J Stewart
@triffic_stuff_ • 35,832 subscribers
“You Win Some, Lose Some, It’s All The Same To Me”
Shorts
Videos
😳 Isabel Oakeshott did not hold back on TalkTV this morning. Speaking about the death of former Cambridge professor Jason Arday, she was extremely blunt and to the point: “Suicide is the most horrendous thing that anyone can do to themselves or their family. It is an utterly, utterly tragic and selfish thing to do. It is not anyone else’s fault. It is on the person that took that decision.” She continued: “Bluntly, Jason Arday was a fraud. He had made things up to get to the position that he was in. Massively embellishing his credentials and made a whole career out of that. Then it all came tumbling down and he wasn’t tough enough to ride it out.” Oakeshott rejected attempts to blame the media or anyone else, insisting no one is responsible for another person’s decision to take their own life and that Arday’s academic career had been built on dishonesty that finally collapsed under scrutiny. No punches pulled.
J Stewart1,306,334 views • 16 days ago
Owen Jones’s appearance on Piers Morgan is a masterclass in ideological dishonesty. He defends Sharia law while insisting the real problem for “queer Muslims” isn’t the doctrine itself. It’s those hateful Brits who “weaponise their plight” by pointing out the obvious conflict. His exact words: “I speak to queer Muslims, which I think is quite important to do because they’re erased from the conversation. They feel deeply frustrated that in a country where anti-Muslim prejudice and bigotry has got worse and worse, is that their plight is weaponised, not by people who want to advance LGBTQ rights but people who want to demonise Muslims as a whole.” Absolute weapon-grade nonsense. You cannot seriously claim to defend “queer Muslims” while downplaying or whitewashing Sharia. Under classical Sharia rulings (the ones still applied in multiple Muslim-majority countries and taught in many orthodox circles), same-sex acts are a major sin. Depending on the school of jurisprudence and the evidence required, the prescribed punishments include flogging, imprisonment, or death. That is not some fringe invention. It’s the traditional legal position. “Queer Muslims” who live under or are influenced by those interpretations face real pressure, family rejection, and in extreme cases violence. Pretending the main threat to them is “anti-Muslim bigotry” from people pointing out this contradiction is self-serving deflection of the highest order. Jones is doing the classic progressive two-step: shield the ideology, then smear anyone who notices the conflict as bigots. Clown. 🤡
J Stewart1,726,834 views • 21 days ago
The moment Alastair Campbell breaks down and can barely breathe under questioning on Iraq. I’ve watched Alastair Campbell for years. The ultimate tough spin doctor. I’ve seen him rattled before — furious, arguing, on the attack — but this is different. I’ve never seen him like this. It’s surreal. February 2010, The Andrew Marr Show. Marr presses him hard on Iraq: “If beyond doubt was not established in the intelligence… does it then follow – yes or no – that the Prime Minister misled parliament?” Campbell: “The Prime Minister didn’t mislead parliament.” Marr again: “Even if the intelligence… does not confirm that assertion that it was beyond reasonable doubt?” And then it happens. Campbell stops. Completely. He can barely breathe. Looks away. Struggles for air. Long, painful silence. “Yes because… Look, as I said… I mean forgive me for this.” I’ve never seen him fazed like this. He finally continues, still visibly shaken, then has the shameless nerve to lecture about “truth”: “I don’t think people are interested in the truth anymore, Andrew. I think you’re all interested in settling your scores and setting your own agenda.” Marr then brings up the hundreds of thousands of dead. Campbell’s response? Double down that Blair was a “totally honourable man” who never misled anyone. The same man who helped sell the war sits there falling apart on live television… then has the gall to accuse everyone else of not caring about the truth.
J Stewart770,750 views • 11 days ago
Go on Richard! 🔥 Richard Madeley proper gave both barrels to Labour’s Victims Minister on Good Morning Britain this morning over the early release scheme that will see thousands of prisoners, including domestic abusers, let out early because the jails are full. He started by saying he actually felt sorry for Alex Davies-Jones because she’d been sent out to defend the indefensible: “I actually feel rather sorry for you this morning, because you’re the one who’s been pushed out to defend what most people would say is the indefensible.” Then he went straight for the jugular: “There’ll be women watching this who’ve had their jaws broken, their teeth knocked out, they’ve been punched in the stomach when they’ve been pregnant. All by men who you, your government, will shortly be releasing years ahead of time because of prison overcrowding. What do you say to those women this morning? Because they are terrified.” Her reply was the usual robotic talking points: “I say to those women that the government’s first responsibility is to keep its public safe.” Is it though? If public safety was genuinely the first responsibility, you wouldn’t be releasing these people back onto the streets! She then claimed: “I would not be able to sleep at night, Richard, if a domestic abuser who was sentenced to time in prison couldn’t go there because there wasn’t a prison place available and we had to send him back to his victim at their property.” Richard immediately pulled her up on the logic: “Minister, Minister, Minister, I don’t see the logic of that at all! What’s the difference in not being able to send a violent offender to prison because it’s full and releasing a violent offender from prison who’s very likely to reoffend? We know that these men are recidivists. They do it again and again. What’s the difference between not sending one to prison and letting one out?” She then argued “these offenders will have served time in prison”, and they would have been released at some point anyway. Oh, that’s ok then. Let’s release everyone who has served a bit of their sentence. Ridiculous argument! Then came the usual promises of tags and “world-first restriction zones”, with the line that if they breach they’ll go straight back. Richard wasn’t having it. He tells her that victims don’t want them released at all and they don’t trust the government: “They don’t trust the measures that you put into place to stop these men hounding them and attacking them again. They don’t trust that the tags always work because they don’t. And they don’t trust that the men will follow the instructions they’ve been given about where they can’t go because some of them will just do it anyway.” He warns there will be inevitable consequences for victims: “There are going to be consequences of these early releases and it’s going to be more attacks on women who are begging you not to release their attackers from jail early. That’s the reality. Not a comforting protocol about tags and restricted areas which if the offender is determined enough just won’t work.” She had no real answer because there isn’t one. Just the same empty lines: “Ensuring that we have a functioning and effective and sustainable criminal justice system is fundamentally important for the safety of our country.” You’re not ensuring that. That’s the entire point. You’re choosing to release dangerous people early and victims will pay the price. Well done Richard for saying it in no uncertain terms. This is wrong.
J Stewart116,122 views • 2 days ago
Owen Jones somehow turns Dolly Parton’s death into a lecture on trans rights and the “bathroom bill”. He praises her for talking about LGBTQ issues “in a very humane way”. What else would you expect? Dolly was simply kind and considerate to everyone. That’s why the whole world loved her, why no one had a bad word to say about her, and why her death is such a huge story. Is basic humanity a surprise to you? You seem almost shocked that she was “humane”, unlike some! Honestly, Owen, have a day off. Leave the virtue-signalling alone for once. No one cares about this rubbish. Only you could hijack her death and turn it into another sermon on trans rights.
J Stewart376,635 views • 7 days ago
0:08
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
🚨HEARTBREAKING BOMBSHELL FROM DIDDLY SQUAT: JEREMY CLARKSON REVEALS HE HAS CANCER 😢 In the final two episodes of Clarkson’s Farm Season 5, Jeremy Clarkson shares some truly devastating personal news. Jeremy is in his office discussing the farm harvest with Charlie and Kaleb Cooper when he breaks off mid-sentence, leans back in his seat, and quietly reveals the devastating news: “I’ve got cancer.” A stunned Kaleb asks where. Jeremy replies it’s not something he wants to detail publicly, but he’s known since May after a medical, followed by a biopsy. It’s aggressive but caught early. He hoped to finish the harvest before treatment, but it’s hitting right in the middle. Kaleb wipes away tears and says: "Look after yourself, you go and do…if you need anything just ring." Later, with the full team (including Lisa, Charlie and Gerald), he reflects on the tough year: starting with heart issues and ending with this. In the closing moments, we see him back in a hospital bed: “So we started season five with me in a hospital bed and we are at the end of season five and I’m back in a hospital bed. Some of the treatment has gone awry, let’s say, I'm going to be here for a little while. I'm nil by mouth, i dont know whats going to happen. If this is all successful I’ll see you for season six and if it isn’t I won’t. Take care everyone.” It’s an incredibly raw, emotional watch from a man who’s usually full of bluster and humour. Thoughts with you, Jezza. 💔 I’m sure you’ll pull through! 💪
J Stewart4,571,568 views • 2 months ago
🚨 SHOCKING! EastEnders legend Shane Richie hauled away in cuffs after explosive late-night meltdown at Tesco petrol station 🚔 cops nick him for alleged drink-driving after he told staff to “fck off” 🤬 EastEnders star Shane Richie, 62, better known as cheeky chappie Alfie Moon, has been arrested and charged with drink-driving after a fiery confrontation at a Tesco garage in Harlow, Essex. Just after 11pm on Wednesday 29 July, the actor pulled onto the empty forecourt in a white Hyundai that appeared to have a flat tyre. Staff spotted him (in a red baseball cap, blue sweatshirt, shorts and grey sliders) and challenged him over what they believed was an e-cigarette, warning that vaping on the forecourt was dangerous. What followed was captured on shocking video obtained by The Sun. Richie, real name Shane Roche, insisted “It’s not smoking, it’s a vape”, then snapped “What, you’re filming me? All right, I’m going to film you.” Walking back to his car he claimed “This is not a vape”, before snarling “Yeah, I don’t give a fck” when staff warned of the risk. The manager later told police he’d grown aggressive and continued vaping. Staff called the cops, reporting a suspected drink-driver. Essex Police arrived shortly before 11.20pm, arrested him on the spot, and have now authorised a drink-driving charge. He’s due to appear at Colchester Magistrates’ Court on 9 September. The soap favourite, who’s played Alfie on and off since 2002, has previously spoken about therapy for his temper and claimed he barely touches alcohol.
J Stewart1,575,747 views • 1 month ago
🤯 Listen to this extraordinary exchange between Camilla Tominey and Labour’s Health Secretary James Murray. It is genuinely jaw-dropping. Camilla: “You’re quite pro-trans, aren’t you? Do you think a woman can have a penis? Because you did previously?” Murray: “No, I don’t.” Camilla: “So you’ve changed your mind?” Murray: “Yes.” Camilla: “Why?” Murray stumbles. He says he’s been thinking about the issue over recent years and would not now say trans women are women. Camilla hits back: “You must have known that before. You are very well educated. How on earth can you have previously thought that a woman can have a penis?” He had no real answer. Because there isn’t one. This is not some backbench MP. This is the Secretary of State for Health, the man responsible for the entire NHS, puberty blocker policy, women’s health services, and child safeguarding. He spent years either believing or pretending to believe that biological sex is fluid and that women can have penises. Only now, when the Cass Review, court rulings, and public opinion have made that position politically toxic, has he magically “changed his mind”. Think about the damage done while he held that view. The eroded women’s rights. The confused children fast-tracked toward hormones and surgery. The female prisoners and athletes forced to share spaces with biological males. All enabled or ignored by senior Labour figures like him. This level of ideological delusion at the very top of government is not just embarrassing, it is dangerous. Basic biology should never have been up for debate, let alone something a Health Secretary had to “evolve” on.
J Stewart2,936,031 views • 1 month ago
0:54
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
🚨HORRIFIC ATTEMPTED BEHEADING ON THE STREETS OF BELFAST 😱 Graphic Warning ⚠️ Just after 10:30pm last night on Kinnaird Avenue, North Belfast, a man was slashed and stabbed in a frenzied attack, with the suspect on top of him on the ground repeatedly hacking at his head and neck in what looked like an attempt to cut his head off. Blood everywhere. Hero bystanders dragged the attacker off. The suspect appears to be a foreign national as he is shouting in a foreign language during the assault. PSNI have one suspect in custody. Victim rushed to hospital with serious head and neck injuries.
J Stewart4,187,107 views • 2 months ago
📞 🚕 Not heard this for a while. It’s brilliant. 😂 Jon Culshaw impersonating Shaggy and ringing a taxi firm on the Chris Moyles show is deadpan, ridiculous, very sharp and very funny. How he keeps a straight face and doesn’t burst out laughing the entire time is beyond me. The woman taking the call is laughing her head off, then ends it with “you’ve lost the plot mate” before slamming the phone down. 😭
J Stewart185,524 views • 5 days ago
🚨OASIS VS BBC: THE SECRET SPAT FINALLY EXPOSED! Until now it was a total mystery why the Beeb suddenly deleted that star-studded Wonderwall tribute clip they put out during the World Cup… but insiders have just confirmed Noel and Liam Gallagher’s legal team demanded its removal. The BBC had thrown a load of time and cash at getting celebs like Micah Richards, Stephen Fry, Maya Jama, Claudia Winkleman, Michael McIntyre, Ross Kemp, Paddy McGuinness and the rest to sing or speak along, hoping it would go viral after England fans made the song their anthem. Instead, Oasis’s legal team shot it down. One source spilled: “Apparently the BBC didn’t seek the correct permissions to use the song on social media so they didn’t have a leg to stand on.” How did I miss this till now?! I’ve only just watched the video and it’s absolutely HORRENDOUS! 😬 🙉 Why do slebs do these things? They NEVER turn out well. And this shocker is no different. No wonder Oasis made them take it down. Anyway, watch at your peril, it’s worse than you could EVER imagine! 🫣
J Stewart417,959 views • 12 days ago
2:46
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
This is what “honour” looks like in 2020s Britain. A 21-year-old starts seeing a 17-year-old girl. Her brothers don’t approve. So a masked gang drags him from his front door in Telford in broad daylight, legs hanging out the boot of an Audi, and takes him to a shipping container. They strip him, tie him to a chair, and torture him for hours while filming him begging for forgiveness. Then they phone his dad and demand £20,000 or they’ll kill him. He only escaped because later, when two of them got out of the car, he locked the doors, saw the keys were still in the ignition, and drove himself to a takeaway for help. He was left with a fractured eye socket, a torn retina, broken ribs and severe bruising. He now suffers PTSD and rarely leaves the house. Five men just got a combined 37 years. Three of them (including the two brothers) got 7½ years each. The judge said it was driven by “perceived family honour”. This isn’t British culture. This is an imported system that still treats women, and any man who dates them without family permission, as property to be punished. It arrived with certain communities and has been allowed to take root while people look the other way. While we’re told all cultures are equal, actual young men are being tortured in storage units over “honour”. Shocking.
J Stewart1,543,203 views • 1 month ago
Finally, someone challenged Miatta Fahnbulleh and she completely crumbled. Well done to Tom Swarbrick for asking the obvious question about net zero and high energy bills. Miatta starts off with a blatant lie: “The reason why our energy bills are much higher than in other countries is because those costs are being driven by global fossil fuel markets.” I mean that doesn’t even make sense. Why would ours be so much higher if it was just about “global fossil fuel markets”? She just made that up on the spot, and Tom doesn’t let her get away with it: “It is not just down to being exposed to oil and gas prices because of wars far away. There are choices, political choices, made by you and your colleagues that say we are going to increase bill prices to pay for upgrades to the national grid, to pay for renewable subsidies. That’s what’s putting bills up.” Exactly! We all know this is the case, but she just always tries to blame anything and everything but that. Miatta: “Well, no. It is both. We should be honest and it is both.” She says “we should be honest” at the exact time she is not being honest! Unbelievable! Tom jumps straight back: “So not “no” then! It’s not “no”. It is true that you are making choices to increase people’s bills to spend on renewable subsidies and infrastructure costs.” Well done Tom. I’ve watched many of her interviews this morning and previously, and no one challenges her on this key claim. They just let her off with the usual talking points. Net Zero is a primary reason your energy bills are sky-high, and that is a fact. They just don’t like to admit it because they know how unpopular it is, so they do what they do on almost every issue: blame something or someone else.
J Stewart213,422 views • 7 days ago
🚨 SHOCK EXPOSÉ: British reporter sneaks onto migrant dinghy and catches French police GIVING FREE TAXI RIDES to people-smugglers back to their camps so they can keep flooding Britain! Christian Drogan spent weeks undercover in the lawless Calais camps, posing as a fugitive British crook. He boarded a packed inflatable with dozens of others, filming every grim second of the seven-hour nightmare crossing. French gendarmes pulled up mid-Channel, warned the boat the seas ahead were “very dangerous”, and offered anyone a lift back to shore. The ONLY ones who jumped at the chance? The four smugglers running the operation. Police cheerfully dropped them straight back on the beach to organise the next wave of illegal trips! Unbelievable! Drogan later said: “I rolled the dice with my life for this investigation, and its findings have only cemented my scepticism towards the establishment.” TalkTV’s Isabel Oakeshott added: “There is a very good reason no reporter has ever attempted such a mission before: because it is both extraordinarily difficult, and extraordinarily dangerous.” Border Force eventually picked them up in UK waters. One officer even told Drogan: “You’re on the wrong boat.” This is the reality the authorities don’t want you seeing. Great work!
J Stewart243,688 views • 8 days ago
😳 CLARKSON LAUNCHES “ONLY FARMERS” AND IT’S ABSOLUTELY GENIUS! 🔥 Forget everything you thought you knew… Jeremy Clarkson (and the Diddly Squat crew) just dropped the most cheeky, brilliant, countryside-saving platform of the year! Welcome to Only Farmers – the wholesome (yes, really!) spin on that other site… but instead of the usual, you get REAL farms, REAL people, REAL British countryside experiences you never even knew existed! Farm stays, animal encounters, pick-your-own days, workshops, private hire, seasonal events – book straight with the farmers themselves. No middlemen, just proper rural magic supporting the backbone of Britain. Kaleb’s already calling it “real farms, real people, real countryside” and Jezza’s promising experiences that’ll blow your city mind. This isn’t just an app… it’s a movement. Back British farming the fun way!
J Stewart877,118 views • 27 days ago
🔥 Angela Rayner’s HEATED CLASH with Rob Rinder on GMB exposes hypocrisy over the money. Rinder put it to her straight: “When Conservative ministers did that and you described them as having a staggering lack of shame. You’re back as Housing Secretary and you’ve kept the money so help me understand why that isn’t hypocritical?” Rayner claimed her case is different because those Tories were only in the job for weeks, while she was there for nearly a year: “People were in government for a number of weeks in some cases and accepted sums of severances in the thousands, only to return to government weeks later.” Rinder wasn’t buying it: “A number of people didn’t come back and they kept the money, you said they had a staggering lack of shame — but in your case that doesn’t apply?” Her reply: “If you’ve been in the job for a couple of weeks and accepted thousands of pounds, that is very different from the circumstances that I was in.” No, Angela. It’s no different. You were in the job for under a year, had to resign over unpaid tax allegations, took the £16,876 severance, then returned to the exact same role and kept every penny. You should hand that money back. You are a shameless money-grabbing hypocrite! What’s worse is that you’ve spent years lecturing others about their behaviour, yet the moment you step into government you do the very same thing. Disgraceful.
J Stewart1,197,010 views • 1 month ago
🚨 FURIOUS CLASH ON GMB: Jermaine Jenas Snaps Back as Kate & Ranvir Grill Him Over Sexting Scandal! 🔥 Former England footballer and TV presenter Jermaine Jenas, 43, exploded during a tense interview on Good Morning Britain as Kate Garraway and Ranvir Singh pressed him on his devastating sexting scandal. “I’ve lost EVERYTHING: my job, my family, everything has been taken away from me!” Jenas admitted, opening up about the brutal two years since his BBC axe. When Kate asked what he had learnt, things got a little prickly: “I think that’s a very specific thing to try and put your finger on… I think it’s probably a little bit of an unfair question… You go through life, you make mistakes…” The atmosphere turned very heated when the hosts challenged him on taking responsibility. Ranvir: “You’re skirting around what you’ve learnt… but clearly these women did not want to receive what you were sending them.” Jenas fired straight back: “I’m not skirting around anything. I’m more than happy to have the conversation, which is why I’m here. I’m not here to be defending myself in any way, shape, or form. I know what I did was wrong. I accept those punishments. Nobody is skirting around the responsibility of what I did. I know what I did!” He then took direct aim at the hosts: “I’m a human being. We make mistakes. You two can’t sit in front of me and tell me you’ve never made a mistake in your lives. We all make mistakes!” Throughout the interview, Jenas came across as someone who clearly feels hard done by. He insisted he’s not after a job, but this felt very much like an attempt to get back on TV. It was all a bit “woe is me”, poor old me, it’s so unfair, I’ve lost everything. A little pathetic and humiliating, really.
J Stewart2,692,604 views • 2 months ago
This is painful to watch. Lucy Powell stutters and squirms as she’s questioned about the Home Office migrant booklet. She went to extraordinary lengths to ignore the actual question — she really does not want to admit the truth or acknowledge what the booklet implies, and spends the entire interview dodging it. It starts simply. She’s asked by Tom Swarbrick: “Why are these pamphlets necessary?” Simple question. They’re pretty self-explanatory. Not for Lucy, who’s still clearly in denial: “I don’t know the background to these pamphlets, but what I do know…” She then quickly changes the subject and starts talking about the rule of law. Yes Lucy, we all know the rule of law. Now back to the pamphlet. 😂 Tom tries again. Blunt and to the point: “You’re not issuing guidance about rules on littering. You’re issuing pamphlets about not rping women. Is this the government acknowledging that some asylum seekers are a risk to women?” Lucy, now like a stuttering repetitive robot: “I don’t know the background to these particular pamphlets…” Tom cuts her off to help, but she just talks over him saying “it’s part of a range of measures we’re doing…” Kate Garraway jumps in to keep her on the subject of the pamphlet. Lucy starts shouting over her to avoid the question: “THE ASYLUM SYSTEM IS ROBUST” and launches into statistics. Tom jumps back in: “Yes, that’s right, but I do need to press you on this. There will be a lot of people watching who will be very concerned by this. If this is the government acknowledging that there is some risk among this group of people who arrive about the safety of women, how can the government reassure people that those asylum seekers can be let into communities?” Lucy again completely ignores the question and talks about “speeding up the asylum process” and removing people who have no right to be here. Lucy, none of them have any right to be here! Stop deflecting and answer the question! Kate Garraway has another go: “That isn’t the point though, is it? We’re trying to address this extraordinary pamphlet from the Home Office which is specifically saying to asylum seekers, ‘Child abuse is wrong. Do not r*p* women.’ Why would you give that to a group of asylum seekers if you didn’t feel concerned they might not already know that?” Lucy gets a little closer but still ignores the specifics. Instead she says she “appreciates people’s concerns around asylum hotels and houses of multiple occupancy” and “that’s why we’ve taken huge steps to close down these hotels and process applications much more quickly”, then repeats the line about removing people “who have no right to be here”. She refused to answer the actual question for the whole interview. It’s her own party’s government that released the pamphlet! Absolutely incredible. This is the same woman who previously accused people talking about grooming gangs of “dog whistle” politics, so we shouldn’t be surprised.
J Stewart315,303 views • 12 days ago
Miatta Fahnbulleh says we have a “responsibility to protect other countries” by pouring billions of our money into climate aid. No. We are not responsible for what happens around the world. That is absurd. The only people a British government has a responsibility to protect are the British people. We are broke. Debt is out of control. Public services are strained. Households are drowning in bills. And she still wants to ship our cash abroad so she can look virtuous on the world stage. She also says: “We’ve always been proud of our role in climate leadership. That is the history of the Labour government and that continues to be the case.” What are you talking about? That is a string of empty words she thinks sound impressive. They don’t. And that is not the history of the Labour Party. Labour was supposed to be about the working class and putting their needs first. You and your party today could not be further from that. It is grotesque watching her lecture people here who can barely heat their homes. When she says “we”, she means YOU. YOUR taxes. YOUR squeezed pay packet. Not her. Not her colleagues. They get the moral applause. You get the bill. We have already handed over £11.6 billion in climate finance from 2021/22 to 2025/26. Now they want another £6 billion from 2026/27 to 2028/29. We’ve had enough of this rubbish. If the public had a direct vote, this would be scrapped tomorrow. Protect Britain first. Everything else is a luxury we cannot afford.
J Stewart156,111 views • 6 days ago