Tim Soret's banner
Tim Soret's profile picture

Tim Soret

@timsoret50,204 subscribers

Founder @oddtalesgames Creative Director @TLN_Game Art Direction, Cinematography, Tech Art. Atoms, Bits, Memes, Genes. Courage, Freedom, Futurism, Humanism.

Shorts

2 years apart. Again, don't look at the finger when it is pointing at the moon. Many mocked the early results, but it was already profound to witness a machine clumsily hallucinate from its learning. To me, it felt like mocking a child's drawing.

2 years apart. Again, don't look at the finger when it is pointing at the moon. Many mocked the early results, but it was already profound to witness a machine clumsily hallucinate from its learning. To me, it felt like mocking a child's drawing.

476,088 просмотров

Mind blown that: - this is ThreeJS (mrdoob ) - this is running on my 2021 iPhone (while recording).

Mind blown that: - this is ThreeJS (mrdoob ) - this is running on my 2021 iPhone (while recording).

221,140 просмотров

Videos

timsoret's profile picture

Imagine seeing this 3 years ago with no explanation.

Tim Soret

701,906 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

timsoret's profile picture

Educative minute: Film twitter, please know that all these "amateur 35mm scans" comparison are deceptive. 1. Films are made of atoms (nitrate, acetate, polyester), and unlike digital data, they are vulnerable to entropy like everything else. 2. For the same movie, not all theatrical projection prints were made with the same process. Most were poor quality with short shelf-life (6 years according to Martin Scorsese). 3. Dye compounds are unstable, decaying at different rates over time, their colors degrading, fading & shifting. Notice how most of these "35mm scans" are bluish & faded, with contrast added in post after scanning. 4. Even if you had a perfectly manufactured, flawlessly stored & maintained, and masterfully scanned film, digitalization remains an interpretation process. A projected film is pure light, and mapping a RAW capture to the displayable dynamic range of screens is a subjective process, not a perfect science. So never interpret these 35mm scans as "how a film was supposed to look". No two surviving 35mm films look the same, and none look the way they did at release. These are just films degraded by hundreds of theatrical runs & decade of chemical decay. This organic "instagram filter" evokes a certain nostalgia, but it's an illusion. There is no pristine original to go back to. Even the original negatives stored by studios require month of digital cleaning to be considered "usable". It's all a subjective process.

Tim Soret

91,442 просмотров • 23 дней назад

timsoret's profile picture

From the talent that made this btw. Completely worth it.

Tim Soret

15,617 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

timsoret's profile picture

Absolutely wild. Interactive 4D video live in your browser.

Tim Soret

56,285 просмотров • 1 год назад

Больше нет контента для загрузки