正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Lindsay Clancy's lawyer... Initial trial's opening statement: "She knows that she killed these children." Today's Hearing: "Where is the evidence that she did this?" Another crazy walkback by Kevin Reddington🤡
59,532 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)
27 条评论

Opening statements are not evidence. :)

how'd he come up with that line though? 🤔

Lawyers gonna lie. Despicable liar

yeah. if he was going to try this, he should've done it the initial trial. he just looks desperate now.

He's not beholdened to his trial 1 strategy. He's putting the burden of proof back where it should have been from the beginning.

why wouldn't he start with that?

It was his argument. It's not his fault you are uneducated on this law stuff.

are you saying a lawyer made a claim that his client murdered three children without having any supporting evidence?

That was never said.

In the U.K. we call this misleading the court. You can’t run a whole case on the basis of telling a jury she heard voices only to come back and say there’s no evidence she killed them. If she said she did it and voices told her to, that’s the evidence.

Why didn’t the judge himself call him out on changing his entire case theory? Unbelievable!

You must be stupid since this was always their position but the corrupt DAs office wouldn’t allow him to argue this in court. Once again you trolls know nothing and push false narratives and you all can go to hell

The actual sentence in the opening statement: "And they would bring their evidence in front of a jury that she knows that she killed these children.“ Very different with the first part, isn’t it? If you were right that she did it, you wouldn’t need to lie to make us believe it.

Missing context “they’re going to bring evidence of she knows that she killed these children and we will sit here and listen to their evidence” is not the same as admitting guilt. He’s describing the process of hearing the government’s evidence, not saying Lindsay killed her kids

Go ahead and listen to the full opening statement because the selective editing is working hardddd here

@lawyer4laws I hope the black male juror from the 1st trial sues Reddington into oblivion and he gets debarred.

SHE NEVER CONFESSED SHE WAS TOLD!!!!

Mistrial Law

In America, if your fetus has some kind of mental defect, killling the fetus is seen as mercy....BUT if you are a murderer with some kind of mental defect...it is mercy to keep them alive. The left is psychotic.

He realized the public us stupider than he could have ever imagined. If they went through all the evidence piece-by-piece in court, most of the jurors would throw her in jail.

Mindblowing, some defense attorneys credit Reddington with being “MASTERCLASS” 🤣🤣🤣

Show me the evidence you space cadet. She didn’t do it

Buffoon

Clown 🤡

If she wasnt guilty, she would be begging for a bullet daily.

And, as someone else mentioned, he asked Trump to pardon her. Why would she need a pardon if he says she didn't do it? Such a joke. The sad thing is Cora, Dawson and Callan, who they might've become, the lives they could've lived, being totally forgotten.

👍


