Western Lensman
@WesternLensman • 385,071 subscribers
🇺🇸 Video Producer | Politics | Media | American 🇺🇸
Shorts
Videos
Philly DA Larry Krasner says he wants the WH Ballroom blown up: "I'm going to have a paperweight sitting on my desk. You know what that paperweight is going to be? It's going to be a piece of the ballroom after we all blow it up." "In an official ceremony we're going to blow it up." Soros-backed lunatic.
Western Lensman2,336,537 views • 6 days ago
James Clyburn says he regrets advocating for Clarence Thomas to join the Supreme Court. "I will own up to that mistake." "I had no idea that Clarence Thomas would rebel the way he has against his own background and experiences." Disappointed in James here for not just coming out and saying what he means, instead of playing rhetorical word games. Which is: 'Thomas is betraying black people.'
Western Lensman157,645 views • 2 days ago
DSA Co-Chair Megan Romer says "We believe in taxing the hell out of millionaires." She then struggles to explain what that actually means: Remnick: "What does 'taxing the hell out of them' mean?" Romer: "Yeah. You know, again, I don't have, like, a solid…" Remnick: "But shouldn't you?" Romer: "Ummmmm, that's a good question." Remnick: "If you're the co-chair of the DSA, shouldn't you be more specific than just taxing the hell out of something? What exactly do you mean?" Romer: "So again, it's democracy, right?…" This is the Democrat party 'Big Tent.'
Western Lensman3,148,935 views • 24 days ago
Jon Stewart tells Michelle Obama that when he left New York City and went to Jersey, he saw a strange sight: A "Hillary for Prison" bumper sticker. "I was, like, oh ok." These kinds of tales where bubbled libs boldly venture into the American wilds and actually encounter people with opposing views kill me.
Western Lensman435,026 views • 5 days ago
Elon Musk They have no clue why they are there, and they have no clue what their signs even mean.
Western Lensman77,054,170 views • 1 year ago
Jill Biden says Joe should be remembered as a hero for dropping out in 2024: "I thought what he did was heroic. It was his decision." "Talk about heroes. I knew how hard it would be. But he did it." The historical revisionism campaign she's determined to run on this is wild.
Western Lensman181,841 views • 5 days ago
Chris Cuomo actually argues to Andrew Kolvet that the next Dem president won't open the border floodgates again. Says Republicans created a "boogeyman" about what Biden did. I'm not making that up. Kolvet rightly questions Cuomo's sanity: "You're crazy if you don't think they're going to come in." Cuomo: "You're speculating because you guys created numbers of what happened under the Democrats...a boogeyman...I think they learned a very harsh lesson in the Harris-Trump campaign." Kolvet: "If you interview places that want to come to America, they are saying, we will wait for Trump to be out." Which they are. Even CNN, Cuomo's old network, has an piece about this. There is no mystery here. 2021-2024 wasn't a fluke, it was a design. If they reclaim power, it will have been a *start.* Cuomo is either willfully dishonest, hopelessly naive, or incredibly dense. Maybe some combination of all three.
Western Lensman226,954 views • 6 days ago
Libs are counter-programming the UFC event at the White House. With this.
Western Lensman3,644,670 views • 2 months ago
🚨1996: Chuck Schumer explains “the number one reason" illegals come to the US is so they can defraud programs like Social Security — and wants to stop it. Chuck sounding very DOGE! “This is an anti-fraud amendment. All over where we go, people say, why can't you stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here?" "And the number one answer we give our constituents is when they come here, they can get jobs, get benefits against the law because of fraud." "If you believe you want to stop fraud in immigration, you have no choice but to support this amendment." The amendment Schumer so passionately supports here would add additional security features to the Social Security card.
Western Lensman34,924,056 views • 1 year ago
Don Lemon says that he can now "tell the truth" with no corporate overlords to stop him. He then proceeds to go full race-grifter: "I can say whatever the f*ck I want...I feel the spirit of Malcolm X coming over me." "This issue is a white people problem right now....These are white people, co-opted poor and working class white people who put this man in office." "If I had said that, you know, on corporate media, oh my gosh, you're a race baiter. An anchor shouldn't be saying that. Now I say whatever I want and I tell the truth." Congratulations, Don. You're Joy Reid Junior. Note how he had to keep looking down at the notes on his phone to get all of this 'truth' just right.
Western Lensman114,601 views • 4 days ago
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not “bias." It’s much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. In this clip: 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check. To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators: "They did exactly what their bosses wanted."
Western Lensman41,370,308 views • 2 years ago
Scott Pelley says Bari Weiss asked 60 Minutes staffers: “Why do you think the country thinks you’re biased?" Pelley: "Why do you think so? Do you have a poll? Is there market research? What are you talking about?" "Because we certainly didn't believe that." Incredible.
Western Lensman3,286,105 views • 2 months ago