle Danielle DiMartino Booth by visiting my Substack (link below) ⬇️
Thoughtful Money®15,115 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
The full version of our interview with Cam Karsan Cem Karsan 🥐 is now available to watch on X below
Thoughtful Money®30,836 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten
What If Warsh Cuts Rates Next Week? Markets are overwhelmingly expecting Kevin Warsh to keep rates unchanged at his first Fed meeting next week, with some traders even pricing in the possibility of higher rates later this year. But what if the consensus is wrong? In this Short video, Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world" presents the contrarian case that Warsh could be far more dovish than investors expect. The argument starts with inflation. Warsh has suggested that traditional inflation measures may overstate current price pressures and that alternative metrics, such as Dallas Trimmed PCE, paint a much cooler picture. If inflation is closer to target than headline data suggests, the justification for maintaining restrictive policy becomes much weaker. Another key piece of the thesis is productivity. Warsh has repeatedly discussed the transformative impact of AI on economic output. If artificial intelligence drives a meaningful productivity boom, the economy could grow faster without generating the same inflationary pressures that normally accompany growth. That would give the Fed more room to lower rates without reigniting inflation. The discussion also highlights the possibility that recent inflation pressures are being driven by temporary factors, particularly energy prices and geopolitical tensions. If those pressures ease, inflation could fall naturally, strengthening the case for easier monetary policy. There is also a broader economic backdrop to consider. The administration has made economic growth, domestic manufacturing, and reindustrialization central priorities. Building factories, infrastructure, and supply chains requires capital, and high interest rates make those investments more difficult. Lower rates would provide the financial fuel needed to accelerate those goals. The most controversial part of the conversation is the suggestion that Warsh could deliver not just a rate cut, but potentially a larger-than-expected cut (50 bps) if he wants to quickly reset policy. While that remains a low-probability outcome, Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world" argues that markets may be underestimating the possibility of a significant shift in direction. If that happens, stocks could respond very positively as lower rates improve liquidity, reduce financing costs, and support higher valuations. However, the bigger story may be in #bonds. Long-term Treasury investors could view aggressive easing as inflationary or fiscally irresponsible, pushing #yields sharply higher. In that scenario, equities celebrate the pivot while the bond market revolts. So, according to Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world", Kevin Warsh may not follow the path investors currently expect. If he embraces alternative inflation measures, leans on the AI productivity story, and prioritizes growth, the market could be forced to rapidly reprice both interest-rate expectations and long-term bond yields. 🔽Get access to my notes with the key takeaways from this interview with Lawrence Lepard, "fix the money, fix the world" by visiting my Substack (link below) ⬇️
Thoughtful Money®11,749 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten
The Coming Gold Repricing & The New Financial System In this Short video, Andy Schectman of Miles Franklin Precious Metals and Adam Taggart break down the case for a future gold $GLD repricing, the shift away from U.S. Treasuries, and the quiet transformation taking place in the global monetary system. For decades, the global financial system has revolved around the U.S. dollar, U.S. Treasuries, and Western-controlled payment networks. But a quiet shift is taking place beneath the surface. BRICS nations and other emerging economies are steadily building an alternative framework for trade and settlement. Instead of selling commodities for dollars, countries can increasingly transact in local currencies, settle imbalances with #gold, and move value through new financial infrastructure outside the traditional Western system. The most overlooked part of this trend may be the rapid expansion of gold vaults and settlement hubs across Hong Kong, Shanghai, Singapore, Dubai, Mumbai, and other regions. Combined with payment systems such as CIPS, these networks could eventually allow countries to trade with one another without relying on the dollar as an intermediary. Andy Schectman also argues that gold and #silver $SLV have never been allowed to fully reflect their true market value. While the West continues to set global precious metals prices through paper markets, physical demand has been rising as central banks and sovereign buyers accumulate metal and increasingly stand for delivery. At the same time, the traditional safe-haven asset – U.S. Treasuries – has suffered one of the worst drawdowns in modern history. The argument is that many countries are quietly reducing Treasury exposure and reallocating reserves toward gold. If these trends continue, the world could be moving toward a more multipolar financial system where physical gold plays a much larger role in trade, reserve management, and international settlement. The big question is whether gold's current price reflects that future—or whether a major repricing still lies ahead. ⬇️Get access to my notes with the key takeaways from this interview with Andy Schectman by visiting my Substack (link below) ⬇️
Thoughtful Money®11,731 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten
Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar