Umm Imagine's banner

Umm Imagine

@UmmImagine • 1,019 subscribers

I just got here...

Shorts

WTF???!!! This is insane! NBC made Lindsay Clancy juror Kellie Farina re-answer a question - but they left her initial response in the video! This is at the 32:08 mark in the interview, watch: Interviewer: "Do you think that she should be re-tried?" Farina: "I would like to see her be re-tried, absolutely." Then the interviewer looks off screen and gestures to someone. Was that a signal to edit that part out because they didn't like her answer? Then she stumbles through asking the EXACT same question! Interviewer: "You think, you think, you would like she should be re- re-tried?" Then they cut to another camera shot for Farina to re-answer the question. Farina: "I would like him NOT to re-try her." What is this? They didn't even edit out Farina's initial answer which was that she WOULD like Lindsay to be re-tried! In the span of 10 seconds, you can watch Farina basically say "yes" and "no" to literally the same question. How can we believe anything these jurors say? If a juror answers a question in a way the media doesn't like they make them re-do the question with a different answer? How many other times has this happened? Fake. News. What a disgrace... Link to the interview:

WTF???!!! This is insane! NBC made Lindsay Clancy juror Kellie Farina re-answer a question - but they left her initial response in the video! This is at the 32:08 mark in the interview, watch: Interviewer: "Do you think that she should be re-tried?" Farina: "I would like to see her be re-tried, absolutely." Then the interviewer looks off screen and gestures to someone. Was that a signal to edit that part out because they didn't like her answer? Then she stumbles through asking the EXACT same question! Interviewer: "You think, you think, you would like she should be re- re-tried?" Then they cut to another camera shot for Farina to re-answer the question. Farina: "I would like him NOT to re-try her." What is this? They didn't even edit out Farina's initial answer which was that she WOULD like Lindsay to be re-tried! In the span of 10 seconds, you can watch Farina basically say "yes" and "no" to literally the same question. How can we believe anything these jurors say? If a juror answers a question in a way the media doesn't like they make them re-do the question with a different answer? How many other times has this happened? Fake. News. What a disgrace... Link to the interview:

1,186,775 Aufrufe

"Good moms have bad thoughts ... and you have to be OK with that." - Lindsay Clancy juror, Paula Devlin No Paula. Good moms do not think about sending their husband on an errand so they can strangle their children in the basement. No one should be OK with that!

"Good moms have bad thoughts ... and you have to be OK with that." - Lindsay Clancy juror, Paula Devlin No Paula. Good moms do not think about sending their husband on an errand so they can strangle their children in the basement. No one should be OK with that!

39,579 Aufrufe

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

Lindsay Clancy's lawyer... Initial trial's opening statement: "She knows that she killed these children." Today's Hearing: "Where is the evidence that she did this?" Another crazy walkback by Kevin Reddington🤡

Lindsay Clancy's lawyer... Initial trial's opening statement: "She knows that she killed these children." Today's Hearing: "Where is the evidence that she did this?" Another crazy walkback by Kevin Reddington🤡

59,532 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Historians will look back at the Lindsay Clancy trail and say these three: Kellie Farina, Paula Devlin and Roni Carlson, might be the most unbiased, impartial jurors ever to serve on a jury. 🤡🤡🤡

Historians will look back at the Lindsay Clancy trail and say these three: Kellie Farina, Paula Devlin and Roni Carlson, might be the most unbiased, impartial jurors ever to serve on a jury. 🤡🤡🤡

36,261 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Why is the media going to such great lengths now to smear the one holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial? They are digging through this man's entire past and citing domestic violence allegations and missed rent payments as potential reasons the case could get thrown out. First, allegations are not convictions. Also, it's insane to let Lindsay get away with murdering her kids because this man is behind on his rent. They don't mention digging through the past of the other 11 jurors, only the 1 that held out. It sounds like the media is on "Team Lindsay". Can this juror just claim "psychosis" and get a pass on everything they're claiming?

Why is the media going to such great lengths now to smear the one holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial? They are digging through this man's entire past and citing domestic violence allegations and missed rent payments as potential reasons the case could get thrown out. First, allegations are not convictions. Also, it's insane to let Lindsay get away with murdering her kids because this man is behind on his rent. They don't mention digging through the past of the other 11 jurors, only the 1 that held out. It sounds like the media is on "Team Lindsay". Can this juror just claim "psychosis" and get a pass on everything they're claiming?

10,513 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Keine weiteren Inhalte verfügbar